On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:21:53AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> After upgrading to Fedora 32 I've noticed when editing files, especially
> spec files that vim does some crazy jumps/indents that it didn't do before.
>
> Right now I'm pressing i to insert a line before a Requires: and when I hit
>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:45:06PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:35 pm, John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> > I haven't found any systems where that's the case, though my systems
> > have been
> > upgraded all along through from ~F24. Looking at my latest install,
> > which
Hi All,
Can anyone provide the info for the below one.
Regards,
Muneendra.
*From:* Muneendra Kumar M [mailto:muneendra.ku...@broadcom.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2020 3:05 PM
*To:* 'Development discussions related to Fedora' <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
*Subject:* Query on upgrading
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 16:26 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Here's a bit of fallout from the mass rebuild. The alt-ergo build failed:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1548139
[ ... ]
You might try without LTO. I'm just shooting in the dark, but LTO does have a
significant
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:35 pm, John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
I haven't found any systems where that's the case, though my systems
have been
upgraded all along through from ~F24. Looking at my latest install,
which has
been upgraded from F30, /etc/resolv.conf is still just a file by
default.
On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 9:22:58 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I agree we should not replace /etc/resolv.conf if it's not already a
> symlink (although this will not be a common case, since by default it
> is a symlink managed by NetworkManager).
I haven't found any systems where that's
On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 11:47:27 AM MST Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 7/28/20 12:31 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> > I think we should remove it if it's generated by NetworkManager, and
> > leave it untouched otherwise. If NetworkManager is managing DNS then it
> > will just push all its settings
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/07/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200728git98d6c7f.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 7/28/20 3:46 PM, Andy Mender wrote:
Dear Fedorians,
I really need some help with a review of a GCC toolchain variant I've
started recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
A Koji build of the most recent SRPM:
Here's a bit of fallout from the mass rebuild. The alt-ergo build failed:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1548139
Everything seems fine up until debuginfo processing begins, then this happens:
/usr/lib/rpm/debugedit:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:29 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> Whatever you committed in the last couple days seems to have fixed the issue.
> I
> just got a clean build of z3 on x86_64.
Hmmm. That's mysterious. All I did was switch us from building with
the old python script method to building with
El mar., 28 jul. 2020 a las 18:49, John Florian ()
escribió:
> I also have seen some weirdness of late, but I'm still on F31. I had yaml
> files indented with sw=4 and my foldmethod=indent. Now I have to open the
> fold twice, once for the invisible fold that seems to be implied as if sw=2
>
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 15:29 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:01 pm, Jeff Law wrote:
> > If this is a new failure (say in the last week), it could be an out
> > of memory
> > scenario. Try disabling LTO. The standard way to do that is
> >
> > %define _lto_cflags
I also have seen some weirdness of late, but I'm still on F31. I had
yaml files indented with sw=4 and my foldmethod=indent. Now I have to
open the fold twice, once for the invisible fold that seems to be
implied as if sw=2 and one more to get the real thing. If I reformat to
use 2-space
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 20:26:23 UTC
From 32978e375fc0405f79dc81b49f8afd60d316fa8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 20:26:18 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:03 PM Steven Munroe wrote:
>
> Dave Love writes:
>
> > It surprises me if that's IBM experience, and it's a bit worrying for our
> > new system.
>
> I no longer speak for IBM (retired) so more of a personal Linux for POWER
> opinion. But the Advance Toolchain (AT)
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 20:03:08 UTC
From 5d4b4499a6e6f2abb5f776dde382aa3fcaa8f8cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 20:03:04 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 20:01:35 UTC
From bbedb85766dcd36f5e2e33c4e8763b02cd1e440f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 20:01:30 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Dear Fedorians,
I really need some help with a review of a GCC toolchain variant I've
started recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
A Koji build of the most recent SRPM:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48035045
Some minor issues have been fixed
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 19:54:01 UTC
From 905c73742de841aa78aded4f0f361f5c0031f132 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 19:53:57 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
The license for bowtie was changed from "Artistic 2.0 and zlib and
GPLv3 and LGPLv3+"
to "Artistic 2.0 and zlib" [1].
Because the bundled dependency SeqAn [2] (licence: "GPLv3 and
LGPLv3+") was deleted on the latest version.
[1]
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 19:53:36 UTC
From 2715e40eb8d6f56099b23e24c9bb9111699bcc30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 19:53:31 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:01 pm, Jeff Law wrote:
If this is a new failure (say in the last week), it could be an out
of memory
scenario. Try disabling LTO. The standard way to do that is
%define _lto_cflags %{nil}
In your %build stanza in the spec file.
Heff
I agree, it's almost
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 19:32:39 UTC
From a41fb55198f5b309f6924dd5a2440cab2ee56f87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 19:32:35 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 14:51 -0500, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> I've been seeing build failures for Fedora 32[0][1][2], always the same
> failure: "xgcc: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus"
>
> I can't find any more detail than that. These builds succeed locally
> with mock. The
I've been seeing build failures for Fedora 32[0][1][2], always the same
failure: "xgcc: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus"
I can't find any more detail than that. These builds succeed locally
with mock. The copr failures are reproducible so I'm sure I'm doing
something
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:29 AM stan via devel
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:07 -0400
> Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM
>
> > How can it be disabled?
> >
> > Immediately:
> > swapoff /dev/zram0
> >
> > Permanently:
> > rm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861508
Bug ID: 1861508
Summary: perl-Test-TempDir-0.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-TempDir
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Spoke too soon, some other build failures that don't look like my fault:
ddd: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48032896
gdm: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48033123
- ajax
___
devel mailing list --
I've gone through (almost) every package I could find that depended on
one of the xorg-x11-* superpackages and fixed them up as best I could.
Here's how that went.
lxde-common has been switched to explicitly require xprop from
xorg-x11-utils, but still explicitly requires xorg-x11-server-utils
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Silvie Chlupova wrote:
> Epel 7 isn't built for s390x architecture at all, so we don't have the
> needed mirrors to build against. It will not be enabled.
The ClefOS 7 binaries include all of EPEL 7 and more
http://download.sinenomine.net/clefos/epel7/
-- Russ
On Tuesday, 28 July 2020 07:56:52 CEST Qiyu Yan wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I am trying to package a golang program to fedora and found that I
> need to bring those dependencies:
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861185
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861187
> -
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:52:44 UTC
From b5bd5f2a47be149acb2089238e7862c7c50082e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:52:39 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:53:09 UTC
From 22c98676257b5f687c443d54bf5a92ddda05cfb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:53:05 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:45:35 UTC
From 4aaca5f35a243269499e74c78e0fb8ccb93cdf9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:45:31 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:35:04 UTC
From 76ede33bb79e2113864fd00b10682ed50ba24d74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:34:59 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On 7/28/20 12:31 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I think we should remove it if it's generated by NetworkManager, and
leave it untouched otherwise. If NetworkManager is managing DNS then it
will just push all its settings to systemd-resolved anyway after
upgrade, right?
Don't assume that the
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:32:06 UTC
From bb08e6f6c283d8cfa4fb2db4c69f15c46cd940f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:32:02 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51221
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:29:39 UTC
From 268a4960285772ff6431709614842659c5ab3ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:29:35 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:29:48 UTC
From bf6c47ee66a5ef060842ca8230a5eab07f38c585 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:29:43 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Dave Love writes:
> It surprises me if that's IBM experience, and it's a bit worrying for our
new system.
I no longer speak for IBM (retired) so more of a personal Linux for POWER
opinion. But the Advance Toolchain (AT)
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 18:06:12 UTC
From 94db0b3108cabf7e8d7953f186202e2adf93419e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 18:06:08 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 18:02, Dave Love wrote:
>
> I'm offering the experience of doing all this work from various
> different points of view. I don't off-hand remember instances where
> particular problems have occurred, because I've done quite a of this.
> Isn't engineering experience
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 17:42:11 UTC
From a3aa54455a6722714b5a85c3d613ca17f1c087ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 17:42:07 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 17:41:54 UTC
From e4e7a4ad01938910bd62c03e1923534dfb0f4493 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 17:41:50 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 17:42:03 UTC
From 3194eb6d58f0100b3036ede6290b81c855874a3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 17:41:59 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:23 pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
I.e. only a hint is emitted. I'm open to suggestions how to improve
it.
I think we should remove it if it's generated by NetworkManager, and
leave it untouched otherwise. If NetworkManager is managing DNS then it
will just
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:07 -0400
Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM
> How can it be disabled?
>
> Immediately:
> swapoff /dev/zram0
>
> Permanently:
> rm /etc/systemd/zram-generator.conf
I realize this is a really late reply, but I wanted to
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:22:58AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I agree we should not replace /etc/resolv.conf if it's not already a
> symlink (although this will not be a common case, since by default
> it is a symlink managed by NetworkManager).
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:07 am, Neal
Hello,
we've enabled emulated s390x chroots for F31, F32 and rawhide in Copr.
Note that the chroots are emulated on x86_64 builders using
forcearch [1], so expect that builds might behave differently
especially when you're doing some low-level coding.
Depending on how CPU intensive they are, they
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 17:07:09 UTC
From 6fca8b124042d89d172fcba8d4dc0c94b0f9fe5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 17:07:05 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 17:04:38 UTC
From d908dc9c7331b28d12edf3a28cf8866457cbc9bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 17:04:34 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:55:59 UTC
From 79871d8b57a171dcdb561398602110c52b8b8382 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:55:54 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:54:52 UTC
From 0de19359070b477e65468c54192a623a2bc8b44b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:54:48 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:53:44 UTC
From 8be2f4b336963fa5443676ef13111dc53e40aba7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:53:39 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:51:02 UTC
From fb7ddd5f0d4d433bc7c247cbdb85fdfc8d8dc153 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:50:58 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
I meant to say that wrapping symbols may cause some confusion with
debugging and profiling, though I don't think that's critical where its
necessary.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:43:30 UTC
From e6bddbe2fc712f53ebe7af75a7374b08ff25aa53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:43:26 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Steven Munroe writes:
> I come from a different culture and experience. I am not as conversant
> in Fedorian as I should be. So I tend to misunderstand what is plain
> to you all.
Really, it's nothing specific to Fedora. The same would apply to any
GNU/Linux distro (or other OS with a typical
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Michael Young wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 02:40:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:03:50PM +0100, Michael Young wrote:
> > > > I am about to update xen to xen-4.14.0 on
I agree we should not replace /etc/resolv.conf if it's not already a
symlink (although this will not be a common case, since by default it
is a symlink managed by NetworkManager).
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:07 am, Neal Gompa wrote:
We can be smart here and replace the file when we detect
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:20:45 UTC
From 6431451a1c14540df448c1b83c498f7a13b6ded6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:20:40 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:12:51 UTC
From 7352960df18705d4535d54ce809f0330db6fef6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:12:47 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860598
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 16:12:01 UTC
From d97359782224706ff6636ead744ec8c3163d847a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 16:11:57 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854752
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.015-1
Iñaki Ucar writes:
> So here you are exclusively talking about BLIS, because other
> libraries implement BLAS + some parts of LAPACK. I may agree that
> doing the latter is a bad idea given that the reference implementation
> offers two distinct libraries. But that's the landscape we have
>
On 28 July 2020 17:07:14 CEST, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> To prevent brutally overwriting configuration, it would be best not to
>> replace
>> /etc/resolv.conf with a symlink on upgrade, ignoring user configuration, but
>> to do so on all new installs.
>>
>
>We can be smart here and replace the
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 15:25:21 UTC
From 5be1c0c2e40925969ac90452973e2d4d786664dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 15:25:17 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850776
Bug 1850776 depends on bug 1850793, which changed state.
Bug 1850793 Summary: Add perl-Time-Duration-Parse to EPEL8 / co-maintainer
request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850793
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.017-1 |perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.017-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850793
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853720
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.00-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.00-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.017-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.017-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854753
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-4.015-1.fc33|perl-Sereal-4.015-1.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.015-1 |perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.015-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855332
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sereal-4.017-1.fc33|perl-Sereal-4.017-1.fc33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861424
Bug ID: 1861424
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.073 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857787
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.0 |perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.0
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:58 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:11:31 AM MST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 27.07.20 09:20, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >
> > > That *is* what will happen. In this scenario, systemd-resolved creates
> > > a file in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858481
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857787
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858476
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858467
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.27-1. |perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.27-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855963
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-5.30.3-455.fc32|perl-5.30.3-455.fc32
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 15:00:42 UTC
From adef2aa6a72414a18171be761ff1199247cf6219 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 15:00:37 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:11:31 AM MST Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 27.07.20 09:20, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>
> > That *is* what will happen. In this scenario, systemd-resolved creates
> > a file in /run that is populated with the required information for
> >
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 14:36:44 UTC
From 87bdafe1361d9af7e2ab2a4c475d8ec37c12e5f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 14:36:39 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 14:33:56 UTC
From 118338a5d2df2062f8107150bc88600e36f9ec64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 14:33:52 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 14:24:03 UTC
From 92d671cad542153c1383007bb3052839b7153676 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 14:23:59 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-07-28 14:21:54 UTC
From 12ba09ce0d0995b1f01d7aa895a7154f1595e587 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jul 28 2020 14:21:50 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.00-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.00-1
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 13:22, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
[..]
> > Looks like all other pseudo filesystems are mounted over .mount units
> with
> > probably one exception .. binfmt_misc.
> > Probably .. because as I've pointed there are two units for that fs.
>
> Only binfmt_misc is typically a
On Di, 28.07.20 13:02, Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczko.tom...@gmail.com) wrote:
> So .. someone knows why it cannot be mounted on "mount -a" when entry
> for binfmt_misc would be in fstab or even over .mount unit?
You can do that, of course, but binfmt_misc is a .ko we don't want to
load unless needed.
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 33 in a week.
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
Note that some listed packages are orphaned and hence may
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:14 PM Till Hofmann wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/27/20 2:28 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I just got a BZ on OpenImageIO due to inability to install the -devel
> > package,
> >
> > Upon inspection it looks like the soname was bumped but a rebuild of
> > OIIO was not performed.
> >
>
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
