Fedora Rawhide-20181105.n.1 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 33/142 (x86_64), 7/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181030.n.0):

ID: 305344  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305344
ID: 305423  Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305423
ID: 305431  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305431
ID: 305440  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305440
ID: 305441  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305441
ID: 305443  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305443
ID: 305444  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305444
ID: 305445  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305445
ID: 305446  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305446
ID: 305447  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305447
ID: 305453  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305453
ID: 305474  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305474
ID: 305475  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305475
ID: 305504  Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305504
ID: 305505  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305505

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20181030.n.0):

ID: 305343  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305343
ID: 305348  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305348
ID: 305369  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305369
ID: 305373  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305373
ID: 305374  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305374
ID: 305375  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305375
ID: 305386  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305386
ID: 305387  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305387
ID: 305389  Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305389
ID: 305390  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305390
ID: 305391  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305391
ID: 305392  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305392
ID: 305393  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305393
ID: 305395  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305395
ID: 305402  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305402
ID: 305405  Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305405
ID: 305406  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305406
ID: 305410  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305410
ID: 305411  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305411
ID: 305412  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305412
ID: 305448  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305448
ID: 305461  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305461
ID: 305468  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305468
ID: 305469  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305469
ID: 305479  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305479
ID: 305480  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/305480

Soft failed 

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181105.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

[rawhide]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181105.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/30

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20181105.n.1_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20181105.n.1_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20181105.n.1_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20181105.n.1_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20181105.n.1_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20181105.n.1_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20181105.n.1_Security_Lab

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unretire recordmydesktop

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 17:07 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/5/18 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland can't be
> > > held against it.  Nothing works to record the desktop on Wayland since
> > > that isn't supported yet.
> > 
> > GNOME's inbuilt screen recorder does it fine.
> 
> Does that use a Gnome shell-specific API or does Wayland have support 
> for that now?

I've no idea. I just know it works.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unretire recordmydesktop

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/5/18 12:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:

I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland can't be
held against it.  Nothing works to record the desktop on Wayland since
that isn't supported yet.


GNOME's inbuilt screen recorder does it fine.


Does that use a Gnome shell-specific API or does Wayland have support 
for that now?

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mass-removal of LANG=anything-not-C.UTF-8 in packages

[Kevin Kofler]

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
> (and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files.

But there are probably many more packages where the setting is hidden in 
upstream build scripts.

> This will be backwards and forwards compatible, in the sense that packages
> that use C.UTF-8 should build OK on older and newer Fedoras.

Older Fedoras only since F22 updates / F24 GA, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902094

And what about EL?

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Kevin Kofler]

Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I have to say, making core, non-leaf packages available as modules
> only sounds like a *terrible* idea to me.
> I don't want to have to deal with this uncooked mess if I just want to
> do standard packaging.

+1. And, for that matter, that goes even for standard USING, as you implied 
in the previous paragraph:

> Because I don't even have the "-modular" repositories enabled on my
> f29 system, and I'll keep it that way.

As you explained pretty well, it does not make sense to FORCE modules onto 
users. Even less so if those packages are dependencies of other packages 
outside of the module walled garden. Ursa Major is a crude hack to make that 
broken setup work.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

mass-removal of LANG=anything-not-C.UTF-8 in packages

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Dear maintainers,

I'm working again on implementing
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot.
The first step is to replace LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 with LC_ALL=C.UTF-8
(and similarly for LANG=, LC_CTYPE=, etc.) in all spec files. This
will be backwards and forwards compatible, in the sense that packages
that use C.UTF-8 should build OK on older and newer Fedoras.

Once that's done, I'll file the PRs to actually replace glibc-langpacks-all
with glibc-minimal-langpacks in mock and koji.

I'll do a mass update to use C.UTF-8 for the packages in the list that
follows, next week. I'll do test builds locally, and I'll only push to
dist-git if the local builds succeed. Let me know if you want your
package to be excluded.

Zbyszek

Maintainers by package:
OpenTK   orphan
apache-poi   gil lef mbooth
ardour5  nphilipp tartina
bash-completion  mrunge ooprala sheltren svashisht
borgbackup   bpereto fschwarz
clover2  mtasaka
elixir   codeblock fnux martinlanghoff puiterwijk s4504kr
fail2ban athimm atkac jgu orion
fantasdicmtasaka
felix-osgi-core  jcapik mizdebsk
fmf  psss
gfan jjames pcpa tremble
ghc  petersen
git  amahdal besser82 chrisw pcahyna pstodulk skisela tmz
hibernate3   gil lef
hive coolsvap moceap orphan pmackinn
hunspell-az  caolanm
hunspell-fa  caolanm
hunspell-ga  caolanm
hunspell-gv  caolanm
hunspell-ky  caolanm
ibus-typing-booster  anishpatil mfabian
ipython  churchyard cstratak dcantrel ignatenkobrain lbalhar mrunge 
salimma tomspur
jblaszbyszek
kgb-bot  averi
langtablemfabian
lazygal  rathann
libmp4v2 amigadave moezroy rathann sergiomb thias
libraqm  moceap
migemo   mtasaka
# migemo is special, I'll just add BR:glibc-langpack-ja
mongodb  hhorak jpacner maxamillion mskalick panovotn strobert 
tdawson
openqa   adamwill
paraview deji orion sagitter
passengerjkaluza kanarip tdawson
php-horde-Horde-Imap-Client remi
php-horde-Horde-JavascriptMinify remi
php-horde-Horde-Util remi
php-kdyby-events orphan
php-kdyby-strict-objects orphan
php-latteorphan
php-nette-application orphan
php-nette-bootstrap  orphan
php-nette-cachingorphan
php-nette-component-model orphan
php-nette-database   orphan
php-nette-deprecated orphan
php-nette-di orphan
php-nette-finder orphan
php-nette-forms  orphan
php-nette-http   orphan
php-nette-mail   orphan
php-nette-neon   orphan
php-nette-php-generator orphan
php-nette-reflection orphan
php-nette-robot-loader orphan
php-nette-safe-stream orphan
php-nette-security   orphan
php-nette-tester orphan
php-nette-tokenizer  orphan
php-nette-utils  orphan
php-phpspec  remi siwinski
php-tracyorphan
pyp2rpm  bkabrda cstratak ishcherb kevin mcyprian rkuska
python-CommonMarkjujens
python-acoustid  terjeros
python-blessed   abompard aviso
python-click cstratak fab mstuchli rkuska
python-deprecation   jpena
python-djangobkabrda churchyard jdornak mrunge salimma sgallagh
python-djangoql  vkrizan
python-evic  besser82
python-execnet   ktdreyer thm
python-ipython_genutils orion
python-mapniktomh
python-mtg   tc01
python-musicbrainzngs amluto
python-pankoclient   pkilambi
python-path  laxathom
python-pexpect   amcnabb fabiand ignatenkobrain radez tomspur
python-pypandoc  orion zbyszek
python-pytest-pep8   cstratak orion
python-pythonz-bdmcyprian orphan
python-seesawtc01
python-setproctitle  hguemar stevetraylen
python-setuptools_git apevec
python-sphinx-autodoc-typehints tdecacqu
python-sphinx-intl   jujens
python-spur  orion
python-tablestnorth zbyszek
python-vcstools  cottsay rmattes
python-webassets dcallagh kumarpraveen pjp sundaram
python-whitenoisepiotrp
python2-django1.11   pviktori
python2-ipython  lbalhar
rubygem-gettext  mtasaka sseago
rubygem-http_parser.rb ilgrad spredzy
rubygem-nokogiri kanarip mtasaka tdawson tremble
rubygem-org-ruby vondruch
rubygem-ruby-openid  orphan
udiskie  jstanek
varnish  ingvar luhliarik
xorg-x11-drv-intel   ajax glisse

Packages by maintainer:
abompard   python-blessed
adamwill   openqa
ajax   xorg-x11-drv-intel
amahdalgit
amcnabbpython-pexpect
amigadave  libmp4v2
amluto python-musicbrainzngs
anishpatil ibus-typing-booster
apevec python-setuptools_git
athimm fail2ban
atkac  fail2ban
averi  kgb-bot
aviso  python-blessed
besser82   git python-evic
bkabrdapyp2rpm python-django
bperetoborgbackup
caolanmhunspell-az hunspell-fa hunspell-ga hunspell-gv hunspell-ky
chrisw git

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

[nils]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Modularity Office Hours on 2018-11-06 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
   At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to 
answer them)!

Join us on [IRC](irc://chat.freenode.net/#fedora-modularity): 
#fedora-modularity on [FreeNode](https://freenode.net)


Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5910/

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unretire recordmydesktop

[Adam Williamson]

On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/4/18 11:47 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Quoting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1538352#c1
> > 
> > > Yes, recordmydesktop was intentionally retired due to the project being
> > > abandoned (no new release in 10 years), it contained many crash bugs,
> > > and was not at all working on Wayland.
> 
> I don't know about the other bugs, but not working on Wayland can't be 
> held against it.  Nothing works to record the desktop on Wayland since 
> that isn't supported yet.

GNOME's inbuilt screen recorder does it fine.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Cassandra package looking for human power

[Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira]

I can help you with it. Do I need to request approval to get
maintainer role to this package? I already created packages before.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:58 PM Jakub Janco  wrote:
>
> Hello Fedora developers and maintainers,
>
> Apache Cassandra is a free and open-source distributed NoSQL database written 
> in Java, we have a package since Fedora 27, I am a maintainer for about a 
> year with a help of Augusto Caringi, but currently we dont have enought 
> capacity to keep it up-to-date.
>
> State in Fedora:
> - older Cassandra version 3.11.1 with backported fix for CVE-2018-8016 from 
> 3.11.2
> - generally working, no issues in Bugzilla
> - 2 main packages are cassandra(client tools) and cassandra-server(database 
> server)
> - removed Thrift interface
>
> We also have docker container[1], software collection[2] and tests[3].
>
> Current goal is to update Cassandra to 3.11.3 version. This is not that easy 
> because of Thrift API, there are 2 ways:
> 1. rebase patch which removes Thrift interface, it is not trivial, the patch 
> is quite big and touch almost everything
> 2. package missing dependencies for Thrift interface
>
> Nice to have:
> - dnf module
> - SELinux policy
>
> If you have any questions or you are interested, do not hessitate to contact 
> me.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> More about how to use Cassandra in Fedora:
> http://cassandra.apache.org/
> https://fedoramagazine.org/get-started-apache-cassandra-fedora/
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Apache_Cassandra
>
> [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/centos/cassandra-3-centos7/
> [2] https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/sclo-cassandra3/
> [3] https://github.com/devexp-db/db-ci-tests/tree/master/packages/cassandra
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Jakub Janco
> RH - Brno - TPB-C
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State building since Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:12:27 UTC !???

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 11/1/18 8:03 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> this koji build [1] is in state bunding since , 17 Sep 2018 16:12:27
> UTC !???
> 
> [1]
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1145294

Cleaned up. Thanks for the heads up.

kevin





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:13 PM Justin Forbes  wrote:
>
> This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
> (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
> (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003).

Until now, I've been mostly keeping quiet about the whole modularity
thing - in part, because I disagree with the direction the concrete
implementation has been taken in;
I didn't see it as useful to me, and it has not impacted me as a
packager who only builds standard packages. TL;DR: I want to keep it
that way (at least for now).

> We understand the need to
> enable this, but there is an impact to workflow for local builds. It
> is possible that some of this could be alleviated with a fairly simple
> change to mock.

What exactly does "could be alleviated" mean here - would that "simple
change" to mock make it just 90% more cumbersome, instead of 100%?
What would the new workflow look like?

> The ability to install all builddeps with dnf builddep will be a bit
> more difficult.

A bit more difficult ... how, exactly?
Do I have to solve the Riemann Hypothesis before calling that command
- or what would be the added difficulty here?

> Of course local builds where the build deps are
> already installed will not be impacted.

Do you mean host-system-local, or mock-local builds?
Because I don't even have the "-modular" repositories enabled on my
f29 system, and I'll keep it that way.

> With this in mind, we wanted
> to open this up to some discussion on list before we make a decision.

I have to say, making core, non-leaf packages available as modules
only sounds like a *terrible* idea to me.
I don't want to have to deal with this uncooked mess if I just want to
do standard packaging.

Heck, as things stand right now, I'd even volunteer to maintain
"standard branches" of my dependencies which are "in danger" of being
converted to module-only, just to not have to deal with modules.

I understand that modularity can have benefits for some work-flows and
some specific packages, but this effort sure looks like jumping on the
band-wagon just because it's the new, shiny thing, without considering
the consequences.

Please don't take this criticism the wrong way - I acknowledge that
releng and FESCo are doing hard work here.
I'm just not convinced that this work is actually benefiting fedora as
a developer platform / platform to develop for.

Fabio

> Thanks,
> Justin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646572] Description for the 'Fedora' product in Bugzilla still lists Fedora 29 as unreleased

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646572

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj |kh...@redhat.com,
   |ect.org |qg...@redhat.com
  Component|bugzilla|Creating/Changing Bugs
Version|29  |4.4
Product|Fedora  |Bugzilla
Summary|Bugzilla still lists Fedora |Description for the
   |29 as unreleased|'Fedora' product in
   ||Bugzilla still lists Fedora
   ||29 as unreleased



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646572] New: Bugzilla still lists Fedora 29 as unreleased

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646572

Bug ID: 1646572
   Summary: Bugzilla still lists Fedora 29 as unreleased
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 29
 Component: bugzilla
  Assignee: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
  Reporter: vonbr...@inf.utfsm.cl
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: bazanlui...@gmail.com, emman...@seyman.fr,
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Description of problem:
The bugzilla front page lists Fedora 29 as "branched pre-released version"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=Fedora
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-11-05 Fedora QA Meeting

[Silvia Sánchez]

Hello all,

While I have an interesting bug in Dnfdragora, I don't think it's super
urgent, so if you want, we can skip this week and have a meeting the other
week?
I have one or two other little issues I'd like to discuss, but again
nothing to die for.

Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS:  Lailah




On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 06:52, Adam Williamson 
wrote:

> Hi folks! (Yep, I'm back from vacation). I'm proposing we cancel the QA
> meeting tomorrow. Thanks to everyone for the great job in getting
> Fedora 29 released last week! As that's done, and there's no other
> pressing business I'm aware of, I figured we all deserve a break :)
>
> There are currently several issues with Rawhide - composes are broken,
> and the last few composes that completed had a major bug (anaconda
> wouldn't start). There's work in progress on all of those issues, so
> hopefully we'll get some working composes next week, and the first
> Fedora 30 validation event.
>
> If anyone's concerned about how the Big News affects us - well, so far
> the answer is "it's kinda too soon to know anything for sure, but for
> the immediate future, not at all". Who knows whether anything will
> change in the long term, but so far we've had no indication anything is
> changing wrt Fedora or Fedora QA in the short to medium term. We can
> certainly talk about it more at next week's meeting, but to be honest,
> that's all the information we have for now.
>
> Thanks again, everyone!
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 11:14, Justin Forbes  wrote:
>
> This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
> (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
> (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003).  We understand the need to
> enable this, but there is an impact to workflow for local builds. It
> is possible that some of this could be alleviated with a fairly simple
> change to mock.
> The ability to install all builddeps with dnf builddep will be a bit
> more difficult.   Of course local builds where the build deps are
> already installed will not be impacted.  With this in mind, we wanted
> to open this up to some discussion on list before we make a decision.
>

There were a couple of things that weren't clear in the proposal or the meeting:

1. Can you use rpmbuild to rebuild packages with this change? Or do
you have to use mock or koji to do so?
2. How do sites which rebuild Fedora work with this?
3. Where do the bits which are getting added get built from and what
is their build history?
4. For buildsystems outside of koji how do they work?

I expect all the answers are benign, but it might make things clearer
to the effects.

> Thanks,
> Justin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL6 conntrack-tools-0.9.13-3.el6.x86_64 metadata possibly incorrect

[John Griffin]

Hello Stephen,

We mirror the EPEL5 and EPEL7 repositories, but I really don’t know if there 
are other issues with those or EPEL6. The only reason I stumbled upon this one 
was due to the fact that the munin update in Sept 2018 now requires 
conntrack-tools. There may be others, and this also maybe be the only one.

I will request from RH the technical details they use when applying date 
filters in Satellite, maybe with that I can scan the other RPM’s in our mirrors 
for other hits.

Best Regards,
[cid:image005.jpg@01D24A1F.439697B0]
John Griffin | Infrastructure Architect
815 NW 9th Street, Ste 221  |  Corvallis, OR 97330
P 541-768-4707
jgrif...@samhealth.org



From: Stephen John Smoogen 
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 2:04 PM
To: epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL6 conntrack-tools-0.9.13-3.el6.x86_64 metadata 
possibly incorrect





WARNING: This email originated from outside of SHS.  DO NOT CLICK ANY LINKS OR 
OPEN ATTACHMENTS unless you recognize the sender and know the contents are safe.




On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 16:46, John Griffin 
mailto:jgrif...@samhealth.org>> wrote:

Hello Stephen,



Yes, we have the conntrack-tools in our Red Hat Satellite repository, and we 
can apply it outside of our Satellite process; by manually copying the rpm to 
each server and installing outside of our process.



The issue is the interworking of the metatdata in the conntrack-tools RPM and 
Red Hat Satellite date filters for Content Views. Not sure how familiar you are 
with Red Hat Satellite, but the data filters are the primary method used to 
create a cyclical patching schedule and thus patch sets based on date.



In Red Hat Satellite, if I specify any date inclusion (Like from January 1, 
1970 - October 12, 2018) and point it at the EPEL6 repository the filter does 
not pick up the conntrack-tools. I opened support case with Red Hat, and with 
their assistance we have a work around, where we don't specify any Satellite 
date filters for the EPEL repositories (i.e. Get Everything no matter when 
released) and yes still keep the Satellite date filters on the official Red Hat 
repositories used to create the combined  Satellite content view.



However this work-around does not allow us to recreate a patch content view of 
EPEL product or patches of any date other than 'today'. Without a date filter 
we get all EPEL content and patches. This does not work with our Patching 
paradigm, as we base patch sets on Date. We then use life-cycle management to 
promote a patch set to Production after it has been vetted on Dev then Test.



Red Hat does not support EPEL, and indicated this is not a Satellite issue but 
a RPM metadata issue with EPEL release process.


I will check but I am not sure it is a problem we can solve quickly as I don't 
know how Satellite categorizes dates currently. Do you also mirror anything 
from other non Red Hat Network repositories and do they have the problem also? 
[I am mostly looking to see if we are not setting something up we should or not]



Let me know if you need further clarification.



Best Regards,
[cid:image005.jpg@01D24A1F.439697B0]
John Griffin | Infrastructure Architect
815 NW 9th Street, Ste 221  |  Corvallis, OR 97330
P 541-768-4707
jgrif...@samhealth.org








-Original Message-
From: Stephen John Smoogen mailto:smo...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 2:14 PM
To: 
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL6 conntrack-tools-0.9.13-3.el6.x86_64 metadata 
possibly incorrect



WARNING: This email originated from outside of SHS.  DO NOT CLICK ANY LINKS OR 
OPEN ATTACHMENTS unless you recognize the sender and know the contents are safe.

On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 16:01, John Griffin 
mailto:jgrif...@samhealth.org>> wrote:

>

> We now use Red Hat Satellite 6.3 and have it synchronizing to

> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6Server/

>

> Recent updates to munin-node and munin-common require conntrack-tools x86_64 
> 0.9.13-3.el6.

>

> The conntrack-tools  x86_64 0.9.13-3.el6 was release in May 2014, based on 
> rpm -qip, and is in our synchronized EPEL content view on our Satellite.

>

> We use content view date filters to only select errata (patches) up to a 
> specific date (based on our patch cycle) and publish new content views based 
> on said dates. We stumbled upon the issue that the conntrack-tools x86_64 
> 0.9.13-3.el6 package not being included in the content view, even though it 
> existed in the repository, and our date based content filter should have 
> encompassed the release date of the package. This caused yum update to fail 
> for the munin updates, as the prerequisite could not be satisfied.



I need more information like what you are exactly seeing. The conntrack-tools 
is in the repository and can be downloaded and installed via yum and reposync.



> Curious if 

Cassandra package looking for human power

[Jakub Janco]

Hello Fedora developers and maintainers,

Apache Cassandra is a free and open-source distributed NoSQL database written 
in Java, we have a package since Fedora 27, I am a maintainer for about a year 
with a help of Augusto Caringi, but currently we dont have enought capacity to 
keep it up-to-date.

State in Fedora:
- older Cassandra version 3.11.1 with backported fix for CVE-2018-8016 from 
3.11.2
- generally working, no issues in Bugzilla
- 2 main packages are cassandra(client tools) and cassandra-server(database 
server)
- removed Thrift interface

We also have docker container[1], software collection[2] and tests[3].

Current goal is to update Cassandra to 3.11.3 version. This is not that easy 
because of Thrift API, there are 2 ways:
1. rebase patch which removes Thrift interface, it is not trivial, the patch is 
quite big and touch almost everything
2. package missing dependencies for Thrift interface

Nice to have:
- dnf module
- SELinux policy

If you have any questions or you are interested, do not hessitate to contact me.

Thanks.


More about how to use Cassandra in Fedora:
http://cassandra.apache.org/
https://fedoramagazine.org/get-started-apache-cassandra-fedora/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Apache_Cassandra

[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/centos/cassandra-3-centos7/
[2] https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/sclo-cassandra3/
[3] https://github.com/devexp-db/db-ci-tests/tree/master/packages/cassandra

--
Best Regards,
Jakub Janco
RH - Brno - TPB-C
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-11-05)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Meeting started by zbyszek at 15:02:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-05/fesco.2018-11-05-15.02.log.html
.


Meeting summary
---
* init process  (zbyszek, 15:02:08)

* follow-ups  (zbyszek, 15:03:40)

* 2003 Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement  (zbyszek, 15:03:53)
  * LINK: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003   (zbyszek, 15:03:59)
  * ACTION: jforbes to send out an e-mail to devel mailing list
(zbyszek, 15:09:46)
  * AGREED: Let's wait another week for discussion on fedora-devel (+5,
0, 0)  (zbyszek, 15:12:12)

* 2004 Enabling pm_request in fedoraproject koji  (zbyszek, 15:12:47)
  * LINK: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2004   (zbyszek, 15:12:47)
  * AGREED: current proposal is rejected. FESCo asks for a new proposal
which addresses issues 1-3 (+6, 0, 0)  (zbyszek, 15:52:36)

Issues:
1) security issues
2) if the implementation is dependent on RPM changes, those need to be
   made available to EPEL, or we need a way to disable the feature for
   EPEL builds
3) local build workflow

* Next week's chair  (zbyszek, 15:52:50)
  * ACTION: bowlofeggs will chair next meeting  (zbyszek, 15:53:54)

* Open Floor  (zbyszek, 15:54:00)
  * Reminder: fesco members, please vote on
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2009  (zbyszek, 15:54:18)

Meeting ended at 15:56:54 UTC.

Action Items

* jforbes to send out an e-mail to devel mailing list
* bowlofeggs will chair next meeting
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Justin Forbes]

This is related to an open ticket to Release Engineering
(https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7840) which was brought to FESCo
(https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2003).  We understand the need to
enable this, but there is an impact to workflow for local builds. It
is possible that some of this could be alleviated with a fairly simple
change to mock.
The ability to install all builddeps with dnf builddep will be a bit
more difficult.   Of course local builds where the build deps are
already installed will not be impacted.  With this in mind, we wanted
to open this up to some discussion on list before we make a decision.

Thanks,
Justin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646144] Upgrade perl-RDF-NS to 20181102

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bb5e3a8dba

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646144] Upgrade perl-RDF-NS to 20181102

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c1c9f7af64

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646144] Upgrade perl-RDF-NS to 20181102

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eaddee1bb5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646144] Upgrade perl-RDF-NS to 20181102

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-RDF-NS-20181102-1.fc30



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646134] Upgrade perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS to 4.07

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646134

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS-4.07-1.
   ||fc30
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-11-05 06:24:12



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30683538

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646141] Upgrade perl-HTML-Selector-XPath to 0.25

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.25-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-586030188d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646141] Upgrade perl-HTML-Selector-XPath to 0.25

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTML-Selector-XPath-0.25-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-edccca8c87

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Enabling powerline theme system wide by default

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le 2018-11-05 11:31, Jonathan Underwood a écrit :

On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:44, Nicolas Mailhot
 wrote:

If someone wants to do this the font powerline uses should be fixed to
used correct unicode point values (and PUA when it include things not
standardised by unicode).

Otherwise powerline display is just broken on many terminals


Is there a bug report for this?


Probably:) But I haven’t checked. It’s 2018. I’m getting sick of telling 
people:

1. use unicode.
2. use unicode mechanisms like PUA for special non-standard glyphs.
3. apply Fedora fonts packaging guidelines so apps find the result
4. use Opentype only (ttf and otf). Do not ship multiple special 
feel-good just-in-case cargo culted font formats that confuse apps.
4. write the fontconfig file our guidelines request so your font get 
picked by fontconfig substitution
5. for fonts intended for use in terms and code editors: get your font 
aliases in “monospace”. And make sure your font is actually monospace.


Regards,

--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Enabling powerline theme system wide by default

[Jonathan Underwood]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 14:55, Randy Barlow  wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 17:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > Since powerline does
> > not
> > impact the performance, it will be great to set for Fedora 30.
>
> I experienced a performance problem with powerline on Fedora on a
> Raspberry Pi I was setting up for a friend. It seemed to put
> significant load on the CPU.

A lighter weight alternative might be PureLine:
https://github.com/chris-marsh/pureline
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Enabling powerline theme system wide by default

[Jonathan Underwood]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 09:44, Nicolas Mailhot
 wrote:
> If someone wants to do this the font powerline uses should be fixed to
> used correct unicode point values (and PUA when it include things not
> standardised by unicode).
>
> Otherwise powerline display is just broken on many terminals

Is there a bug report for this?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Updating python3-setuptools in EPEL7

[Miro Hrončok]

On 05. 11. 18 1:12, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'd like to update python3-setuptools from 19.6.2 to something newer (at 
least 20.8.1 but hopefully much later) without breaking the world. 
However, I don't have much experience with possible setuptools breakage. 
  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.


I'd do it in copr and mass rebuild everything (all python3 packages) in 
it. If it works, I'd assume it is safe.


If there are FTBFS, I'd investigate if they are setuptools related.
Feel free o bring any possible setuptools related problems here so we 
can all try to figure them out.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating python3-setuptools in EPEL7

[Miro Hrončok]

On 05. 11. 18 1:12, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'd like to update python3-setuptools from 19.6.2 to something newer (at 
least 20.8.1 but hopefully much later) without breaking the world. 
However, I don't have much experience with possible setuptools breakage. 
  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.


I'd do it in copr and mass rebuild everything (all python3 packages) in 
it. If it works, I'd assume it is safe.


If there are FTBFS, I'd investigate if they are setuptools related.
Feel free o bring any possible setuptools related problems here so we 
can all try to figure them out.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646135] Upgrade perl-DB_File to 1.843

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-029aac9f38

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646135] Upgrade perl-DB_File to 1.843

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5372a4cd42

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646135] Upgrade perl-DB_File to 1.843

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5b86f97c2a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646135] Upgrade perl-DB_File to 1.843

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DB_File-1.843-1.fc30



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1643855] Upgrade perl-prefork to 1.05

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643855

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-prefork-1.05-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-94d5c88101

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646137] Upgrade perl-File-NFSLock to 1.29

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646137

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-File-NFSLock-1.29-1.fc
   ||30
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-11-05 04:24:02



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646144] New: Upgrade perl-RDF-NS to 20181102

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646144

Bug ID: 1646144
   Summary: Upgrade perl-RDF-NS to 20181102
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-RDF-NS
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest Fedora delivers 20180227 version. Upstream released 20181102. When you
have free time, please upgrade it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need assistance to build LuxCoreRender

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

biniSox9c99xT.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification


encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646142] New: Upgrade perl-libintl-perl to 1.30

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646142

Bug ID: 1646142
   Summary: Upgrade perl-libintl-perl to 1.30
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-libintl-perl
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest Fedora delivers 1.29 version. Upstream released 1.30. When you have free
time, please upgrade it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646141] New: Upgrade perl-HTML-Selector-XPath to 0.25

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646141

Bug ID: 1646141
   Summary: Upgrade perl-HTML-Selector-XPath to 0.25
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath
  Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040...@freenet.de



Latest Fedora delivers 0.23 version. Upstream released 0.25. When you have free
time, please upgrade it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646137] New: Upgrade perl-File-NFSLock to 1.29

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646137

Bug ID: 1646137
   Summary: Upgrade perl-File-NFSLock to 1.29
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-File-NFSLock
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
xav...@bachelot.org



Latest Fedora delivers 1.28 version. Upstream released 1.29. When you have free
time, please upgrade it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646135] New: Upgrade perl-DB_File to 1.843

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646135

Bug ID: 1646135
   Summary: Upgrade perl-DB_File to 1.843
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-DB_File
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest Fedora delivers 1.842 version. Upstream released 1.843. When you have
free time, please upgrade it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646134] New: Upgrade perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS to 4.07

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646134

Bug ID: 1646134
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS to 4.07
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest Fedora delivers 4.06 version. Upstream released 4.07. When you have free
time, please upgrade it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1646133] New: Upgrade perl-Catalyst-Runtime to 5.90122

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646133

Bug ID: 1646133
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Catalyst-Runtime to 5.90122
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
trem...@tremble.org.uk



Latest Fedora delivers 5.90120 version. Upstream released 5.90122. When you
have free time, please upgrade it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org