Hi.
Whats wrong with ppc64 in koji?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31454970
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4970/31454970/root.log
DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Package: wxGTK3-3.0.2-15.el7.ppc64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:439: Requires:
pykka is now back in rawhide.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
Did you report a bug?
Well, the new bugzilla is obviously still in Beta. I experience another bug
with an odd timeout issue to autofill the dropdown boxes, after another reload
it magically works.
___
devel mailing list --
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/12/14/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.19-20181214git5ed5f87.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I'm currently getting up to 9 emails per new issue, each attachment generates a
separate email!
This needs fixing now/yesterday, if it continues I will pipe all bugzilla mail
to spam.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 06:10 +, Raphael Groner wrote:
> > I've just orphaned pykka (
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package
> > /rpms/pykka/) as I'm no longer using it.
>
> Hi Jonathan,
> what do you use instead?
> Regards, Raphael
MPD with local music.
Jonathan
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:30 PM, stan
wrote:
Latency statistics:
min max avg std_dev conf99%
1.51 2.583 1.925330.576087 11.5249
Looks like this is what we want for Workstation, where latency is more
important than throughput?
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 19:59:14 +0100
Paolo Valente wrote:
> > Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:34, stan
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:46:30 +0100
> > Paolo Valente wrote:
> >
> >>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 17:41, stan
> >>> ha scritto:
> >>>
> >
> >> You
On 12/13/18 11:50 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> I would love to help bring back the birds-eye view dashboard that
> pkgdb provided for things like "how many packages does X person
> maintain",
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/ktdreyer
You maintain 62 packages (or are co-maintainer, etc)
>
or "who
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:14 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Not treating it as a community objective is how we got in a situation,
> where upstreams (including @rh upstreams) want nothing to do with rpms
> and Fedora, and invent their own packaging tech to bypass Linux
> distributions completely.
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:34, stan ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:46:30 +0100
> Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 17:41, stan
>>> ha scritto:
>>>
>
>> You don't have bfq for a comparison, but you can still get an idea of
>> how good your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1659170
--
You are receiving this
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:36:09AM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 01:40 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Is there an executive summary as to what's backwards incompatible and
> > what the impact on the average user is? A quick look at the kanban
> > doesn't give me any
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50084
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50087
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:46:30 +0100
Paolo Valente wrote:
> > Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 17:41, stan
> > ha scritto:
> >
> You don't have bfq for a comparison, but you can still get an idea of
> how good your system is, by comparing these start-up times with how
> long the same
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:24:21 +0100
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:30:20PM -0700, stan wrote:
> > Enabled deadline and cfq again, but still no bfq available.
> > $ cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
> > noop deadline [cfq]
>
> Those are single-queue scheduler. Multiqueue
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 17:53, stan ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:42:24 +0100
> Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> To test the behavior of your system, why don't you check, e.g., how
>> long it takes to start an application while there is some background
>> I/O?
>>
>> A super
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018, 17:52 J. Scheurich https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481
>
> COPYING.txt must be installed with %license not %doc.
>
> But %License: only accepts things like GPLv3+ or am i wrong ?
>
You're talking about two different things:
- The "License:" tag, which
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 17:51 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481
>
> COPYING.txt must be installed with %license not %doc.
>
> But %License: only accepts things like GPLv3+ or am i wrong ?
>
> so long
> MUFTI
Hi,
you are confusing "License" tag with
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:42:24 +0100
Paolo Valente wrote:
> To test the behavior of your system, why don't you check, e.g., how
> long it takes to start an application while there is some background
> I/O?
>
> A super quick way to do this is
>
> git clone https://github.com/Algodev-github/S
> cd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481
COPYING.txt must be installed with %license not %doc.
But %License: only accepts things like GPLv3+ or am i wrong ?
so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:42:24 +0100
Paolo Valente wrote:
> To test the behavior of your system, why don't you check, e.g., how
> long it takes to start an application while there is some background
> I/O?
>
> A super quick way to do this is
>
> git clone https://github.com/Algodev-github/S
> cd
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 17:17, stan ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:42:24 +0100
> Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> To test the behavior of your system, why don't you check, e.g., how
>> long it takes to start an application while there is some background
>> I/O?
>>
>> A super
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:30:20PM -0700, stan wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 14:41:37 -0700
> stan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:07:49 -0500
> > Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your insight. Doesn't look good for my use of BFQ.
> >
> > > Note that you can change the current I/O
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 06:15, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le 2018-12-12 18:49, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> > On 12/12/18 4:10 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > then
> > finding out what it would take to solve each and helping create and
> > land
> > fixes for them, be that a pagure bugfix or a workflow
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:42:24 +0100
Paolo Valente wrote:
> To test the behavior of your system, why don't you check, e.g., how
> long it takes to start an application while there is some background
> I/O?
>
> A super quick way to do this is
>
> git clone https://github.com/Algodev-github/S
> cd
On 12/13/18 3:14 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2018-12-12 18:49, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
..snip...
>
>> IMHO, it mostly needs people spending time and driving it. First,
>> gathering a list of issues that are non ideal for maintainers,
>
> That's quite easy to do and you'll find no end of
On 12/13/18 2:34 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
...snip...
> Sure, I agree that this is what needs to be done. But I don't think it
> is going to happen on its own without some sort of organization to
> make it happen, and to try and organize/focus the work. I don't know
> if that organization requires an
olysonek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random` that you are following:
``
Drop Group tag
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
olysonek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA` that you are following:
``
Drop Group tag
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
olysonek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum` that you are following:
``
Don't remove buildroot in %install
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum/pull-request/1
* Richard Shaw:
> I've never had this problem before but for the last week or so I frequently
> get the following
> at some point before the build completes:
>
> Could not execute build: ('Connection aborted.',
> RemoteDisconnected('Remote end closed connection without response'))
The Python 3
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, Richard Shaw wrote:
I've never had this problem before but for the last week or so I frequently
get the following at some point before the build completes:
Could not execute build: ('Connection aborted.', RemoteDisconnected('Remote
end closed connection without response'))
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 01:40 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Is there an executive summary as to what's backwards incompatible and
> what the impact on the average user is? A quick look at the kanban
> doesn't give me any understanding :)
Each of the issues on the kanban board is a proposal to make
I've never had this problem before but for the last week or so I frequently
get the following at some point before the build completes:
Could not execute build: ('Connection aborted.', RemoteDisconnected('Remote
end closed connection without response'))
I know it doesn't affect the build but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-XML-Parser-2.44-12.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0d0dd93395
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 8:53 AM Justin W. Flory wrote:
>
> Hi all, could a maintainer review these four PRs on the fedora-bookmarks
> package?
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-bookmarks/pull-requests
>
> It would be cool to see these merged. I'm not sure what the process is
> for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-XML-Parser-2.44-14.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e14a4bcc87
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Hi all, could a maintainer review these four PRs on the fedora-bookmarks
package?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-bookmarks/pull-requests
It would be cool to see these merged. I'm not sure what the process is
for requesting review on PRs in dist-git.
--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caillon+fedoraproject@gmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
External Bug ID|
> Il giorno 12 dic 2018, alle ore 22:41, stan ha
> scritto:
>
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:07:49 -0500
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
> Thanks for your insight. Doesn't look good for my use of BFQ.
>
>> Note that you can change the current I/O scheduler for any block
>> device by echo-ing into
Le 2018-12-12 18:49, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
On 12/12/18 4:10 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:07 PM Till Maas
wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:42:51AM +0100, Ben Rosser wrote:
I don't know. I feel like we could do a lot to improve the
experience
of packaging by
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm not sure this really deserves the level of community objective...
> but perhaps I am wrong.
So, here's why a community objective sounds like a good idea to me
(though other people should feel free to comment if they have
different ideas):
47 matches
Mail list logo
