https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632767
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-Bidi-2.15-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
109 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
47 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f21474267b
condor-8.6.11-1.el6
13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630976
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630976
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Devel-Size-0.82-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630976
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.40-19.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628413
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
ctstream-29-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 285923 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/285923
ID: 285959 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632347
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On 09/26/2018 06:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 02:24:16PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I'm prefer to add a new milestone of 'day before release' and put it
>> there. I think after the 'go' some folks who would be helpful in making
>> the announcement have more time to
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/27/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180926gitc73cd26.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629605
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628550
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628413
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
ctstream-29-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Path-2.16-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
On 09/21/2018 12:00 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 20/09/2018 21:30, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:17, Jonathan Underwood
>
>>> In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that the
>>> user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges
Planned Outage - Fedora Production Openshift - 2018-09-27 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-09-27 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 08:17 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24.9.2018 v 19:32 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 12:21 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Just FTR, some while ago, I proposed to drop comps entirely:
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 11:46 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> I ssh to the big system and do all my Vagrant work there.
Heh, sorry for so many posts, but I wanted to add to this that it is
also possible to point your Vagrantfile at a remote libvirt server.
This lets you run Vagrant on your laptop, but
On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 17:25 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> The conversation
> went like this:
>
> Hey, I'm trying to do this and all the documented Fedora
> things are really hard or poorly documented. Is this how Fedora
> should work?
> Oh, use this thing that *Fedora doesn't produce* in a
>
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 11:04 +, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> - There is no GUI for it that I can find. I just like GUIs,
> especially for this sort of work that I might do for a stretch at a
> time and then not have to do for months afterwards and have to
> relearn next time.
I don't know of a GUI
On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 11:06 +, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Is there a way to use a vagrant image that works with virt-manager?
I'll say "sort of" here. If you use vagrant-libvirt, you would use the
vagrant CLI to launch/provision the VM, but once it's running you can
see it in virt-manager and
Dne 26.9.2018 v 15:51 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:17:18AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> rubygem-rails (which already exists and has its purpose no matter if
>> there are comps or not) via Suggests for example. The only issue AFAIK
>> is there is no real support for
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 14:44, Brian (bex) Exelbierd
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:25 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On 09/25/2018 01:35 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora
>> > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 02:24:16PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm prefer to add a new milestone of 'day before release' and put it
> there. I think after the 'go' some folks who would be helpful in making
> the announcement have more time to devote to it. Also, it would seem sad
> to me to be
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 06:33:28PM -0300, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> Basically, the issue on the announcement is that is tight to the Talking
> Points, and almost any team is helping us with that. The Marketing task is
Almost *no* team, right? I've seen those posts and crickets in return.
--
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 02:18:50PM -, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> - Is running a lightweight local VM for web development a usecase we want to
> support? Is it dare I ask important?
Yeah. I think we really need to straighten out the Fedora Cloud / Fedora
Server image thing. As I understand it,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:17:18AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> rubygem-rails (which already exists and has its purpose no matter if
> there are comps or not) via Suggests for example. The only issue AFAIK
> is there is no real support for Suggests in DNF :/
What would that look like? An
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:25 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 09/25/2018 01:35 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora
> > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a
> > little late and then only due to a drop-everything
Hi Máirín,
For several years now I've been using VMs with backing files to do
what you're trying to achieve. It's basically what Dusty Mabe
describes in the last paragraph of this article:
https://dustymabe.com/2015/01/11/qemu-img-backing-files-a-poor-mans-snapshotrollback/
Using virt-manager, I
Dne 26.9.2018 v 13:28 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> If you these two steps from documentation:
>
> https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tools/vagrant/vagrant-atlas.html
>
> the vagrant box appears in virt-manager as another machine. The name of
> the machine will be derived from the directory name
I just tried it. I was able to connect to remote hypervisor, it showed my VM -
pretty impressive. It was a little flaky in that when I right clicked to view
properties of the VM it hung (with a, wait / force quit dialog popping up) but
I was eventually able to load the dialog.
It seems to
So the environment I'm trying to set up involves a backend that consists of
three separate containers, and the web front end is separate from that. Because
setting up the environment is a difficult task, I'd like it in a VM so I can
clone it once it's configured so that I can reproduce it
Is there a way to use a vagrant image that works with virt-manager?
~m
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi Randy,
I did consider Vagrant but there are a few issues with it:
- There is no GUI for it that I can find. I just like GUIs, especially for this
sort of work that I might do for a stretch at a time and then not have to do
for months afterwards and have to relearn next time.
- I have had -
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:49 PM wrote:
>
>
> A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
>
> Version: 28.20180923.0
> Commit(x86_64):
> 8b82902a0ca203645e9e288b8a0bbf9fe525749ec67cd674e6715daa64e5b7dd
> Commit(aarch64):
>
>> Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>>
>> This is exactly what I feared when the modules were first proposed:
>> essential packages moving to modules only.
>>
>> I think this is absolutely a step in the wrong direction. Things like "ant"
>> are essential parts of a distribution. They cannot sit in some
38 matches
Mail list logo
