Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: DeepinDE

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:11 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:16:18PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > > > > > Deepin Desktop Environment will make Fedora a more interesting

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 22:40 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > > > > But to be fair, MIT krb5 is not known for having great error output. > Not being able to start at all because the K/M has an enctype which is > acceptable and not at all deprecated according to the documentation that >

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

> "RH" == Robbie Harwood writes: RH> Per your follow-up email, I'm not clear on whether you want changes RH> here. If you do, speak up, especially if you have suggestions. Well, it was just odd that the summary had information not contained at all within the detailed description. Since

[Bug 1470542] PAR::Packer requires the same perl version it was built against

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-Packer-1.037-5.fc2 |perl-PAR-Packer-1.037-5.fc2

[Bug 1662968] Upgrade perl-Unicode-Collate to 1.26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662968 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1662961] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.56

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662961 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.56-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1662957] Upgrade perl-NetPacket to 1.7.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662957 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-NetPacket-1.7.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1662960] Upgrade perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf to 0.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662960 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1662957] Upgrade perl-NetPacket to 1.7.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662957 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1662961] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.56

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662961 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 23:07 +, Robbie Harwood wrote: > > BC> == Detailed Description == > > > > > > Is it just me or does this not actually say clearly what is changing? > > The first paragraph talks about two RFCs. The second paragraph talks > > about how easy it is to break single DES.

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

> BC> == Detailed Description == > > > Is it just me or does this not actually say clearly what is changing? > The first paragraph talks about two RFCs. The second paragraph talks > about how easy it is to break single DES. The third paragraph talks > about how disabled by default is

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

* Michael Cronenworth: > On 1/3/19 3:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> "Compliant with Fedora policy" == gcc right now. >> >> Fromhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler >> "Fedora uses gcc as the compiler (for all languages that gcc >> supports). Packages may only build

[EPEL-devel] Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of obsolete scriptlets

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:16 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > I'm going to push multiple commits to packages (I'll send list later) > which execute scriptlets which are not needed anymore for Fedora. > > However, people tend to keep same spec for Fedora and EPEL which makes > everything much more

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of obsolete scriptlets

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:16 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > I'm going to push multiple commits to packages (I'll send list later) > which execute scriptlets which are not needed anymore for Fedora. > > However, people tend to keep same spec for Fedora and EPEL which makes > everything much more

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:23 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 1/3/19 3:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > "Compliant with Fedora policy" == gcc right now. > > > > Fromhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler > > "Fedora uses gcc as the compiler (for all languages that gcc

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

Raphael, I'm confused how this doesn't comply. Their source code lives here: https://github.com/h1kari/des_kpt Also, let's keep comments on this thread *and CC me* - then there's only one place to look for replies (and I'm not subscribed to this list). In any case, as I stated there, if you

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

* Michael Cronenworth: > On 1/3/19 2:31 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: >> The recommended solution for now is to filter out flags that clang does >> not support. > > I'm aware of how to adjust flags, but if everyone wants to dump gcc > and adopt clang (I'm not one of those buying-in) wouldn't you want

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Flicker Free Boot

Hi, On 03-01-19 20:50, John Harris wrote: On Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:46:47 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlickerFreeBoot This doesn't seem to be inclusive of any other desktop environment than GNOME. There is no reason why the new plymouth theme and

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

On 1/3/19 3:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: "Compliant with Fedora policy" == gcc right now. Fromhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler "Fedora uses gcc as the compiler (for all languages that gcc supports). Packages may only build with an alternative compiler to gcc if

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:55 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 1/3/19 2:31 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > The recommended solution for now is to filter out flags that clang does > > not support. > > I'm aware of how to adjust flags, but if everyone wants to dump gcc and adopt > clang > (I'm not

[EPEL-devel] [HEADS UP] Removal of obsolete scriptlets

I'm going to push multiple commits to packages (I'll send list later) which execute scriptlets which are not needed anymore for Fedora. However, people tend to keep same spec for Fedora and EPEL which makes everything much more complicated. So please, if you have such package, guard scriptlets by

[HEADS UP] Removal of obsolete scriptlets

I'm going to push multiple commits to packages (I'll send list later) which execute scriptlets which are not needed anymore for Fedora. However, people tend to keep same spec for Fedora and EPEL which makes everything much more complicated. So please, if you have such package, guard scriptlets by

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

On 1/3/19 2:31 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: The recommended solution for now is to filter out flags that clang does not support. I'm aware of how to adjust flags, but if everyone wants to dump gcc and adopt clang (I'm not one of those buying-in) wouldn't you want to make it 1) easy and 2)

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

On 01/03/2019 12:28 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 1/3/19 2:49 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Part of Fedora's default C/CXX flags include -fstack-clash-protection >> but clang does not support this flag and has until a few weeks ago[1] >> silently ignored the flag. >> >> What are clang apps

Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

On 1/3/19 2:49 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Part of Fedora's default C/CXX flags include -fstack-clash-protection > but clang does not support this flag and has until a few weeks ago[1] > silently ignored the flag. > > What are clang apps who use Fedora's default flags supposed to do? > Are

Delaying the ppc64le transition to 128-bit IEEE long double.

Just a heads up that the ppc64le ABI transition from IBM long double to 128-bit IEEE long double has been delayed. I've removed the following from F30: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PPC64LE_Float128_Transition (moved it back to ChangePageIncomplete). I've also indicated this is the

F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.12

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.12 == Summary == Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.12 in Fedora 30, including rebuild of all dependent packages(pre-release version of Go will be used for rebuild, if released version will not be available at the time of the mass

F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Flicker Free Boot

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlickerFreeBoot == Summary == Make Fedora Workstation boot graphically smooth, without the display briefly turning off and without any abrupt graphical transitions. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jwrdegoede| Hans de Goede]] * Email: hdego...@redhat.com ==

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Flicker Free Boot

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:46:47 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlickerFreeBoot > > == Summary == > Make Fedora Workstation boot graphically smooth, without the display > briefly turning off and without any abrupt graphical transitions. > > == Owner == > *

clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags

Part of Fedora's default C/CXX flags include -fstack-clash-protection but clang does not support this flag and has until a few weeks ago[1] silently ignored the flag. What are clang apps who use Fedora's default flags supposed to do? Are there clang default flag macros? Thanks, Michael [1]

F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Flicker Free Boot

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlickerFreeBoot == Summary == Make Fedora Workstation boot graphically smooth, without the display briefly turning off and without any abrupt graphical transitions. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jwrdegoede| Hans de Goede]] * Email: hdego...@redhat.com ==

F30 System-Wide Change proposal: uEFI for ARMv7

(This change was originally proposed for Fedora 29, but was pulled from that release. The Change proposal is unchanged, but I am re-circulating it for visibility.) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/uEFIforARMv7 == Summary == Move to uEFI as the default boot mechanism for ARMv7 devices. ==

F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.12

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.12 == Summary == Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.12 in Fedora 30, including rebuild of all dependent packages(pre-release version of Go will be used for rebuild, if released version will not be available at the time of the mass

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: krb5 crypto modernization

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes: > How does this ties with crypto policies? libkrb5 is already under > crypto policies and has these ciphers disabled by default. Is this > change about removing them from the code or removing them from the > capabilities of the KDC which is not covered by crypto

[Bug 1663304] New: Drop sub-package perl-interpreter

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663304 Bug ID: 1663304 Summary: Drop sub-package perl-interpreter Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Status: NEW Component: perl-generators Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dennis Gregorovic wrote: > > Forwarding info I got from Tomas off-line... > > """ > oz should be py3-ready according to clancellete (not tested by me). I've > started some work on ImageFactory, but didn't get too far as there were other > priorities. It seemed to

Re: /usr/bin/yarn conflict between nodejs-yarn, hadoop-yarn and cmdtest

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 04:05:51PM +0100, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: > Hi, > > there are currently three packages, that (should) provide /usr/bin/yarn and > it obviously causes conflicts. [1] [2] > > Right now we would like nodejs-yarn to provide /usr/bin/yarn and cmdtest > and hadoop-yarn to use

Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

Dne 03. 01. 19 v 15:28 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:11 PM Kevin Fenzi > wrote: > > On 12/13/18 11:50 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > I would love to help bring back the birds-eye view dashboard that > > pkgdb provided for things like "how

/usr/bin/yarn conflict between nodejs-yarn, hadoop-yarn and cmdtest

Hi, there are currently three packages, that (should) provide /usr/bin/yarn and it obviously causes conflicts. [1] [2] Right now we would like nodejs-yarn to provide /usr/bin/yarn and cmdtest and hadoop-yarn to use different naming. We would like to get some feed-back (or suggestions) before

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Remove Obsolete Scriptlets

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:00:13PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 1/3/19 11:47 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019, 09:59 Panu Matilainen > wrote: > > > > On 1/2/19 7:52 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >> "FV" == Fabio

Re: Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

Forwarding info I got from Tomas off-line... """ oz should be py3-ready according to clancellete (not tested by me). I've started some work on ImageFactory, but didn't get too far as there were other priorities. It seemed to be doable (waited on oz in that time), so if we want to give it some

Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

* Richard Shaw [03/01/2019 08:28] : > > Just checked mine and apparently I have 98 packages now but one thing to > note, it only shows the first 6 and has a link for "View all X packages" > but it doesn't do anything. I suspect that link should take you to

Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 12/13/18 11:50 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > I would love to help bring back the birds-eye view dashboard that > > pkgdb provided for things like "how many packages does X person > > maintain", > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/ktdreyer

Re: How to avoid re-generating Pagure API keys all the time?

Dne 13. 12. 18 v 21:09 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On 12/13/18 11:50 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > >> I would love to help bring back the birds-eye view dashboard that >> pkgdb provided for things like "how many packages does X person >> maintain", > https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/ktdreyer > > You

[Bug 1663185] New: Upgrade perl-Type-Tie to 0.012

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663185 Bug ID: 1663185 Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tie to 0.012 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Type-Tie Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1662966] Upgrade perl-Text-CSV to 1.99

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662966 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Upgrade perl-Text-CSV to|Upgrade perl-Text-CSV to

[Bug 1663184] New: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663184 Bug ID: 1663184 Summary: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.11 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

[Bug 1662963] Upgrade perl-Sys-Info-Base to 0.7807

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662963 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1662953] Upgrade perl-Log-ger to 0.025

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662953 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1593318] CVE-2018-12558 perl-Email-Address: Specially crafted input could cause Denial of Service due to complex parse() method

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593318 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- Email-Address-1.910 (1.911 and 1.912 updates a documentation) fixes this vulnerability by extensive use of independent subexpressions ("(?>pattern)" constructs) that prevents from undesired backtracking. An

[Bug 1662950] Upgrade perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO to 1.035

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662950 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Remove Obsolete Scriptlets

On 1/3/19 11:47 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2019, 09:59 Panu Matilainen wrote: On 1/2/19 7:52 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "FV" == Fabio Valentini mailto:decatho...@gmail.com>> writes: > > FV> - unless those other,

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Remove Obsolete Scriptlets

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019, 09:59 Panu Matilainen On 1/2/19 7:52 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> "FV" == Fabio Valentini writes: > > > > FV> - unless those other, main icon theme packages have also added > > FV> %transfiletrigger* scriptlets, like I've done for elementary and > > FV> Paper. >

[Bug 1662968] Upgrade perl-Unicode-Collate to 1.26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662968 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Unicode-Collate-1.27-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d86f78fbfc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1662968] Upgrade perl-Unicode-Collate to 1.26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662968 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190102.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190101.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190102.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 17 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:28.81 KiB

[Bug 1662961] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.56

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662961 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.56-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f7dfb63aab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1662961] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.56

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662961 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-RT-Client-REST-0.56-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9d5c54e789 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1662961] Upgrade perl-RT-Client-REST to 0.56

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662961 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1662960] Upgrade perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf to 0.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662960 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0.10-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-24273a734e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1662960] Upgrade perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf to 0.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662960 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Remove Obsolete Scriptlets

On 1/2/19 7:52 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "FV" == Fabio Valentini writes: FV> - unless those other, main icon theme packages have also added FV> %transfiletrigger* scriptlets, like I've done for elementary and FV> Paper. Perhaps it should be mandatory for icon themes to add the

[Bug 1662957] Upgrade perl-NetPacket to 1.7.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662957 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-NetPacket-1.7.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-711639e70c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1662957] Upgrade perl-NetPacket to 1.7.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662957 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-NetPacket-1.7.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-94da94507e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

perl-NetPacket-1.7.0 license change

perl-NetPacket-1.7.0 changes a license from (Artistic 2.0) to (Artistic 2.0 and CC-BY). -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1662957] Upgrade perl-NetPacket to 1.7.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662957 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora Rawhide-20190102.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 11/131 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not

[Bug 1661697] java-openjdk have wrong description

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661697 --- Comment #2 from jiri vanek --- ty! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe