Re: Switching package to fragmented default configuration

On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 8:03:03 AM MST David Tardon wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 23:46 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > On Monday, August 31, 2020 11:24:57 PM MST David Tardon wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 00:08 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: services impact on startup times

On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 6:27:22 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:09 pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > As for crond and atd, I think we can keep them installed by default, > > but inactive. I.e. make them socket activated or path activated, so > > t

Re: services impact on startup times

On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 6:09:26 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 09:27:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > These are based on Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200828.n.0.iso > > in a VM. The numbers are different on bare metal but corre

[announcement] Lua macro changes, new mailing list

Hi all, Some exciting updates re: Lua packaging TL;DR we want to simplify the Lua packaging experience as much as possible, across both Fedora and RHEL. Some background: - before RHEL 7, the Lua RPM does not provide "lua(abi) = MAJ.MIN" so a package that ships Lua modules has to declare this to

New Mock release v2.5

Hi packagers, I'm pleased to announce that there's a new mock/mock-core-configs release: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.5 This is rather a small release, so shortly, from the most interesting changes -- there's a new opt-in plugin for `rpm --showrc` dump

Re: Fedora Jam 33 Beta - Possible Blocker?

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:33:05PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I did close the infra ticket: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9271 > Anyhow, happy testing. Thanks Kevin! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -

Re: Fedora official kernel build fails to compile on Copr

I solved the previous error about macros expanded in comments, and now the build fails for other strange reasons. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/germano/kernel_204253_comment_14_patch/build/1616496/ By the way by commenting my patch on spec file, the kernel builds successfully https://cop

Fedora-IoT-34-20200902.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200830.0): ID: 653697 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653697 Old failures (same

Fedora-Rawhide-20200902.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2020-09-03 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2020-09-03 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2020-09-03 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2020-09-03 1

Re: Fedora Jam 33 Beta - Possible Blocker?

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:08:58PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > HI all, > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:36 pm, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > There's a FBR (freeze break request) to patch all the builders to > > > fix > > > this pro

OCaml F33 rebuild and .1 release tags

I'm doing a rebuild of the OCaml-related packages in F33 to move from OCaml 4.11.0 prerelease to OCaml 4.11.1 because: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870368#c26 "A serious bug has been discovered last week in OCaml 4.11.0: explicit polymorphic annotations are checked too permiss

Re: Fedora Jam 33 Beta - Possible Blocker?

HI all, On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:36 pm, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: There's a FBR (freeze break request) to patch all the builders to fix this problem[1], but I don't know if it has been applied yet. [1]:

Re: Fedora Jam 33 Beta - Possible Blocker?

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > There's a FBR (freeze break request) to patch all the builders to fix > this problem[1], but I don't know if it has been applied yet. > > [1]: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/threa

Re: F34 Change: Reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem (Self-Contained Change)

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:13:21PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the most > likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our QA > fedorapeople space, if needed). That would allow interested parties to test > and benc

Re: Fedora Jam 33 Beta - Possible Blocker?

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:23 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:52:25PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > This is just very disappointing [3]. Unless there is a huge delay in > > the beta timeline due to *actual* blockers, we've got no beta to > > test since this is 1-2 weeks o

Re: Fedora Jam 33 Beta - Possible Blocker?

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:52:25PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > This is just very disappointing [3]. Unless there is a huge delay in > the beta timeline due to *actual* blockers, we've got no beta to > test since this is 1-2 weeks out due to further testing needed [2]. > So, unless this minor Ko

Re: services impact on startup times

On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 21:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > These are based on Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200828.n.0.iso > in a VM. The numbers are different on bare metal but correlate. > > The only standout is rngd.service. That's a pretty big single hit, > percentage wise. And I

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

Vít Ondruch writes: > Hi Robbie, > > I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, If you're asking if I plan to take them, I do not. They have been orphaned, so anyone interested can pick them up. (They should refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_mai

Re: Switching package to fragmented default configuration

Hello, On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 23:46 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Monday, August 31, 2020 11:24:57 PM MST David Tardon wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 00:08 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > > On Saturday, August 29, 2020 3:36:33 PM MST Colin Walters wrote: > > > > > > > https://blo

Fedora-33-20200902.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 33/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200901.n.0): ID: 653087 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/653087 ID: 653090 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_reposi

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-09-02)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-02/fesco.2020-09-02-14.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-02/fesco.2020-09-02-14.01.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-09-02/fesco.2020-09-02-14.01.lo

Fedora-IoT-33-20200902.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200901.0): ID: 653316 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:43 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 02. 09. 20 v 15:18 Greg Hellings napsal(a): > > Vit, et al, > > My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no > personal investment into Ruby. > > > That is perfectly fine. > > > So I would prefer not to take on mor

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:50 pm, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: And oh, "files" always comes first because local config files should always take priority over upstream network based services. Zbigniew wound up moving files first in the end, but his justification for putting resolve first is here:

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

Dne 02. 09. 20 v 15:18 Greg Hellings napsal(a): > Vit, et al, > > My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no > personal investment into Ruby. That is perfectly fine. > So I would prefer not to take on more Ruby packages as I don't pay > much attention to the space.

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20200901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 10 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:235.88 KiB Size of

Re: Release criteria proposal: first boot experience

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 00:12:34 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: No user creation in Workstation Live, for a long time. First user is created by GNOME Initial Setup. Root user is not enabled. I was using the XFCE spin, so that might be different. ___ de

Re: services impact on startup times

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:09 pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: As for crond and atd, I think we can keep them installed by default, but inactive. I.e. make them socket activated or path activated, so that they are only started if people install actual crontabs or run at. I don't think th

Re: Release criteria proposal: first boot experience

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote: Since every screen contains just a couple of things, the "basic functionality test" as you phrased it seems to cover essentially everything that is present in there, with one arguable exception of the Enterprise Login functionality. Do you h

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

Vit, et al, My professional need for rubygems ended a while back, and I have no personal investment into Ruby. So I would prefer not to take on more Ruby packages as I don't pay much attention to the space. --Greg On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:38 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi Robbie, > > I wonder if y

Re: services impact on startup times

On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 09:27:33PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > These are based on Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200828.n.0.iso > in a VM. The numbers are different on bare metal but correlate. > > The only standout is rngd.service. That's a pretty big single hit, > percentage wise.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:17:49AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > >> Big Brother will be happy. :-) > > > > > > Sure, those two companies will be thrilled, I'm sure. This is a huge > > > disservice to our users. Why in the world does systemd try to force DNS > > > servers when none are configu

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:50:46AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I don't think the DHCP server for the QEMU VMs is supplying a domain.  > However, Network Manager > will add a "search" option to resolv.conf when "hostname" returns a FQDN. Ed opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874419

OpenImageIO 2.2 release and soname bump

OpenImageIO 2.2.6.1 was released yesterday. There are no API changes so simple rebuilds should be sufficient for all dependent packages. The builds will be done in a side-tag for Rawhide. I'd like to update f33 as well unless there's a good reason not to, dependent package maintainers CC'd. Thank

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:05 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 01. 09. 20 v 19:54 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a): > > On 01/09/2020 18:29, kevin wrote: > > > >> Just to make sure folks know, the retrace server being down is not this > >> teams fault, it's ours (infrastructure). We planned to just hav

Re: Release criteria proposal: first boot experience

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:24 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup > is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release > criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial > setup experience. So

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200902.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

Dne 01. 09. 20 v 19:54 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a): > On 01/09/2020 18:29, kevin wrote: > >> Just to make sure folks know, the retrace server being down is not this >> teams fault, it's ours (infrastructure). We planned to just have it down >> for a week or less when moving it to RDU, but it tu

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200902.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200901.0): ID: 652894 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: domcleal

Hi Robbie, I wonder if you had some intentions with the packages, be cause at lest the 3 down bellow looks to be required by other packages and they are now in danger of being removed from Fedora. Adding on CC Pavel, Dan and Greg who might be interested in some of them. Vít Dne 01. 09. 20 v 2