Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 19:00 +, Christian Glombek wrote: > And how many people actually still run NC v10? FWIW, I have a nextcloud 10 setup on a Fedora 27 server. I have no problems with major version updates within a Fedora release, but my expectation was that Fedora was keeping it updated.

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Le 03/04/2018 à 19:44, Dennis Gilmore a écrit : > El mar, 03-04-2018 a las 17:07 +, Stephen Gallagher escribió: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:39 PM Christian Glombek > .de> wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> I'd be happy to maintain NextCloud!I have already done the >>> packaging work for NC v13 and v13.

Re: Unacceptable size increase to ALL live images in F28: Noto CJK Fonts

Sorry for late response. I somehow missed this mail. On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > And the problem is not so much the exception to guidelines but why it > was written in the first place. > > Installing just part of a font family is massively unintuitive for > users, wh

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

I notice upstream offers VM, Docker and Snap downloads prominently, for server. But they also offer the client as flatpak: https://help.nextcloud.com/t/linux-packages-status/10216 I didn't spend much time looking but was unable to find v10 and v11 VM's as maybe an easy way to upgrade from v10 to

Fedora Notifications app is incomprehensible

Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications? It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user understand how to use it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Totally agreed. I'd expect having streams for each major would somewhat mitigate this. Adam Williamson schrieb am Mi., 4. Apr. 2018 um 01:02 Uhr: > On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 15:25 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > One question comes to mind though - won't this be a problem in the > > future too? How ca

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 15:25 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > One question comes to mind though - won't this be a problem in the > future too? How can we guarantee that users can keep upgrading to 14, > 15, 16, etc. since Fedora doesn't keep in-between updates in the repos? When I maintained ownCloud,

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

I'm definitely a fan of modules and streams! I'm also a fan of not having to package v11 and v12 ;) Recently, I've made some non-code PRs to NextCloud in order to streamline their dependency declarations & mgmt in general (see https://github.com/nextcloud/server/issues/8555 & ref'd PRs). It used t

Fedora 28-20180403.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 216330 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/216330 ID: 216372 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedorapro

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/03/2018 03:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Given the current status, I suggest you just ask FESCo to give you > permission to release 13.x without supporting upgrades from 10.x and > then submit a Magazine article explaining the situation once 13.x is > landing. I would support this option

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:01 PM Christian Glombek wrote: > I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been shipped > in the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this affects major updates, > it is leading to problems elsewhere (i.e. people have to uninstall some > apps on v1

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Christian Glombek wrote: > I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been shipped in > the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this affects major updates, it > is leading to problems elsewhere (i.e. people have to uninstall some apps on

Re: Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on a new version of hamlib (3.1 -> 3.2) and instead of > building manually or downloading packages and using abi-compliance-checker, > I was going to try and use fedabipkgdiff from the libabigail package. > > How do I go about doin

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been shipped in the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this affects major updates, it is leading to problems elsewhere (i.e. people have to uninstall some apps on v13 and re-install them on v13.0.1 for them to work again). And

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Yup, that, essentially. Some deps that are needed for these versions are already outdated and have newer, incompatible versions in the Fedora rpm repos. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

El mar, 03-04-2018 a las 17:07 +, Stephen Gallagher escribió: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:39 PM Christian Glombek .de> wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I'd be happy to maintain NextCloud!I have already done the > > packaging work for NC v13 and v13.0.1, and various dependencies. > > Unfortunately th

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:39 PM Christian Glombek wrote: > Hello! > > I'd be happy to maintain NextCloud! > I have already done the packaging work for NC v13 and v13.0.1, and various > dependencies. > Unfortunately there is no upgrade path from the EOL'd v10 rpm that is in > Fedora right now, whi

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

For reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433919 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nextcloud/pull-request/3 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180403.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180402.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180403.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 26 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 31 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 71.40 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

DNF dependencies and --allowerasing

Recently, upgrading pymol was blocked because of version incompatiblity with pymol-wxpython: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563269 The previous version is 1.8.6 and both packages are closely coupled so they require each other's version. Pymol update to 1.9.0 is blocked because t

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Hello! I'd be happy to maintain NextCloud! I have already done the packaging work for NC v13 and v13.0.1, and various dependencies. Unfortunately there is no upgrade path from the EOL'd v10 rpm that is in Fedora right now, which seems to be somewhat of a blocker. I'd happily support upgrades from

Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

I'm working on a new version of hamlib (3.1 -> 3.2) and instead of building manually or downloading packages and using abi-compliance-checker, I was going to try and use fedabipkgdiff from the libabigail package. How do I go about doing that (best practice) that should be less work than doing ever

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 28 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 28 Beta. A short list of highlights: * Modular Repository for Fedora Server * The Workstation edition of Fedora 28 Beta features GNOME 3.28. * 64-bit Arm (Aarch64) now a primary architecture for Fed

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/03/2018 09:19 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > Here's some traces ... > Ah, well it sounds like it's happy news at least ☺ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 03/04/18 15:13, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Randy Barlow > wrote: >> Greetings! >> >> It seems that OwnCloud and NextCloud might be unmaintained in Fedora. I >> found that upgrading my F27 box to F28 causes it to be unable to login: > > I think the old maintainer di

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings! > > It seems that OwnCloud and NextCloud might be unmaintained in Fedora. I > found that upgrading my F27 box to F28 causes it to be unable to login: I think the old maintainer did a blog post about this some time ago, can't seem to

Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Greetings! It seems that OwnCloud and NextCloud might be unmaintained in Fedora. I found that upgrading my F27 box to F28 causes it to be unable to login: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562949 There are also CVEs open: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472720 https://bu

Re: Review Swap

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to do rename of rpkg-client > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-client) to rpkg-util and also I > would like to go the package again through a review process because the spec > might deserve some care: https://b

Review Swap

Hello, I would like to do rename of rpkg-client ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-client) to rpkg-util and also I would like to go the package again through a review process because the spec might deserve some care: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184 Can I possibly swap r

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180403.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap