Hi,
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages
> in list
> or anything else -- please let me know.
Done: boost-gdb-printers cppunit libabw libcdr libcmis libcss libe-book
libeot libepubgen libetonyek
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dfcf7fbede
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525990
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mojolicious-7.67-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4a3b2cd2dd
--
You are receiving
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> So this may not be all the packages which would need a
> BuildRequires:gcc in them. I had two packages without
>
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49571
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/047304c49649993c733777115
ee9042f8fe9c381cd29e35f5863118a965024f2-0001-Ticket-49571-perl-
subpackage-and-python-installer-by.patch
--
Thanks,
William Brown
___
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:36 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild,
> The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found
> here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3]
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-02-21 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2018-02-21 10:00 PST US/Pacific
2018-02-21
Hi All,
Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f28 you also have to do in the
master branch and do a
Hi All,
Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f29 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f28 you also have to do in the
master branch and do a
On 20 February 2018 at 13:11, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
[..]
> today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm-
> sign-libs.
[root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs
error: Failed dependencies:
librpmbuild.so.8()(64bit) is needed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547327
Bug ID: 1547327
Summary: perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.50 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Scalar-List-Utils
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547321
Bug ID: 1547321
Summary: perl-Test-Strict-0.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Strict
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547308
Bug ID: 1547308
Summary: perltidy-20180220 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perltidy
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547303
Bug ID: 1547303
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180220 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547297
Bug ID: 1547297
Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.102 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547296
Bug ID: 1547296
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.32 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547290
Bug ID: 1547290
Summary: perl-File-Slurper-0.012 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-Slurper
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288
Bug ID: 1547288
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 00:03 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> > nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview
> >
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If you fixed package(s) -- please let me know.
Fixed: util-linux-2.32-0.2.fc29
Karel
--
Karel Zak
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> I am asking because the rpm documentation leaves quite a lot to be
>> desired. If I went and changed all my "Requires: foo" to "Requires:
>> foo%{_isa}" in all my non-noarch packages, would
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> List of packages and respective maintainers:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview hydrogen
jaaa lensfun libgnomecanvasmm26 libiec61883 liblo liblrdf
Hi there,
version 0.1.9 of libsamplerate which I've recently built in all
branches changed its license from GPLv2+ to BSD (2-clause).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
Software Engineer purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither
Red Hat
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Well, with some delay, the waiver worked and I was able to push the
> f26 package to batched.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>>> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional
Well, with some delay, the waiver worked and I was able to push the
f26 package to batched.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of
>> Molsketch. The %{_isa} macro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > today I've split⁰
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of
> Molsketch. The %{_isa} macro got added during the review
I think the reviewer in this case was wrong to suggest that, just use
Requires: openbabel
FYI, the package is multilib'd because it has a
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2018-02-20 11:21, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to
>> rawhide, includes a soname bump affecting
>
> The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it.
That's very good news, thanks!
-- Rex
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hey,
>
> today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm-
> sign-libs.
Does this mean that the python bindings no longer
On 02/20/2018 05:40 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages
> with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is
> architecture specific, so I want to remove it.
>
> This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so
> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot writes:
NM> BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both
NM> for the two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that
NM> succeeded but has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap
NM> server)
On 2018-02-20 11:21, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to rawhide,
> includes a soname bump affecting
The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it.
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Software Engineer - Platform Enablement Group
Red Hat,
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:15 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > First question, why "arch" and "scenario" are x86_64, but the error
> > > concerns the 32-bit build? Since OpenBabel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> First question, why "arch" and "scenario" are x86_64, but the error
>> concerns the 32-bit build? Since OpenBabel exists on all arches, why
>> do I get this particular error message?
>
> Your
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 07:08 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > I was updating my mythtv box and I saw that it was pulling in
> > > some mysql community packages as
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-02-21 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks
and problems needed to keep EPEL
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Well, true, but then just like every year, we'll wind up doing
> > > > a lot of
> > > > the spadework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Thank you for this alert. I will mention it in the coming meeting but
I think it should be fine.
On 20 February 2018 at 08:30, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Openjpeg2 has MANY CVE bugs reported against it and most are fixed with the
> current release. I have run
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1079 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
842 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
424
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
952 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
842 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
813
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
> or anything else -- please let me know.
I've added the missing BuildRequires to the following packages:
elog gfm hyperrogue
Been putting it off, but finally going to work to bring gc-7.6.2 to rawhide,
includes a soname bump affecting
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires gc --repoid=rawhide
...
Macaulay2-0:1.9.2-8.fc28.x86_64
aisleriot-1:3.22.4-3.fc28.x86_64
asymptote-0:2.41-1.fc27.x86_64
autogen-0:5.18.12-6.fc28.x86_64
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list
> or anything else -- please let me know.
Fixed in rawhide:
aspell
exempi
gpxsee
groff
joe
jpilot
libcgroup
libpng12
libpng15
libtiff
man-db
pilot-link
Also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544287
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-System-Info-0.057-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543215
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542774
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 30/129 (x86_64), 8/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 194274 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/194274
ID: 194275 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso
Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages
> with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is
> architecture specific, so I want to remove it.
>
> This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so files. I
>
Hi,
I want to have vim-filesystem subpackage as noarch (as most packages
with *-filesystem subpackage have), but dir mentioned above is
architecture specific, so I want to remove it.
This dir was added in bugzilla #1193230 as dir for plugins .so files. I
made repo queries, if any package puts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542774
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543215
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WebService-Rajce-1.180.380-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
Hi all,
I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts.
I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing
with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and
Requires for sonames because ROS does not use proper sonames (and
therefore they
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165
Bug ID: 1547165
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder should require gcc
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter:
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having a problem with dist.rpmdeplint checks for one of my
> packages (molsketch).
> This is a new package and it has a run-time dependency on OpenBabel:
>
> Requires: openbabel%{?_isa}
>
> The failure is the same on both f26 & f27:
>
> results:
I'm probably in the minority, but I wasn't even aware of this sight and I
found it very helpful in addressing some CVE's for one of my packages. It
provides links to bug trackers, links to other distros, and links to
commits that address the CVE.
It would be really helpful to provide a link in
=
#fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two
weeks)
=
Meeting started by nils at 15:00:10 UTC.
Hi,
I've been having a problem with dist.rpmdeplint checks for one of my
packages (molsketch).
This is a new package and it has a run-time dependency on OpenBabel:
Requires: openbabel%{?_isa}
The failure is the same on both f26 & f27:
results:
- arch: x86_64
item: molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc26
According to the Fedora 28 schedule [1] we are going to reach the
"Software String Freeze" deadline in one week on 2018-Feb-27. Beyond
this deadline there should not be any changes in strings, ideally.
If you want to help with translations then, please check the packages
that follow Fedora
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 14:17] :
>
> It may be that I have 2 Bugzilla accounts, but the email address
> mgansser (at) alice.de does not exist anymore.
> How can I delete this old email account?
You can file a bug against the Bugzilla product:
> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 13:30] :
>
> When I hover over your name in bug #1377631, I see mgansser (at) alice.de
> in the tooltip. Are you sure you don't have two Bugzilla accounts?
>
> Emmanuel
It may be that I have 2 Bugzilla accounts, but the email address
mgansser (at) alice.de does not
Greetings!
Today, on 2018-Feb-20, we have reached Fedora 28 Change
Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1].
At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially
complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by
default, it must be enabled at Change Completion
A new release of rpm-ostree, a hybrid transactional image/package system is now
available:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ostree-2018.2-1.fc27%20rpm-ostree-2018.3-1.fc27
Direct link to main release notes:
https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/releases/tag/v2018.2
In this release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey,
today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm-
sign-libs.
This resulted into 8 packages disappearing from buildroot¹².
This should not be a problem, but still useful to know.
⁰
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey,
today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm-
sign-libs.
This resulted into 8 packages disappearing from buildroot¹².
This should not be a problem, but still useful to know.
⁰
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 13:30] :
>
> the email address is already mgansser(a)online.de on the top of page see:
When I hover over your name in bug #1377631, I see mgansser (at) alice.de
in the tooltip. Are you sure you don't have two Bugzilla accounts?
Emmanuel
Openjpeg2 has MANY CVE bugs reported against it and most are fixed with the
current release. I have run abi-compliance-checker on the packages and it
shows 100% binary compatibility so there should not be a problem.
Thanks,
Richard
___
epel-devel
> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 12:30] :
>
> You can see it in the banner (the red bar at the very top) of that page.
>
> Emmanuel
the email address is already mgansser(a)online.de on the top of page see:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Pictures/bugzilla.png
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 08:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I was updating my mythtv box and I saw that it was pulling in some mysql
> community packages as a dependency but I looked through the options and I
> couldn't
On 01/05/2018 02:50 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= System Wide Change: Make authselect default tool instead of authconfig =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AuthselectAsDefault
Change owner(s):
* Pavel Březina
Replace authconfig with authselect and make authselect a default tool
to configure
On 02/20/2018 01:02 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
List of packages and respective maintainers:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
Done in packages where I am admin.
TY!
J.
___
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 12:30] :
>
> where can I see in bugzilla the wrong email address ?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
You can see it in the banner (the red bar at the very top) of that page.
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing
On 18/02/18 16:22 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Fedora decided to use gcc as *the* compiler [1], and frankly, we have
enough trouble getting packages to compile without trying to support
more than one compiler (vide the lass mass rebuild).
Also a *lot* of core GCC devs work on
> * Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 10:02] :
>
> Your FAS account has the email mgansser(a)online.de but
> your bugzilla account uses mgansser(a)alice.de .
>
> Emmanuel
where can I see in bugzilla the wrong email address ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470030
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
---
On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> List of packages and respective maintainers:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> zdohnalc2esp cups cups-filters enscript foomatic hplip jbigkit mgetty
> openobex pnm2ppa ptouch-driver python-cups python-smbc qpdf
BTW dovecot is broken by all the compiler and crypto changes, both for the
two last rebuilds (that failed) and the build before (that succeeded but
has broken auth which is sort of needed for an imap server)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list --
On Feb 20, 2018 08:54, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > Well, true, but then just
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 02/19/2018 03:40 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > On 02/19/2018 06:34 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> But anyway, why don't we
> >> have "updates-testing", "updates-batched" and "updates" repositories?
> >> "updates-batched" could be
* Martin Gansser [20/02/2018 10:02] :
>
> I am not aware that the email addresses are different.
Your FAS account has the email mgans...@online.de but
your bugzilla account uses mgans...@alice.de .
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list --
i get this message from limb in the pagure ticket [1]
The Bugzilla review bug creator could not be found in FAS. Make sure your FAS
email address is the same as in Bugzilla.
I am not aware that the email addresses are different.
[1] pagure ticket:
Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 09:01 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 08:44 +0100, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
> >
> > Dne 19.2.2018 v 17:16 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > > redhat-rpm-config taht is needed has grown dependencies, as
> > > language
> > > specifc macros have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9d4d306336
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9d4d306336
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544162
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7e2cb0696f
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie-0.29-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7e2cb0696f
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546961
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Le mardi 20 février 2018 à 08:44 +0100, Vít Ondruch a écrit :
>
> Dne 19.2.2018 v 17:16 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > redhat-rpm-config taht is needed has grown dependencies, as language
> > specifc macros have moved into their own space
>
> So we removed Perl from buildroot, but there is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546963
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
96 matches
Mail list logo