Re: Buildroot broken in Rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 07/23/2018 08:01 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: I got several FTBFS bug reports, the logs of which look like this: + make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rp

Re: Buildroot broken in Rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/22/2018 11:01 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: I got several FTBFS bug reports, the logs of which look like this: /bin/sh: cc: command not found I consider that a broken buildroot. There have been several announcements and several extensive mailing list threads about this. gcc was removed from

Buildroot broken in Rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Jan Synacek
I got several FTBFS bug reports, the logs of which look like this: + make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/

Fedora testing-20180723.0 compose check report

2018-07-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.18 to 0.35 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/259329#downloads Current test data: https://

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180722.n.0 changes

2018-07-22 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180721.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180722.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 98 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 430.93 KiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora Rawhide-20180722.n.0 compose check report

2018-07-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 12/138 (x86_64), 22/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180721.n.0): ID: 259392 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/259392 ID: 259

Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

2018-07-22 Thread Pavel Alexeev
Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log): error: Installed (but unpa

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

2018-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 07/21/2018 02:54 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Jul 15, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Does each build start with its own fresh VM? Do you

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

2018-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 07/20/2018 11:15 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 20.7.2018 19:56, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 07/20/2018 03:55 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> >>> >>> I actually already filed the respective bugs: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591225 >>> >>> There is even PR: >>> >>> https://github

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

2018-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 07/17/2018 04:35 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: ...snip... > > We want to keep them and we are able to maintain Python 2 for them > (well, we would very much prefer to have them ported to Python 3 but we > realize it's not always happening.) Well, if something is broken in python2, breaking one of th

Non-responsive maintainer - Daniel Kopeček

2018-07-22 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello! According Non-responsive Maintainer Policy I'm asking the maintainer to respond and resolve issues with packages spdlog and json. RHBZ (spdlog): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468817 RHBZ (json): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: diorite: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Martin Gansser
I changed the spec file [1] but it still fails on rawhide [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/nuvolaruntime/diorite.spec [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28522155 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: Self Introduction: Kairui Song

2018-07-22 Thread Zamir SUN
On 07/13/2018 02:33 AM, Kairui Song wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on submitting a package, it's my first package. So I want to > give a brief self-introduction here. > > My name is Kairui Song, I'm a software engineer at Red Hat, have been a > Red Hat employee for two years, and start workin

Re: Errors in compiling darktable subpackages

2018-07-22 Thread Germano Massullo
A little update: upon FAS misc suggestion I started trying to comment from line 5 to 15 of file https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/darktable-2.4.x/tools/basecurve/CMakeLists.txt and then the previous error seems to be disappeared. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/germano/darktab

Re: Build failures of packages which use waf as build system

2018-07-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 08:45 +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > 2018-07-17 0:38 GMT+02:00 Miro Hrončok : > > On 16.7.2018 21:54, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > > > > I fixed some of these audio packages, prefixing waf calls with > > > %{__python2} macro. You have to BR python2-rpm-macros or python2- > > > dev

Re: Build failures of packages which use waf as build system

2018-07-22 Thread Martin Gansser
i changed the spec file [1] but it still fails on rawhide [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/nuvolaruntime/diorite.spec [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28522155 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Orphaned many packages in Fedora

2018-07-22 Thread Parag Nemade
Hi, I want to reduce my current package maintenance, hence orphaned below packages now Following packages have no bugs open against them and also not seen any upstream release since imported in Fedora few years ago aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts almas-mongolian-title-fonts cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts

Re: diorite: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Antonio Trande
Are you already read this https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TIT5YDEUODUBTDOE2CGL754DWV6655F5/#G7R54DGDCHNTXJLL6QDYCP53PNHUTWVK ? On 22/07/2018 13:43, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > i am trying to fix the FTBFS for diorite but i have no success. >

diorite: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, i am trying to fix the FTBFS for diorite but i have no success. koji [1] build process failed with: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1zlcEa + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd diorite-4.12.0 + waf configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --novaladoc Traceback (most re

Re: Fedora crda To wireless-regdb Upgrade

2018-07-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 11:53:51AM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2018-07-20 20:47 GMT+02:00 John W. Linville : > [...] > > QUESTIONS > > > > Are there reasons to oppose the Obsolete/Provides upgrade path from > > crda to wireless-regdb? +1 to the upgrade. > Would it be desirable to require user