[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-05-19 - 93% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/05/19/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190518git31c89d3.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self Introduction: David Auer
Hello everyone, my name is David Auer and I am from Mainz / Germany. I am studying computer science and working at ZDF Digital (related to german TV channel ZDF). I have been using Fedora for 4 years now as my main operating system and I think it's time to contribute something back to the community by making the distribution easy to use for less experienced users and more efficient for everyone. Therefore I decided to package pdfarranger, a fork of the unmaintained pdfshuffler for Fedora. Having contributed to pdfarranger here and there, I think I would be well suited as maintainer, but if anyone else wants to take the package that's fine for me too, as long as it's available for Fedora users. (There are a few open bugs against pdfshuffler and it is missing a dependency in Fedora 30 so there is actual need for a replacement.) Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611 Best Regards David ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 in RHEL 8
On 19 May 2019 01:58:59 Kevin Fenzi wrote: Is there anything, aside from older versions, which holds one back from using EPEL 7 for the time being with RHEL 8 in production? We don't really need that much from EPEL directly but are using repos in production which depend on EPEL. Or is this considered that unsafe we have to wait until EPEL 8 is done? I don't think it would have any chance of working. The libraries in rhel8 are completely different from rhel7. I don't think any epel7 rpms will install, and if they do, I doubt they would work at all. kevin Thanks for making that very clear. I was afraid of that. RHEL 8 is dead for us from that point until Epel 8 is released. More than 6 months old application versions in AppStream are not very helpful though. We won't leave RHEL/CentOS in favour of a bleeding edge distro in production as we love the stable core system for years now. But for some apps we simply run latest versions and this seems impossible without an Epel basis. AppStreams won't help with more often releases if they are 6-12 months behind upstream, if that is enough estimated at all. Thanks Kevin. Hope everything works out in the best time possible. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 in RHEL 8
On 5/18/19 12:58 AM, TG Servers wrote: > Hi, > > as RHEL 8 was released it was clear to us that due to the new > infrastructure requirements there will be some more work to do for EPEL > 8 to be released. > Iirc form reading your plans it will be at least 8-10 weeks until there > will be an EPEL 8, unclear if it is really stable at that point. Right. > Is there anything, aside from older versions, which holds one back from > using EPEL 7 for the time being with RHEL 8 in production? > We don't really need that much from EPEL directly but are using repos in > production which depend on EPEL. > Or is this considered that unsafe we have to wait until EPEL 8 is done? I don't think it would have any chance of working. The libraries in rhel8 are completely different from rhel7. I don't think any epel7 rpms will install, and if they do, I doubt they would work at all. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency
On 5/17/19 2:37 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 17. 05. 19 3:54, Jerry James wrote: >> And, going off on a really steep tangent, I was just reading about >> Flock and wishing I could go. I've been hanging around the Fedora >> community for something on the order of 14 years now, believe it or >> not, and I have yet to meet a single other Fedora contributor in >> person. There's no way I'm going to make it to Hungary, I'm afraid. >> What is coming up in North America in the next year or so that will >> have significant numbers of Fedorans present? I would love to put >> some faces to the names I've been seeing on my screen all these years. > > Would love to meet you Jerry! Me too! > I think that next Flock after Hungary is supposed to happen in NA. > > It normally rotates between NA and Europe every year, but a shift in > schedule was needed, hence 2019 is in Europe again, so 2020 can be in NA. Also, If it's just a lack of funds stopping you from getting to Hungary, we do have sponsorship, so might be work putting in for that. (Or course it could be any number of other things, but thought I would mention it if it's just funds. :) kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711566] New: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.78 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711566 Bug ID: 1711566 Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.78 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, trem...@tremble.org.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.78 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.77-1.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/YAML-LibYAML/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3548/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711558] New: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000122 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711558 Bug ID: 1711558 Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000122 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test2-Suite Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.000122 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.000121-1.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test2-Suite/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/9536/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: orphaning bleachbit
Hello, I don't have experience maintaining packages but I'm willing to maintain Bleachbit as I use it a lot, it's the first programme I install when I do a fresh install. Let me know what I need to do and I'll take care. Kind regards, Silvia On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 23:32, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > I intend to orphan bleachbit soon. If anyone is interested please let me > know and I will transfer the package. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bleachbit > > Mukundan. > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] EPEL 7 in RHEL 8
Hi, as RHEL 8 was released it was clear to us that due to the new infrastructure requirements there will be some more work to do for EPEL 8 to be released. Iirc form reading your plans it will be at least 8-10 weeks until there will be an EPEL 8, unclear if it is really stable at that point. Is there anything, aside from older versions, which holds one back from using EPEL 7 for the time being with RHEL 8 in production? We don't really need that much from EPEL directly but are using repos in production which depend on EPEL. Or is this considered that unsafe we have to wait until EPEL 8 is done? Thanks! ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
