[Bug 1738385] New: Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Bug ID: 1738385 Summary: Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Status: NEW Component: mod_perl Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2019-08-06 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing atop-1.27-3.el6 bird-1.6.7-1.el6 perl-Net-BGP-0.17-1.el6 Details about builds: atop-1.27-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9070cc2d90) An

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-08-06 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing BackupPC-4.3.1-2.el8 BackupPC-XS-0.59-3.el8 bird-2.0.5-1.el8 earlyoom-1.3-3.el8 flameshot-0.6.0-4.el8 git-secret-0.2.6-2.el8 git-subrepo-0.4.0-3.el8 google-benchmark-1.5.0-2.el8

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-08-07 - 93% PASS

2019-08-06 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/07/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190806git4159cf6.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2019-08-06 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 357 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 132 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294 cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7 98

Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 compose check report

2019-08-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 11:52 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 13 of 45 required tests failed, 8 results missing > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below > Unsatisfied

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

2019-08-06 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 8/6/19 9:15 AM, Jun Aruga wrote: >>> Please come! >>> >> Would love to see your examples use podman... > Sorry here is the podman's example. > And no worry. podman's examples are used as much as possible in my talk! > > ``` > $ uname -m > x86_64 > > $ podman run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

2019-08-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 11:35:44 +0200, Tomas Korbar wrote: > Hi, > I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package in > need of review. Not at all, please proceed :) -- Thanks very much, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

2019-08-06 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 05:47:58 CEST J. Scheurich wrote: > > What's your version of fedora-review? You should have 0.7.2 > > > > > > > > Name : fedora-review > > Version : 0.7.2 > > Release : 1.fc30 > > $ fedora-review -V > fedora-review version 0.7.2 65d36bb 2019-04-09

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

2019-08-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Most of modern C++ header-only libraries provides Cmake scripts. Such > scripts will be installed to %{_libdir}/cmake/foo. That's why they > cannot be noarch. CMake will actually also find the scripts if you install them to %{_datadir}/cmake/foo. And if (and

[HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

2019-08-06 Thread Petr Stodulka
Hi guys, as discussion was started week ago, Python2 is dying. As that, some dependencies of mercurial will be orphaned soon (or they are already) and mercurial as it is has to move in weeks on Python3. As I wrote in [0], I already started some testing and investigation. Currently it seems that

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-06 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 15:10, Dave Dykstra wrote: > I don't think I understand how epel8-playground is envisioned to be > used. I did the fedpkg request-branch epel8 and got it created for my > package. I also ran fedpkg request-branch epel8-playground as in the > script below, but that was

[EPEL-devel] how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-06 Thread Dave Dykstra
I don't think I understand how epel8-playground is envisioned to be used. I did the fedpkg request-branch epel8 and got it created for my package. I also ran fedpkg request-branch epel8-playground as in the script below, but that was rejected: Could not execute request_branch: You cannot

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

2019-08-06 Thread smooge
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2019-08-07 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the

[Bug 1588760] CVE-2018-12015 perl: Directory traversal in Archive::Tar

2019-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588760 --- Comment #12 from errata-xmlrpc --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Via RHSA-2019:2097 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2097 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1588760] CVE-2018-12015 perl: Directory traversal in Archive::Tar

2019-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588760 errata-xmlrpc changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Red Hat Product Errata

Could not execute clone: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/mcatanzaro/Projects/fedora-scm/eog/.git/info/exclude'

2019-08-06 Thread mcatanzaro
$ fedpkg clone eog Cloning into 'eog'... remote: Counting objects: 2048, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1594/1594), done. remote: Total 2048 (delta 787), reused 1036 (delta 349) Receiving objects: 100% (2048/2048), 253.53 KiB | 2.33 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (787/787), done.

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

2019-08-06 Thread Robbie Harwood
Miro Hrončok writes: > I'd like to drop python2-Cython subpackage from Cython, as I consider > it not needed, however there are still packages that buildrequire > it. Let me know if you want to maintain python2-Cython instead of me > and Igor. Hi, I believe you're CC'd on the thread with myself

I wish to drop python2-Cython

2019-08-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
I'd like to drop python2-Cython subpackage from Cython, as I consider it not needed, however there are still packages that buildrequire it. Let me know if you want to maintain python2-Cython instead of me and Igor. python2-Cython is buildrequired by: bzr pystatgrab python-cassandra-driver

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190806.n.0 changes

2019-08-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 15:26 Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190805.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:0 > Dropped images: 0 > Added packages: 5 > Dropped packages:2 > Upgraded

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

2019-08-06 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 AM Martin Kolman wrote: > On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 20:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:43 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 03:45 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:10 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd > > > >

RE: Orphaning/retiring 3 Java packages

2019-08-06 Thread D L
Perhaps, if this introduction is done by video conference it could be recorded and archived for future reference on this page – https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Java/ If its not too much trouble. -- Danny Lee   I have been impressed with the urgency of doing.

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Ship BerkleyDB backend as a module

2019-08-06 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:58 AM Matus Honek wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > I've made changes according to your notes [1], please have a look. And > thanks for the feedback! > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FOpenLDAPwithBerkleyDBasModule=revision=549672=549258 > > Looks

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

2019-08-06 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 15:17 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 08. 19 14:13, Mat Booth wrote: > > > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:11, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: > > > eclipse-pydev > > > unused build dep > >

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

2019-08-06 Thread Jun Aruga
> > Please come! > > > Would love to see your examples use podman... Sorry here is the podman's example. And no worry. podman's examples are used as much as possible in my talk! ``` $ uname -m x86_64 $ podman run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -m standard_init_linux.go:211: exec user process

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Ship BerkleyDB backend as a module

2019-08-06 Thread Matus Honek
Hello Stephen, I've made changes according to your notes [1], please have a look. And thanks for the feedback! [1] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FOpenLDAPwithBerkleyDBasModule=revision=549672=549258 On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:49 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Aug

Fedora 31 release-blocking deliverables

2019-08-06 Thread Ben Cotton
The list of release-blocking deliverables for Fedora 31 is now available[1]. If there are any changes that should be made that were part of an already-accepted Fedora 31 Change proposal, please let me know. If an edit is required that was not part of an accepted Change proposal, please file a

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

2019-08-06 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 8/6/19 7:56 AM, Jun Aruga wrote: >> ``` >> $ docker run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -m > standard_init_linux.go:207: exec user process caused "no such file or > directory" >> $ docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static:register --reset >> $ docker run --rm -t

Fedora 31 release-blocking deliverables

2019-08-06 Thread Ben Cotton
The list of release-blocking deliverables for Fedora 31 is now available[1]. If there are any changes that should be made that were part of an already-accepted Fedora 31 Change proposal, please let me know. If an edit is required that was not part of an accepted Change proposal, please file a

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190806.n.0 changes

2019-08-06 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190805.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 94 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 1.67 MiB Size of dropped packages

REMINDER: Fedora 31 Code complete (testable) deadline in one week

2019-08-06 Thread Ben Cotton
According to the Fedora 31 schedule[1], the deadline for Changes to be code complete (i.e. testable enough for beta) is Tuesday 13 August. At this time, all Changes should be testable and tracker bugs should be set to the MODIFIED state. For more information on this deadline, see the wiki[2]. [1]

REMINDER: Fedora 31 Code complete (testable) deadline in one week

2019-08-06 Thread Ben Cotton
According to the Fedora 31 schedule[1], the deadline for Changes to be code complete (i.e. testable enough for beta) is Tuesday 13 August. At this time, all Changes should be testable and tracker bugs should be set to the MODIFIED state. For more information on this deadline, see the wiki[2]. [1]

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

2019-08-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 08. 19 14:13, Mat Booth wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:11, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: >     eclipse-pydev >     unused build dep >     attempted removal previously closed >

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

2019-08-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: eclipse-pydev unused build dep attempted removal previously closed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-pydev/pull-request/1 I already told you it was *NOT* unused -- that there was a packaging bug. And I fixed this bug in a later

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

2019-08-06 Thread Jun Aruga
> ``` > $ docker run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -m standard_init_linux.go:207: exec user process caused "no such file or directory" > > $ docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static:register --reset > $ docker run --rm -t quay.io/junaruga/multiarch-fedora:30-aarch64 uname -m >

Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 compose check report

2019-08-06 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 13 of 45 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

2019-08-06 Thread Martin Kolman
On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 16:18 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 20:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:25:55AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > > I've already done some experiments with that. I used multi-stage > > > > > builds >

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

2019-08-06 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Tom Hughes writes: On 06/08/2019 09:37, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: Ok, but does that mean the program has to abort? Could gcc do anything dangerous here? If we were actually trying to catch undefined behavior (e.g. with -fsanitize=undefined), I suspect Fedora wouldn't even boot without a crash.

Re: I wish to drop python2-certifi

2019-08-06 Thread Petr Stodulka
On 05. 08. 19 16:07, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 07. 19 16:01, Petr Stodulka wrote: Hi Miro, thanks for notification. I am thinking about that. From the point, that Python2 is going to be death... Mabye I would take it, but I am fan of removing Python2 stuff from Fedora. But Mercurial (hg-git,

Re: Nonresponsive maintainers jchaloup, lkundrak, jkaluza

2019-08-06 Thread Peter Robinson
> lkundrak > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737816 >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716527 Lubomír is active, he's not always great at replying to emails but he actively updates thing like NetworkManager and I believe he's based in the Red Hat Brno office. Peter

Re: Orphaning/retiring 3 Java packages

2019-08-06 Thread Marián Konček
I could introduce Peter into Fedora java packaging. On 24. 7. 2019 20:03, Peter Boy wrote: Am 23.07.2019 um 16:08 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski : On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 23. 07. 19 13:27, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: Soon after Fedora 31 branching I intend to retire

Nonresponsive maintainers jchaloup, lkundrak, jkaluza

2019-08-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello Jan, Lubomír, Jan. Are you responsive? I try to reach your help in bugzilla for a while. jchaloup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737815 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333990 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721645

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

2019-08-06 Thread Tomas Korbar
Hi, I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package in need of review. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for > inclusion in NeuroFedora: > >

[Bug 1737781] New: Upgrade perl-Role-Tiny to 2.000008

2019-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737781 Bug ID: 1737781 Summary: Upgrade perl-Role-Tiny to 2.08 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Role-Tiny Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

2019-08-06 Thread Tom Hughes
On 06/08/2019 09:37, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:22 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91357 Depending on the resolution of that bug, I suggest that Fedora consider

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

2019-08-06 Thread Martin Kolman
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 20:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:43 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 03:45 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:10 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd > > > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Barring objection, I plan

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

2019-08-06 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 06.08.2019 2:06, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Well, if there is no testsuite and if the headers are truly > architecture-independent Most of modern C++ header-only libraries provides Cmake scripts. Such scripts will be installed to %{_libdir}/cmake/foo. That's why they cannot be noarch. --

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

2019-08-06 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:22 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91357 > > > > Depending on the resolution of that bug, I suggest that Fedora > > consider dropping _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS from

NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

2019-08-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for inclusion in NeuroFedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737770 It's a relatively simple package. Folks looking for sponsorship, please feel free to review it unofficially too. -- Thanks, Regards,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-08-06 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing argon2-20171227-3.el8 jhead-3.03-4.el8 pdns-4.1.11-3.el8 re2-20190801-1.el8 Details about builds: argon2-20171227-3.el8