experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

Hello, I am occasionally experiencing the following error in my day-to-day dnf use: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates' I've had that happened even in local mock builds. Do you also experience this error upon dnf operations

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

Excerpts from Miro Hrončok's message of 2018-07-19 17:48 +02:00: > I know it is not comfortable, yet at this point reverting the change > and doing another mass rebuild is IMHO more work than fixing the > packages. Also, let me take this opportunity to give Koschei a shout-out. I have it

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

No offense but can you kindly rephrase whatever you said.Its kinda difficult to decipher as your sentences seem to contradict. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 20:06 Chris Murphy, wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > > The Actual Url > > > > > I've got the copr enabled,

[Bug 1604806] New: rt-4.4.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604806 Bug ID: 1604806 Summary: rt-4.4.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: rt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1604727] New: ctstream-28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727 Bug ID: 1604727 Summary: ctstream-28 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ctstream Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: Compilation issue after gcc removal

On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:08:55 +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > On 2018-07-20 00:26, Artur Iwicki wrote: > > I looked at libattr and in the changelog, there's this: > >> * Tue Jul 17 2018 Kamil Dudka 2.4.48-3 > >> - temporarily provide attr/xattr.h symlink until users are migrated > >>

Compilation issue after gcc removal

On 2018-07-20 00:26, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I looked at libattr and in the changelog, there's this: >> * Tue Jul 17 2018 Kamil Dudka 2.4.48-3 >> - temporarily provide attr/xattr.h symlink until users are migrated >> (#1601482) > > The bugzilla ticket says that attr/xattr.h was removed from

audiofile package to become an orphan

When I picked up the package in 2015, the upstream maintainer(s) apparently had stopped the maintenance already. Meanwhile, there have been a few CVEs and other fixes that have been ignored upstream. Recently, another CVE has been assigned to an issue, and there isn't any upstream interest either.

Re: Compilation issue after gcc removal

I looked at libattr and in the changelog, there's this: >* Tue Jul 17 2018 Kamil Dudka 2.4.48-3 >- temporarily provide attr/xattr.h symlink until users are migrated (#1601482) The bugzilla ticket says that attr/xattr.h was removed from libattr and is now a symlink to sys/xattr.h. Taking a look

Compilation issue after gcc removal

Hi, After the recent gcc removal from build root [1] I added explicit dependency on gcc [2], but even though my pyxattr package started to fail with [3][4]: > xattr.c:532:56: error: 'ENOATTR' undeclared (first use in this function); did > you mean 'ENOTTY'? I've checked it and ENOATTR should be

Orphaning some of my packages

HI, I'll orphan the packages cpptest and dreamchess-tools because both currently FTBFS and I don't find any time to fix them in near future, besides I don't currently use those packages. Maybe a simple add of BuildRequires: gcc-c++ would fix the builds. In case of cpptest, there's CppUTest [1]

Re: Errors in compiling darktable subpackages

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:28 PM Germano Massullo wrote: > > I am working on adding more features to darktable (basecurve tool and noise > tool subpackages). > > In log [1] from line > > BUILDSTDERR: /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/dt-curve-tool.dir/dt-curve-tool.c.o: > relocation R_X86_64_32S against

[Bug 1602758] perl-Thread-Queue-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602758 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Thread-Queue-3.13-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:13 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 19-07-18 17:42, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain > >

Errors in compiling darktable subpackages

I am working on adding more features to darktable (basecurve tool and noise tool subpackages). In log [1] from line BUILDSTDERR: /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/dt-curve-tool.dir/dt-curve-tool.c.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against symbol `spline_set' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile

Fedora Rawhide-20180719.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 29/138 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180714.n.0): ID: 258720 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/258720 ID: 258728 Test: x86_64

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 09:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 08:19 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time LibRaw > > bumped its version, as a result we have broken dependencies and some > >

Re: Intent to orphan js-jquery1 and js-jquery2

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Christopher wrote: > It is my intention to orphan js-jquery1 and js-jquery2. Does anybody want > to take them over? > > These very old versions of jQuery have security issues that I do not have > time nor expertise to maintain. Upstream's last patch for either of

[Bug 1591449] CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in Archive::Zip

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Archive-Zip-1.60-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1596132] CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in Archive::Zip [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Archive-Zip-1.60-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1591449] CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in Archive::Zip

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591449 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Archive-Zip-1.59-6.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1596132] CVE-2018-10860 perl-Archive-Zip: Directory traversal in Archive::Zip [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596132 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Archive-Zip-1.59-6.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

On 19/07/18 18:59, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 08:19 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: Hi all, please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time LibRaw bumped its version, as a result we have broken dependencies and some composes like Astronomy spin fail to

Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: Basic FPGA Support

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Summary == > A number of devices like Xilinx ZYNQ based devices such as the > 96boards Ultra96 and the Intel based UP² have onboard FPGAs. FPGA > manager is a vendor-neutral framework that has been upstream in the > kernel since 4.4. This

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 09:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 08:19 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time LibRaw > > bumped its version, as a result we have broken dependencies and some > >

[Bug 1602758] perl-Thread-Queue-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602758 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: Basic FPGA Support

On 07/18/2018 02:26 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > == User Experience == > Currently the Fedora support for FPGAs is basically non existent. > There's currently a few open tools for specific FPGAs. This is the > beginning of improving this with the intention of having a uniform as > possible user

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 08:19 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > Hi all, > > please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time LibRaw > bumped its version, as a result we have broken dependencies and some > composes like Astronomy spin fail to build… > > Problem 1: conflicting

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: python 2 retirement commo efforts

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The ** POINT ** of producing such a report is to 'put > > numbers' on the scope of the work rather than loose armwaving > > assertions such as: > > > > > Fedora still has more than 3000 packages depending on > > > python2 – many more than we can

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

Hi, On 19-07-18 17:42, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi All, I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'. A quick

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

On 19.7.2018 17:15, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'. A quick check shows that these are all caused by a missing BuildRequires on gcc / g++ related to:

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

Christian Dersch wrote: > Hi all, > > please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time > LibRaw bumped its version I added explicit soname tracking there so hopefully it won't happen again (at least not by surprise),

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

Hi, On 19-07-18 17:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:15:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'. A quick check shows that these

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain > and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'. > > A quick check shows that these are all caused by a missing > BuildRequires on gcc / g++

Re: Update to scotch-6.0.6

On 19.07.2018 13:35, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm updating to scotch-6.0.6, which carries a soname bump. I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: hypre mmg MUMPS petsc qrmumps superlu_dist I've done a test run in this [1] COPR repo and all dependencies built successfully. All

Re: Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:15:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain > and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'. > > A quick check shows that these are all caused by a missing > BuildRequires on gcc /

Auto-filing of FTBFS bugs gone wild

Hi All, I've just got 20 bugs auto-filed against packages which I co-maintain and that is just for packages starting with the letter 'a'. A quick check shows that these are all caused by a missing BuildRequires on gcc / g++ related to:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 39 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8c4ebc0d2d wordpress-4.9.7-1.el6 7

[Bug 1603528] bugzilla: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603528 --- Comment #1 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1460805 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1460805=edit build.log file build.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1603528] bugzilla: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603528 --- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1460807 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1460807=edit state.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1603528] bugzilla: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603528 --- Comment #2 from Mohan Boddu --- Created attachment 1460806 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1460806=edit root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1603528] New: bugzilla: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603528 Bug ID: 1603528 Summary: bugzilla: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: bugzilla Assignee: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br Reporter:

Re: Self introduction: Eduardo Otubo

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 15:24 Cole Robinson wrote: > Welcome Eduardo :) > > On 07/19/2018 06:47 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > My name is Eduardo and I'll be helping co-maintaining the cloud-init > package for Fedora. > > > > I've been working with QEMU/KVM since 2011. In 2013 I

Re: JSharing some poor experience

On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 16:31, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > Hello, > > I recently upgraded my computer to Fedora 28 and experienced some > strange behaviour with the cinnamon deskop when having two screens. > On the second screen there was a black "border" around windows (eg >

Re: dnf history - change in how rpmdb checksum is computed

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:37 PM Terry Bowling wrote: >> >> Regarding these two questions: >> Are there any concerns about such change? I believe that >90% users wouldn't notice anything as it's related to the history database

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > The Actual Url > I've got the copr enabled, but I can't figure out how to install the kernel. Even though I don't have -devel -cross-headers -headers for this kernel installed, those packages are included in a normal 'dnf update' for

JSharing some poor experience

Hello, I recently upgraded my computer to Fedora 28 and experienced some strange behaviour with the cinnamon deskop when having two screens. On the second screen there was a black "border" around windows (eg terminals) that was flickering and expanding eg when the mouse was moving

Re: dnf history - change in how rpmdb checksum is computed

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:37 PM Terry Bowling wrote: > > Regarding these two questions: > >>> Are there any concerns about such change? >>> I believe that >90% users wouldn't notice anything as it's related to the >>> history database only. > > >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:01 AM Igor

Re: Self introduction: Eduardo Otubo

Welcome Eduardo :) On 07/19/2018 06:47 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote: > Hello all, > > My name is Eduardo and I'll be helping co-maintaining the cloud-init package > for Fedora. > > I've been working with QEMU/KVM since 2011. In 2013 I became the maintainer of > the seccomp subsystem in QEMU. In

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

Dne 12.7.2018 v 18:00 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > On 07/11/2018 10:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> The effects of fsync are impossible to see unless you hard-reboot the >> machine. (OK, strictly speaking, you can time the fsync call, but let's >> ignore that). I'd be more worried

[Bug 1603196] New: perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603196 Bug ID: 1603196 Summary: perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Parallel-ForkManager Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Update to scotch-6.0.6

Hi I'm updating to scotch-6.0.6, which carries a soname bump. I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: hypre mmg MUMPS petsc qrmumps superlu_dist I've done a test run in this [1] COPR repo and all dependencies built successfully. Sandro [1]

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

Rebuilds done for gegl04, indi-gphoto, kstars and siril. This should fix the broken dependencies resulting in the compose failures of Astronomy Lab (gimp(gegl04),indi-gphoto,kstars,siril), Design Suite (gnome-photos(gegl04)) and Scientific (gimp). Greetings, Christian On 19/07/18 08:19,

Self introduction: Eduardo Otubo

Hello all, My name is Eduardo and I'll be helping co-maintaining the cloud-init package for Fedora. I've been working with QEMU/KVM since 2011. In 2013 I became the maintainer of the seccomp subsystem in QEMU. In mid-2017 I joined Red Hat to support RHEL in different clouds (Hyper-V, Xen, etc)

Re: glibc-2.27.9000 and struct statx_timestamp

19.07.2018 00:10 Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > I'm hitting the following with qt5-qtbase: > > /usr/include/linux/stat.h:56:8: error: redefinition of 'struct > statx_timestamp' > struct statx_timestamp { > ^~~ > In file included from /usr/include/sys/stat.h:446, >

Re: F29 Mass rebuild - Help needed to fix failed build

On 18.7.2018 15:23, Zoltan Kota wrote: Hi All, The Mass rebuild of pybliographer failed. See below: Fwd: releng's pybliographer-1.2.18-4.fc29 failed to build Notification time stamped 2018-07-15 03:04:40 UTC releng's pybliographer-1.2.18-4.fc29 failed to build

Re: some trac plugins looking for point of contacts

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:41:53 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey all. > > I have: > > trac-bazaar-plugin > trac-git-plugin > trac-iniadmin-plugin > trac-mercurial-plugin > trac-ticketdelete-plugin I took a look at trac-ticketdelete-plugin as I've had that on my system for a

Re: F29 Mass rebuild - Help needed to fix failed build

On 18.7.2018 18:07, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Mattias Ellert wrote: ons 2018-07-18 klockan 15:23 +0200 skrev Zoltan Kota: Hi All, The Mass rebuild of pybliographer failed. See below: Fwd: releng's pybliographer-1.2.18-4.fc29 failed to build Notification

[EPEL-devel] Re: python 2 retirement commo efforts

On 18.7.2018 20:24, R P Herrold wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, R P Herrold wrote: I've poked at getting accurate counts and manifests of unique python(2) package SRPMs off my mirror today -- I'll supplement this email with the script and links to the mainfests tomorrow. A 'sort | uniq' let me

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: python 2 retirement commo efforts

On 18.7.2018 20:24, R P Herrold wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, R P Herrold wrote: I've poked at getting accurate counts and manifests of unique python(2) package SRPMs off my mirror today -- I'll supplement this email with the script and links to the mainfests tomorrow. A 'sort | uniq' let me

Re: Lots a permission denied activity

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 07:54:48PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 14:27 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have been testing a new set of audit rules and have run across > > some > > processes that are doing things that might out to be changed. > > Typically, > >

Re: F29 Self-Contained Change: Basic FPGA Support

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 05:26:08PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Summary == > A number of devices like Xilinx ZYNQ based devices such as the > 96boards Ultra96 and the Intel based UP² have onboard FPGAs. FPGA > manager is a vendor-neutral framework that has been upstream in the > kernel since 4.4.

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Can you give some more details as those would help Investigate the problem better. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 10:38 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manas Mangaonkar < > manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The Actual Url >>

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

Thabks On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 12:29 Rajeesh K V, wrote: > On 7/19/18, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Good to here there haven't been any breakages. > > > > I will look into the swapper process issue asap. > > Thanks. > Output from $perf top -F 49 > > 16.19% [kernel] [k]

Re: GCC 8/9 ABI change: call for rebuilds

In the meantime, gcc-8.1.1-5 is available as an update for F28. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 7/19/18, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Good to here there haven't been any breakages. > > I will look into the swapper process issue asap. Thanks. Output from $perf top -F 49 16.19% [kernel] [k] sdhci_irq 7.72% [unknown] [.]

Re: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:52:05 PM > Subject: Re: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures > > On mardi 17 juillet 2018 14:34:49 CEST you wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > Since the mass

Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

Hi all, please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time LibRaw bumped its version, as a result we have broken dependencies and some composes like Astronomy spin fail to build… Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides libraw.so.16()(64bit) needed by