d. Do it now and you
will save everyone time later. ;)
Python-Classroom:
``
[pungi.global.log](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-31-20191005.n.0/compose/../logs/global/pungi.global.log)
- [38066743](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38066743)
```
[LIVE
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 01:35:03PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:32:13PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > Anyone have any ideas? I tried re-submitting them but they were obsoleted
> > > by bodhi again.
> >
> > It lo
Hello,
I don't know how many of you are Vim users and what fraction of those
use plugins. Anyway, there is a great, well-known plugin called
vim-fugitive (by notorious Tim Pope), that provides a lot of cool
features. My favorite one is probably `:Gbrowse` command, which opens
the current file, lin
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:32:13PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Anyone have any ideas? I tried re-submitting them but they were obsoleted
> > by bodhi again.
>
> It looks like the newer pyside is now in
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 02:35:59AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > It depends how you maintain your packages. My guess is (and I am sorry
> > if I am mistaken) that you don't follow the
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Philosophy
> >
> > If you followed th
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:32:13PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas? I tried re-submitting them but they were obsoleted
> by bodhi again.
It looks like the newer pyside is now in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2a4f82aa58
perhaps try and get the author of that
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191004.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191005.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 99
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 31.64 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
Sounds like an amazing solution to me, I'll follow up on the link you've sent
me along with the kodi link Stephen J Smoogen kindly offered me in order to
reach a viable future solution.
Thanks very much for getting back to me so soon and at the weekend on this
matter.
During the process I'm go
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:18 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> 1. Creating new packages has become (more of) a pain since the
> retirement of pkgdb2. I know I keep complaining about needing to
> manually fetch Pagure API keys, but it is actually extremely annoying
> when I go to request a repo and realize
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Your example is not valid. This is not a mass change, this was an
> individual change presented to the package maintainers via a PR that was
> not merged by me:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine/pull-request/3
>
> Had there been a "please, make it build
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 20:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > What do you mean by breaking breaking because you use that term like a
> > sledge hammer for anything from a 'pixel off' bug to 'too old software
> > is in repos', 'too young software is in repos' , 'software is n
On 05. 10. 19 2:16, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
It goes like this:
- master and f31 are at the same commit "aa"
- I push a change only possible in rawhide, commit "bb" to master
(it includes release bump and changelog entry)
- a commit relevant for both, "c
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20191004.n.0):
ID: 463524 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/463524
ID: 463563 Test: x86_64 KD
OLD: Fedora-31-20191004.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191005.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 167
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 13.45 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Let's start from the very beginning maybe. What are the use cases for
the Fedora Calendar?
* Group meetings
These events need shared ownership, we submit them once and keep
"forever". I think this is a good candidate for Git PR workflow used
by OpenStack.
* Test Days
Test Days are always associ
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Additionally, if-guarding every non-backwards compatible change will
> result in unmaintainable, brittle and broken .spec files pretty fast.
> Nobody should be expected to work through if-else-endif spaghetti (and I'm
> not even talking about automated tools here, which alm
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Another benefit of this would be that the "*-modular" repositories
> could be disabled by default, which would eliminate a whole lot of
> upgrade issues for "normal users".
> Only people who *actually want* alternate versions would enable
> modules (and *-modular repos?), a
Hi, Matthew,
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:47 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:58:19PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >Fedocal: If no maintainer is found by October 18th, it will be
> >decommissioned.
>
> This is pretty huge, since we use this to keep IRC meeting channel
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 10. 19 16:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Right now, there are two conflicting requirements in Fedora Modularity
> > that we need to resolve.
> >
> > 1. Once a user has selected a stream, updates should follow that
> > stream and not i
Hi,
I'm the "upstream maintainer" of libvtemm. In quotes, because last change I
have made to the project was 8 years ago. It depends on an orphaned package
vte (which is based on gtk2). It's also a leaf package. I don't think it
makes sense to even orphan it.
I intend to retire the package within
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019, 02:17 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > It goes like this:
> >
> > - master and f31 are at the same commit "aa"
> > - I push a change only possible in rawhide, commit "bb" to master
> > (it includes release bump and changelog entry)
> > - a commi
22 matches
Mail list logo
