Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-08-30 Thread Tomáš Popela
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:24 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:15 PM Chris Murphy > wrote: > > > > Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-33-20200830.n.0.iso does not have nano > > on the install media itself. Is it intentional? > > > > It's s

Re: Release criteria proposal: networking requirements

2020-08-30 Thread Tomáš Popela
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:34 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:52 PM Chris Murphy > wrote: > > > The IPP Everywhere specification requires clients to support DNS-SD > > (mDNS is part of that) or WS-Discovery. Printers are required to > > support both DNS-SD and WS-Discovery. Ava

Re: The case of LTO when produced enlarged binaries

2020-08-30 Thread Jeff Law
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 14:42 +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 12:37 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 21:31, Igor Raits < > > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> > > wrote: > > [..] > > > > > Well, I tell what I see :) > > > > > > Compiling kitty with settings b

Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

2020-08-30 Thread Christopher
This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202) keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account. I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the flags they keep setting, and remove their CC as well, so they don't get follow-ups and get enc

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-08-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:15 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-33-20200830.n.0.iso does not have nano > on the install media itself. Is it intentional? > It's supposed to be there, but I don't know how Silverblue is "defined" so it would

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-08-30 Thread Chris Murphy
Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-33-20200830.n.0.iso does not have nano on the install media itself. Is it intentional? -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-30 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:30 pm, Andreas Tunek wrote: On my F33 test system (new install yesterday) I can see my NAS but I can't connect to it. Could that be due to this change? Possibly! Try using 'resolvectl query' and see what it says ___ de

Re: %lua_requires behaves differently in F33+

2020-08-30 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Aug 30, 2020 02:04:36 Miro Hrončok : Establish a FAS group for "Lua provenpackagers". Make sure the name it not to be confused with the Lua SIG, but note that the FAS group usually needs to be called ...-sig. I'd go with lua-packagres-sig or lua-maintainers-sig. Get it a mailing list needed fo

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-30 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30.08.2020 16:04, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > The file should not be generated by NetworkManager. NetworkManager > should notice that the file is a symlink to > /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf and leave it alone. (In point 3. > the file should be a symlink.) Network Manager can be configur

Fedora-IoT-34-20200830.0 compose check report

2020-08-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200829.0): ID: 651109 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/651109 ID: 65 Test: x86_64 IoT-

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-30 Thread Andreas Tunek
On my F33 test system (new install yesterday) I can see my NAS but I can't connect to it. Could that be due to this change? Best regards Andreas ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-30 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:06 am, Michael Catanzaro wrote: I don't know what to do about this. Ideally we would figure out what's wrong and sneak a freeze exception into the beta release. If the file in 3. is not a symlink, then that would be what's wrong, but it ought to be a symlink. I just

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-30 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 3:12 pm, Chris Murphy wrote: Are these the expected behavior? 4. is unexpected. The file should not be generated by NetworkManager. NetworkManager should notice that the file is a symlink to /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf and leave it alone. (In point 3. the f

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

2020-08-30 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:04 am, Michael Catanzaro wrote: 4. is unexpected. The file should not be generated by NetworkManager. NetworkManager should notice that the file is a symlink to /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf and leave it alone. (In point 3. the file should be a symlink.) I d

Re: The case of LTO when produced enlarged binaries

2020-08-30 Thread Igor Raits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 12:37 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 21:31, Igor Raits < > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > [..] > > > Well, I tell what I see :) > > > > Compiling kitty with settings below produces this big

Fedora-Rawhide-20200830.n.0 compose check report

2020-08-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 31/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200828.n.2): ID:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200830.n.0 changes

2020-08-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200828.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200830.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:10 Upgraded packages: 73 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 17.07 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: The case of LTO when produced enlarged binaries

2020-08-30 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 21:31, Igor Raits wrote: [..] > Well, I tell what I see :) > > Compiling kitty with settings below produces this big > /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fast_data_types.so: > > * Without any LTO-related flags: 4.52 MB > * With -flto: 4.30 MB > * With -flto -ffat-lto-objects: 4.79 MB >

Re: The case of LTO when produced enlarged binaries

2020-08-30 Thread Igor Raits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 14:32 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 22:30 +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 14:27 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 22:24 +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200830.0 compose check report

2020-08-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/7 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-31-20200829.0): ID: 650916 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/650916 ID: 650921 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qc

Re: %lua_requires behaves differently in F33+

2020-08-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:04 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 30. 08. 20 4:07, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Quick question: for Python there's both python-devel and python-sig -- > > this seems overkill for Lua, right? Would starting lua@lists be enough? > > Not only it is overkill, but it brin

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200830.0 compose check report

2020-08-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200829.0): ID: 650909 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: %lua_requires behaves differently in F33+

2020-08-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 08. 20 4:07, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Quick question: for Python there's both python-devel and python-sig -- this seems overkill for Lua, right? Would starting lua@lists be enough? Not only it is overkill, but it brings problems. For the story, see this ticket: https://pagure.io/fe