Sorry, I have no interest in EPEL packages, so I didn't respond.
If you would like to maintain it, I will happily add you as comaintainer.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018, 16:11 Avram Lubkin I've been trying to reach the maintainers for python-ldap3
> (ignatenkobrain, mcyprian) for the last month. I've
git commit -m "rebuild" --allow-empty
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 23:10 Orion Poplawski I'm trying to build some modules that specify the branch for the package
> to use, e.g.:
>
>components:
> rpms:
>openmpi:
> rationale: The core package
> ref: 2.1
>
Afaik expanded builds can't be resubmitted, the good news is that if you
make empty commit and run build again it will be less painful because it
will reuse components for successful build.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/12/16/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20181216git174c468.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #13 from
Module build number 2628 failed due to what appears to have been a koji
issue:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31483290
: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 31743 waits for ShareLock on transaction 4127247553;
blocked by process 17714.
Process 17714 waits for ShareLock on
# F30 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-12-17
# Time: ** 17:00 ** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta blockers and 3 proposed Final blockers
to review, so let's have the first Fedora 30 blocker review meeting on
Monday! Note that clocks
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent for the agenda. Note that would mean we probably
won't meet till the New Year, due to the holidays and the Red Hat
shutdown, so please speak up if you think we need to discuss anything
before then.
If you're
JFYI I have just orphaned python-dropbox. I no longer use it for several
years and I don't really care about it.
python2-dropbox is required by duplicity.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list --
I'm trying to build some modules that specify the branch for the package
to use, e.g.:
components:
rpms:
openmpi:
rationale: The core package
ref: 2.1
buildorder: 10
My first builds failed because I had failed to push the proper commits
to the new branches.
I'm testing out rebuilding packages with openmpi 3.1 in COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/openmpi3.1/builds/
A number of packages are failing running tests only on Fedora Rawhide
x86_64 with processes killed with signal 4 (Illegal instruction). For
example:
+
- Original Message -
> From: "Anthony F McInerney"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 6:00:52 PM
> Subject: Self Introduction: Anthony McInerney
>
> Hi All, as per the packaging guidelines i'm just touching base to say hello.
> I'm hoping to get
Also, probably would be good to mention modulemd-validator somewhere on
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/
On 12/15/18 11:27 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Thanks, that pointed out the problem (I had profile instead of
profiles). This is
Thanks, that pointed out the problem (I had profile instead of
profiles). This is
https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/octave/blob/4.4/f/octave.yaml
On 12/15/18 1:37 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
You can use modulemd-validator.
Where can I find your modulemd?
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 3:10 AM
teeworlds / teeworlds should have been always "Teeworlds and zlib",
because it bundles some md5 code which is zlib-licensed.
teeworlds-data was supposed to be CC-BY-SA, but it was not marked this way.
Now to the real changes, since 0.7 it bundles json-parser (unbundle
will come within next few
Rex Dieter wrote:
> I ran into a aarch64 FTBFS situation during some testing with
> qt5-qtwebengine (see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-72289 ), so I'm
> going to hold off on this for now.
This work was completed in a side tag, and is awaiting move/tagging into
rawhide now,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:37:24 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 14:29:15 +,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
Anyway it seems like Rawhide isn't getting new nodebug kernels.
- Latest nodebug kernel:
kernel-4.20.0-0.rc1.git4.2.fc30.x86_64.rpm
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 11:17 Raphael Groner > I hope to one day add a true task working system to Bodhi that allows
> failed tasks to be automatically retried so that it can automatically
> recover from situations like this
>
> Well, I'm not sure if I understand your issue correctly but did you
> I hope to one day add a true task working system to Bodhi that allows failed
> tasks to be automatically retried so that it can automatically recover from
> situations like this
Well, I'm not sure if I understand your issue correctly but did you try to
implement anything like continuous
Thanks for your statement.
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:26:39 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/14/18 7:41 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:29:26 -0500
> > Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 08:53, Vascom wrote:
> >>>
> >>> But it was here in previous build few months ago.
> >>>
You can use modulemd-validator.
Where can I find your modulemd?
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 3:10 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build a module, and it's failing without much useful
> information:
>
> octave (4.4)]$ fedpkg module-build
> Submitting the module build...
> Could not
22 matches
Mail list logo
