OLD: Fedora-29-20180915.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180916.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.58-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PathTools-3.75-1.fc30 |perl-PathTools-3.75-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.58-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PathTools-3.75-1.fc30 |perl-PathTools-3.75-1.fc30
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/17/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180916git4881826.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Deprecating_Packages
This policy is highly impractical. Any package can be deprecated without
notice, in some situations even without any kind of approval (if there is
nothing using it in Fedora yet). One needs to do a repoquery
On 18-09-16 17:53:08, Björn Persson wrote:
I have a Kerberos authentication problem.
On one computer running Fedora 27, I run kinit to authenticate to the
Fedora servers. After I enter my passphrase, kinit returns exit status
141. Then I run "fedpkg build", and get these error messages:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Would *you* be interested in maintaining python2 past 2020, with no
> upstream support and 3415 dependent packages?
Yet, I just see NO practical alternative to SOMEBODY doing just that. It
just needs to be done, just as with GTK+ 1 and 2, and Qt 3 and 4. (Yes, all
those
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Working on a new package and tried to install it only to get:
>
> Error: Transaction check error:
> file /usr/lib/.build-id/67/7d4bdbbde390cc49fddb539cceb06ccb80efd6 from
> install of ft8call-0.6.4-1.fc28.x86_64 conflicts with file from
I have a Kerberos authentication problem.
On one computer running Fedora 27, I run kinit to authenticate to the
Fedora servers. After I enter my passphrase, kinit returns exit status
141. Then I run "fedpkg build", and get these error messages:
Kerberos authentication fails: (-1765328352,
First time I've run into this...
Working on a new package and tried to install it only to get:
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib/.build-id/67/7d4bdbbde390cc49fddb539cceb06ccb80efd6 from
install of ft8call-0.6.4-1.fc28.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
hamlib-3.2-1.fc28.x86_64
On 16.9.2018 21:43, Rex Dieter wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
*first*,
As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180914.n.0):
ID: 280994 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280994
ID: 281003
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 280858 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280858
ID: 280874 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
>>> The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
>>> *first*,
>>
>> As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
>> as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
>> The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
>> *first*,
>
> As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
> as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in the policy.)
It does
On 16.9.2018 14:42, Haïkel wrote:
The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer
*first*,
As a side note, where exactly does it mention that? (Note that it comes
as a reasonable thing to do, but I don't see it in the policy.)
I think we should actually make this the step
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180914.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180916.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 36
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 51.00 KiB
Size of dropped packages
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
Le dim. 16 sept. 2018 à 11:27, Fabio Valentini a écrit :
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> There are many open bugs assigned to hguemar, which he is not
> responding to at all. According to a quick bugzilla query, he doesn't
> seem to have responded to any of the bugs assigned to him since
> October 2017
I should have added, it's currently FTBFS, and has been since F25, so
any potential adapters would have to deal with that. It needs at least a
BuildRequires removed or updated, and a patch for the printf change of
that time, so you'd have to be able to fix at least that much.
On 16/09/2018 11:15,
Hello,
gogoc is dead to the world upstream (the gogo6.com site is now a
nutritional supplement pusher!), and without gogo6's servers, gogoc is
fairly useless. It's still possible it could be used to TSP tunnel
through one's own servers to get IPv6, but as far as I know, there
aren't any more
Hi everybody,
There are many open bugs assigned to hguemar, which he is not
responding to at all. According to a quick bugzilla query, he doesn't
seem to have responded to any of the bugs assigned to him since
October 2017 (!).
Particularly important to me are the FTBFS reports for libgda, which
Hi,
On 14-09-18 20:03, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their
25 matches
Mail list logo
