https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613504
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.87-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e8defd29ee
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613504
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.86-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ccd98cb01c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Hello everyone,
0.27.x is released long time ago, but I never got time for updating it. It
obviously involves SONAME change.
The good thing about this release is that it breaks only things in runtime
and only one function changed signature (for building) which nobody uses
anyway.
I'm going to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613344
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-7.91 is|perl-Mojolicious-7.92 is
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:09 PM Pascal Terjan wrote:
> > $ GET
> > http://ftp.free.fr/mirrors/mageia.org/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/media_info/file-deps
> > /bin/csh
> > /bin/grep
> > /bin/perl
> > /usr/bin/ln
> > /usr/bin/rm
> > /sbin/service
> > /usr/bin/chattr
> > /usr/bin/guile
> >
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 11:23 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 73/141 (x86_64), 20/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
So in this compose, all RPM-based installs (so, DVD and netinst, but
not dvd-ostree or live) failed because anaconda crashes during
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:32:35PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> I have orphaned the bouml [1, 2] package. I haven't used this
> application for almost a decade, and don't have any time or motivation
> to give it the attention that it needs.
And also its sibling bouml-doc package:
Hello everybody,
I have orphaned the bouml [1, 2] package. I haven't used this
application for almost a decade, and don't have any time or motivation
to give it the attention that it needs.
Feel free to pick it up if you want to. If you do, you might want to
update it to one of the more recent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376845
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49896
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On 2018-08-09 08:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 8.8.2018 17:43, John Florian wrote:
On 2018-08-08 10:47, Jason Tibbitts wrote:
"JF" == John Florian writes:
JF> How difficult would it be to provide modern Python (e.g. 35 or 36)
JF> in EPEL?
Obviously not that difficult, since it is already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613344
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-7.90 is|perl-Mojolicious-7.91 is
On 8.8.2018 17:43, John Florian wrote:
On 2018-08-08 10:47, Jason Tibbitts wrote:
"JF" == John Florian writes:
JF> How difficult would it be to provide modern Python (e.g. 35 or 36)
JF> in EPEL?
Obviously not that difficult, since it is already there.
By that I assume you mean 34, right?
- Original Message -
> From: "Cătălin George Feștilă"
> To: python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 7:25:40 PM
> Subject: self-introduction mythcat
>
> Dear team.
> My name is Cătălin George Feștilă known as mythcat into Fedora area.
> I want to join to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1614327
Bug ID: 1614327
Summary: perl-Carp-Always-0.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Carp-Always
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 4.8.2018 22:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
an interesting discussion came up in the Python Maint team recently,
about not shipping python3-debug and python2-debug.
On the Chesterton's fence principle [0], I'd would like to know why are
we building and shipping them before we have a
On 4.8.2018 22:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
an interesting discussion came up in the Python Maint team recently,
about not shipping python3-debug and python2-debug.
On the Chesterton's fence principle [0], I'd would like to know why are
we building and shipping them before we have a
Dale Macartney (dbmacartney) is not responsive.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1608306
Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 73/141 (x86_64), 20/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180802.n.0):
ID: 263892 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/263892
ID: 263902 Test:
- Original Message -
> From: "Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 3:47:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora
>
> I think we already have tools for that. What I expect with the SIG is
> something that
- Original Message -
> From: "Jakub Cajka"
> To: "nicolas mailhot" , "zebob m"
> , "ricardo martinelli oliveira"
> , "Jan Chaloupka"
> , "Derek Parker"
> , "Paul Gier"
> Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to
> Fedora"
> Sent: Friday, August 3,
Hi Everyone,
Since I've just got sponzored - thank you jskarvad :) - it's time for me to
introduce myself. So here's my attempt :) .
I've discovered Linux, programming and the whole open source world about
7-8 years ago when I was at high school and immediately fell in love with
it. Even though
Dne 9.8.2018 v 07:34 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:09 PM Pascal Terjan wrote:
>> On 7 August 2018 at 09:50, Michael Schroeder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 04:36:07PM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek
>>> wrote:
this mail is a continuation of an FPC [1] and a
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 03:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I am all for it, although I am not involved in such discussion since
> a
> while now ...
Great! I plan to put some more of my ideas up on the ML for what I
think the direction should be/what I'm working on in the future, so I
hope that we can
I am all for it, although I am not involved in such discussion since a
while now ...
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 14:46 +1000, William Brown wrote:
> Hi Simo and Alex,
>
> It's come to my attention that there are some discussions underway for
> new features being designed for IPA and 389ds. However
There is a further optimization for file dependencies not in some whitelist
that might be undertaken by depsolvers like dnf: lookup the path in the already
installed packages.
The fundamental need for depsolvers resolving a dependency is the ability to
traverse a mapping from path to package
On 08/08/2018 11:45 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Except that it doesn't quite solve it. What happens if a third party
repo package depends on a file that is not included in the Fedora
whitelist? It doesn't help that the other repo has that file path in
its whitelist, dnf won't be able to resolve
Perhaps you do not understand the implications of "maintained" wrto a whitelist.
A cross repository file dependency should lead to a request to add a path or
pattern to a whitelist for the other repository to provide a file path, not to
a lazy download of megabytes of mostly unused data "just
30 matches
Mail list logo
