Re: Self Introduction: Dakota Williams

2019-12-08 Thread Matthias Runge
On 08/12/2019 02:52, Dakota Williams via devel wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm working on bringing cutelyst to Fedora for my personal project. > Formally, I'm a C/C++ developer, but have a strong interest in RPM > packaging. > > I've had some packaging experience through work by backporting glib2, >

[389-devel] System tap performance results,

2019-12-08 Thread William Brown
Hi all, Following last weeks flamegraph runs, I wanted to find more details on exactly what was happening. While flamegraphs highlighted that a changed existed between single and multithreaded servers, it did not help to isolate where the change was occuring. To understand this I have started

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-12-09 - 95% PASS

2019-12-08 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/12/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.5-20191209gitd527003.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2019-12-08 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 481 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 223 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80 python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7 220

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-12-08 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-52445f11c2 clamav-0.101.5-1.el8 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-df038eb817 chromium-78.0.3904.108-1.el8 The following builds

[Bug 1778465] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Entropy

2019-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778465 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1780944] Failing dependencies for package perl-Net-SNMP

2019-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780944 i...@itfuzzi.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1780944] Failing dependencies for package perl-Net-SNMP

2019-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780944 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emman...@seyman.fr Doc

Re: OCaml 4.09.0 will be added to Fedora 32 via a side tag

2019-12-08 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:40 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Builds will start soon into a side tag (f32-build-side-14856), and > then if everything goes OK I will merge it into Rawhide. > > This version should have fixed RISC-V support which is broken > currently (and requires some extremely

[Bug 1780944] New: Failing dependencies for package perl-Net-SNMP

2019-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780944 Bug ID: 1780944 Summary: Failing dependencies for package perl-Net-SNMP Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-SNMP Assignee:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191208.n.0 changes

2019-12-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191207.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191208.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 26 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.04 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Rawhide-20191208.n.0 compose check report

2019-12-08 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 9/165 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

NeuroFedora review swap: Arbor

2019-12-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get Arbor reviewed for NeuroFedora. It's a multi-compartment neural network simulation library: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780906 The spec is a little long, since Arbor is also built with MPI support. Unofficial

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

2019-12-08 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 07/12/19 19:32, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > But we already explained this. Comments on stable updates are not > primarily for the maintainer, they are for *users*. Users tend to refer > to Bodhi notes, if anything, more than maintainers do. > ...and that's exactly the behavior that the change