What's the best way to monitor for new releases on a package in copr? I
know the release-monitoring.org has "COPR" as a distribution that it knows
about, but I'm not sure if that's the same as the copr repositories we have
available. I'm also not sure how to tell it which package in which project
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Wednesday at 2018-03-21 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2018-03-21 10:00 PDT US/Pacific
2018-03-21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558769
Bug ID: 1558769
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180221 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550531
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558760
Bug ID: 1558760
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.50 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hey, y'all.
As far as I know, qtile is the only package that depends on
python3-xcffib, and nothing depends on the python2- subpackage.
Accordingly, I am have dropped the python2-subpackage in Rawhide.
--
Dulaney.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ok..I'll do json one when I get home
On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
> wrote:
>
>> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-
>> unofficial and
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 208287 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208287
ID: 208323 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 208077 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/208077
ID: 208085 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-
> unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson .
>
I've now finished golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial as well.
-Jared
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:38 PM, djb djb wrote:
> Jared, which ones have you so far?
>
I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial
and golang-github-bitly-simplejson .
> I would like to do:
>
> Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:11:46PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:28:23PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 20.3.2018 14:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >Indeed, I'm using those python packages like a dinosaur ;)
> >
> > :D
> >
> > >What about
Jared, which ones have you so far?
I would like to do:
Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson - Go package to interact
with arbitrary JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
show_bug.cgi?id=1555345
if you have not done that one so far.
Thanks
On Sat,
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
980 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
870 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-find2perl-1.004-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.42-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 10:09 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> All the tests can be green if the "important" ones are missing, they
> > don't show :(
>
> I suspect the problem of missing tests is that dist.rpmdeplint is
> run on x86_64 only, but my update is for s390x only. So bodhi shouldn't
> rely on a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-find2perl-1.004-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.42-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
I've rec'd about 30 of these in the last hour or so, fedora-28,
fedora-27, fedora-26, and fedora-28-modular.
Would someone please make them stop
Thanks
--
Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-03-21 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks
and problems needed to keep EPEL
OLD: Fedora-28-20180319.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180320.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 122
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551481
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.24-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
On 20.3.2018 17:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Should a Fedora Change for that release be crafted that says "Mass
python2 packages removal"?
Yeah, I think it should be filed as a F29 change.
I think we should send the e-mail first and do that after, if nobody
takes python2.
--
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Branched 20180320.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:28:23PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20.3.2018 14:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Indeed, I'm using those python packages like a dinosaur ;)
>
> :D
>
> >What about adding conditionals like
> >
> >%if 0%{?rhel} > 7 || 0%{?fedora} > 31
> ># Disable python2
Congratulations!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180319.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180320.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 30
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 107
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 169.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 03/20/18 14:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:23:06PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 20.3.2018 11:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
to push the whole ecosystem. The proposed model of nipping python2 support
at the edges is the same thing, in reverse.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558276
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558011
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20.3.2018 14:33, Michal Novotny wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27.2.2018 00:04, Michal Novotny wrote:
Hello,
you
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
>
>> Your tool can use good old buildsys.build.state.change fedmsg with the
>> well known name/version/release fields like this:
>>
>>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> The question here is why don't we actually implement the modularity
> the simple way.
>
> Let's suppose I would like to make nodejs-8 available in EPEL7.
>
> The most effortless way would be to create subdirectory called
On 20.3.2018 14:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Indeed, I'm using those python packages like a dinosaur ;)
:D
What about adding conditionals like
%if 0%{?rhel} > 7 || 0%{?fedora} > 31
# Disable python2 build by default
%bcond_with python2
%else
%bcond_without python2
%endif
starting
On 03/20/2018 10:18 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> FWIW, greenwave does supply the list of missing and/or failed testcase
> names in its API response back to Bodhi. Surfacing those more
> granular details in the Bodhi UI would be good.
I filed an issue about this:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> Your tool can use good old buildsys.build.state.change fedmsg with the
> well known name/version/release fields like this:
>
> https://apps.stg.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/
>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:23:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 15:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100
> > > Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 18
Thanks for your comment, that's a really good point! I think I will start
with the packages and once I will have few accepted go back to have a talk
on freenode with the spin guy's to see the best way to go for the rest of
the adventure!
Have a nice day!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Björn
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:22:32 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>
> > The important ones are the ones defined in the policy that gates
> > packages and
> > are listed here:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.7
Owner(s):
* Charalampos Stratakis
* Miro Hrončok
* Tomáš Orsava
* Petr Viktorin
Update the Python 3 stack in Fedora from Python 3.6 to Python 3.7.
== Detailed description ==
Python 3.7
= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.7
Owner(s):
* Charalampos Stratakis
* Miro Hrončok
* Tomáš Orsava
* Petr Viktorin
Update the Python 3 stack in Fedora from Python 3.6 to Python 3.7.
== Detailed description ==
Python 3.7
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> The important ones are the ones defined in the policy that gates packages
> and
> are listed here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/gating_updates
>
> waiverdb-cli should now support waiving missing results, I'm
>
Dne 16.3.2018 v 08:07 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 22:26 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
>> No missing expected images.
>>
>> Failed openQA tests: 84/137 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
> Virtually all tests currently fail on Rawhide because a complete
> redesign of
Of course :)
However I still look forward to some day, when branches named
"private-*", used to help the maintainer with big tasks, will be
fully under the package admin control.
So far, you can see, such branches are used for either different
versions of the package, or big tasks to be worked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 13:22 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Thanks for the tip.
> I just started using it and it works great! :)
>
> I'm not hooking forked repository, but private branches instead.
> The use case is to have multiple versions of
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 28
Beta Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 22, 2017 at 19:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 28
Beta.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 17:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
Before each public release
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 28
Beta.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 17:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
Before each public release
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 28
Beta Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 22, 2017 at 19:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
Thanks for the tip.
I just started using it and it works great! :)
I'm not hooking forked repository, but private branches instead.
The use case is to have multiple versions of packages available in
COPR - especially MariaDB 10.3 and MySQL 8 which are still in
developement.
--
Michal Schorm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531705
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.16-6.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ce7aa5e68e
--
You are receiving this
On 20.3.2018 11:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
to push the whole ecosystem. The proposed model of nipping python2 support
at the edges is the same thing, in reverse. First some leaf packages
are dropped, and then some somewhat more important packages, and then
suddenly it becomes hard to
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:51:30AM +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Hello,
> Here is a message I want to post to devel-announce later. Let me
> know if you see anything wrong (or would like to take over python2
> maintainership).
>
> ---
> Intent to orphan Python 2
First a disclaimer: I'm all for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.42-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a50cbff35a
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.42-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-93f05827e1
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.42-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-51f0588dd5
--
You are receiving this
Hello,
Here is a message I want to post to devel-announce later. Let me know if
you see anything wrong (or would like to take over python2 maintainership).
---
Intent to orphan Python 2
tl;dr: Unless someone steps up to Python 2 after 2020, we need to start
dropping python2 packages now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558276
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBI-1.641-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e60ced2450
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558293
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558276
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Rene Jr Purcell wrote:
> I'm starting with a idea to build a spin of Fedora related to crypto
Hello René!
You should know that "crypto" was short for "cryptography" long before
it came to mean "cryptocurrency", and there are people around who will
misunderstand if you're not explicit. When
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-find2perl-1.004-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-023f27f244
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-find2perl-1.004-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c47e5de5d5
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-find2perl-1.004-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d020ca9370
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558276
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:57:19 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100
> > Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100
> > > Fabio Valentini
The question here is why don't we actually implement the modularity
the simple way.
Let's suppose I would like to make nodejs-8 available in EPEL7.
The most effortless way would be to create subdirectory called 8 at
src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs
with the updated spec file and sources for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558274
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |27
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427
Bug ID: 1558427
Summary: Useless dependency on perl(Path::Iter) prevents from
bootstrapping Perl packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
Welcome to Fedora. There is a security lab that may also be of interest
and worth contributing to:
https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/security/
Qubes (https://www.qubes-os.org/) also builds ontop of Fedora as a base.
Regards,
Benson
On 03/20/2018 04:04 AM, Rene Jr Purcell wrote:
Hi
76 matches
Mail list logo