Fedora-Cloud-30-20200210.0 compose check report

2020-02-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: g++ 10: static declared in extern "C" inline function

2020-02-09 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Iñaki Ucar writes: On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 14:20, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Iñaki Ucar writes: > > > Thoughts? > > > > [1] https://gist.github.com/kevinushey/cfa848be2d39ddd110f893d9b6c5ac9c > > I managed to find the part of the C++ standard that specified the semantics > of extern "C" linkage,

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2020-02-10 Fedora QA Meeting

2020-02-09 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for tomorrow. We met the last few weeks and I don't think we have any urgent business this week. There will be a blocker review meeting. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go a

[Test-Announce] 2020-02-10 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting

2020-02-09 Thread Adam Williamson
# F32 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-02-10 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta blocker and 2 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a Fedora 32 blocker review meeting tomorrow! If you have time today, you can ta

Re: Packaging of Ansible collections

2020-02-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 2/9/20 2:58 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hello, Did anybody had an experience of packaging Ansible collections into an RPM? I guess if would be enough to put the files somewhere under /usr/share/ansible, but not sure. Also I'm not sure what download URL could be used. It seems to me that "an

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:36 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Friday, January 31, 2020 7:58:55 AM MST Peter Robinson wrote: > > Feankly if a proprietary piece of software hasn't migrated in 8+ years I > > would be looking for a replacement. > > Proprietary software works at the speed of eventuall

Re: [Retired] gstreamer & gstreamer-plugins-base

2020-02-09 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, January 31, 2020 7:58:55 AM MST Peter Robinson wrote: > Feankly if a proprietary piece of software hasn't migrated in 8+ years I > would be looking for a replacement. Proprietary software works at the speed of eventually. This is why RHEL maintains compat libraries going back a ridicul

Re: Packaging of Ansible collections

2020-02-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:59 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello, > > Did anybody had an experience of packaging Ansible collections into an RPM? > > I guess if would be enough to put the files somewhere under > /usr/share/ansible, but not sure. Also I'm not sure what download URL could > be used.

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-09 Thread Jun Aruga
> netcdf-java[1] uses the Gradle build system, and is required to update hdfview[2] to the latest version. Gradle, however, was retired[3] as "out of date, broken, fails to build, basically unmaintainable". Checking the build.grade file (gradle recipe filei) of netcdf-java, is it possible to build

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 2:09 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 10:30:41 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > > Le samedi 08 février 2020 à 19:16 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > > > > > What does it tell? To me, i

Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Sun., Feb. 9, 2020, 11:15 a.m. Jerry James, wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade > wrote: > > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but > > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package > > review process [2] which

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-09 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 2:49 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 10:30:41 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le samedi 08 février 2020 à 19:16 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > > > What does it tell? To me, it says that FOSS platforms don't care > > > about > > > Java as much

Re: g++ 10: static declared in extern "C" inline function

2020-02-09 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 14:20, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Iñaki Ucar writes: > > > Thoughts? > > > > [1] https://gist.github.com/kevinushey/cfa848be2d39ddd110f893d9b6c5ac9c > > I managed to find the part of the C++ standard that specified the semantics > of extern "C" linkage, it is [dcl.link]. The

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 8:49 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 10:30:41 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le samedi 08 février 2020 à 19:16 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > > > What does it tell? To me, it says that FOSS platforms don't care > > > about > > > Java as much

Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread François Cami
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade > wrote: > > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but > > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package > > review process [2] which me

Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package > review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive > *submitters*, but n

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200209.n.0 changes

2020-02-09 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200207.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200209.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:7 Upgraded packages: 62 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 9.91 MiB Size of dropped packages:5.15

Fedora-Rawhide-20200209.n.0 compose check report

2020-02-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 25 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 99/169 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fed

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-09 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 10:30:41 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le samedi 08 février 2020 à 19:16 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > What does it tell? To me, it says that FOSS platforms don't care > > about > > Java as much as they used to. We're clearly able to do stuff with Go > > and

Re: g++ 10: static declared in extern "C" inline function

2020-02-09 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Iñaki Ucar writes: Thoughts? [1] https://gist.github.com/kevinushey/cfa848be2d39ddd110f893d9b6c5ac9c I managed to find the part of the C++ standard that specified the semantics of extern "C" linkage, it is [dcl.link]. The term used is "language linkage". There is no such thing as an inlin

Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 6:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Hello, > > I've been waiting almost 2 months for my reviewer to respond on my > package request. I pinged and set needinfo some time ago, but still > nothing. My package is FTBFS and FTI in F31, and I've been stuck > because of thi

g++ 10: static declared in extern "C" inline function

2020-02-09 Thread Iñaki Ucar
Hi, I've stumbled upon a regression, and I'm not sure this is a gcc 10 bug or not. Consider the sample program in [1], a simplification of a real case out there [2]. It fails to compile in Fedora Rawhide with the following message: /tmp/cccbVeNV.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cccbVeNV.s:59: Error: s

Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Hello, I've been waiting almost 2 months for my reviewer to respond on my package request. I pinged and set needinfo some time ago, but still nothing. My package is FTBFS and FTI in F31, and I've been stuck because of this. Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but I

Re: Packaging of Ansible collections

2020-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:59 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello, > > Did anybody had an experience of packaging Ansible collections into an RPM? > > I guess if would be enough to put the files somewhere under > /usr/share/ansible, but not sure. Also I'm not sure what download URL could > be used.

Packaging of Ansible collections

2020-02-09 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Hello, Did anybody had an experience of packaging Ansible collections into an RPM? I guess if would be enough to put the files somewhere under /usr/share/ansible, but not sure. Also I'm not sure what download URL could be used. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Package uses Gradle (retired) to build: what to do?

2020-02-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le samedi 08 février 2020 à 19:16 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > What does it tell? To me, it says that FOSS platforms don't care > about > Java as much as they used to. We're clearly able to do stuff with Go > and Rust, which are just as "anti-distribution" as Java is (based on > what other peop

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200209.0 compose check report

2020-02-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200209.0 compose check report

2020-02-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap