Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-19 Thread Kalev Lember
On 11/19/2018 10:04 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Centos also ships a lot of non-Red Hat kernels and modules which meet various itches that people feel (xen, upstream lts, various gluster/ceph/arm32/etc) I wonder if something like this could make sense for Fedora as well, to ship two kernel

Fedora Rawhide-20181119.n.0 compose check report

2018-11-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/142 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181118.n.0): ID: 310311 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/310311 ID: 310314 Test: x86_64

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181119.n.0 changes

2018-11-19 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181118.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181119.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 28 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 186 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 179.58 MiB Size of dropped packages

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-11-20 - 90% PASS

2018-11-19 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/11/20/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-1.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-19 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 2018-11-13 3:36 p.m., Matthew Miller wrote: > > Hi everyone! Let's talk about something new and exciting. Since its > first release fifteen years ago, Fedora has had a 13-month lifecycle > (give or take). That works awesomely for many cases (like, hey, we're > all here), but not for everyone.

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181119.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2018-11-19 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20181119.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread sixy
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 at 10:07 PM > From: "Jonathan Dieter" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Subject: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using > zchunked rpms instead > > For reference, this is in reply to Paul's email about lifecycle >

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

2018-11-19 Thread nils
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-11-20 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us on

[rpms/perl-Glib-Object-Introspection] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Glib-Object-Introspection" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Glib-Object-Introspection on branch master, which you are following: e70307e0ee4ab57055f6790feb9aa66cc02593c1Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-SzmekUse C.UTF-8 locale To view more about the commits, visit:

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 16:29 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 21:02 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:18 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > I do not think you can just trust random metadata somewhere, one of the > > > points of a rpm reinstall is to fix damaged

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 22:18 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 19 novembre 2018 à 20:30 +, Jonathan Dieter a écrit : > > > > The zchunk advantage over deltarpms is much less CPU usage, while its > > disadvantages are slightly larger network usage and increased disk > > usage. > >

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 22:18 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 19 novembre 2018 à 20:30 +, Jonathan Dieter a écrit : > > The zchunk advantage over deltarpms is much less CPU usage, while its > > disadvantages are slightly larger network usage and increased disk > > usage. > >

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 21:14 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 19/11/2018 20:30, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > On the client: > > The zchunk advantage over regular rpm is decreased network usage, while > > its disadvantage is increased disk usage (since the local chunks will > > be uncompressed). > >

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 21:02 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:18 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 19:58 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > > > That's an interesting thought. I was picturing using the zchunk > > > library in the dnf download stage to

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 19 novembre 2018 à 20:30 +, Jonathan Dieter a écrit : > > The zchunk advantage over deltarpms is much less CPU usage, while its > disadvantages are slightly larger network usage and increased disk > usage. Unfortunately, that's a bad compromise for most limited clients. A limited

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Tom Hughes
On 19/11/2018 20:30, Jonathan Dieter wrote: On the client: The zchunk advantage over regular rpm is decreased network usage, while its disadvantage is increased disk usage (since the local chunks will be uncompressed). The zchunk advantage over deltarpms is much less CPU usage, while its

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-19 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 19 novembre 2018 à 11:27 -0800, Japheth Cleaver a écrit : > On 11/16/2018 3:19 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > Really, if there is one distro component we should backport to el > > and > > all release streams, that's rpm + all Fedora macro packages, not the > > kernel. > > Well,

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 17:20, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 5:08 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > On 11/18/18 2:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I'm not for or against a longer Fedora lifecycle, but I think we need > > > a stronger statement of what the problem is we're

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:18 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 19:58 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > That's an interesting thought. I was picturing using the zchunk > > library in the dnf download stage to build a local rpm from the > > verified locally installed files and the

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 13:19 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 12:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Jonathan Dieter > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 22:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > > > My proposal would

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 19:58 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 20:16 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > > On 19/11/18 13:13 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le 2018-11-19 12:28, Martin Kolman a écrit : > > > > > > > Many people might think RAM would not be an issue in 2018, but in

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 20:16 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 19/11/18 13:13 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le 2018-11-19 12:28, Martin Kolman a écrit : > > > > > Many people might think RAM would not be an issue in 2018, but in > > > practice there are > > > and likely always will be memory

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 07:02 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > +1 to anything to rid me of deltarpms, I currently have to disable > this lame default. The irony is that getting deltarpms into Fedora was largely my fault. ;) Sorry, Leigh. Jonathan ___ devel

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 14:57 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 16. 11. 18 v 23:07 Jonathan Dieter napsal(a): > >1. Downloading a new release of a zchunked rpm would be larger than > > downloading the equivalent deltarpm. This is offset by the fact > > that the client is able to

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-19 Thread Japheth Cleaver
On 11/16/2018 3:19 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le vendredi 16 novembre 2018 à 13:02 -0800, Japheth Cleaver a écrit : I'm not sure why punting like this is a good thing. RPM is a standard, moving along at what one might expect a core component to do, but to the extent that "evolving our

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 19/11/18 13:13 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-11-19 12:28, Martin Kolman a écrit : > >> Many people might think RAM would not be an issue in 2018, but in >> practice there are >> and likely always will be memory constrained installation targets, >> such as massive deployments >> of

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Howard Johnson
On 16/11/2018 22:07, Jonathan Dieter wrote: The uncompressed local chunks would be combined with the downloaded compressed chunks to create a local rpm that will pass signature verification without needing to recompress the uncompressed local chunks, making this computationally much faster than

Orphaing some packages: hdapsd, pg_journal

2018-11-19 Thread Tomasz Torcz
Hi, I've orphaned two of my packages: – hdapsd - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hdapsd This is daemon for laptops with accelerometer. It detects computer falling down and parks HDD head to reduce damage. I haven't used a laptop with spinning drive for years, I'm not sure if it

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-8 plans and needed work

2018-11-19 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:00 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 11/17/18 4:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > I'm afraid I'm still very unfamiliar with modules, but it does seem like > > this will be very central to how we deliver packages to EPEL-8. My > > initial questions are: > > Yeah, I don't

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-11-19)

2018-11-19 Thread Randy Barlow
= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-11-19) = Meeting started by bowlofeggs at 15:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-11-19/fesco.2018-11-19-15.00.log.html .

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL7 Bad-Dependencies Tracking Bug

2018-11-19 Thread Troy Dawson
My apologies for delaying my work on this. Priorities got shifted so I'm starting this work today. On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:50 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > Here are the list of packages with bad dependencies, their bug URL, > > and

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL6 conntrack-tools-0.9.13-3.el6.x86_64 metadata possibly incorrect

2018-11-19 Thread John Griffin
Hello Stephen, Here is RH’s reply on the query as to how RH Satellite parses RPMs for date base filters. Hi John, I got some information for you. Errata filter based on date does not scan RPMs, but scan errata (update or create) date and exclude/include all rpms which this specific errata

[rpms/perltidy] New Commits To "rpms/perltidy" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perltidy on branch master, which you are following: ead4489b3f8f65e7936e79b592d27548198d675dPaul HowarthUpdate to 20181120 (see CHANGES.md for details) To view more about the commits, visit:

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

2018-11-19 Thread Mátyás Selmeci
On 11/16/18 5:17 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "MM" == Matthew Miller writes: > > MM> It's the fundamental contradiction that all operating systems face: > MM> users complain "too fast and too slow!" at the same time. > > Well, then lengthening the Fedora lifecycle does not seem to me

Re: NSS package consolidation

2018-11-19 Thread Daiki Ueno
Robert-André Mauchin writes: >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ueno/nss-consolidate/ > Could we also remove the old cruft? Thank you! I have updated the PR based on the suggestions. > - Consider using a URL for Source0: > > Source0:

Re: [EPEL-devel] rhel 8 beta mock configs and EOLed mock configs

2018-11-19 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 16. 11. 18 v 23:45 Orion Poplawski napsal(a): > On 11/15/18 3:05 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote: >> Hi, >> I just released [1] new mock-core-config package which include new >> rhelbeta-8-* configs. >> This will allows you to build packages on top of RHEL 8 Beta. This is >> temporary config. I put

[rpms/perl-Devel-Cycle] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Devel-Cycle" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Devel-Cycle on branch master, which you are following: abe47936b360bf083cef4008c2ecb24bdc6d1b11Paul HowarthSpecify all build dependencies To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1651148] Upgrade perl-Event to 1.27

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651148 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 16. 11. 18 v 23:07 Jonathan Dieter napsal(a): >1. Downloading a new release of a zchunked rpm would be larger than > downloading the equivalent deltarpm. This is offset by the fact > that the client is able to work out which chunks it needs no matter > what the original

[rpms/perl-Event] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Event" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Event on branch master, which you are following: 3e169303735fa1fcdb73c6b165f766d37965Paul HowarthUpdate to 1.27 To view more about the commits, visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Event/commits/master

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 07:02:24AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > +1 to anything to rid me of deltarpms, I currently have to disable this lame > default. Leigh, it may be "lame" to you, but it's important to many people with bandwidth limitations or slower connections. There's always room for

Schedule for today's FESCo Meeting (2018-11-19)

2018-11-19 Thread Randy Barlow
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday (today) at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-11-19 15:00 UTC' Links to all

[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Config] New Commits To "rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Config" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Config on branch master, which you are following: 78c446fbf43604ec25b25d26195ae4e4267d3553Paul HowarthPackage clean-up To view more about the commits, visit:

[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Helpers] New Commits To "rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Helpers" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Helpers on branch master, which you are following: 62927958914f8f2294523380ea446234d4be481cPaul HowarthDrop EL-5 support To view more about the commits, visit:

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-11-19 12:28, Martin Kolman a écrit : Many people might think RAM would not be an issue in 2018, but in practice there are and likely always will be memory constrained installation targets, such as massive deployments of "small" VMs or the IoT use cases mentioned above. Sure, that’s

[Bug 1651147] Upgrade perl-DBD-MySQL to 4.049

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651147 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL] New Commits To "rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL on branch master, which you are following: 5b0dba690e8b5e4d59c78f83f870c35d8d003557Jitka Plesnikova4.049 bump To view more about the commits, visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL/commits/master

[Bug 1651167] Upgrade perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP to 1.26

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651167 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Martin Kolman
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 11:41 +0100, Sheogorath wrote: > On 11/18/18 7:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 12:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Jonathan Dieter > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 22:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > >

[rpms/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP on branch master, which you are following: d1c8b1f79f09276cf1ef7a69078441b83cfa7a19Petr PísařCache 1.26 sources To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1651168] Upgrade perl-TestML to 0.55

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651168 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1650156] Upgrade perl-TestML to 0.55

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650156 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- *** Bug 1651168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel

[rpms/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP on branch master, which you are following: d83cf165a3cb5a9bbf65a7752bddc4ec9e12bc84Petr Písař1.26 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1651151] Upgrade perl-FFI-CheckLib to 0.23

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651151 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.23-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-743cb3ece4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1651151] Upgrade perl-FFI-CheckLib to 0.23

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651151 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.23-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d8d7c922cc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib] New Commits To "rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib" (f28)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib on branch f28, which you are following: 2e34a50fad737b6e6cefac0339595ca45904f012Petr Písař0.23 bump aba2725f1cf22de6ba3f09128d60c8eb6b24ec2dJitka Plesnikova0.22 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib] New Commits To "rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib" (f29)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib on branch f29, which you are following: 35a92059c436fb408d77546c83cec236546dca3cPetr Písař0.23 bump ae072bbac9701f5c63d952b97b067da94ef87b60Jitka Plesnikova0.22 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1651151] Upgrade perl-FFI-CheckLib to 0.23

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651151 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib] New Commits To "rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib on branch master, which you are following: 35a92059c436fb408d77546c83cec236546dca3cPetr Písař0.23 bump To view more about the commits, visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib/commits/master

[Bug 1651146] Upgrade perl-CBOR-XS to 1.71

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651146 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1651161] Upgrade perl-Graphics-ColorNames to 3.4.0

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651161 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNames] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNames" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Graphics-ColorNames on branch master, which you are following: c807905593906b3c84dc56530e2ef2f2ead7a411Jitka Plesnikova3.4.0 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

[Bug 1651168] New: Upgrade perl-TestML to 0.55

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651168 Bug ID: 1651168 Summary: Upgrade perl-TestML to 0.55 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-TestML Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1651167] New: Upgrade perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP to 1.26

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651167 Bug ID: 1651167 Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP to 1.26 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Sheogorath
On 11/18/18 7:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 12:49, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Jonathan Dieter wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 22:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jonathan Dieter wrote: > My proposal would be to make zchunk

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 beta ?

2018-11-19 Thread Xavier Bachelot
Le 17/11/2018 à 17:02, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 06:21, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, Now that RHEL 8 beta is out, is there any plan to have some sort of EPEL 8 beta for people willing to prepare for the real RHEL 8 in advance ? Thanks Xavier, I put out an email

[Bug 1651166] New: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS to 1.19

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651166 Bug ID: 1651166 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS to 1.19 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS Assignee: pwout...@redhat.com Reporter: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1651164] New: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.07

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651164 Bug ID: 1651164 Summary: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.07 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1651162] New: Upgrade perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator to 1.119

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651162 Bug ID: 1651162 Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator to 1.119 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1651161] New: Upgrade perl-Graphics-ColorNames to 3.4.0

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651161 Bug ID: 1651161 Summary: Upgrade perl-Graphics-ColorNames to 3.4.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Graphics-ColorNames Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[rpms/perl-CBOR-XS] New Commits To "rpms/perl-CBOR-XS" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-CBOR-XS on branch master, which you are following: bcbf2b8b6f5017e0364fa3ac92383872cdee0723Petr Písař0.71 bump To view more about the commits, visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CBOR-XS/commits/master

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2018-11-19 10:31, Gerd Hoffmann a écrit : caches: doesn't look so good. squid can't store chunks of a file. For range request caching you probably want apache traffic server (ATS), not squid, as cache layer. The video guys implemented lots if range request magic in the cache tech

[Bug 1651151] New: Upgrade perl-FFI-CheckLib to 0.23

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651151 Bug ID: 1651151 Summary: Upgrade perl-FFI-CheckLib to 0.23 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-FFI-CheckLib Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1651148] New: Upgrade perl-Event to 1.27

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651148 Bug ID: 1651148 Summary: Upgrade perl-Event to 1.27 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Event Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1651147] New: Upgrade perl-DBD-MySQL to 4.049

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651147 Bug ID: 1651147 Summary: Upgrade perl-DBD-MySQL to 4.049 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-MySQL Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1651146] New: Upgrade perl-CBOR-XS to 1.71

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651146 Bug ID: 1651146 Summary: Upgrade perl-CBOR-XS to 1.71 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CBOR-XS Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: jples...@redhat.com

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

2018-11-19 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 02:43:23PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Jonathan Dieter said: > > The benefit of zchunked rpms is that, when downloading an updated rpm, > > you would only need to download the chunks that have changed from > > what's on your system. > > How well do web

[rpms/perl-Pegex] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Pegex" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Pegex on branch master, which you are following: a5bb6d3bbb8f0af7eb45c89e5fc59670ea41d558Petr PísařRemove perl_bootstrap code because perl-TestML >= 0.54.05 does not require perl-Pegex 1072b01868e89560c09a1ae274ecd27f568c8e98

[Bug 1612860] perl-Net-Pcap-0.18-9.fc29 FTBFS: stubs.inc:357:8: error: redefinition of 'struct pcap_rmtauth'

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612860 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Pcap-0.18-7.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4fa442797 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1612860] perl-Net-Pcap-0.18-9.fc29 FTBFS: stubs.inc:357:8: error: redefinition of 'struct pcap_rmtauth'

2018-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612860 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from

[rpms/perl-Net-Pcap] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Net-Pcap" (f27)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Net-Pcap on branch f27, which you are following: 904c3be3375e4170005e3a0438f6df4be64a41dcJitka PlesnikovaFix build with libpcap-1.9.0 (bug #1612860) To view more about the commits, visit:

Fedora Rawhide-20181118.n.0 compose check report

2018-11-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 20/142 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181117.n.0): ID: 309823 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/309823 ID: 309824

[rpms/perl-Net-Pcap] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Net-Pcap" (f28)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Net-Pcap on branch f28, which you are following: 3d386274b9372b356ebd9f299adc4afcbb8a281dJitka PlesnikovaFix build with libpcap-1.9.0 (bug #1612860) To view more about the commits, visit:

[rpms/perl-Template-Toolkit-Simple] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Template-Toolkit-Simple" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Template-Toolkit-Simple on branch master, which you are following: 861eb81b822b0494ec21008d7b86aee95ee39570Petr PísařModernize spec file 740ecd7861b7f607c895195b4e8af8e386087243Petr PísařOld TestML API moved to TestML1 name

[rpms/perl-Swim] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Swim" (master)

2018-11-19 Thread pagure
The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Swim on branch master, which you are following: 0bfd5a6df0a35bfeb0bb3ca463fc814c676938cbPetr PísařModernize spec file c1269ffa8203b0df3860920711b7c1ef714fd316Petr PísařOld TestML API moved to TestML1 name space To view