Re: Orphaning tinymce

2020-02-16 Thread Matthias Runge
On 15/02/2020 21:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > I was (probibly poorly) maintaining tinymce for a while because we used > it for askbot. We no longer do need it so I am going to orphan it and > hope someone out there has more time and energy to give it the love it > needs. > > There's

[389-devel] Please review 50900 fix cargo offline

2020-02-16 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50900 — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-02-17 - 96% PASS

2020-02-16 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/02/17/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.3-20200217git2f8fbe2.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Orphaned package: cuneiform

2020-02-16 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Subj is an OCR system which needs to much love to be alive that I haven't. It's not required from any other package, it never had upstream from he very beginning and it is a `tesseract` OCR to switch to. So it's time to say good bye for me. It would be nice if anybody could adopt it (but I do

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2020-02-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0e6e3f93b6 mbedtls-2.16.4-1.el8 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e016baf8b3 cacti-1.2.9-1.el8 cacti-spine-1.2.9-1.el8 0

[Bug 1797154] perl-Modern-Perl-1.20200201 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797154 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Modern-Perl-1.20200201 |perl-Modern-Perl-1.20200201

[Bug 1797154] perl-Modern-Perl-1.20200201 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797154 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Modern-Perl-1.20200201 |perl-Modern-Perl-1.20200201

[Bug 1801905] perl-Mojolicious-8.33 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801905 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Disabling Fedora 29 chroots in Copr

2020-02-16 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
Hello, we have just disabled Fedora 29 chroots in Copr. According to the Fedora wiki [1], Fedora 29 reached the end of its life on 2019-11-30 and therefore we are disabling it in Copr. That effectively means that from this moment, it is no longer possible to submit builds for the following

[Bug 1803552] perl-Devel-Hide-0.0013 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803552 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Devel-Hide-0.0013-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41527656 -- You

[Bug 1803552] perl-Devel-Hide-0.0013 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803552 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1663376 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1663376=edit [patch] Update to 0.0013 (#1803552) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1803552] New: perl-Devel-Hide-0.0013 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803552 Bug ID: 1803552 Summary: perl-Devel-Hide-0.0013 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-Hide Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

2020-02-16 Thread stan via devel
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 10:57:26 -0700 "John M. Harris Jr" wrote: > On Monday, February 10, 2020 10:53:45 AM MST Jared K. Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:30 AM John M. Harris Jr > > > > > > wrote: > > > As for the software available, that's called choice. I know > > > it's a relative

Re: URGENT: users prompted to upgrade to F32

2020-02-16 Thread drago01
On Saturday, February 15, 2020, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 05:14:57PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 18:37 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Users are being prompted to upgrade to F32. Anyone who knows how to > fix > > > this, please

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 8:29 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:28:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:59 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Similarly, a package with a

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:25:01 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 2:23 PM John M. Harris Jr > wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:19:41 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 2:23 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:19:41 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > > But

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 12:19:41 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr > wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > But the contra argument is, well what if there is an urgent security > > > fix? >

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:08 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > But the contra argument is, well what if there is an urgent security fix? > > > > The repo metadata, I guess, needs some way of distinguishing urgent vs > >

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell > > wrote: > > > > > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned > > > > after 4 > > > > reminders

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned > > > after 4 > > > reminders (after 9-12 weeks), retired at a point if still not CLOSED > > > after 4

Re: URGENT: users prompted to upgrade to F32

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, February 14, 2020 5:37:53 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > Users are being prompted to upgrade to F32. Anyone who knows how to fix > this, please help with > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8652 ASAP. A quick note: This only affected GNOME users, or those

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 3:44:17 AM MST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:05:27PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > On Monday, February 10, 2020 12:03:25 PM MST Robbie Harwood wrote: > > > > > "John M. Harris Jr" writes: > > > > > > > On Saturday, January 25, 2020

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 3:28:36 AM MST Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 2020-02-11 05:05, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported > > (you can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks > > hibernation (for

Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > > > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned > > > after 4 reminders (after 9-12 weeks), retired at a point if still not > > > CLOSED

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

2020-02-16 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Monday, February 10, 2020 10:53:45 AM MST Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:30 AM John M. Harris Jr > > wrote: > > As for the software available, that's called choice. I know > > it's a relative unknown in the GNOME world, as one option is shoved down > > everyones' throat,

[Bug 1803512] perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.41 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803512 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1803531] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0013 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803531 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Test-mysqld-1.0013-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41525401 -- You are

[Bug 1803531] perl-Test-mysqld-1.0013 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803531 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1663361 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1663361=edit [patch] Update to 1.0013 (#1803531) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1803531] New: perl-Test-mysqld-1.0013 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803531 Bug ID: 1803531 Summary: perl-Test-mysqld-1.0013 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-mysqld Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Another take on RStudio (review swaps?)

2020-02-16 Thread Iñaki Ucar
Hi all, There were some efforts to package RStudio in the past [1], but they're all dead. So following recent work by Dan Čermák for openSUSE [2], I adapted it for Fedora and submitted it for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528 If anyone is interested in pushing this

Re: How to write License field for packages bundling mutliple others

2020-02-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 9:25 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > In Rust world we package all crates as source code in -devel packages. > Then we use them to build the real applications. > > Some time ago, someone noticed that we don't put licenses of those > -devel packages into a resulting RPM with app

[Bug 1803512] New: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.41 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803512 Bug ID: 1803512 Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.41 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

How to write License field for packages bundling mutliple others

2020-02-16 Thread Igor Gnatenko
In Rust world we package all crates as source code in -devel packages. Then we use them to build the real applications. Some time ago, someone noticed that we don't put licenses of those -devel packages into a resulting RPM with app which is fair. However, I'm not entirely sure how to properly

Re: How to deal with large number of bugs related to the, "multiple definition of..." issue

2020-02-16 Thread Richard Shaw
For now I'm settling for packages which I know I don't want to be retired to add: # https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html#common %define _legacy_common_support 1 To the top of the spec with a link to an upstream issue if filed... Thanks, Richard >

How to deal with large number of bugs related to the, "multiple definition of..." issue

2020-02-16 Thread Richard Shaw
So I have several FTBFS bugs most likely from the new gcc being more pedantic. I understand the bug at a high level but I think it would be nice if someone who really understood it could perhaps document strategies for figuring out how to find the right file that needs to be updated and how.

Re: Why does "fedpkg build" failed for wdune ?

2020-02-16 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 11:21:34 +, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:24:09 +0100 > "J. Scheurich" wrote: > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41519708 > > > > | Result > > > > | GenericError: Build already in progress (task 41519706) > > > > I already started

Re: Why does "fedpkg build" failed for wdune ?

2020-02-16 Thread Paul Howarth
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:24:09 +0100 "J. Scheurich" wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41519708 > > | Result > > | GenericError: Build already in progress (task 41519706) > > I already started "fedpkg build", but it said > > ... > Watching tasks (this may be safely

[Bug 1803381] perl-Devel-Hide-0.0012 is available

2020-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803381 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

COPR builds from SCM still not working

2020-02-16 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
Hello all. COPR builds from SCM are still failing with no visible errors. Does anyone know how to fix this? Full build log: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/phracek/PyCharm/build/1241112/ P.S. I cannot even upload SRPM due to its size. COPR throw HTTP 500 error when trying to upload SRPM

Orphaned rome

2020-02-16 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
I've just orphaned rome (Java rss library). Couple of its dependencies have been removed and I don't have neither the time nor the need to maintain it anymore. -- Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse Team ___ devel mailing list --

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200216.0 compose check report

2020-02-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200216.0 compose check report

2020-02-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to