Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

> Sure Hyperkitty has drawbacks. Pipermail had drawbacks you complained > about too. You seem to win either way because you can complain if we > don't change stuff, and you can complain if we do change things. It is > really extremely tiring trying to deal with your constant > negativity... so I

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of 2 march (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mails and others e-mails was visible until 3 march 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay. ___ devel mailing

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

On Sat, 2018-03-03 at 18:30 +0100, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > Hello Farhad, > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887 > > > > Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation > > you > > are waiting for e-mails and check the web page several times but >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. Fixed: abc, gnofract4d, libedit, lrslib. The abe package does not actually need a

[Bug 1551252] New: perl-SNMP-Info-3.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551252 Bug ID: 1551252 Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.49 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SNMP-Info Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 23:24:07 + (UTC) Philip Kovacs wrote: > Alright I got around the catch-22 of dnf needing the f29 keys in > order to install the f29 keys with: dnf install --nogpgcheck > fedora-gpg-keys-29-0.1 > > That cleared the road for me. The latest

Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?

Alright I got around the catch-22 of dnf needing the f29 keys in order to install the f29 keys with: dnf install --nogpgcheck fedora-gpg-keys-29-0.1 That cleared the road for me. On Saturday, March 3, 2018 5:41 PM, Philip Kovacs wrote: Yeah I'm living in the chaos

Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?

Yeah I'm living in the chaos of going from f28 rawhide to f29 rawhide.    Thanks for the tips. On Saturday, March 3, 2018 5:26 PM, stan wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 21:15:22 + (UTC) Philip Kovacs wrote: > I would settle for knowledge

Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 21:15:22 + (UTC) Philip Kovacs wrote: > I would settle for knowledge of where the f29/rawhide gpg keys are > hidden so I import them. The "To Rawhide" instructions below are > outdated as they direct you to a page where the f29/rawhideare not >

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

On samedi 3 mars 2018 23:09:56 CET Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi Kevin, > i made the mentioned changes, i hope it's correct. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/FreeSOLID/blob/master/f/FreeSOLID.spec > ___ > devel mailing list --

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

> No. Please just remove the "Requires: qhull" from the .pc file in > FreeSOLID-2.1.1-pkgconfig.patch entirely. There is already "@QHULL_LIBS@" in > "Libs:" that links to the qhull libraries. > > You can add a "Requires: qhull-devel" to the RPM specfile (NOT the .pc file) > instead. > > You

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

On 3 March 2018 at 14:00, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> That is correct. They are just one of many archivers on the internet >> that get emails from Fedora and redisplay them. [This is one of the >> reasons why people who ask us to remove their

How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?

I would settle for knowledge of where the f29/rawhide gpg keys are hidden so I import them. The "To Rawhide" instructions below are outdated as they direct you to a page where the f29/rawhideare not presented. Upgrading Fedora using package manager - Fedora Project Wiki | | | Upgrading

Meeting March 5 (Monday)

Hello folks, I'm out of luck in the last times... I just realised I'm likely to be offline at 16:00 this Monday as I'll be flying in the afternoon. So maybe I can attend later, or maybe not. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. The storm has thrown everything into chaos. Kind regards, Silvia FAS:

[EPEL-devel] Re: qt5 dependency problem

On 03/03/2018 01:20 PM, Christopher Brown wrote: On 02/24/2018 02:15 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 17:45 +, Christopher Brown wrote: Hi, In trying to install trojita, I got the following error: $ sudo yum install trojita Loaded plugins: langpacks Resolving Dependencies

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

Added qpdf to the ABI tracker: https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/qpdf/ 27.02.2018, 21:16, "Adam Williamson" : > qpdf was updated from 7.1.1-4 to 8.0.0-1 in Rawhide on 2018-02-26. > This update bumped the soname from libqpdf.so.18 to libqpdf.so.21 . > This

Orphaning procedure for rubygem-review

Hi all. This mail is part of the "orphaning" procedure for 'rubygem-review' package [1]. Feel free to adopt it if interested. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-review -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG

Re: [Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

Hi everyone, I've been talking with other people and apparently is quite common to have issues with HP laptops. F25 works but F27 doesn't, with an extreme case of not booting at all. In my case I suspect of Wayland, provided other desktops/spins did work. But maybe I'm wrong or it's not the only

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > That is correct. They are just one of many archivers on the internet > that get emails from Fedora and redisplay them. [This is one of the > reasons why people who ask us to remove their emails from the archives > are asking an impossible task.. there are hundreds of

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

Martin Gansser wrote: > i changed now the line Requires: qhull to Requires: qhull-devel in patch > FreeSOLID-2.1.1-pkgconfig.patch: [snip] > +Requires: qhull-devel [snip] > an then it requires the following packges, is this correct ? [snip] > pkgconfig(qhull-devel) No. Please just remove the

Re: Appstream metadata compose failures

PS: I wrote: > Richard Hughes wrote: >> 64x64 is a very low bar indeed, compared to all of the other >> platforms, e.g. Windows Store or the Apple AppStore. > > All that's going to happen with such a requirement is that specfiles are > going to run the icon through scale2x or hq2x if you're

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > data as well as the original repodata. In My Honest Opinion, this is > not going away until the whole "let's keep this all in one database" > approach is discarded and individual small metadata files for each > RPM, which can be surveyed and updated individually, replace

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * It means things will likely be broken longer as there is less urgency > to fix them quickly. This means less stress for maintainers who are usually not working full time on Fedora. I don't see why a broken dependency in some leaf application that happens to be included

[EPEL-devel] Re: qt5 dependency problem

On 02/24/2018 02:15 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 17:45 +, Christopher Brown wrote: Hi, In trying to install trojita, I got the following error: $ sudo yum install trojita Loaded plugins: langpacks Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package

Re: qarte - compilation fails

> Try this: > > BuildRequires: python3-devel > # bytecompile with Python 3 > %global __python %{__python3} > > in your specfile to force it to bytecompile your Python code with Python 3. > > Kevin Kofler Thanks for your feedback and solution, compiles/works fine now. Martin

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

> On samedi 3 mars 2018 17:30:30 CET Martin Gansser wrote: > > Didn't you see the reply I made to your other thread? > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ > message/YIAXJASDD5J6NMJHTON5PK5CRB4FUDQA/ > > I explained how to get rid of that Requires.

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

On 3 March 2018 at 12:30, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > Hello Farhad, > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887 >> >> Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation you >> are waiting for e-mails and check the web page

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

Hello Farhad, https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887 Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation you are waiting for e-mails and check the web page several times but you don't see anything! |: I don't think that spinics.net is the official

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

On samedi 3 mars 2018 17:30:30 CET Martin Gansser wrote: > > Hi, > > > > try qhull-devel instead of pkgconfig(qhull), afaik there was a change in > > qhull package some days ago. > > > but there is no pkgconfig(qhull) in the spec file ? >

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

> Hi, > > try qhull-devel instead of pkgconfig(qhull), afaik there was a change in > qhull package some days ago. but there is no pkgconfig(qhull) in the spec file ? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/FreeSOLID/blob/master/f/FreeSOLID.spec ___ devel

Test gate failures

Hello, The "Test Gating" mechanism is preventing two updates from being pushed. * F27 Wine 3.3    - "The update can not be pushed: no test results found"    - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa6f017315 * F26 Wine 3.3    - "The update can not be pushed: 1 of 2 required tests

[Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2018-03-05 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's been a couple of weeks since we had a meeting, and we've had exciting times in release

Re: Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 07:22:42PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mardi 27 février 2018 à 18:34 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > > > > > > How do we test this? I installedtho go-srpm-macros from Rawhide but it > > doesn't seem to have the required macros? > > Yes in rawhide

Re: Appstream metadata compose failures

On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 16:11:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard Hughes wrote: > > 64x64 is a very low bar indeed, compared to all of the other > > platforms, e.g. Windows Store or the Apple AppStore. > > All that's going to happen with such a requirement is that specfiles are > going to run

Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay. ___ devel mailing

Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay. ___ devel mailing

[Bug 1551203] amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551203 --- Comment #1 from Marcel Haerry --- Fixes: * https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/amavisd-new/pull-request/1 * https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/amavisd-new/pull-request/2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[rpms/amavisd-new] PR #1: fix RHBZ#1551203 - correct sock location

maha opened a new pull-request against the project: `amavisd-new` that you are following: `` fix RHBZ#1551203 - correct sock location `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/amavisd-new/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/amavisd-new] PR #2: fix RHBZ#1551203 - correct sock location

maha opened a new pull-request against the project: `amavisd-new` that you are following: `` fix RHBZ#1551203 - correct sock location `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/amavisd-new/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel

[Bug 1551203] New: amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551203 Bug ID: 1551203 Summary: amavisd-release and amavisd-submit use wrong default socket path Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: amavisd-new Assignee:

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

Oh, right, that was just mentioned on list some days ago… On 03/03/2018 12:32 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/03/2018 12:19 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> try qhull-devel instead of pkgconfig(qhull), afaik there was a change in >> qhull package some days ago. > > No. The change you

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

On 03/03/2018 12:19 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: Hi, try qhull-devel instead of pkgconfig(qhull), afaik there was a change in qhull package some days ago. No. The change you are referring to happened in April 2016! Ralf (Fedora qhull packager) ___

Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!

At few days ago I did open two threads: 1: "Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU" in "Users" https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/fedora-users/threads.html#481765 2. "Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?"

Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

Hi, try qhull-devel instead of pkgconfig(qhull), afaik there was a change in qhull package some days ago. Greetings, Christian On 03/03/2018 11:16 AM, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > how can i solve this dependencies ? > > FreeSOLID has broken dependencies in the F-28 tree: > On x86_64: >

Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID

Hi, how can i solve this dependencies ? FreeSOLID has broken dependencies in the F-28 tree: On x86_64: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(qhull) On armhfp: FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.armv7hl requires pkgconfig(qhull) On ppc64le: