Re: Koschei branching?

2019-08-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hi Nico, > > you can check it here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/ > > You can see Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 30, Fedora 29 and EPEL7, but there > is no Fedora 31 which kinda indicates that Koschei has not been > updated yet. Which

Re: Koschei branching?

2019-08-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 8/25/19 9:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi Nico, > > you can check it here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/ > > You can see Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 30, Fedora 29 and EPEL7, but there > is no Fedora 31 which kinda indicates that Koschei has not been > updated yet. yes, it's being

Re: Koschei branching?

2019-08-25 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Hi Nico, you can check it here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/ You can see Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 30, Fedora 29 and EPEL7, but there is no Fedora 31 which kinda indicates that Koschei has not been updated yet. On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 3:31 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sun, Aug

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-08-26 - 96% PASS

2019-08-25 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/26/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190825gitaf4631f.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] Please review 50564 - fix rust and docker build issues

2019-08-25 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50564 -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Test-Announce] 2019-08-26 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 31 Blocker Review Meeting

2019-08-25 Thread Adam Williamson
# F31 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2019-08-26 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Final blocker and 1 proposed Beta freeze exception to review, so let's have a Fedora 31 blocker review meeting tomorrow!

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-08-26 Fedora QA Meeting

2019-08-25 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow, as there isn't a lot for the agenda. We will be doing a blocker review meeting, though - I'll send out the announcement for that in a minute. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail

Re: Koschei branching?

2019-08-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 8:33 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > I see that there is no Fedora 31. Is anybody working on creating that > and moving rawhide forward to 32? I think you need to take a look at the current Fedora repositories, you'll find fedora 31 packages and find that the rawhide package

Re: hwloc update with so-bump and mpich rebuild

2019-08-25 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 8/25/19 1:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, I made a minor mess in the mpich world and instead of upgrading to 3.3.1 from 3.2.1., I built 3.1.1. I was a bit surprised when I got a bug [1] that mpich in Fedora is from 2014 :( I'd like to update to 3.3.1, but that needs newer

[EPEL-devel] Re: itstool missing in aarch64 and s390x

2019-08-25 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 08:31, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > The package "itstool" seems to be missing in some architectures (s390x > and aarch64) although it should be provided by RHEL server rpms. It > appears to be available in x86_64 and ppc64le. > > I noticed this when building gparted. See the

hwloc update with so-bump and mpich rebuild

2019-08-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, I made a minor mess in the mpich world and instead of upgrading to 3.3.1 from 3.2.1., I built 3.1.1. I was a bit surprised when I got a bug [1] that mpich in Fedora is from 2014 :( I'd like to update to 3.3.1, but that needs newer hwloc which has an so-bump. There's a number of users of

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190825.n.0 changes

2019-08-25 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-31-20190824.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190825.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 25 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 51.54 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Fedora-31-20190825.n.0 compose check report

2019-08-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 15/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190824.n.0): ID: 435666 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/435666 ID: 435685 Test: x86_64

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic 29 EOL date?

2019-08-25 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 8/24/19 6:27 AM, Feilong Wang wrote: > Hi team, > Hi Feilong! I'm adding in Spyros who has worked with us in the past on Atomic Host and Magnum. > Could you please help me understand when will be the EOL date for Fedora > Atomic 29? I understand generally it takes 13 months. But given

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190825.n.0 changes

2019-08-25 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190824.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190825.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 47 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 560.70 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0

2019-08-25 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Not `unrar`, but `unar` :) On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 2:38 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > > 'unrar' is a RPMFusion package. > > On 25/08/19 14:16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > gnustep-base-libs-1.25.0-14.fc31.x86_64 > > openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-28.fc31.x86_64 > > libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit) > >

Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0

2019-08-25 Thread Antonio Trande
'unrar' is a RPMFusion package. On 25/08/19 14:16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > gnustep-base-libs-1.25.0-14.fc31.x86_64 > openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-28.fc31.x86_64 > libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit) > raidem-0.3.1-39.fc31.x86_64 >

Koschei branching?

2019-08-25 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I see that there is no Fedora 31. Is anybody working on creating that and moving rawhide forward to 32? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[EPEL-devel] itstool missing in aarch64 and s390x

2019-08-25 Thread Mukundan Ragavan
The package "itstool" seems to be missing in some architectures (s390x and aarch64) although it should be provided by RHEL server rpms. It appears to be available in x86_64 and ppc64le. I noticed this when building gparted. See the failed build here -

Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0

2019-08-25 Thread Igor Gnatenko
gnustep-base-libs-1.25.0-14.fc31.x86_64 openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-28.fc31.x86_64 libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit) raidem-0.3.1-39.fc31.x86_64 libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit) unar-1.10.1-12.fc31.x86_64

[HEADS-UP] snakeyaml 1.25 update

2019-08-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We plan to merge the PR rebasing it to the latest version (1.25, released this month) into master / rawhide and f31. The new versions include *a lot of bug fixes*,

Fedora-Rawhide-20190825.n.0 compose check report

2019-08-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 21 of 45 required tests failed, 11 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0

2019-08-25 Thread Antonio Trande
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37267892 On 25/08/19 12:38, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > 'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key:

gnustep-base 1.26.0

2019-08-25 Thread Antonio Trande
Hi all. 'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days. Packages involved: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-source --enablerepo=updates-source --release=rawhide --whatrequires gnustep-base-devel Fedora rawhide - Updates Source

Re: vdr-epg-daemon does not compile on f32

2019-08-25 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, I still do not know in which file the command Usage: /usr/bin/python3.7m-x86_64-config is called and what I need to change so that it can be compiled under F30. For help, I would be grateful. make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.146/epglv' Package