Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-28 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Friday, August 28, 2020 9:55:18 PM MST drago01 wrote: > On Saturday, August 29, 2020, John M. Harris Jr > > wrote: > > On Monday, August 10, 2020 9:52:42 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:08 am, Michael Catanzaro > > > > > > wrote: > > > > Zbigniew, do you agree

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-28 Thread drago01
On Saturday, August 29, 2020, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Monday, August 10, 2020 9:52:42 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:08 am, Michael Catanzaro > > wrote: > > > > > Zbigniew, do you agree that we should remove the script if and only > > > if it is generated by

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-28 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Monday, August 10, 2020 9:52:42 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:08 am, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > Zbigniew, do you agree that we should remove the script if and only > > if it is generated by NetworkManager? Otherwise, the change is only > >

Re: Switching package to fragmented default configuration

2020-08-28 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 9:32:35 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:11:49PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > > I'm considering to split the default configuration file in the chrony > > package to make it easier for vendors, products, and configuration > >

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-08-29 - 95% PASS

2020-08-28 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/08/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200828git3d61aaf.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-08-28 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 29.08.20 um 00:11 schrieb Troy Dawson: On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:10 PM Troy Dawson wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:12 AM kevin wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:50:39PM -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: On 21/8/20 19:06, Troy Dawson wrote: C) Drop playground. Say it was an

Re: %lua_requires behaves differently in F33+

2020-08-28 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 18:56 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 18:36 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Björn added some useful Lua packaging macros in > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447324 > > > > One of them, %lua_requires, adds a

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

2020-08-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:52 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > The IPP Everywhere specification requires clients to support DNS-SD > (mDNS is part of that) or WS-Discovery. Printers are required to > support both DNS-SD and WS-Discovery. Avahi and systemd-resolved > support DNS-SD, functionally equating

Re: %lua_requires behaves differently in F33+

2020-08-28 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 18:36 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Hi, > > Björn added some useful Lua packaging macros in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447324 > > One of them, %lua_requires, adds a dependency on either `lua(abi) = > %{lua_version}` or, on EL6 and below, on lua

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

2020-08-28 Thread Chris Murphy
[Sorry for the double post, somewhere along the way desktop@ and kde@ were dropped, so I'm re-adding them and that means double post for test@ and devel@.] Re: add working mDNS to the criterion The IPP Everywhere specification requires clients to support DNS-SD (mDNS is part of that) or

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

2020-08-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 5:56 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 10:06 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > > > > Basic networking > > > > > > It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network

%lua_requires behaves differently in F33+

2020-08-28 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi, Björn added some useful Lua packaging macros in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447324 One of them, %lua_requires, adds a dependency on either `lua(abi) = %{lua_version}` or, on EL6 and below, on lua >= current version and lua < next version. Somehow this seems to be

[Test-Announce] 2020-08-31 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 33 Blocker Review Meeting

2020-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson
# F33 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-08-31 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Final blocker and 4 proposed Beta freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a Fedora 33 blocker review meeting on

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2020-08-31 Fedora QA Meeting

2020-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. I don't have anything urgent this week. We can discuss the network criterion in the blocker review meeting, I think. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead

[EPEL-devel] plasma has moved from epel into playground causing update conflicts

2020-08-28 Thread Andy Hall
Can the below be fixed ? I guess this package should not be in both repos... # yum update Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:02 ago on Fri 28 Aug 2020 23:47:51 BST. Error: Problem 1: package plasma-workspace-geolocation-5.18.4.1-2.epel8.playground.x86_64 requires libgps.so.24()(64bit), but

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

2020-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > So at this week's blocker review meeting, the fact that we don't have > explicit networking requirements in the release criteria really started > to bite us. In the past we have squeezed networking-related issues in > under

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

2020-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 10:06 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > Basic networking > > > > It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections > > using DHCP and static addressing. The default network

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

2020-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 01:14 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:51 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > > Also, should we add WireGuard to this list for future-proofing? > > I had thought about explicitly suggesting > wireguard, but then thought that we should > focus

[Bug 1873624] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.28 is available

2020-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873624 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-DateTime-Locale-1.27

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-08-28 Thread James Cassell
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, at 6:11 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:10 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:12 AM kevin wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:50:39PM -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: > > > > > > > > On 21/8/20 19:06, Troy Dawson wrote:

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:44 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 15:03 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > > ok, I'll try again tomorrow or the day after tomorrow when it's > > available in Rawhide. > > you may build it with koji package if you add enabled=1 in [local] > configuration

[EPEL-devel] Re: Continuing playground discussion

2020-08-28 Thread Troy Dawson
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:10 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:12 AM kevin wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:50:39PM -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: > > > > > > On 21/8/20 19:06, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > > > C) Drop playground. Say it was an interesting

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 15:03 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > ok, I'll try again tomorrow or the day after tomorrow when it's > available in Rawhide. you may build it with koji package if you add enabled=1 in [local] configuration at /etc/mock/templates/fedora-rawhide.tpl [1] [1] [local]

Re: python-versioneer: no version information in github archives?

2020-08-28 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 28. 08. 20 20:31, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hiya, Is anyone working with python packages that use versioneer[1]? My primary issue here is that upstream does not include tests in the pypi tars, but because they use versioneer and it does all sorts of "magic": - it is non trivial to figure out what

[Bug 1873624] New: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.27 is available

2020-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873624 Bug ID: 1873624 Summary: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.27 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Locale Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: Self Introduction: Eugene Syromiatnikov

2020-08-28 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Friday, 28 August 2020 20:30:18 CEST Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > Hello. > > My name is Eugene Syromiatnikov, I am a Software Engineer at Red Hat, > an IBM company. I maintain strace and microcode_ctl packages > in RHEL, among other things. Also, I am a strace developer and used > to

python-versioneer: no version information in github archives?

2020-08-28 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hiya, Is anyone working with python packages that use versioneer[1]? My primary issue here is that upstream does not include tests in the pypi tars, but because they use versioneer and it does all sorts of "magic": - it is non trivial to figure out what untagged commit on Github matches the

Self Introduction: Eugene Syromiatnikov

2020-08-28 Thread Eugene Syromiatnikov
Hello. My name is Eugene Syromiatnikov, I am a Software Engineer at Red Hat, an IBM company. I maintain strace and microcode_ctl packages in RHEL, among other things. Also, I am a strace developer and used to contribute to the MoinMoin wiki project. My main areas of interests are computer

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 16:41 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 02:30:20PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > > the macro "%{vdr_apiversion}" is included in the package vdr-devel > > > > rpm -qf /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.vdr > > vdr-devel-2.4.4-1.fc32.x86_64 > > There is no

s390x builder issues

2020-08-28 Thread kevin
Greetings. As many of you know, the s390x builders have been very slow or failing builds with intermittent i/o issues for a while now. I've done what I can to mitigate this on the builder level, but the problem is at a deeper level. I've been asked to try and collect issues that package

s390x builder issues

2020-08-28 Thread kevin
Greetings. As many of you know, the s390x builders have been very slow or failing builds with intermittent i/o issues for a while now. I've done what I can to mitigate this on the builder level, but the problem is at a deeper level. I've been asked to try and collect issues that package

Re: [HOWTO] Keep using Rawhide after branching

2020-08-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 28. 08. 20 v 19:09 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 18:51 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 25. 08. 20 v 16:25 Petr Menšík napsal(a): >>> No, unfortunately the key is there, but the package is incomplete. >>> >>> If you have enabled gpg signatures verification, it would fail.

Re: [HOWTO] Keep using Rawhide after branching

2020-08-28 Thread kevin
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 25. 08. 20 v 16:25 Petr Menšík napsal(a): > > No, unfortunately the key is there, but the package is incomplete. > > > > If you have enabled gpg signatures verification, it would fail. At least > > it does to me. > > > > Check

Re: [HOWTO] Keep using Rawhide after branching

2020-08-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 18:51 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 25. 08. 20 v 16:25 Petr Menšík napsal(a): > > No, unfortunately the key is there, but the package is incomplete. > > > > If you have enabled gpg signatures verification, it would fail. At least > > it does to me. > > > > Check it with:

Re: [HOWTO] Keep using Rawhide after branching

2020-08-28 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 25. 08. 20 v 16:25 Petr Menšík napsal(a): > No, unfortunately the key is there, but the package is incomplete. > > If you have enabled gpg signatures verification, it would fail. At least > it does to me. > > Check it with: > > rpm -ql fedora-gpg-keys | grep fedora-34-$(arch) > > It just does

Non-responsive maintainer: tmoertel

2020-08-28 Thread Robbie Harwood
Hi, in accordance with [1] this is a non-responsive maintainer check for Tom Moertel. Non-responsive bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873573 Unactioned bugs (earliest is February 2017): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221305

[Bug 1869726] perl-Getopt-Long-2.52 is available

2020-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869726 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-d51b4bbc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2020-08-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1af9888c22 golang-1.15-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing php-horde-Horde-Core-2.31.15-1.el6

[Bug 1869106] perl-Importer-0.026 is available

2020-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869106 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-d51b4bbc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1869106] perl-Importer-0.026 is available

2020-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869106 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-9f03413d40 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1869726] perl-Getopt-Long-2.52 is available

2020-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869726 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-9f03413d40 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Fwd: Re: CppunitTest_sw_htmlexport failing due to zlib variation?

2020-08-28 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 8/28/20 1:38 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: All, The below question came up in the context of a LibreOffice unit test, where LibreOffice writes out a PNG image (involving zlib for compression) and the test checked the exact sequence of bytes, which failed on aarch64 when using Fedora's

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Martin Gansser
ok, I'll try again tomorrow or the day after tomorrow when it's available in Rawhide. Regards Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1843866] perl-Mango-1.30-7.fc33 FTBFS: t/bson.t: Failed test 'successful roundtrip'

2020-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843866 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4a08a623d2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 02:30:20PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > the macro "%{vdr_apiversion}" is included in the package vdr-devel > > rpm -qf /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.vdr > vdr-devel-2.4.4-1.fc32.x86_64 There is no such version in Fedora (is this a local build)? Latest in F32 is

Re: fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Martin Gansser
the macro "%{vdr_apiversion}" is included in the package vdr-devel rpm -qf /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.vdr vdr-devel-2.4.4-1.fc32.x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-33-20200828.n.0 compose check report

2020-08-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200827.n.0): ID: 650037 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/650037 Old failures (same test failed in

fedora-review fails with "warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires .."

2020-08-28 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, when I want to do a review with: fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1873407 i get this error message: warning: line 16: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires: vdr(abi)(x86-64) = %{vdr_apiversion} Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 setting

Re: Future of shared-mime-info in Fedora

2020-08-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - > On 28. 08. 20 13:33, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > I'm sorry, I read through the mail, but I don't understand what you'd want > > me to say, or what questions you'd want me to answer. > > You pretty much answered all the questions. Thanks. > > > In short, I've

Re: Future of shared-mime-info in Fedora

2020-08-28 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 28. 08. 20 13:33, Bastien Nocera wrote: I'm sorry, I read through the mail, but I don't understand what you'd want me to say, or what questions you'd want me to answer. You pretty much answered all the questions. Thanks. In short, I've maintained the upstream shared-mime-info for 16

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200828.n.0 changes

2020-08-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20200827.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200828.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 1 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:889.49 KiB Size

Re: Future of shared-mime-info in Fedora

2020-08-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - > Hello Fedorans, Bastien, > > I have noticed that the shared-mime-info package was orphaned couple days > ago. I'm sorry, I read through the mail, but I don't understand what you'd want me to say, or what questions you'd want me to answer. In short, I've

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200828.0 compose check report

2020-08-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-IoT-33-20200828.0 compose check report

2020-08-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200826.0): ID: 649883 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/649883 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64) (Tests

[389-devel] Re: Odd behaviour in import

2020-08-28 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 27.08.20 04:01, William Brown wrote: Hey there, I'm seeing some odd behaviour in an import test. I'm seeing that a large number of entries won't import unless the directory is restarted before the import task is performed. The error appears to be: [25/Aug/2020:14:14:58.973490600 +1000]

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200828.0 compose check report

2020-08-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200827.0): ID: 649871 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

RE: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Muneendra Kumar M via devel
Hi Christopher, Thanks for the detailed information. Regards, Muneendra. -Original Message- From: Christopher Engelhard [mailto:c...@lcts.de] Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 2:26 PM To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Query on upgrading the Fedora package Hi Muneendra, On

Re: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Christopher Engelhard
Hi Muneendra, On 28.08.20 10:47, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote: > After stable time i.e 14 day's the updates will be automatically moved to > stable .Is this correct. That is the default yes, but you can configure it differently in the Bodhi web interface if you choose. Check out the EPEL

Re: [HOWTO] Keep using Rawhide after branching

2020-08-28 Thread Petr Menšík
Of course this would "solve" issue with GPG signature. It opens door for man-in-the-middle attack without any protection. But I am aware there are no many better fixes. There is one with arch symlink, allowing continued GPG verification. On 8/25/20 5:56 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il

RE: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Muneendra Kumar M via devel
Hi Chrstopher, Thanks for the info. I have run the below command for update Fedpkg update --type enhancement. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-77b06c3bc1 After stable time i.e 14 day's the updates will be automatically moved to stable .Is this correct. Regards,

Re: Galera FTBFS in f33, but same build passes in f32

2020-08-28 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Yep, thanks for help Lukas On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:11 AM Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:01:37 +0200 > Lukas Javorsky wrote: > > > > one difference is that F-33 enabled LTO (new compiler flags added at > > > the distro level, [1], but as you are building with -Werror, then you >

Re: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 28.08.20 10:04, Muneendra Kumar M wrote: > Do I need to call fedpkg update --type enhancement after fedpkg build for > epel8 ? Yes. Any branch that is Bodhi-enabled (normally any branch except rawhide & epel8-playground) will require a 'fedpkg update' to actually submit the build to the

Re: Galera FTBFS in f33, but same build passes in f32

2020-08-28 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:01:37 +0200 Lukas Javorsky wrote: > > one difference is that F-33 enabled LTO (new compiler flags added at > > the distro level, [1], but as you are building with -Werror, then you > > should review the code for real issues. as others already mentioned - there is a

RE: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Muneendra Kumar M via devel
Hi Christopher, A small doubt . Do I need to call fedpkg update --type enhancement after fedpkg build for epel8 ? Regards, Muneendra. -Original Message- From: Muneendra Kumar M [mailto:muneendra.ku...@broadcom.com] Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 1:00 PM To: 'Development discussions

Re: Galera FTBFS in f33, but same build passes in f32

2020-08-28 Thread Lukas Javorsky
> one difference is that F-33 enabled LTO (new compiler flags added at > the distro level, [1], but as you are building with -Werror, then you > should review the code for real issues. What do you mean by real issues? On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020

RE: Query on upgrading the Fedora package

2020-08-28 Thread Muneendra Kumar M via devel
Hi Christopher, I did the below steps to upgrade my package to EPEL8 and fedpkg build was success. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1602105 Do I need to do anything more for the same. As the below link still shows the older version. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fctxpd

Future of shared-mime-info in Fedora

2020-08-28 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello Fedorans, Bastien, I have noticed that the shared-mime-info package was orphaned couple days ago. Bastien, AFAIK you were the primary point of contact in Fedora and I also see you are the RHEL 8 default bugzilla assignee. Considering the following commit:

Fwd: Re: CppunitTest_sw_htmlexport failing due to zlib variation?

2020-08-28 Thread Stephan Bergmann
All, The below question came up in the context of a LibreOffice unit test, where LibreOffice writes out a PNG image (involving zlib for compression) and the test checked the exact sequence of bytes, which failed on aarch64 when using Fedora's zlib. (Though the resulting images look rather