[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.5 Available Now!
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.5 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/29 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.5_Security_Lab All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-29/f-29-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What does 141 mean?
On ke, 19 syys 2018, Björn Persson wrote: Michal Toman wrote: Exit codes with top bit set to 1 (IOW higher than 127) usually mean unhandled signal. In your case 141 & 127 = 13 (or 141 - 128 = 13 if you want) indicating the app got SIGPIPE and died on it. That's a good point. And apparently no message is printed for the PIPE signal. For most signals there is a message: "Terminated", "Killed", "Segmentation fault", "Illegal instruction" and so on – but not for PIPE. So that suggests two bugs: Something that kinit communicates with crashes, and kinit is too naïve to catch the error and report it. If it is SIGPIPE then it is KCM provider in SSSD failing. I'd suggest to file a bug so that SSSD guys can look at it in detail. -- / Alexander Bokovoy Sr. Principal Software Engineer Security / Identity Management Engineering Red Hat Limited, Finland ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What does 141 mean?
On ke, 19 syys 2018, Björn Persson wrote: Alexander Bokovoy wrote: Can you provide output from export KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr klist -A kinit fedpkg build ? The log is attached. I tried it twice as Tony Nelson suggested. The first attempt failed as usual, but the second attempt was successful. Björn Persson [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ export KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ klist -A Ticket cache: KCM:1000 Default principal: rombobe...@fedoraproject.org Valid starting Expires Service principal 2018-09-17 05:24:43 2018-09-18 05:24:35 krbtgt/fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org renew until 2018-09-24 05:24:35 2018-09-17 05:27:25 2018-09-18 05:24:35 HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org renew until 2018-09-24 05:24:35 [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ kinit rombobe...@fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389788.507256: Getting initial credentials for rombobe...@fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389788.507258: Sending request (207 bytes) to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG [14092] 1537389788.507259: Resolving hostname id.fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389788.507260: TLS certificate name matched "id.fedoraproject.org" [14092] 1537389789.71948: Sending HTTPS request to https 152.19.134.142:443 [14092] 1537389789.71949: Received answer (322 bytes) from https 152.19.134.142:443 [14092] 1537389789.71950: Terminating TCP connection to https 152.19.134.142:443 [14092] 1537389794.417687: Response was not from master KDC [14092] 1537389794.417688: Received error from KDC: -1765328359/Additional pre-authentication required [14092] 1537389794.417691: Processing preauth types: 16, 15, 14, 136, 19, 147, 2, 133 [14092] 1537389794.417692: Selected etype info: etype aes256-cts, salt "3'Ds5@-0:LIC'DI@", params "" [14092] 1537389794.417693: Received cookie: MIT Password for rombobe...@fedoraproject.org: [14092] 1537389816.394788: AS key obtained for encrypted timestamp: aes256-cts/3ECA [14092] 1537389816.394790: Encrypted timestamp (for 1537389811.329323): plain 301AA011180F3230313830393139323034315AA105020305066B, encrypted 9D4E22D8C8E839FD08FDEF5513D8B3ECA58449937FAA393FC840524E9FBB4C5AAD7AAF5747A5F9B36B608199BB2A62A85BAED55317B1BA18 [14092] 1537389816.394791: Preauth module encrypted_timestamp (2) (real) returned: 0/Success [14092] 1537389816.394792: Produced preauth for next request: 133, 2 [14092] 1537389816.394793: Sending request (302 bytes) to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG [14092] 1537389816.394794: Resolving hostname id.fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389816.394795: TLS certificate name matched "id.fedoraproject.org" [14092] 1537389817.98943: Sending HTTPS request to https 140.211.169.196:443 [14092] 1537389817.98944: Received answer (795 bytes) from https 140.211.169.196:443 [14092] 1537389817.98945: Terminating TCP connection to https 140.211.169.196:443 [14092] 1537389822.391083: Response was not from master KDC [14092] 1537389822.391084: Processing preauth types: 19 [14092] 1537389822.391085: Selected etype info: etype aes256-cts, salt "3'Ds5@-0:LIC'DI@", params "" [14092] 1537389822.391086: Produced preauth for next request: (empty) [14092] 1537389822.391087: AS key determined by preauth: aes256-cts/3ECA [14092] 1537389822.391088: Decrypted AS reply; session key is: aes256-cts/A5E2 [14092] 1537389822.391089: FAST negotiation: available [14092] 1537389822.391090: Initializing KCM:1000 with default princ rombobe...@fedoraproject.org [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ echo $? 141 So there is something wrong happening right after starting to save the cred into KCM credentials cache. Jakub (in CC:), do you see any reason for this? [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ fedpkg build [14333] 1537389921.736427: ccselect module realm chose cache KCM:1000 with client principal rombobe...@fedoraproject.org for server principal HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org [14333] 1537389921.736428: Getting credentials rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org using ccache KCM:1000 [14333] 1537389921.736429: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from KCM:1000 with result: -1765328243/Matching credential not found [14333] 1537389921.736430: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> krbtgt/fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from KCM:1000 with result: 0/Success [14333] 1537389921.736436: ccselect module realm chose cache KCM:1000 with client principal rombobe...@fedoraproject.org for server principal HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org [14333] 1537389921.736437: Getting credentials rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org using ccache KCM:1000 [14333] 1537389921.736438: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from KCM:1000 with result: -1765328243/Matching credential not found [14333] 1537389921.736439: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> krbtgt/fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from K
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-09-20 16:00 UTC)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-09-20 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-09-20 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2018-09-20 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <--
2018-09-20 16:00 UTC UTC
2018-09-20 17:00 BST Europe/London
2018-09-20 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin
2018-09-20 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris
2018-09-20 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta
New Day: Friday -
2018-09-21 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong
2018-09-21 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore
2018-09-21 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo
2018-09-21 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting
= Followups =
#topic #665 SSLCertificateHandling policy update
.fpc 665
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/665
#topic #667 Recommend use of systemd sandboxing directives
.fpc 667
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/667
#topic #693 Wiki:Packaging:RPMMacros
.fpc 693
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/693
#topic #703 Inconsistency between "General Naming" and "Case Sensitivity"
.fpc 703
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/703
#topic #719 Simplify packaging of forge-hosted projects
.fpc 719
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/719
#topic #726 Review for SELinux Independent Policy packaging Draft
.fpc 726
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/726
#topic #727 convert guidelines to git and restructured text
.fpc 727
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/727
#topic #743 Add link to C/C++ build flag docs. in redhat-rpm-config
.fpc 743
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/743
#topic #775 Allow to have %{?suse_version} condition in spec file
.fpc 775
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/775
#topic #784 forbid globs for shared libraries as it conceals sonames
.fpc 784
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/784
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can:
* Reply to this e-mail
* File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee
* E-mail me directly
* Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic.
Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 29 Beta status: RC5 incoming, purpose
Hi, folks! So, Beta RC4 is out there and being tested (thanks for all the testing so far). There is an RC5 coming too: here's why. We haven't found any blockers in RC4 yet, but we did find several not- quite-blockers that seemed bad. First of all, the Silverblue (formerly known as Atomic Workstation) installer image build failed due to a network blip, so RC4 does not have that image. If we ship RC4 as the Beta, we wouldn't have a Silverblue installer for the Beta at all (unless we did some ugly hack to stuff some other image in), and that seems bad - the image isn't release-blocking, but it is a major area of development and we really ought to include it in Beta. Beyond that, we happened to run into and find fixes for quite a slew of bugs in gnome-shell, plus a couple in gtk+ and mesa that are quite visible too. Here's a list of all the bugs in question: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630134 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/574 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/539 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/227 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/523 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631068 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628462 So nirik, mboddu and I agreed it'd be reasonable to run a Beta RC5 to give us at least the option of shipping a compose with the Silverblue image and fixes for all those bugs, if everything goes well. As there aren't any outright blockers in it, Beta RC4 is still a candidate for release too. Beta RC5 should complete in ten hours or so. There should be no difference between Beta RC4 and Beta RC5 outside of GNOME and the mesa fix, so most RC4 tests should be valid for RC5 too. So, please continue testing RC4. Once RC5 arrives, go ahead and test that too, prioritizing smoke tests, tests of GNOME, and any Basic / Beta tests not yet run against RC4. It is not a high priority to run tests on RC5 that have already been run on RC4, unless they're basic smoke tests or GNOME tests. Thanks a lot, everyone! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Disabling build options for SSE on non-capable arches ?
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 07:58 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Hi, (this is a 4th retry, now trying devel as first try to packaging
> a
> week ago says held by moderator, but doesn't seem to have been posted
> to
> the list, and I don't know why...)
>
> Audacity has had the following as part of rpm spec in the %configure
> section:
>
> %configure \
> --disable-dynamic-loading \
> ...
> %ifnarch %{ix86} x86_64
> --disable-sse \
> %else
> %{nil}
> %endif
>
> Which fails on: non x86 arches:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29513664
>
> If I remove the conditional, I get successful build, but not
> optimized
> on x86 with SSE.
>
> What's wrong with this conditional ?
The conditional is correct but [1] from the previous %endif you leave
two blanks lines which you can't, one blank line makes terminate the
./configure command and so last option "--disable-sse" is not included
in build, you may check build.log [2] and you don't find any "
--disable-sse"
[1]
%endif
(blank line)
(blank line)
%ifnarch %{ix86} x86_64
--disable-sse \
%else
%{nil}
%endif
[2]
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29513670
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3670/29513670/build.log
Thanks and Best regards,
> Cheers, David
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin
> es
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@li
> sts.fedoraproject.org
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Disabling build options for SSE on non-capable arches ?
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 07:58 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Hi, (this is a 4th retry, now trying devel as first try to packaging a
> week ago says held by moderator, but doesn't seem to have been posted to
> the list, and I don't know why...)
>
> Audacity has had the following as part of rpm spec in the %configure
> section:
>
> %configure \
> --disable-dynamic-loading \
> ...
> %ifnarch %{ix86} x86_64
> --disable-sse \
> %else
> %{nil}
> %endif
>
> Which fails on: non x86 arches:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29513664
>
> If I remove the conditional, I get successful build, but not optimized
> on x86 with SSE.
>
> What's wrong with this conditional ?
I think sticking a conditional in the middle of a line-wrapped command
like that may not work.
I'd try instead creating a variable for the args first, something like
this:
%ifnarch %{ix86} x86_64
%global sseargs --disable-sse
%else
%global sseargs
...
%configure %{sseargs} \
...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Disabling build options for SSE on non-capable arches ?
Hi, (this is a 4th retry, now trying devel as first try to packaging a
week ago says held by moderator, but doesn't seem to have been posted to
the list, and I don't know why...)
Audacity has had the following as part of rpm spec in the %configure
section:
%configure \
--disable-dynamic-loading \
...
%ifnarch %{ix86} x86_64
--disable-sse \
%else
%{nil}
%endif
Which fails on: non x86 arches:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29513664
If I remove the conditional, I get successful build, but not optimized
on x86 with SSE.
What's wrong with this conditional ?
Cheers, David
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What does 141 mean?
Michal Toman wrote: > Exit codes with top bit set to 1 (IOW higher than 127) usually mean > unhandled signal. In your case 141 & 127 = 13 (or 141 - 128 = 13 if you > want) indicating the app got SIGPIPE and died on it. That's a good point. And apparently no message is printed for the PIPE signal. For most signals there is a message: "Terminated", "Killed", "Segmentation fault", "Illegal instruction" and so on – but not for PIPE. So that suggests two bugs: Something that kinit communicates with crashes, and kinit is too naïve to catch the error and report it. Björn Persson pgpJZayHYWE18.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What does 141 mean?
Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > Can you provide output from > > export KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr > klist -A > kinit > fedpkg build > > ? The log is attached. I tried it twice as Tony Nelson suggested. The first attempt failed as usual, but the second attempt was successful. Björn Persson [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ export KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ klist -A Ticket cache: KCM:1000 Default principal: rombobe...@fedoraproject.org Valid starting Expires Service principal 2018-09-17 05:24:43 2018-09-18 05:24:35 krbtgt/fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org renew until 2018-09-24 05:24:35 2018-09-17 05:27:25 2018-09-18 05:24:35 HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org renew until 2018-09-24 05:24:35 [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ kinit rombobe...@fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389788.507256: Getting initial credentials for rombobe...@fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389788.507258: Sending request (207 bytes) to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG [14092] 1537389788.507259: Resolving hostname id.fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389788.507260: TLS certificate name matched "id.fedoraproject.org" [14092] 1537389789.71948: Sending HTTPS request to https 152.19.134.142:443 [14092] 1537389789.71949: Received answer (322 bytes) from https 152.19.134.142:443 [14092] 1537389789.71950: Terminating TCP connection to https 152.19.134.142:443 [14092] 1537389794.417687: Response was not from master KDC [14092] 1537389794.417688: Received error from KDC: -1765328359/Additional pre-authentication required [14092] 1537389794.417691: Processing preauth types: 16, 15, 14, 136, 19, 147, 2, 133 [14092] 1537389794.417692: Selected etype info: etype aes256-cts, salt "3'Ds5@-0:LIC'DI@", params "" [14092] 1537389794.417693: Received cookie: MIT Password for rombobe...@fedoraproject.org: [14092] 1537389816.394788: AS key obtained for encrypted timestamp: aes256-cts/3ECA [14092] 1537389816.394790: Encrypted timestamp (for 1537389811.329323): plain 301AA011180F3230313830393139323034315AA105020305066B, encrypted 9D4E22D8C8E839FD08FDEF5513D8B3ECA58449937FAA393FC840524E9FBB4C5AAD7AAF5747A5F9B36B608199BB2A62A85BAED55317B1BA18 [14092] 1537389816.394791: Preauth module encrypted_timestamp (2) (real) returned: 0/Success [14092] 1537389816.394792: Produced preauth for next request: 133, 2 [14092] 1537389816.394793: Sending request (302 bytes) to FEDORAPROJECT.ORG [14092] 1537389816.394794: Resolving hostname id.fedoraproject.org [14092] 1537389816.394795: TLS certificate name matched "id.fedoraproject.org" [14092] 1537389817.98943: Sending HTTPS request to https 140.211.169.196:443 [14092] 1537389817.98944: Received answer (795 bytes) from https 140.211.169.196:443 [14092] 1537389817.98945: Terminating TCP connection to https 140.211.169.196:443 [14092] 1537389822.391083: Response was not from master KDC [14092] 1537389822.391084: Processing preauth types: 19 [14092] 1537389822.391085: Selected etype info: etype aes256-cts, salt "3'Ds5@-0:LIC'DI@", params "" [14092] 1537389822.391086: Produced preauth for next request: (empty) [14092] 1537389822.391087: AS key determined by preauth: aes256-cts/3ECA [14092] 1537389822.391088: Decrypted AS reply; session key is: aes256-cts/A5E2 [14092] 1537389822.391089: FAST negotiation: available [14092] 1537389822.391090: Initializing KCM:1000 with default princ rombobe...@fedoraproject.org [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ echo $? 141 [beorn@tag gnat-srpm-macros]$ fedpkg build [14333] 1537389921.736427: ccselect module realm chose cache KCM:1000 with client principal rombobe...@fedoraproject.org for server principal HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org [14333] 1537389921.736428: Getting credentials rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org using ccache KCM:1000 [14333] 1537389921.736429: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from KCM:1000 with result: -1765328243/Matching credential not found [14333] 1537389921.736430: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> krbtgt/fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from KCM:1000 with result: 0/Success [14333] 1537389921.736436: ccselect module realm chose cache KCM:1000 with client principal rombobe...@fedoraproject.org for server principal HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org [14333] 1537389921.736437: Getting credentials rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org using ccache KCM:1000 [14333] 1537389921.736438: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> HTTP/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from KCM:1000 with result: -1765328243/Matching credential not found [14333] 1537389921.736439: Retrieving rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> krbtgt/fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org from KCM:1000 with result: 0/Success [14333] 1537389921.736443: Getting credentials rombobe...@fedoraproject.org -> host/koji.fedoraproject@fedoraproject.org using ccache KCM:1000 [14333] 15
Re: What does 141 mean?
Björn Persson wrote: > Tony Nelson wrote: > > No, but googling "kinit 141" leads to > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537866 > > which suggests trying the kinit command twice in a row. > > I would think I must have tried at least twice the first time I had > this problem, but at least that thread gives me some ideas for things > to experiment with after the tickets I currently have have expired. Running kinit twice did indeed work around the problem today. Weird. Björn Persson pgpC8ENUV_ufm.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Intent to orphan coan
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > I don't have the time to continue maintaining this package, > unfortunately. Please get in touch if you want to maintain the > package and I'll hand it over to you. I use coan fairly regularly, it seems to get a lot of things right that unifdef just chokes on. I'd be happy to take it. - ajax ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 29 Beta 1.4 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 282811 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282811 ID: 282821 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282821 ID: 282827 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282827 ID: 282830 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282830 ID: 282833 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282833 ID: 282854 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282854 ID: 282920 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282920 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 282795 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282795 ID: 282796 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282796 ID: 282820 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282820 ID: 282874 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282874 Passed openQA tests: 125/132 (x86_64), 21/24 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 158 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Proposal to modify release criteria for fwraid
On 09/14/2018 07:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status > of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID > device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be > a blocker for Beta, many of the people present at the meeting > disagreed, for a variety of reasons. > > * Hardware supporting fwraid is considerably less pervasive than it > was when the criterion was written > > * Testing this criterion can only be done with install media, which > limits our testing pool to the very dedicated members of Fedora QA. > Yes, anyone *can* download a nightly compose and try it, but in > practice this tends to be limited to the core testers. The majority of > testing that this feature will get will tend to happen as people try > out the Beta release. > > To that end, I'd like to propose that we make the following change to > the criteria going forward: > > "The blocking criterion for successful installation atop a firmware > RAID array is moved to the GA release criteria." +1, although I might suggest completely removing the critera, but if we can at least move it to final thats a step in the right direction. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 29 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
Dear all, The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Beta release will be held on Thursday, 2018-09-20 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting View the meeting on Fedocal at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2018/9/10/#m9338 We will NOT be holding another Release Readiness meeting afterward. For the results of the Release Readiness meeting, see https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-09-13/f29-beta-readiness-meeting.2018-09-13-19.02.html -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 29 Beta status: RC4 incoming
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 21:31 +1000, Amit Saha wrote: > Hi Adam, > > How do I propose > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814 as a blocker for the F29 release? It cannot be one, as that is not a release-blocking image - none of the vagrant boxes are. But in process terms, Zbigniew is correct. All blockers must be tracked through Bugzilla, so if the 'correct' issue tracker is somewhere else, you have to create a shadow bug in Bugzilla. Just note that the Bugzilla bug is for blocker/FE purposes, and point to the external issue. We do this quite commonly for issues where the fix will be in fedora-comps or fedora-kickstarts, for e.g. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/29 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Beta_1.4_Security_Lab All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-29/f-29-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 29 Beta status: RC4 incoming
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:39 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:31:41PM +1000, Amit Saha wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > > > How do I propose > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814 as a blocker for the F29 release? > > My suggestion would be to open a bug in bugzilla, write that it is a > tracking bug for https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814, and propose > the bug in bugzilla as a blocker using > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/propose_bug. > However, it's worth noting that Vagrant images are not release-blocking[1] on any Edition or architecture, so this will probably be rejected as a blocker. It might get a Freeze Exception if RC 4 turns out to have other blocking issues. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/ReleaseBlocking ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 29 Beta status: RC4 incoming
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:31:41PM +1000, Amit Saha wrote: > Hi Adam, > > How do I propose > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814 as a blocker for the F29 release? My suggestion would be to open a bug in bugzilla, write that it is a tracking bug for https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814, and propose the bug in bugzilla as a blocker using https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/propose_bug. Zbyszek > > Thanks, > Amit > > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 4:03 pm, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > Hi, folks! Just a quick mail to let everyone know where we are with F29 > > Beta. > > > > We managed to throw together fixes for all the currently-accepted > > blockers (thanks to the dnf team for help there), so an RC4 (aka Beta- > > 1.4) is currently composing. Compared to RC3 it contains a newer libdnf > > with a fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629340 . It > > also includes a newer gnome-shell with fixes for FE bug > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628263 and also > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/140 (which kinda > > snuck in there), new builds of dnfdragora and dnfdaemon that fix two > > significant bugs for users of those - > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624652 and > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629378 - and an > > updatedgnome-documents which actually works (that was > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628244 ). > > > > The second Go/No-Go meeting will be on Thursday, so it would be awesome > > if folks could pitch in and help get as much testing done as possible > > on Beta-1.4 when it arrives. There will be an announcement mail sent to > > test-announce@, so look out for that. It will have links to the > > validation pages, which have the download links at the top. General > > exploratory testing would also be great to find any significant issues > > not specifically covered in the validation tests. It should arrive in > > around 8-9 hours, assuming the compose takes about as long as the > > previous one. Some of the media will actually be available from Koji a > > little sooner than that, for anyone who wants to get a head start on > > testing; to find the live images, for instance, go to this URL: > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=closed&view=flat&method=createLiveMedia&order=-id > > > > and look for tasks with the string 'Fedora-29-20180919.0' in them (*not* > > 'Fedora-29-20180919.n.0', those would be nightlies, which don't have > > the extra fixed packages). > > > > Thanks a lot, everyone! > > -- > > Adam Williamson > > Fedora QA Community Monkey > > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > > http://www.happyassassin.net > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > -- > http://echorand.me > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 29 Beta status: RC4 incoming
Hi Adam, How do I propose https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814 as a blocker for the F29 release? Thanks, Amit On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 4:03 pm, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! Just a quick mail to let everyone know where we are with F29 > Beta. > > We managed to throw together fixes for all the currently-accepted > blockers (thanks to the dnf team for help there), so an RC4 (aka Beta- > 1.4) is currently composing. Compared to RC3 it contains a newer libdnf > with a fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629340 . It > also includes a newer gnome-shell with fixes for FE bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628263 and also > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/140 (which kinda > snuck in there), new builds of dnfdragora and dnfdaemon that fix two > significant bugs for users of those - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624652 and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629378 - and an > updatedgnome-documents which actually works (that was > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628244 ). > > The second Go/No-Go meeting will be on Thursday, so it would be awesome > if folks could pitch in and help get as much testing done as possible > on Beta-1.4 when it arrives. There will be an announcement mail sent to > test-announce@, so look out for that. It will have links to the > validation pages, which have the download links at the top. General > exploratory testing would also be great to find any significant issues > not specifically covered in the validation tests. It should arrive in > around 8-9 hours, assuming the compose takes about as long as the > previous one. Some of the media will actually be available from Koji a > little sooner than that, for anyone who wants to get a head start on > testing; to find the live images, for instance, go to this URL: > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=closed&view=flat&method=createLiveMedia&order=-id > > and look for tasks with the string 'Fedora-29-20180919.0' in them (*not* > 'Fedora-29-20180919.n.0', those would be nightlies, which don't have > the extra fixed packages). > > Thanks a lot, everyone! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- http://echorand.me ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: koji download-build fails with [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:12:44PM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 11:27:04 AM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I don't know if this is a problem with this specific version of koji, > > or our Koji builders, but: > > > > $ koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch > > Downloading: nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm > > 2018-09-19 10:14:21,056 [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission > > denied: 'nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm' > > > $ rpm -q koji > > koji-1.16.0-1.fc29.noarch > > > > This happens with other fc30 builds I have tried to download too. > > > > Rich. > > Do you have write access to your $PWD ? > > The error can be easily reproduced with: > > $ install -m0555 -d dir && cd dir && koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 > --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch > Downloading: nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm > PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: > 'nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm' Oh yes indeed, it's always the obvious things :-( Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Let's EOL mozjs24 starting from Fedora 29
Hello All! OK, no objections so far so I'm going to retire it soon. 2018-09-05 16:33 GMT+02:00 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All! > With recent erlang-js build there is no more packages dependent on > mozjs24 in F-29 and Rawhide. It wasn't build successfully since Fedora > 26 and no longer updated by upstream. Let's retire it. > > * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=17602 > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423963 > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373213 > > -- > With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: koji download-build fails with [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied
Works fine here with $ rpm -q koji koji-1.16.1-2.fc29.noarch ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: koji download-build fails with [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied
On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 11:27:04 AM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I don't know if this is a problem with this specific version of koji, > or our Koji builders, but: > > $ koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch > Downloading: nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm > 2018-09-19 10:14:21,056 [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission > denied: 'nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm' > $ rpm -q koji > koji-1.16.0-1.fc29.noarch > > This happens with other fc30 builds I have tried to download too. > > Rich. Do you have write access to your $PWD ? The error can be easily reproduced with: $ install -m0555 -d dir && cd dir && koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch Downloading: nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm' ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
koji download-build fails with [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied
I don't know if this is a problem with this specific version of koji, or our Koji builders, but: $ koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch Downloading: nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm 2018-09-19 10:14:21,056 [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm' $ rpm -q koji koji-1.16.0-1.fc29.noarch This happens with other fc30 builds I have tried to download too. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20180917.n.1 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180916.n.0): ID: 282135 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282135 ID: 282169 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282169 ID: 282177 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282177 ID: 282181 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282181 ID: 282185 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282185 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180916.n.0): ID: 282093 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282093 ID: 282109 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282109 ID: 282112 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282112 ID: 282115 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282115 Soft failed openQA tests: 7/132 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20180916.n.0): ID: 282064 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282064 ID: 282098 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282098 ID: 282101 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282101 ID: 282106 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282106 ID: 282197 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282197 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20180916.n.0): ID: 282077 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282077 ID: 282078 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282078 ID: 282154 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282154 ID: 282156 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282156 ID: 282176 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282176 ID: 282187 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282187 ID: 282198 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282198 Passed openQA tests: 115/132 (x86_64), 19/24 (i386) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20180916.n.0): ID: 282071 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282071 ID: 282080 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282080 ID: 282084 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282084 ID: 282149 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282149 ID: 282203 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282203 Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 158 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: System load changed from 1.11 to 1.53 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280974#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282051#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 1.26 to 1.84 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280975#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282052#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 1.54 to 1.15 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280977#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282054#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 1.97 to 1.51 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280978#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282055#downloads Installed system changes in test i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default: 1 packages(s) removed since previous compose: pigz Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281001#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedorapr
Fedora 29-20180918.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 13/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 281934 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281934 ID: 281936 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281936 ID: 281937 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281937 ID: 281940 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281940 ID: 281943 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281943 ID: 281948 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281948 ID: 281949 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281949 ID: 281950 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281950 ID: 281951 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281951 ID: 281953 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281953 ID: 281956 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281956 ID: 281977 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281977 ID: 281984 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281984 ID: 281986 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281986 ID: 281998 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281998 ID: 282047 Test: i386 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282047 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 281918 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281918 ID: 281919 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281919 ID: 281947 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281947 ID: 281997 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281997 Passed openQA tests: 116/132 (x86_64), 20/24 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 2 of 158 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
