Re: Heads up: gssdp and gupnp API changes coming to rawhide

> OK, I'm all done with the gupnp stack updates and everything is merged > into rawhide now. All dependent packages are rebuilt/fixed, with the > exception of 'meiga' (maintainers CC'd). I'm not going to fix meiga > myself as it looks like a dead package to me. My recommendation for the >

[Bug 1813033] perl-Archive-Zip-1.68 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813033 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-03-13 - 96% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/03/13/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.3-20200313gitc23b785.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1809718] perl-Locale-Codes-3.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809718 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.63-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.63-1.fc

Fedora-32-20200312.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200310.n.0): ID: 543391 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/543391 ID: 543441 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

[Bug 1812295] perl-Encode-3.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812295 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-3.04-442.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1812295] perl-Encode-3.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812295 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Encode-3.04-13.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1809718] perl-Locale-Codes-3.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809718 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1809202] perl-Date-Manip-6.80 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809202 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200312.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-32-20200310.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200312.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 1 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: putting my blog back on Planet Fedora

On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 11:33:04PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > It is very, very wrong and I don't feel I should have to make a public > request like this. Nonetheless, there is a certain type of person who Daniel, to request re-instatement, please follow the process outlined in the original

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a61d9e64ef sympa-6.2.54-1.el6 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c807deec30 mbedtls-2.7.14-1.el6 3

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-03-13 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: \#meetingname EPEL \#topic

Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group

* Petr Pisar [06/03/2020 11:24] : > > Do you mean a Pagure group ? Yes. Users and groups for the src.fp.o instance of pagure are managed through FAS so this is the equivalent of a FAS group. >

[Bug 1813033] New: perl-Archive-Zip-1.68 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813033 Bug ID: 1813033 Summary: perl-Archive-Zip-1.68 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Archive-Zip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1812567] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812567 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1812257] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.88 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812257 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1812362] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0203 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812362 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1812295] perl-Encode-3.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1808956] perl-Encode-3.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808956 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from

[Bug 1812177] perl-MooX-StrictConstructor-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812177 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Fedora 32 Beta is No-Go -- will be revisited tomorrow

The release status of Fedora 32 Beta is no-go. Due to an open previous release blocker and insufficient test coverage, Fedora 32 Beta was declared "no-go". We will reconvene at 1800 UTC (note the departure from the usual time) on Friday, 13 March[1] to re-evaluate the existing release candidate.

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Beta is No-Go -- will be revisited tomorrow

The release status of Fedora 32 Beta is no-go. Due to an open previous release blocker and insufficient test coverage, Fedora 32 Beta was declared "no-go". We will reconvene at 1800 UTC (note the departure from the usual time) on Friday, 13 March[1] to re-evaluate the existing release candidate.

RE: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

I realize I'm thinking about the Pie in the Sky, but: Would it be possible for 'microdnf' to become the base for 'dnf' so that extra 'dnf' functionality is added via some kind of modules/plugins/etc behaviour? Perhaps "somehow" it could (for example) find out "oh I've got python, lets load those

Re: Self Introduction: Yongkui Han

On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, Yongkui Han (yonhan) via devel wrote: There is one minor problem with my package review request: I would like to set the blocks for 177841 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-NEEDSPONSOR, however, I tried a few times, could not make my review request get the

Self Introduction: Yongkui Han

Hi All, I would like to join the Fedora community for open-source software development. I do not have much experience in open-sourcing development, but I am using a lot of open-source software, and have >20 years of software development. I just submitted one new Fedora package: OpenOSC, an

Fedora-32-20200312.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/160 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 542611 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542611 ID: 542661 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background URL:

Re: Heads up: gssdp and gupnp API changes coming to rawhide

On 3/12/20 13:28, Kalev Lember wrote: Hi all, I'm working on updating the gssdp and gupnp stack in rawhide from 1.0.x to 1.2.x. This brings a bunch of API changes and dependent packages need rebuilds/version bumps to be able to continue building against new gupnp. I'll rebuild and update

Re: Fedora CI update 2020-03-11

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:30:18PM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > thanks for the update, it seems nice progress is being made. > > > > > ### Dist-git tests support multipackage updates > > > > > >

Re: BuildError: error building package (arch s390x), mock exited with status 1

On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:58:02 - "Martin Gansser" wrote: > Hi, > > the build of speed-dreams on s390x arch fails [1] with > > DEBUG util.py:598: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-6.fc33 > DEBUG util.py:596: error: >

Re: BuildError: error building package (arch s390x), mock exited with status 1

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:58:02PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > the build of speed-dreams on s390x arch fails [1] with > > DEBUG util.py:598: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-6.fc33 > > DEBUG util.py:596: error: unpacking of archive failed on

BuildError: error building package (arch s390x), mock exited with status 1

Hi, the build of speed-dreams on s390x arch fails [1] with DEBUG util.py:598: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-6.fc33 DEBUG util.py:596: error: unpacking of archive failed on file

Fedora-IoT-32-20200312.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200311.0): ID: 542772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542772 Soft failed

Re: Fedora CI update 2020-03-11

Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > thanks for the update, it seems nice progress is being made. > > > ### Dist-git tests support multipackage updates > > > > You can define package tests in dist-git via STR format > > > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200312.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200311.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200312.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:13 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 89 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.59 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Rawhide-20200312.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 14/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200311.n.0): ID: 542386 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL:

[Bug 1812910] New: perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-22.fc33 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:185:46: error: 'CURL_WIN32' undeclared

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812910 Bug ID: 1812910 Summary: perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-22.fc33 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:185:46: error: 'CURL_WIN32' undeclared Product: Fedora Version: rawhide

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Candidate Beta-1.2 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 32 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the

Fedora-IoT-33-20200312.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200308.0): ID: 542526 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542526 ID: 542527 Test:

Heads up: gssdp and gupnp API changes coming to rawhide

Hi all, I'm working on updating the gssdp and gupnp stack in rawhide from 1.0.x to 1.2.x. This brings a bunch of API changes and dependent packages need rebuilds/version bumps to be able to continue building against new gupnp. I'll rebuild and update most of the dependent packages, but some

Unannounced SONAME bump in rawhide: libwebsockets.so.15 → libwebsockets.so.16

Hi all, The recent update to libwebsockets 4.0.0 has introduced an SONAME bump (like in $SUBJECT). Dependent packages have not been rebuilt. This is affecting at least: - guacamole-server - mosquitto - qpid-dispatch - vdr-osd2web Please coordinate the necessary rebuilds with the maintainers of

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module libgit2:0.27:3120190407181414:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package python2-matplotlib-2.2.5-1.fc31.x86_64 requires python2-backports-functools_lru_cache, but none of the providers can be installed

Re: GCC help needed for chromium

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:57:46AM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > Wait, I know that $TOPIC is scary, come back. > > Chromium has this chunk of code (in > third_party/angle/src/common/PackedEnums.h): > > // This horrible const_cast pattern is necessary to work > around a constexpr

Re: Fedora CI update 2020-03-11

On 12. 03. 20 10:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: There's a mention somewhere that this destructively modifies the host machine, and using a VM is suggested. But not in the "Quick Start Guide". I'd expect this to be prominently mentioned at the top. This together with: Simply following

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:22:45AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, 12 March 2020 09.03.38 WET Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote: > > Error: > > Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64 > > requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed >

Re: Fedora CI update 2020-03-11

Hi, thanks for the update, it seems nice progress is being made. > ### Dist-git tests support multipackage updates > > You can define package tests in dist-git via STR format > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/standard-test-roles/ The docs have a "Quick Start Guide", but it describes

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

On Thursday, 12 March 2020 09.03.38 WET Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64 > requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed > - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 15:26, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200312.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 08:22:48AM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > Dne 12. 03. 20 v 6:21 Chris Murphy napsal(a): > >On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > >>>On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >

[Bug 1812799] New: Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812799 Bug ID: 1812799 Summary: Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.32 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBD-Firebird Assignee:

[Bug 1812257] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.88 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812257 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0f5c3e7a5c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0f5c3e7a5c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1812567] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812567 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0f5c3e7a5c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0f5c3e7a5c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1812567] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812567 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1812567] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812567 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

Dne 12. 03. 20 v 6:21 Chris Murphy napsal(a): On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Daniel Mach wrote: Dne 04. 03. 20 v 23:01 Neal Gompa napsal(a): On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Are you going to use sd-bus for the dbus library? I'd hope not, given that

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200312.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to