On 24.10.2018 01:47, Mukundan Ragavan wrote> I think I can just drop
python2 version of spyder. Thank you for letting
me know.
That would be awesome, it would also unblock:
python-spyder-kernels
python-cloudpickle
python-rope
python-pickleshare (after sagemath)
python-QtAwesome
--
Miro
On 10/23/18 3:59 PM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote:
I'm doing a WIFI mode.
Installation works fine using CUPS but It's not working through
gnome-control-center.
I find that "system-config-printer" is much more useful and functional
than trying to do it through the control center. I have had very
On 10/23/18 8:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just orphaned python2-astroid and python2-pylint.
>
> I don't need them and I don't want to maintain legacy python2 packages.
>
> Those are needed for python2-spyder, python2-asttokens,
> python2-flake8-import-order. Please consider
Hi Zdenek,
I'm doing a WIFI mode.
Installation works fine using CUPS but It's not working through
gnome-control-center.
Thanks,
Gilles
On 12/10/18 8:42 pm, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
What type of printer do you want to add (ethernet/usb/wifi)? I tried
to add ethernet and usb types in my
Hello,
I would like to draw some attention to this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622259. Description: startx unsets
DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS, which result in launching another D-Bus session which
breaks communicating with user systemd services (and any D-Bus services started
On mardi 23 octobre 2018 23:47:05 CEST you wrote:
> On mardi 23 octobre 2018 22:43:16 CEST Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Anyway, since no one answers when I list the possible fixes and ask to
> > choose between them, I fixed the Fedora spec files myself.
> >
> > Feel free to reintroduce %gosetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641955
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.78-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.20-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On mardi 23 octobre 2018 22:43:16 CEST Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Anyway, since no one answers when I list the possible fixes and ask to
> choose between them, I fixed the Fedora spec files myself.
>
> Feel free to reintroduce %gosetup calls if you really want them, once
> the %gosetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641958
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20181020-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641955
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.78-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.20-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613218
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.5 |perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.5
On 10/23/18 10:30 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:28 PM Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
>>
>>> "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes:
>>
>> OP> - Can we make epel7-py36 branches, and somehow have
>> OP> %python3_version, et. al. be 3.6 for those builds?
>>
>> I can't think of any
> "NG" == Neal Gompa writes:
NG> Wait, we can do that? I thought we couldn't use the exception
NG> process for this?
Well, the idea is that you don't need a separate review just to import a
different version of the same package. So foo and foo1.2 (the 1.2
version) or python-abc and
> "NG" == Neal Gompa writes:
NG> Wait, we can do that? I thought we couldn't use the exception
NG> process for this?
Well, the idea is that you don't need a separate review just to import a
different version of the same package. So foo and foo1.2 (the 1.2
version) or python-abc and
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49988
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
Anyway, since no one answers when I list the possible fixes and ask to
choose between them, I fixed the Fedora spec files myself.
Feel free to reintroduce %gosetup calls if you really want them, once
the %gosetup implementation has been fixed.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/133 (x86_64), 8/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 299838 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/299838
ID: 299845 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL:
> "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
AS> The package review process suggests the use of "Trivial" on the
AS> Whiteboard for simpler tickets to aid new-comers. So, they seem to
AS> serve the same purpose as EasyFix. Would it be OK to also list these
AS> tickets on the EasyFix page?
I don't see why
OLD: Fedora-29-20181021.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181022.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:28 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes:
>
> OP> - Can we make epel7-py36 branches, and somehow have
> OP> %python3_version, et. al. be 3.6 for those builds?
>
> I can't think of any way to do that without extra magic. And if you
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:28 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes:
>
> OP> - Can we make epel7-py36 branches, and somehow have
> OP> %python3_version, et. al. be 3.6 for those builds?
>
> I can't think of any way to do that without extra magic. And if you
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641955
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-10-24 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
> "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes:
OP> - Can we make epel7-py36 branches, and somehow have
OP> %python3_version, et. al. be 3.6 for those builds?
I can't think of any way to do that without extra magic. And if you
require something in the spec, you might as well just hardcode it.
OP> - Can
> "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes:
OP> - Can we make epel7-py36 branches, and somehow have
OP> %python3_version, et. al. be 3.6 for those builds?
I can't think of any way to do that without extra magic. And if you
require something in the spec, you might as well just hardcode it.
OP> - Can
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:11 AM Kiara Navarro
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am orphaning a list of packages that I am not able to longer maintain. Most
> of them are related to electronic applications.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs-verilog-mode
Hi Kiara,
I looked at this briefly a
Hi all,
I am orphaning pcb (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pcb) since I am not
able to longer maintain. I have spoken with Alain (fas: avigne) and he is
willing to take this package. Thanks a lot Alain.
Best regards.
--
*K.N*
*GPG-KEY*: A81DB1D8
Jan,
I do not recall this all the same way, but no matter, that was months
ago, a long development tunnel away.
The thing which is failing today is a brittle and dangerous rpm macro
aliasing code that was added against my best technical advice. Sound
advice as we see now. And I had honestly
Le 2018-10-23 12:59, Jan Chaloupka a écrit :
Jan
So please, make the %forgeautosetup
compatible with the %gosetup again.
Once the %gosetup macro is functional again, we can discuss its
removal in favor of forgesetup as part of global announcement so all
go packagers have time to migrate to
thanks Ben!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen John Smoogen"
> To: "Fedora Python SIG" ,
> epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Matthew Miller"
> , bexel...@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 9:22:01 PM
> Subject: Moving EPEL7 to python3.6
>
> Hi,
>
> EPEL is a set of packages which
Hi,
I've just orphaned python2-astroid and python2-pylint.
I don't need them and I don't want to maintain legacy python2 packages.
Those are needed for python2-spyder, python2-asttokens,
python2-flake8-import-order. Please consider removing those, so we can
retire python2-astroid and
Hello,
The EasyFix page[1] is a list of various issues/bugs that are considered
simple enough for new contributors to work with. Currently, from
bugzilla, tickets that use the "EasyFix" key word are listed here.
The package review process suggests the use of "Trivial" on the
Whiteboard for
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:28:45PM -, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Please do. Neal and I are starting up an effort. I reached out to
> Abhilash, the upstream lead, last night on the devel list and he was very
> responsive to this idea. He's already created a gitlab subproject for our
> efforts
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Robert-André Mauchin" , jca...@redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 5:32:55 PM
> Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide
>
> Le 2018-10-22 16:52, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
>
> >>
Nicolas,
On 10/22/2018 10:00 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 00:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
Yeah all "gosetup -q" (which is gofed default) are broken because of
your commit:
Well I know no such a thing, there was never any gosetup macro in the
macro set,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641957
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hello everyone.
In reference to the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639646, is anyone else ran
into this problem with OpenMPI recently?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641958
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20181020-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a78a47811c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641958
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20181020-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d0a7948545
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641958
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641955
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.78-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-23dd791bb7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641955
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.78-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-989ef86dde
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641958
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641955
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636864
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
*** Bug 1639582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639582
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 06:33:56PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 10/21/18 6:12 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi writes:
> >
> > > Huh. The only person I know of from Fedora at least that was
> > > working on it was abompard. While he's working on other things now,
> > > as far
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.20-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7ccbb5bf6e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.20-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-27102bf17a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.20-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3893320dd0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640565
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641959
Bug ID: 1641959
Summary: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.04
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641958
Bug ID: 1641958
Summary: Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20181020
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641957
Bug ID: 1641957
Summary: Upgrade perl-Math-BigInt to 1.999815
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641955
Bug ID: 1641955
Summary: Upgrade perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases to 3.78
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 23:31:28 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On dimanche 21 octobre 2018 00:10:03 CEST Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > Please feel free to ping me when you are looking for a reviewer in the
> > future :)
>
> If I can take your offer, I have yet another simple Golang package that
62 matches
Mail list logo
