https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756032
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756677
Bug ID: 1756677
Summary: perl-IO-Pager-0.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Pager
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
mbedtls-2.16.3-1.el8
perl-Module-Manifest-1.09-8.el8
perl-Test-DistManifest-1.014-15.el8
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756668
Bug ID: 1756668
Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.985 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-cpm
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-1.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
410 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
186 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
152
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8901842b1a
golang-1.13-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
mbedtls-2.7.12-1.el6
potrace-1.16-1.el6
Details
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> To make things even more interesting, the non-modular Java stack has
> almost reached parity with what's available from the shiny module
> branches, except a handful of packages that require more work than a
> simple "bump version and build" (for example, the rebase from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Friday, September 27, 2019 8:01:42 AM MST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:53:32AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > >
> > > >
Packages from EPEL 7 don't make it automatically make it into EPEL 8. The
package maintainer has to request EPEL 8 branches.
You can either request that the maintainer support an EL 8 branch via
email, -ow...@fedoraproject.org, or submit the request in bugzilla
(more formal request).
Thanks,
Notification time stamped 2019-09-28 18:47:24 UTC
From f62ede90dc0c84b06d27e6222ff9200465a4e913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sep 28 2019 18:45:41 +
Subject: Use author-independent source URL
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index
Hello, Brian.
On Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 23:08, Brian Sipos wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've been working with RHEL and CentOS packages since about 2011, but
> mostly in the domain of private Yum repositories. I've done some work
> in the past with the SUSE Build Service also. I'm familiar with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756527
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
Hi all,
I started using Centos8 and epel8 and I found out that several packages I used
to have in epel7 are missing from epel8; is it just work-in-progress?
eventually will all packages of epel7 be present also in epel8?
I'm in particular looking into the "supervisor" package... can I do
Ok, thank you. I have requested a branch for f31 and epel8.
May be, there is no whitelist within fedora.
Regardless of this the package appears in the repo:
https://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/u/
Stefan
Am Di., 24. Sept. 2019 um
OLD: Fedora-31-20190927.n.1
NEW: Fedora-31-20190928.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 450.65 MiB
Size of dropped packages:19.25 MiB
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20190927.n.1):
ID: 459676 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/459676
ID: 459712 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > I'm quite certain that forbidding people to move to module-only would mean
> > that we would not only not have a Java stack in Fedora but also no Java
> > module too.
>
> I think that banning module-only packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756609
Bug ID: 1756609
Summary: perl-GDGraph packages for EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Branched 20190928.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756420
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756512
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Gary Buhrmaster from comment #1)
> My bad, it is available in a repo that I forgot to enable.
Namely Code Ready Builder (RHEL) or PowerTools (CentOS) for the benefit of
anyone else stumbling
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 08:47:03AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > == pcre -> pcre2 ==
> >
> > Moving grep (one of the last packages using pcre) to pcre2. [4]
>
> I'm curious if we should simply replace grep by ripgrep :)
Crossed my mind too. But grep is 800k, ripgrep 4500k. In case of grep we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:01 PM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> This is the Minimization Objective [0] update.
>
> Status: Discovery phase
>
> == Regular meeting canceled ==
>
> We have decided to cancel the regular Minimization Team Meeting [1] as we
> prefer async discussions on #fedora-devel and
30 matches
Mail list logo
