Fedora-Cloud-30-20200125.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1791036] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.44 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791036

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.4 |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.4
   |4-1.fc32|4-1.fc32
   ||perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.4
   ||4-1.fc31
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-25 06:34:41



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.44-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1790639] ack-3.3.1 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790639

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ack-3.3.1-1.fc31
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-25 06:34:22



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
ack-3.3.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1786878] ack-3.3.0 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786878

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||ack-3.3.1-1.fc31
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-25 06:34:21



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
ack-3.3.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bubblemail: looking for package maintainer

[razer raz]

Your enthusiasm makes me me happy.
@Javier : you just have to tell me what you need (changes, repo branch, you 
call it)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 1794117 – Disabling support for UDP for NFSv3

[Ian Kent]

On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 14:25 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> FYI... 
> 
> NFS over UDP will be deprecated in the 5.6 kernel. 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794117
> 
> Its not clear what or if any havoc this could cause
> but the commit (f745bfdc) has been accepted upstream.
> Just letting the community know...  

Yeah, that's going to be a problem for am-utils.

It's been a while but IIRC there was a bug that I fixed in
the single-threaded concurrent mount handling that requires
UDP to work properly, not to mention the completely
unnecessary TCP overhead for the localhost (limited function)
server of the amd daemon.

It's not my doing the daemon implemented the concurrent mounting
this way, it was done many years ago, I just fixed the bug I
found. I also don't think re-implementing the concurrent mounting
is an option and neither is converting amd to use pthreads which
I think are the only ways around this.

I implemented an NFSv3 server for amd when NFSv2 was dropped and
while implementing an NFSv4 server might not be that all that
difficult I really would rather not go there, especially since
there's nothing to gain from doing it.

There would need to be a decent number of am-utils package users
that can demonstrate that they can't use the amd format map support
now present in the Linux autofs automounter. I accept that the way
autofs handles amd maps internally (necessarily) isn't the same as
that of amd and amd users might not be terribly happy with it but
that's the way it is. To change that would be a very significant
amount of work that may or may not work in the end and will almost
certainly disrupt existing functionality and still not get entirely
the same behaviour.

Speaking of behaviour, I mean the way mounts are performed internally
not semantic behaviour, amd format maps should themselves behave as
expected for the amd map features that are supported in autofs (and
that's a fairly large portion of the amd functionality).

Ian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-01-25 - 96% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/01/25/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.2-20200125git9b779ed.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Please help review these packages (swaps)

[Robert-André Mauchin]

Hello,

I have 3 packages I'd like help to review.

Two packages requested by the community:
 
   - Goodvibes, a lightweight Radio Player
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=goodvibes

   - Bubblemail, an extensible mail notification service
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=bubblemail

And one re-review of an existing package, dnscrypt-proxy2, but destined to 
EPEL7 only: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=dnscrypt-proxy2

I am at your disposal for any review you may need in exchange.

Best regards,

Robert-André

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1763637] EPEL8 builds

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763637

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Term-Shell-0.11-3.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbabeae126

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1792699] perl-CDB_File-1.00 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792699

Mark McKinstry  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #2 from Mark McKinstry  ---
The update is at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-52c67f5214
but didn't get linked to this ticket for some reason.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

[Dmitry Butskoy]

Tuomo Soini wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 21:10:48 +0300
Dmitry Butskoy  wrote:


Well, now I see the initial behaviour:

DEBUG util.py:598:  Package coreutils-8.22-24.el7.x86_64 is already
installed. DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install:
'rust-toolset-1.35-rust' DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to
install: 'rust-toolset-1.35-cargo' DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching
package to install: 'llvm-toolset-7.0' DEBUG util.py:596:  No
matching package to install: 'llvm-toolset-7.0-llvm-devel'

ie. devtoolset-8 is present, others not.

rust toolset is not needed. Rust is on epel7.

It is rust-1.40 .
Unfortunately rust is changed too fast, and Mozilla-based code (Firefox, 
Seamonkey etc.) just does not keep up with it.


It is a reason why current Firefox-ESR for RHEL7 is compiled by 
rust-1.35 (from toolset), and there is no more recent rust's toolsets 
yet in RHEL7.


~buc
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-db6621b9a8   
perl-Clipboard-0.21-1.el6.1


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

rssh-2.3.4-16.el6
sympa-6.2.52-2.el6

Details about builds:



 rssh-2.3.4-16.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-106155e90f)
 Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp

Update Information:

Fix regression in patch for CVE-2019-118.

ChangeLog:

* Sat Dec 21 2019 Frederick Lefebvre  - 2.3.4-16
- Fix regression in patch for CVE-2019-118.




 sympa-6.2.52-2.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-93ec33bcaf)
 Powerful multilingual List Manager

Update Information:

Add upstream patches to fix 2 scenario failures.

ChangeLog:

* Sun Jan 19 2020 Xavier Bachelot  6.2.52-2
- Add upstream patches to fix 2 scenario failures.


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

[Tuomo Soini]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 21:10:48 +0300
Dmitry Butskoy  wrote:

> Well, now I see the initial behaviour:
> > DEBUG util.py:598:  Package coreutils-8.22-24.el7.x86_64 is already
> > installed. DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install:
> > 'rust-toolset-1.35-rust' DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to
> > install: 'rust-toolset-1.35-cargo' DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching
> > package to install: 'llvm-toolset-7.0' DEBUG util.py:596:  No
> > matching package to install: 'llvm-toolset-7.0-llvm-devel'  
> ie. devtoolset-8 is present, others not.

rust toolset is not needed. Rust is on epel7. And so is llvm7.0 so
llvm-toolset is not needed.

-- 
Tuomo Soini 
Foobar Linux services
+358 40 5240030
Foobar Oy 
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1794207] perl-lib-abs-0.94 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794207



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-lib-abs-0.94-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-60626a4600

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Let's talk about Fedora in the '20s!

[Renich Bon Ciric]

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:29 AM Matthew Miller  wrote:
> I agree that's a challenge. Any ideas for how to address it and change these
> perceptions?

My 1.5 broken-cryptocurrency cents on this one.

I think we should make a serious and great effort to put the users
first remind us of this in every breaking decision we make. For
example, in Fedora 31, we don't have docker out of the box; though,
podman is awesome. This is a good example of how we ask that users
align into, often awesome, new technology paradigms, but it breaks
user's environments and it takes more work to make Fedora your main
OS.

This is why we have, in every release, so many articles and scripts
that "fix" Fedora, so that the user doesn't have to.

Making sure we don't break the user's experience is key, IMHO.

Making sure that software doesn't break is key as well. Things should
just work. Also, we should through some configuration help there as
well; not provide stuff as vanilla as we have for years. For example,
just recently, the nginx configuration took into account php-fpm (as
an example that comes to mind). For several releases, one had to do
this manually.

We should provide an environment that welcomes 3rd parties. We want
companies to make Fedora their go-to distro. Wouldn't be awesome that
docker showed examples of how to do stuff in Fedora first; rather than
Ubuntu? Same goes for k8s, raspberry pi,

Bring the companies and the companies will bring the users.

That's what I can think of right now, hehe.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1794207] perl-lib-abs-0.94 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794207

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-lib-abs-0.94-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e63774f26a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Software Collection packages for EPEL

[Dmitry Butskoy]

Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 12:13, Dmitry Butskoy  wrote:

Now it cannot find devtoolset-8 :

DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install: 'devtoolset-8-gcc'
DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install: 'devtoolset-8-gcc-c++'
DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install: 
'devtoolset-8-libatomic-devel'

See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40411197


OK this is just messed up. The newer version only has the older
devtoolset, and the what I thought was the older version only has the
newer devtoolset but not the other libraries you need.


Well, now I see the initial behaviour:

DEBUG util.py:598:  Package coreutils-8.22-24.el7.x86_64 is already installed.
DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install: 'rust-toolset-1.35-rust'
DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install: 'rust-toolset-1.35-cargo'
DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install: 'llvm-toolset-7.0'
DEBUG util.py:596:  No matching package to install: 
'llvm-toolset-7.0-llvm-devel'

ie. devtoolset-8 is present, others not.

Can someone explain if it makes sense to hope for the appearance of 
these missing packages in EPEL build system in more or less near future?


~buc

P.S. Does their presence violate any policies?
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1759801] please build perl-gtk3 for epel 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759801
Bug 1759801 depends on bug 1787759, which changed state.

Bug 1787759 Summary: please build perl-Glib-Object-Introspection for epel 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787759

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1787759] please build perl-Glib-Object-Introspection for epel 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787759
Bug 1787759 depends on bug 1785501, which changed state.

Bug 1785501 Summary: please build perl-Cairo-GObject for epel 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785501

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1787759] please build perl-Glib-Object-Introspection for epel 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787759

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Glib-Object-Introspect
   ||ion-0.048-1.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-24 17:43:28



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Cairo-GObject-1.005-1.el8, perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.048-1.el8,
perl-Gtk3-0.036-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1783301] perl-Sort-Naturally for EL8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783301

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Sort-Naturally-1.03-22
   ||.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-24 17:43:04



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Sort-Naturally-1.03-22.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1785501] please build perl-Cairo-GObject for epel 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785501

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Cairo-GObject-1.005-1.
   ||el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-24 17:43:26



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Cairo-GObject-1.005-1.el8, perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.048-1.el8,
perl-Gtk3-0.036-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1759801] please build perl-gtk3 for epel 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759801

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Gtk3-0.036-1.el8
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-24 17:43:25



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Cairo-GObject-1.005-1.el8, perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.048-1.el8,
perl-Gtk3-0.036-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1785649] perl-Filesys-Df needed in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785649

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-01-24 17:42:53



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Filesys-Df-0.92-36.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: Issue 50853 - Fix crash from NULL pointer deref when updating cn=config (regression from 48707)

[Mark Reynolds]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50854

--

389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:37 am, Michael Catanzaro 
 wrote:

It doesn't have as many features as github.com,


Sorry, this was a typo. I meant: it doesn't have as many features as 
gitlab.com.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

[John Florian]

On 2020-01-23 11:26, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:28:52 -0500,
 Neal Gompa  wrote:


We don't need to. There are improvements that people would like, and
that does take development effort. That's the piece that requires
manpower to go faster.


In my opinion, I think this is where Red Hat should be helping. Pagure 
has a chance to change what free projects use for software 
development. Github isn't free (though they do some nice things for 
free software). Gitlab is open core, which means they have a conflict 
of interest when accepting improvements from outsiders. They could 
also stop supporting the open core at any time, leaving users who want 
infrastructure running on free software in a poor place.



I completely agree with this.  I find it rather bizarre that I came to 
know FOSS almost exclusively because of Red Hat, yet it seems the 
majority of the projects I contribute to are now being hosted on Github, 
a Microsoft-owned company.  I'd be rather incredulous if someone told me 
it was going to be like this back in the 90s.  I've little experience 
with Gitlab, but plenty with Pagure from an internal instance and a few 
projects on pagure.io like Koji.  I love Pagure and all this talk of 
possibly pushing it aside for Fedora makes me sad.  I thought it was the 
way forward and was just getting to an excellent footing.  Pagure might 
not be a money-making product but it sure can help build a community in 
an environment that is void of any potential corporate hostility.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1794749] New: perl-EV-4.32 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794749

Bug ID: 1794749
   Summary: perl-EV-4.32 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-EV
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: c...@redhat.com, emman...@seyman.fr,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 4.32
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.31-1.fc32
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/EV

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7069/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1794711] perl-lib-abs-0.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794711



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-lib-abs-0.95-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40960133

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1794710] New: perl-lib-abs-0.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794710

Bug ID: 1794710
   Summary: perl-lib-abs-0.95 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-lib-abs
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.95
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.94-2.fc32
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/lib-abs/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3022/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1794711] New: perl-lib-abs-0.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794711

Bug ID: 1794711
   Summary: perl-lib-abs-0.95 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-lib-abs
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.95
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.94-2.fc32
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/lib-abs/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3022/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1794711] perl-lib-abs-0.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794711



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1655070
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1655070=edit
[patch] Update to 0.95 (#1794711)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200124.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1763637] EPEL8 builds

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763637

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbabeae126 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbabeae126

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org