On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:30 AM Jan Grulich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started update process in rawhide to update all Qt modules to 5.12.3 and
> later I will rebuild all packages depending on Qt private stuff. You may
> experience build failures until the whole update process is done, which
> should
> be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I am trying a scratch build of libpst, and I don't understand the
error.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35373272
This package uses boost-python3. On x86, the build log contains:
make[2]: Entering directory
'/builddir/build/
Except that it doesn't scale with multiple people working with different
side tags.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019, 18:51 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 06. 19 17:57, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 18:27 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm going to build libgit 0.28.x in r
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 1:28 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Interesting. I was specifically referring to this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675902
>
> So may be the FTBFS mass filling missed the deadline? Or was there some
> exception?
>
Well it looks like it should have been caug
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 13:16 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Vit,
>
> Rawhide bugs are moved during the development cycle of the next
> stable. So bugs filed against rawhide will become F31 bugs on
> 2019-08-13.
Ah, yeah, to clarify my message - the Rawhide -> F*30* transition (as
given in Subject) hap
Dne 07. 06. 19 v 19:16 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> Vit,
>
> Rawhide bugs are moved during the development cycle of the next
> stable. So bugs filed against rawhide will become F31 bugs on
> 2019-08-13.
>
>
Interesting. I was specifically referring to this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
Vit,
Rawhide bugs are moved during the development cycle of the next
stable. So bugs filed against rawhide will become F31 bugs on
2019-08-13.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailin
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 18:50 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> At release of stable version, the Rawhide bugs used to be moved to the
> stable version. Does this going to happen? It is a bit late already
It already did happen. If your bug wasn't moved then it was excepted
for some
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 18:04 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 06. 19 17:57, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 18:27 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm going to build libgit 0.28.x in rawhide and rebuild all affected
> > > packages somewhere this week.
> >
>
Hi everybody,
At release of stable version, the Rawhide bugs used to be moved to the
stable version. Does this going to happen? It is a bit late already
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to de
Meeting summary
---
* init process (zbyszek, 15:02:03)
* #2063 F31 Change: Ibus-typing-booster default for Indian languages
(zbyszek, 15:03:54)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2063 (zbyszek, 15:03:59)
* AGREED: This change is rejected due to lack of response. Change
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:31 AM David Howells wrote:
>
> The FHS is now maintained by the Linux Foundation:
>
> https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/fhs
That page is also stale.
"Our goal is to release FHS 3.0 by July 1 if possible. "
lsb/fhs.txt · Last modified: 2016/07/19 01:23 (externa
On 07. 06. 19 17:57, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 18:27 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hello,
I'm going to build libgit 0.28.x in rawhide and rebuild all affected
packages somewhere this week.
Unfortunately your rebuild of kf5-ktexteditor failed, and that broke
today's Rawhide co
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 18:27 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to build libgit 0.28.x in rawhide and rebuild all affected
> packages somewhere this week.
Unfortunately your rebuild of kf5-ktexteditor failed, and that broke
today's Rawhide compose:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/k
Hi,
The packaging guidelines pages:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Guidelines&oldid=528452#Filesystem_Layout
still point at the old Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS) site:
http://www.pat
Thanks for opening the ticket, but the update is still stuck, now going on
nine days.
Would someone with the necessary privs please kick it.
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:52 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 18:03 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.or
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:09 AM clime wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > Is there a reason why we do not tag dist-git commits, using a name which
> > is derived from the NEVR from a Koji build?
>
> Interesting idea. I am soon coming with a proposal of the annotat
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why we do not tag dist-git commits, using a name which
> is derived from the NEVR from a Koji build?
Interesting idea. I am soon coming with a proposal of the annotated tags
being created by packagers and storing changelog a
* Bruno Wolff, III:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:37:57 -,
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>>On 2019-06-06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> Might be worth asking if there's a reason to need this offline. If the
>>> exact commit ID is stored in Koji and is authoritative, also tagging
>>> it into git might b
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:37:57 -,
Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-06-06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Might be worth asking if there's a reason to need this offline. If the
exact commit ID is stored in Koji and is authoritative, also tagging
it into git might be convenient for offline purposes. T
On 2019-06-06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Might be worth asking if there's a reason to need this offline. If the
> exact commit ID is stored in Koji and is authoritative, also tagging
> it into git might be convenient for offline purposes. The fact that
> it's not immutable is probably not an issu
21 matches
Mail list logo
