Re: Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 2:57 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:
>
> On 8/8/20 11:30 AM, Christopher wrote:
> > Thanks for the sanity check and for setting me on the right path. This
> > isn't a great user experience, but at least it is *possible* to
> > configure things the way I want.
>
> Well, for most users, it's a great experience because the keys do what
> they say they do.  I'm very happy that my suspend key works. :-)  And I
> don't expect to be able to easily map any random key on my keyboard to
> something else.

That's a fair point. However, this keyboard specifically markets
itself as having the ability to modify the behavior of the keys, so
purchasers of this keyboard *should* expect to be able to easily map
the media keys to something else. I think this is a mainstream
expectation nowadays for standard media keys. And, a quick search
online of this problem will find many people frustrated by the
placement of this key nearby other keys (it sits between the email and
calculator keys), and desire to re-map it to avoid accidentally
shutting down their computer when all they want to do is open their
email (with numerous outdated answers about how to do it in previous
versions of Gnome that don't work anymore).

I will modify my previous statement about not being a great experience
to this longer observation: the *initial* experience (until I learned
more about Gnome configuration and the implications) was *slightly*
less than great *if* you don't like the default behavior. The initial
experience could be improved dramatically if the previous bindings
were automatically removed when a new binding is set in
gnome-control-center keyboard shortcuts. Also, it would be nice if all
available bindings were shown in the GUI, instead of some only
available hidden in dconf-settings/gsettings. It would also be great
if I could search by value in dconf-editor to be able to find all
mappings of XF86Sleep or another button when I don't know the
configuration key name. Feature-wise, the fact that everything works
as labeled out of the box, and the fact that you can make changes, is
great. Usability-wise, there's room for some improvement. Overall,
it's still great, even though it could be better.

Thanks again,
Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1852297] ack-3.4.0 is available

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852297



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6f238c5662 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-6f238c5662`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6f238c5662

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2020-08-08 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2b702ad070   
rpki-client-6.7p1-1.el8
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-88b5647c18   
radare2-4.5.0-1.el8
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6ba549ab3a   
ark-19.12.2-2.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

aha-0.5-1.el8
git-cola-3.7-1.el8
python3-saml-1.9.0-3.el8
vrms-rpm-2.2-1.el8

Details about builds:



 aha-0.5-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-222b80d2a2)
 Convert terminal output to HTML

Update Information:

Initial build for EPEL8

ChangeLog:





 git-cola-3.7-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fd51ad60f9)
 A sleek and powerful git GUI

Update Information:

Build for EPEL8

ChangeLog:


References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1805827 - git-cola for RHEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805827




 python3-saml-1.9.0-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1a5c1898d8)
 Add SAML support to your Python software using this library

Update Information:

Add python3-saml to EPEL8

ChangeLog:





 vrms-rpm-2.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed2a23babb)
 Report non-free software

Update Information:

Initial build and bodhi update for EPEL8 (v2.2)

ChangeLog:



___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2020-08-08 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-87ccee83b4   
hylafax+-7.0.3-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

vrms-rpm-2.2-1.el6

Details about builds:



 vrms-rpm-2.2-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-24c7f4e8fa)
 Report non-free software

Update Information:

Update to upstream release v2.2

ChangeLog:

* Sat Aug  8 2020 Artur Iwicki  - 2.2-1
- Update to upstream release v2.2


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2020-08-08 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 725  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
 465  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b   
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
 174  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fa8a2e97c6   
python-waitress-1.4.3-1.el7
  19  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2c80eb66b5   
libASL-0.1.7-6.el7 matio-1.5.17-3.el7 openmeeg-2.4-0.4.rc4.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-32e4ca563b   
rpki-client-6.7p1-1.el7
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2a93add193   
python34-3.4.10-6.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5d276cc1c4   
hylafax+-7.0.3-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

python-pytest-xdist-1.17.1-4.el7
vrms-rpm-2.2-1.el7

Details about builds:



 python-pytest-xdist-1.17.1-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-08ce6bee45)
 py.test plugin for distributed testing and loop-on-failing modes

Update Information:

Rebuild to get python3-pytest-xdist Provide (#1866696)

ChangeLog:

* Sat Aug  8 2020 Scott Talbert  - 1.17.1-4
- Rebuild to get python3-pytest-xdist Provide (#1866696)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1866696 - Package don't provides python3-pytest-xdist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866696




 vrms-rpm-2.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-561781f15e)
 Report non-free software

Update Information:

Update to upstream release v2.2

ChangeLog:

* Sat Aug  8 2020 Artur Iwicki  - 2.2-1
- Update to upstream release v2.2


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1852297] ack-3.4.0 is available

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852297

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c3f6e29213 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-c3f6e29213`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c3f6e29213

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Using a side tag

2020-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 08:52:22PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> I'm trying to use a side tag to rebuild a package (wxGTK) and its dependent
> (CubicSDR) due to an soname bump.
> 
> I rebuilt wxGTK and then once it completed, I started a build for CubicSDR.
> However, CubicSDR's build still used the old version of wxGTK. I can see
> that the new wxGTK has been tagged into my side tag, however, is there
> something else I have to do to actually get it to be usable by CubicSDR?  Do
> I have to submit a buildroot override for it?  Or do I need to wait for some
> background process to complete?

Yes, you need to wait for kojira to fire off a newrepo and have that
complete. 

You can wait for this with: 

koji wait-repo --build=wxGTK-3.1.4-1.fc33 f33-build-side-26816

Once that completes successfully, you can do the next builds in the
side-tag. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Using a side tag

2020-08-08 Thread Scott Talbert
I'm trying to use a side tag to rebuild a package (wxGTK) and its 
dependent (CubicSDR) due to an soname bump.


I rebuilt wxGTK and then once it completed, I started a build for 
CubicSDR.  However, CubicSDR's build still used the old version of wxGTK. 
I can see that the new wxGTK has been tagged into my side tag, however, is 
there something else I have to do to actually get it to be usable by 
CubicSDR?  Do I have to submit a buildroot override for it?  Or do I need 
to wait for some background process to complete?


Thanks,
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[python-engineio] test failures on F33 koji

2020-08-08 Thread Mukundan Ragavan
I am trying to fix FTBFS and upgrade engineio to 3.13 (current version
in rawhide is 3.11). Some tests keep failing on koji [0] but not when I
build locally using mock. This is what I see in build log -

_ ERROR collecting tests/common/test_async_eventlet.py _
/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dns/resolver.py:743: in read_resolv_conf
f = stack.enter_context(open(f))
E   FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/etc/resolv.conf'
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:




E   dns.resolver.NoResolverConfiguration: Resolver configuration could
not be read or specified no nameservers.


Pointers to fix this will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!


[0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48843424



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Saturday, 8 August 2020 23:10:25 CEST Jeff Law wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-08-08 at 17:27 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > shaderc was FTBFS due to the cmake change, however fixing it does not
> > solve 
 everything. I've got a long list of new errors:
> > 
> > 
> > ==
> > =
 [29/29] : && /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects
> > - fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
> > -Werror=format-security -Wp,- D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> > -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ redhat-hardened-cc1
> > -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/ redhat-annobin-cc1 
> > -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-
> > clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wimplicit-fallthrough -O2 -g -DNDEBUG
> > -Wl,- z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now
> > -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat- hardened-ld-rdynamic
> > glslc/CMakeFiles/glslc_exe.dir/src/main.cc.o -o glslc/glslc 
> > glslc/libglslc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  libshaderc/
> > libshaderc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  -lSPIRV-Tools-opt 
> > -lSPIRV- Tools  -lglslang  -lOSDependent  -lOGLCompiler  -lglslang 
> > -lOSDependent  - lOGLCompiler  -lSPIRV  -lHLSL  -lpthread && :
> > FAILED: glslc/glslc 
> > 
> > : && /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions
> > : -g -
> 
> > grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-
> > D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/
> > redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/
> > redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
> > -fstack-
 clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wimplicit-fallthrough -O2 -g
> > -DNDEBUG -Wl,- z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now
> > -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat- hardened-ld-rdynamic
> > glslc/CMakeFiles/glslc_exe.dir/src/main.cc.o -o glslc/glslc 
> > glslc/libglslc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  libshaderc/
> > libshaderc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  -lSPIRV-Tools-opt 
> > -lSPIRV- Tools  -lglslang  -lOSDependent  -lOGLCompiler  -lglslang 
> > -lOSDependent  - lOGLCompiler  -lSPIRV  -lHLSL  -lpthread && :
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/glslc.KMUNIm.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `main':
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86
> > _64-
 redhat-linux-gnu/../libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:124: undefined
> > reference to `glslang::InitializeProcess()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/glslc.KMUNIm.ltrans1.ltrans.o: in function 
> > `shaderc_util::GlslangInitializer::~GlslangInitializer() [clone
> > .constprop.
 0]':
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86
> > _64-
 redhat-linux-gnu/../libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:136: undefined
> > reference to `glslang::FinalizeProcess()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/glslc.KMUNIm.ltrans1.ltrans.o: in function 
> > `shaderc_util::Compiler::Compile(shaderc_util::string_piece const&, 
> > EShLanguage, std::__cxx11::basic_string, 
> > std::allocator > const&, char const*, std::function > (std::ostream*, shaderc_util::string_piece const&)> const&, 
> > shaderc_util::CountingIncluder&, shaderc_util::Compiler::OutputType, 
> > std::ostream*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) const [clone
> > .constprop.0]':
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x8
> > 6_64- redhat-linux-gnu/../libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:267: undefined
> > reference to `glslang::TShader::TShader(EShLanguage)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> > shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.
> > ./
 libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:271: undefined reference to
> > `glslang::TShader::setStringsWithLengthsAndNames(char const* const*, int 
> > const*, char const* const*, int)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> > shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.
> > ./
 libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:274: undefined reference to
> > `glslang::TShader::setEntryPoint(char const*)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> > shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.
> > ./
 libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:275: undefined reference to
> > `glslang::TShader::setAutoMapBindings(bool)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> > shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.
> > ./
 libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:276: undefined reference to
> > `glslang::TShader::setAutoMapLocations(bool)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> > shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.
> > ./
 libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:278: undefined reference to
> > `glslang::TShader::setShiftImageBinding(unsigned int)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> > shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.
> > ./
 libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:279: undefined 

Re: LTO and the F33 mass rebuild

2020-08-08 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 10:03 PM Jeff Law  wrote:

> So I've done two passes over the F33 build failures here:

Thank you for taking ownership and responsibility
for those things that you can control.  It is a model
for other change owners to attempt to achieve.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


LTO and the F33 mass rebuild

2020-08-08 Thread Jeff Law
So I've done two passes over the F33 build failures here:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f33-failures.html

For any package which was failing and LTO appeared to be a factor, I've assigned
the package's associated FTBFS BZ to me to address the LTO component.  Some of
those I've already fixed and either closed the BZ or handed it back to the
default assignee for non-LTO issues that need to be resolved.

Thus if you have a package on the failing packages list and its still failing,
it's unlikely to be an LTO issue.  I don't mind if you reach out, but start from
the assumption LTO isn't the triggering event.  You can use %define _lto_cflags
%{nil} in your .spec file to disable LTO for testing purposes.

Having said that, I do expect some LTO issues to still pop up.  For example it's
likely we'll continue to see the cmake issues get resolved in various packages
and I wouldn't be surprised if after fixing a package to work with the new cmake
macros that a small number will trip LTO issues.  I'm obviously here to help 
with
those too.

It's also possible there are packages that are failing and which are not on that
list.  One was passed along to me yesterday (libaio).  Again, happy to help with
analyzing those too.

Anyway, the immediate actions are to find a near term resolution for the LTO
issues which I've assigned to myself in BZ.  There aren't that many and I'm
confident we'll be able to close them out in a reasonable timeframe.

After that I'll be reviewing all the opt-outs to see which we can move forward,
which require upstream GCC bug reports, etc.

Jeff
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?

2020-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 12:02:09PM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Stephen John Smoogen" 
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 
> > 
> > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 10:55:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?
> > 
> > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 10:05, Alex Scheel  wrote:
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Stephen John Smoogen" 
> > > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> > > > , asch...@redhat.com
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:55:17 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Respinning rawhide images every filesystem update?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:36, Alex Scheel  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm bumping this thread. This is still broken.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please open a ticket at
> > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue and open new issue
> > > > with an explanation of what is broken and where you are pulling from.
> > > > If it is a fedora registry then infrastructure can work on a fix. If
> > > > it is from docker.io or quay or elsewhere we can try to find the
> > > > people who fix it and let them know.
> > >
> > > Opened:
> > >
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9208
> > >
> > > This was also posted to devel to hopefully get the attention of the
> > > filesystem maintainer.
> > >
> > >
> > > They seem to have ignored 1548403 since 2018. :-)
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > OK so this ticket clarifies the problem because I thought this was a
> > problem with the filesystem in the container image with how it is spun
> > or delivered. It is instead with the package filesystem. Here is the
> > ticket contents (since most people don't follow links in emails).
> 
> There's three ways to solve this:
> 
>  1) Make the filesystem upgrade nicely in a container, or
>  2) Have the container runtime/user namespace system/... support the
> type of change that upgrading the filesystem package makes, or
>  3) Just respin the container image quickly whenever this happens; this
> hides the problem from users without solving the problem.
> 
> 1 isn't happening because the maintainer isn't involved.
> 2 isn't happening because the container runtime maintainers punted on it.
> 3 is the easiest left to accomplish.

But I am confused, because as far as I can tell this is already
happening. 


> If I had a choice, I'd be really happy with 3. I don't know what
> all is involved to respin container images with a new package. I'm 
> sure it takes time, but I'd imagine it'd be mostly automated. The
> problem gets fixed eventually anyways.

It is automated. 

It happens every compose of rawhide. 

I am not sure why you are not seeing the new images. 

Are you pulling from registry.fedoraproject.org?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Still problems with s390x builds

2020-08-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 05:57:07PM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM José Abílio Matos  wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone please check?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Andrea
> >
> >
> >
> > When that happens I issue another rebuild and the problem is solved. In
> > other words this is a transient problem.
> >
> >
> >
> I submitted another build. It failed with the same error:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48924234

There was some upstream to us work in the iad2 datacenter today: 

https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9200

Please retry now and see if things are better. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Sat, 2020-08-08 at 17:27 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> shaderc was FTBFS due to the cmake change, however fixing it does not solve 
> everything. I've got a long list of new errors:
> 
> 
> ===
> [29/29] : && /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -
> fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-
> D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/
> redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/
> redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-
> clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wimplicit-fallthrough -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -Wl,-
> z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-
> hardened-ld-rdynamic glslc/CMakeFiles/glslc_exe.dir/src/main.cc.o -o 
> glslc/glslc  glslc/libglslc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  libshaderc/
> libshaderc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  -lSPIRV-Tools-opt  -lSPIRV-
> Tools  -lglslang  -lOSDependent  -lOGLCompiler  -lglslang  -lOSDependent  -
> lOGLCompiler  -lSPIRV  -lHLSL  -lpthread && :
> FAILED: glslc/glslc 
> : && /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -
> grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-
> D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/
> redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/
> redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-
> clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wimplicit-fallthrough -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -Wl,-
> z,relro -Wl,--as-needed  -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-
> hardened-ld-rdynamic glslc/CMakeFiles/glslc_exe.dir/src/main.cc.o -o 
> glslc/glslc  glslc/libglslc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  libshaderc/
> libshaderc.a  libshaderc_util/libshaderc_util.a  -lSPIRV-Tools-opt  -lSPIRV-
> Tools  -lglslang  -lOSDependent  -lOGLCompiler  -lglslang  -lOSDependent  -
> lOGLCompiler  -lSPIRV  -lHLSL  -lpthread && :
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/glslc.KMUNIm.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `main':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-
> redhat-linux-gnu/../libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:124: undefined reference 
> to `glslang::InitializeProcess()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/glslc.KMUNIm.ltrans1.ltrans.o: in function 
> `shaderc_util::GlslangInitializer::~GlslangInitializer() [clone .constprop.
> 0]':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-
> redhat-linux-gnu/../libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:136: undefined reference 
> to `glslang::FinalizeProcess()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/glslc.KMUNIm.ltrans1.ltrans.o: in function 
> `shaderc_util::Compiler::Compile(shaderc_util::string_piece const&, 
> EShLanguage, std::__cxx11::basic_string, 
> std::allocator > const&, char const*, std::function (std::ostream*, shaderc_util::string_piece const&)> const&, 
> shaderc_util::CountingIncluder&, shaderc_util::Compiler::OutputType, 
> std::ostream*, unsigned long*, unsigned long*) const [clone .constprop.0]':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-
> redhat-linux-gnu/../libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:267: undefined reference 
> to `glslang::TShader::TShader(EShLanguage)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
> libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:271: undefined reference to 
> `glslang::TShader::setStringsWithLengthsAndNames(char const* const*, int 
> const*, char const* const*, int)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
> libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:274: undefined reference to 
> `glslang::TShader::setEntryPoint(char const*)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
> libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:275: undefined reference to 
> `glslang::TShader::setAutoMapBindings(bool)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
> libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:276: undefined reference to 
> `glslang::TShader::setAutoMapLocations(bool)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
> libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:278: undefined reference to 
> `glslang::TShader::setShiftImageBinding(unsigned int)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
> libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:279: undefined reference to 
> `glslang::TShader::setShiftSamplerBinding(unsigned int)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
> shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
> libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:280: undefined reference to 
> 

Re: Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Sat, 2020-08-08 at 22:04 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 August 2020 21:53:57 CEST Jeff Law wrote:
> > More likely it's uninstantiated templates
> 
> I don't know about this, did we change something within Fedora that could 
> trigger this issue while it was working before?
Template instantiation issues are sensitive to inlining heuristics in the
compiler.  Subtle changes in those heuristics can change what gets inlined 
where.

This is a common source level issue.  THe fact that it worked before does not
mean it was correct.

jeff
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Saturday, 8 August 2020 21:53:57 CEST Jeff Law wrote:
> More likely it's uninstantiated templates

I don't know about this, did we change something within Fedora that could 
trigger this issue while it was working before?

Thanks

Robert-André


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Jeff Law
On Sat, 2020-08-08 at 15:51 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 3:47 PM Robert-André Mauchin  wrote:
> > On Saturday, 8 August 2020 17:27:54 CEST you wrote:
> > > And so on.
> > > Tons of errors regarding undefined reference to glslang::.
> > > I don't know if this is due to a new Glslang or if something has been
> > > changed wrt the build system, or if system-wide libraries are not 
> > > supported
> > > anymore.
> > > 
> > > Any help for figuring out what happened would be greatly appreciated.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > 
> > > Robert-André
> > > 
> > 
> > I have the same issue with another FTBFS, soundkonverter:
> > 
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:215: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> > const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:215: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:216: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> > const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:216: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:217: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> > const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:217: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:220: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> > const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function
> > `readXiphTags(TagLib::Ogg::XiphComment*)':
> > /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_function.h:386: undefined reference to
> > `TagLib::String::operator<(TagLib::String const&) const'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_function.h:386: undefined 
> > reference
> > to `TagLib::String::operator<(TagLib::String const&) const'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function
> > `readXiphTags(TagLib::Ogg::XiphComment*)':
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/MetaReplayGain.cpp:
> > 220: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:222: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> > const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:222: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:223: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> > const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:223: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:224: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> > const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> > MetaReplayGain.cpp:224: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function
> > `TagLib::Map::~Map() [clone 
> > .lto_priv.0]':
> > /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_pair.h:211: undefined reference to
> > `TagLib::StringList::~StringList()'
> > /usr/bin/ld: 
> > /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o:/usr/include/c++/10/
> > bits/stl_pair.h:211: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> > 
> > Is it related to the cmake change? Am I missing something obvious?
> > 
> 
> That looks like failures related to LTO?
No.  I've already check that one.  You'll get the same effective failures 
without
LTO.  More likely it's uninstantiated templates (which is a common source issue,
not a compiler issue)


jeff
> 
> 
> 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 3:47 PM Robert-André Mauchin  wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 8 August 2020 17:27:54 CEST you wrote:
> >
> > And so on.
> > Tons of errors regarding undefined reference to glslang::.
> > I don't know if this is due to a new Glslang or if something has been
> > changed wrt the build system, or if system-wide libraries are not supported
> > anymore.
> >
> > Any help for figuring out what happened would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Robert-André
> >
>
> I have the same issue with another FTBFS, soundkonverter:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:215: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:215: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:216: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:216: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:217: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:217: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:220: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function
> `readXiphTags(TagLib::Ogg::XiphComment*)':
> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_function.h:386: undefined reference to
> `TagLib::String::operator<(TagLib::String const&) const'
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_function.h:386: undefined reference
> to `TagLib::String::operator<(TagLib::String const&) const'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function
> `readXiphTags(TagLib::Ogg::XiphComment*)':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/MetaReplayGain.cpp:
> 220: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:222: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:222: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:223: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:223: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:224: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char
> const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
> /usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
> MetaReplayGain.cpp:224: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function
> `TagLib::Map::~Map() [clone .lto_priv.0]':
> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_pair.h:211: undefined reference to
> `TagLib::StringList::~StringList()'
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o:/usr/include/c++/10/
> bits/stl_pair.h:211: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
>
> Is it related to the cmake change? Am I missing something obvious?
>

That looks like failures related to LTO?



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Saturday, 8 August 2020 17:27:54 CEST you wrote:
> 
> And so on.
> Tons of errors regarding undefined reference to glslang::.
> I don't know if this is due to a new Glslang or if something has been
> changed wrt the build system, or if system-wide libraries are not supported
> anymore.
> 
> Any help for figuring out what happened would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Robert-André
> 

I have the same issue with another FTBFS, soundkonverter:

/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:215: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char 
const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:215: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:216: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char 
const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:216: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:217: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char 
const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:217: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:220: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char 
const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function 
`readXiphTags(TagLib::Ogg::XiphComment*)':
/usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_function.h:386: undefined reference to 
`TagLib::String::operator<(TagLib::String const&) const'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_function.h:386: undefined reference 
to `TagLib::String::operator<(TagLib::String const&) const'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function 
`readXiphTags(TagLib::Ogg::XiphComment*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/MetaReplayGain.cpp:
220: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:222: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char 
const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:222: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:223: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char 
const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:223: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:224: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::String(char 
const*, TagLib::String::Type)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/soundkonverter-3.0.1/src/metadata/
MetaReplayGain.cpp:224: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o: in function 
`TagLib::Map::~Map() [clone .lto_priv.0]':
/usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_pair.h:211: undefined reference to 
`TagLib::StringList::~StringList()'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/soundkonverter.4HzRaR.ltrans3.ltrans.o:/usr/include/c++/10/
bits/stl_pair.h:211: undefined reference to `TagLib::String::~String()'

Is it related to the cmake change? Am I missing something obvious?

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 8/8/20 11:30 AM, Christopher wrote:

Thanks for the sanity check and for setting me on the right path. This
isn't a great user experience, but at least it is *possible* to
configure things the way I want.


Well, for most users, it's a great experience because the keys do what 
they say they do.  I'm very happy that my suspend key works. :-)  And I 
don't expect to be able to easily map any random key on my keyboard to 
something else.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Christopher
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:38 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:
>
> On 8/8/20 3:52 AM, Christopher wrote:
> > Does anybody know what the current state of media key support is in
> > F32 / Gnome / systemd?
> > Is it currently broken?
>
> It works great.

That wasn't my experience, but knowing it works for others helps me
narrow down whether the problem is on my end or not.

>
> > I recently bought a Logitech MK270 wireless mouse/keyboard (pretty
> > common), which has a "power" media key, which seems to put my Fedora
> > 32 system to sleep, and it doesn't seem to be possible to disable it
> > in Gnome or in systemd-logind settings. It's possible I'm doing
> > something wrong, but I'm now questioning whether this is just broken
> > in Fedora right now, since nothing I've tried works.
>
> That sounds to me like it's doing exactly what it should.  What are you
> expecting it to do?  If you go into the Gnome settings Power panel, you
> could try changing the power key action, but that might only affect the
> hard power button on the case.  An alternative is to use dconf-editor
> and change the suspend key setting in
> /org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/.

What I was expecting was the ability to disable it. After your
response, and another half hour of troubleshooting, I have learned
that:

1. There is no GUI to change the setting.
2. The logind.conf settings have no effect on the media keys.
3. The key is XF86Sleep (and not XF86Suspend).
4. The key is assigned to the 'suspend-static' behavior in
dconf-editor / gsettings
5. Changing the assignment in dconf-editor / gsettings requires
logging out and back in to take effect
And most importantly,
6. It is *not* enough to assign the XF86Sleep button to another action
in the keyboard shortcuts. You have to *also* remove it from the
'suspend-static' action, or it will suspend the computer instead of
performing the other assigned action.

This last bit was the part that was the most frustrating, since
everything else I did had no effect. Now that I have unassociated
'XF86Sleep' from the 'suspend-static' action, I can now re-assign it
to do other things.

Thanks for the sanity check and for setting me on the right path. This
isn't a great user experience, but at least it is *possible* to
configure things the way I want.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 8/8/20 3:52 AM, Christopher wrote:

Does anybody know what the current state of media key support is in
F32 / Gnome / systemd?
Is it currently broken?


It works great.


I recently bought a Logitech MK270 wireless mouse/keyboard (pretty
common), which has a "power" media key, which seems to put my Fedora
32 system to sleep, and it doesn't seem to be possible to disable it
in Gnome or in systemd-logind settings. It's possible I'm doing
something wrong, but I'm now questioning whether this is just broken
in Fedora right now, since nothing I've tried works.


That sounds to me like it's doing exactly what it should.  What are you 
expecting it to do?  If you go into the Gnome settings Power panel, you 
could try changing the power key action, but that might only affect the 
hard power button on the case.  An alternative is to use dconf-editor 
and change the suspend key setting in 
/org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/media-keys/.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200808.n.0 changes

2020-08-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200807.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200808.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   246
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  8.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages:991.42 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   3.96 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -81.64 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-armhfp-Rawhide-20200808.n.0-sda.raw.xz
Image: LXQt raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-LXQt-armhfp-Rawhide-20200808.n.0-sda.raw.xz
Image: Mate raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-Mate-armhfp-Rawhide-20200808.n.0-sda.raw.xz
Image: Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-Rawhide-20200808.n.0-sda.raw.xz
Image: Workstation raw-xz armhfp
Path: 
Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-armhfp-Rawhide-20200808.n.0-sda.raw.xz
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: 
Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20200808.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Jam_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Jam_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200807.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: e-antic-0.1.8-1.fc33
Summary: Real Embedded Algebraic Number Theory In C
RPMs:e-antic e-antic-devel
Size:632.54 KiB

Package: golang-gvisor-20200804.0-1.20200805git1d6b9c1.fc33
Summary: A container sandbox runtime focused on security, efficiency, and ease 
of use
RPMs:golang-gvisor golang-gvisor-devel
Size:8.00 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: ktoblzcheck-1.49-4.fc33
Summary: A library to check account numbers and bank codes of German banks
RPMs:ktoblzcheck ktoblzcheck-devel
Size:991.42 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CheMPS2-1.8.9-10.fc33
Old package:  CheMPS2-1.8.9-9.fc33
Summary:  A spin-adapted implementation of DMRG for ab initio quantum 
chemistry
RPMs: CheMPS2 CheMPS2-devel
Size: 3.65 MiB
Size change:  1.41 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Aug 07 2020 I??aki ??car  - 1.8.9-10
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager


Package:  Coin4-4.0.0-7.fc33
Old package:  Coin4-4.0.0-5.fc32
Summary:  High-level 3D visualization library
RPMs: Coin4 Coin4-devel Coin4-doc
Size: 53.83 MiB
Size change:  138.47 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
4.0.0-6
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sat Aug 01 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
4.0.0-7
  - Second attempt - Rebuilt for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild


Package:  DSDP-5.8-26.fc33
Old package:  DSDP-5.8-25.fc33
Summary:  Software for semidefinite programming
RPMs: DSDP DSDP-devel DSDP-examples
Size: 8.68 MiB
Size change:  871 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Aug 07 2020 I??aki ??car  - 5.8-26
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager


Package:  GMT-6.1.0-4.fc33
Old package:  GMT-6.1.0-3.fc33
Summary:  Generic Mapping Tools
RPMs: GMT GMT-common GMT-devel GMT-doc
Size: 65.70 MiB
Size change:  -558 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Aug 07 2020 Orion Poplawski  - 6.1.0-4
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager
  - Use new cmake macros


Package:  aespipe-2.4e-4.fc33
Old package:  aespipe-2.4e-4.fc32
Summary:  AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes imagemore
RPMs: aespipe
Size: 254.06 KiB
Size change:  -860 B

Package:  armadillo-9.900.2-5.fc33
Old package:  armadillo-9.900.2-4.fc33
Summary:  Fast C++ matrix library with syntax similar to MATLAB and Octave
RPMs: armadillo armadillo-devel
Size: 10.93 MiB
Size change:  1.26 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 05 2020 Jos?? Matos  - 9.900.2-5
  - add upstream patch to support flexiblas
  - enable tests


Package:  arpack-3.7.0-8.fc33
Old package:  arpack-3.7.0-7.fc33
Summary:  Fortran 77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems
RPMs: arpack arpack-devel arpack-doc arpack-static
Size: 2.07 MiB
Size change:  1.95 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Aug 07 2020 I??aki ??car  - 3.7.0-8
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager


Package:  bolt-0.9-3.fc33
Old package:  bolt-0.9-1.fc33
Summary:  Thunderbolt device manager
RPMs: bolt
Size: 932.91 KiB
Size change:  -41.78 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.9-2
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sat Aug 01 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.9-3
  - Second attempt - Rebuilt for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild


Package:  candy-icon-theme-0-16.20200731git5df1fcdf.fc33
Old package:  candy-icon-theme-0-15.20200704git8c144f59.fc33
Summary:  Sweet

bug on display DPI , Component cinnamon.

2020-08-08 Thread Cătălin George Feștilă
I haven't completed a bug in a while.
Now with the new badge system, I suspect it is even more complex to add to
the contribution of each user.
I did not find any indication of how to proceed for the badge.
1. Maybe someone will help me and tell me if I have to go somewhere else.
2. The bug can be found at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867313
Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Still problems with s390x builds

2020-08-08 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM José Abílio Matos  wrote:

> On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
> > Can someone please check?
>
> >
>
> > Thanks!
>
> >
>
> > Andrea
>
>
>
> When that happens I issue another rebuild and the problem is solved. In
> other words this is a transient problem.
>
>
>
I submitted another build. It failed with the same error:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48924234

Regards,

Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Still problems with s390x builds

2020-08-08 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Can someone please check?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Andrea

When that happens I issue another rebuild and the problem is solved. In other 
words this is a transient problem.

-- 
José Abílio___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Help needed to fix a FTBFS (shaderc)

2020-08-08 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
reference to 
`glslang::TShader::setShiftUboBinding(unsigned int)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:282: undefined reference to 
`glslang::TShader::setShiftSsboBinding(unsigned int)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:284: undefined reference to 
`glslang::TShader::setShiftUavBinding(unsigned int)'
/usr/bin/ld: /builddir/build/BUILD/
shaderc-7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/../
libshaderc_util/src/compiler.cc:286: undefined reference to 
`glslang::TShader::setHlslIoMapping(bool)'
===

And so on.
Tons of errors regarding undefined reference to glslang::.
I don't know if this is due to a new Glslang or if something has been changed 
wrt the build system, or if system-wide libraries are not supported anymore.

Any help for figuring out what happened would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

Robert-André


Here's the SPEC: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shaderc/tree/master

===
# Force out of source build
%undefine __cmake_in_source_build

# Release 2020.1
%global commit  7c2aa93903558f017f31b35df163bce5fe849f45
%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
%global snapshotdate20200808

# Glslang revision from packaged version
%global glslang_version SDK-candidate-2-11-gc9b28b9f

Name:   shaderc
Version:2020.1
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:A collection of tools, libraries, and tests for Vulkan shader 
compilation

License:ASL 2.0
URL:https://github.com/google/shaderc
Source0:%url/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{shortcommit}.tar.gz

# https://github.com/google/shaderc/pull/463
Patch0: 0001-Fix-the-link-order-of-libglslang-and-libHLSL.patch
# Patch to unbundle 3rd party code
Patch1: 0001-Drop-third-party-code-in-CMakeLists.txt.patch

BuildRequires:  cmake3
BuildRequires:  gcc-c++
BuildRequires:  ninja-build
BuildRequires:  python3-devel
BuildRequires:  glslang-devel
BuildRequires:  spirv-headers-devel
BuildRequires:  spirv-tools
BuildRequires:  spirv-tools-devel

%description
A collection of tools, libraries and tests for shader compilation.

Shaderc aims to to provide:
 - a command line compiler with GCC- and Clang-like usage, for better
   integration with build systems
 - an API where functionality can be added without breaking existing clients
 - an API supporting standard concurrency patterns across multiple
   operating systems
 - increased functionality such as file #include support

%package-n  glslc
Summary:A command line compiler for GLSL/HLSL to SPIR-V

%description -n glslc
A command line compiler for GLSL/HLSL to SPIR-V.

%package-n  libshaderc
Summary:A library for compiling shader strings into SPIR-V

%description -n libshaderc
A library for compiling shader strings into SPIR-V.

%package -n libshaderc-devel
Summary:Development files for libshaderc
Requires:   libshaderc%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

%description -n libshaderc-devel
A library for compiling shader strings into SPIR-V.

Development files for libshaderc.

%package -n libshaderc-static
Summary:A library for compiling shader strings into SPIR-V (static 
libraries)

%description -n libshaderc-static
A library for compiling shader strings into SPIR-V.

Static libraries for libshaderc.

%prep
%autosetup -p1 -n %{name}-%{commit}

rm -rf third_party

# Stolen from Gentoo
# Create build-version.inc since we want to use our packaged
# SPIRV-Tools and glslang
echo \"shaderc $(grep -m1 -o '^v[[:digit:]]\{4\}\.[[:digit:]]\(-dev\)\? 
[[:digit:]]\{4\}-[[:digit:]]\{2\}-[[:digit:]]\{2\}$' CHANGES)\" \
> glslc/src/build-version.inc
echo \"spirv-tools $(grep -m1 -o '^v[[:digit:]]\{4\}\.[[:digit:]]\(-dev\)\? 
[[:digit:]]\{4\}-[[:digit:]]\{2\}-[[:digit:]]\{2\}$' /usr/share/doc/spirv-
tools/CHANGES)\" \
>> glslc/src/build-version.inc
echo \"glslang %{glslang_version}\" >> glslc/src/build-version.inc

# Point to correct include
sed -i 's|SPIRV/GlslangToSpv.h|glslang/SPIRV/GlslangToSpv.h|' libshaderc_util/
src/compiler.cc

%build
# We disable the tests because they don't work with our unbundling of 3rd 
party.
# See https://github.com/google/shaderc/issues/470
%cmake3 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \
-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=True \
-DSHADERC_SKIP_TESTS=True \
-DPYTHON_EXE=%{__python3} \
-GNinja
%cmake3_build

%install
%cmake3_install

%check
ctest -V

%files -n glslc
%doc glslc/README.asciidoc
%license LICENSE
%{_bindir}/glslc

%files -n libshaderc
%doc AUTHORS CHANGES CONTRIBUTORS README.md
%license LICENSE

Still problems with s390x builds

2020-08-08 Thread Andrea Musuruane
Hi guys,
   I was updating gcompris-qt for the newer cmake but I got this error on
the s390x builder:

GenericError: Downloaded rpm
http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4182/48924182/gcompris-qt-0.97-6.fc33.src.rpm
is corrupted:
rpm's header can't be extracted:
/var/tmp/koji/tasks/4188/48924188/local/work/tasks/4182/48924182/gcompris-qt-0.97-6.fc33.src.rpm
(rpm error: error reading package header)

Can someone please check?

Thanks!

Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1828915] perl-Net-ARP-1.0.11 is available

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828915

Robin Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Net-ARP-1.0.11-1.fc33
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2020-08-08 13:09:11




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1852297] ack-3.4.0 is available

2020-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852297

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6f238c5662 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6f238c5662


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[HEADS UP] pytest update to 6.0.x is approaching

2020-08-08 Thread Miro Hrončok

Hello,

recently we have updated pytest to 5, but version 6 is out and I feel confident 
that the update is safe, hence I plan to merge and ship pytest 6.0.1 in Fedora 
33+ in couple days:


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pytest/pull-request/17

I've analyzed the build failures with pytest 6.0.0rc1:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pytest/pull-request/17#comment-50314

And later with 6.0.1:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pytest/pull-request/17#comment-52937

Most of the failures are caused by PytestDeprecationWarning treated as error.
If your package FTBFS, you should see the reason in one of the comments there ^

As a short term mitigation, you can disable this treatment, see

https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/changelog.html#breaking-changes


PytestDeprecationWarning are now errors by default.

Following our plan to remove deprecated features with as little disruption
as possible, all warnings of type PytestDeprecationWarning now generate
errors instead of warning messages.

The affected features will be effectively removed in pytest 6.1, so please
consult the Deprecations and Removals section in the docs for directions on
how to update existing code.

https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/deprecations.html

In the pytest 6.0.X series, it is possible to change the errors back into
warnings as a stopgap measure by adding this to your pytest.ini file:

[pytest]
filterwarnings =
ignore::pytest.PytestDeprecationWarning

But this will stop working when pytest 6.1 is released.

If you have concerns about the removal of a specific feature, please add
a comment to https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/5584



And if nothing else works, you can still use pytest 4, see:


https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZZTI6MJJBTPST35DZG22YIUC4JBMCJXN/

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[HEADS UP] pytest update to 6.0.x is approaching

2020-08-08 Thread Miro Hrončok

Hello,

recently we have updated pytest to 5, but version 6 is out and I feel confident 
that the update is safe, hence I plan to merge and ship pytest 6.0.1 in Fedora 
33+ in couple days:


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pytest/pull-request/17

I've analyzed the build failures with pytest 6.0.0rc1:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pytest/pull-request/17#comment-50314

And later with 6.0.1:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pytest/pull-request/17#comment-52937

Most of the failures are caused by PytestDeprecationWarning treated as error.
If your package FTBFS, you should see the reason in one of the comments there ^

As a short term mitigation, you can disable this treatment, see

https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/changelog.html#breaking-changes


PytestDeprecationWarning are now errors by default.

Following our plan to remove deprecated features with as little disruption
as possible, all warnings of type PytestDeprecationWarning now generate
errors instead of warning messages.

The affected features will be effectively removed in pytest 6.1, so please
consult the Deprecations and Removals section in the docs for directions on
how to update existing code.

https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/deprecations.html

In the pytest 6.0.X series, it is possible to change the errors back into
warnings as a stopgap measure by adding this to your pytest.ini file:

[pytest]
filterwarnings =
ignore::pytest.PytestDeprecationWarning

But this will stop working when pytest 6.1 is released.

If you have concerns about the removal of a specific feature, please add
a comment to https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/5584



And if nothing else works, you can still use pytest 4, see:


https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZZTI6MJJBTPST35DZG22YIUC4JBMCJXN/

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Media key support in F32 / Gnome / systemd

2020-08-08 Thread Christopher
Does anybody know what the current state of media key support is in
F32 / Gnome / systemd?
Is it currently broken?

I recently bought a Logitech MK270 wireless mouse/keyboard (pretty
common), which has a "power" media key, which seems to put my Fedora
32 system to sleep, and it doesn't seem to be possible to disable it
in Gnome or in systemd-logind settings. It's possible I'm doing
something wrong, but I'm now questioning whether this is just broken
in Fedora right now, since nothing I've tried works.

Anybody have any insight into this?

Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org