Dear Fedora Development Community,
Hello Fedora Community!
As I mentioned in my previous email I was working on an implementation of
KangarooTwelve, a cryptographic hash function made by the same creators of the
SHA-3 hash function. The implementation guidelines are currently a rough draft
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842698
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Le 30/05/2020 à 11:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
> Is mod_php a maintainance burder and/or a noticable installation
> overhead when not used? And if it is, would additional help with the
> maintainance that was offered make it easier to keep?
Its maintainance is not much work, the
On Tuesday, June 2, 2020, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On June 1, 2020 7:13:51 p.m. PDT, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer
> >to
> >install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with
> >tons of
> >small files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-269563a18f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842173
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-269563a18f has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841508
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839515
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-88796d10b6 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841264
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841523
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.3-20200601git7b79b89.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-perlfaq-5.20200523-1.f |perl-perlfaq-5.20200523-1.f
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:37 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On June 1, 2020 7:13:51 p.m. PDT, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> >I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer
> >to
> >install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with
> >tons of
> >small files
On June 1, 2020 7:13:51 p.m. PDT, Richard Shaw wrote:
>I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer
>to
>install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with
>tons of
>small files (boost-devel, vtk-devel, cmake-data).
>
>Checking on my NVME 970 EVO, all the
I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer to
install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with tons of
small files (boost-devel, vtk-devel, cmake-data).
Checking on my NVME 970 EVO, all the stats look good:
SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02)
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/39 (x86_64)
ID: 608816 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608816
ID: 608843 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification
URL:
On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this. I
hacked up a minimal reproducer with empty packages, and experimented a
bit, and the solution I was able to find that works is to have systemd-
udev Obsoletes: systemd < 245.6-1. This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842709
Bug ID: 1842709
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200602 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842698
Bug ID: 1842698
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20200601 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
Hi folks! openQA caught a subtle issue in a systemd update over the
weekend, and I thought it would be worth flagging up here both to let
people know about it and also to see if anyone has a better solution
than the one I came up with.
The issue affects this systemd update for F32:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 11/11 (x86_64)
New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200520.0):
ID: 608806 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608806
ID: 608808 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_greenboot
On 5/29/20 4:02 AM, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> * more space on the hard disks of the servers, because they contains
> repositories only for LLVM IR packages rather than one by supported
> architectures
LLVM IR is not really arch-independent -- by the time you get to this
level, all of the
https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/releases/tag/v0.8.1
Some highlights for this release:
- Many UX improvements to `cosa run`
- A lot of work around enhancing our support for GCP image uploads and
manipulations.
- Add support for offline installs
- More multi-arch fixes and improvements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842602
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Text-Xslate-3.5.8-1.fc30.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45291054
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842602
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1694148
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1694148=edit
[patch] Update to 3.5.8 (#1842602)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842602
Bug ID: 1842602
Summary: perl-Text-Xslate-3.5.8 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Xslate
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-01/fesco.2020-06-01-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-01/fesco.2020-06-01-15.00.txt
Log:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 1:11 AM Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm unable to submit updates to EPEL 7 stable:
>
> $ bodhi updates request FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d8b45f1e30 stable
>
> fedora.client.ServerError:
> ServerError(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d8b45f1e30/request,
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841508
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 11/11 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841264
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841523
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842524
Bug ID: 1842524
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.82 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 18:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 12:07:35 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > On 30/05/2020 12:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > > However, the License that the Oxford University has released it under
> > > has certain clauses that make me unsure if it
When did this nonsense start happening?
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 7:12 AM
Subject: [Bug 1842499] flmsg-4.0.15 is available
To:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842499
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring <
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 4:46 AM Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> I'm starting the rebuilds for Boost 1.73.0 and packages that depend on
> it, using the f33-boost side tag.
>
>
Is this still in progress? I don't see that ceph-15.2.2 has been rebuilt
nor is it being rebuilt now. Should I build the new
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842487
Bug ID: 1842487
Summary: Upgrade perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl to 0.05
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841523
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 608735 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608735
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
Miro Hrončok writes:
> python-metaextract defolos
This should be fixed in Rawhide as well.
Cheers,
Dan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:31:23PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 5/31/20 6:37 PM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > We have to compile/build the module before we can import it from a
> > python3 shell. The problem is how to compile the modules without pass
> > "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" to the
Thanks David,
I could install tensorflow successfully with your help.
Regards,
Arun SL
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 01. 06. 20 4:14, Denis Arnaud wrote:
Thanks for the follow up!
| airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen
All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade):
* airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762
* airrac:
Hi all,
I have just orphaned python-tgext-crud[0], as far as I can tell this
package is not a dependency of any other package.
$ sudo repoquery --whatdepends python3-tgext-crud
There are currently 2 open bz for it [1]
[0] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud
[1] -
Thanks a Ton David,
With these I could get Tensorflow working :)
Regards,
Arun SL
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
I'm unable to submit updates to EPEL 7 stable:
$ bodhi updates request FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d8b45f1e30 stable
fedora.client.ServerError:
ServerError(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d8b45f1e30/request,
504, Error returned from json module while processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842173
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-89f78c37ce has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-89f78c37ce
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842173
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842173
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841508
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On 6/1/20 4:37 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:30:32AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 5/31/20 1:24 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
As you see, "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" library must be provided to
the linker. Otherwise, a lot of "undefined reference to xxx" error
messages show
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 09:37:39AM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:30:32AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 5/31/20 1:24 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > > As you see, "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" library must be provided to
> > > the linker. Otherwise, a lot of "undefined
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841264
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-88796d10b6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-88796d10b6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On 5/31/20 6:37 PM, Honggang LI wrote:
We have to compile/build the module before we can import it from a
python3 shell. The problem is how to compile the modules without pass
"-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" to the linker (/usr/bin/ld).
Do you have a link to a build log?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842176
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
61 matches
Mail list logo
