On Monday, September 7, 2020 7:25:49 AM MST Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 19:15 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:22:26 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial s
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind of
>> aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
>> metadata being pinned
>
>
> I d
Hi,
Upstream has clarified their license as they embed some Knronos/EGL
specifications under a different license.
Thus, the package's license has changed from MIT to MIT and ASL 2.0.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200906.n.0):
ID:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:34:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> + Communication: repurposing the Fedora Btrfs wiki as a landing page
> is a work-in-progress
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs
I prefer end-user documentation to not be in the wiki, because it's an easy
click away to a lot of not
+ F33 Btrfs By Default Test Week has concluded
Test results page
https://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/92
Perhaps the most significant issue discovered is something of an edge
case. The installer has performance issues when it encounters a Btrfs
file system with many snapshots (500+ in thi
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 07:44, Dhanesh B. Sabane
wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I've been away from all Fedora activities for quite some time and I
> don't see a return anytime soon. There are 6 Python packages which are
> maintained by me and I'd like to hand them over. Following is the list
> of packa
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 2:24 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:17 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and
Hello Kamil,
> Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the
most likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our
QA fedorapeople space, if needed). That would allow interested parties
to test and benchmark the experience themselves.
I'll provide I
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200906.0):
ID: 657523 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657523
Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)
Installed system cha
Hello everyone,
I'd like to announce a new project of the QA team and an extension of the
BlockerBugs App [1]. The blocker and freeze exception proposals can now not
only be discussed during regular blocker review meetings [2], but also at
any time through discussion tickets hosted on Pagure [3].
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200906.n.0):
ID: 657220 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657220
ID: 657266 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso i
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 19:15 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:22:26 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> > is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> > crite
Hi all,
The new version of libcbor package will arrive soon and there are going to be
some changes.
SONAME change: "libcbor.so.0" to "libcbor.so.0.7" (More info:
https://github.com/PJK/libcbor/issues/52)
Rename cbor_ctrl_is_bool to cbor_get_bool (More info:
https://github.com/PJK/libcbor/issues
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64)
ID: 657453 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657453
ID: 657459 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedorap
OLD: Fedora-33-20200906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind of
>> aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
>> metadata being pinned
>
>
> I d
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind
> of aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
> metadata being pinned
>
I don't follow. If you have one master copy and 10 snapshots, and yo
Hey Pruthvi,
> I am looking for packages to maintain and this would help a lot.
>
Do let me know the package that you'd like to maintain and I'll add you as a
co-maintainer for it.
Have a good one!
Cheers!
Dhanesh Sabane
___
devel mailing list -- d
Hello Lumir,
> I'd like to maintain:
>
> python-first
> python-pipdeptree
> python-pipreqs
> python-yarg
>
> These are dependencies of pipenv we (@python-sig) maintain so please add
> me as an admin and this group as co-maintainer.
>
I've added you as admin and @python-sig as committer for th
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 1:02 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the composes?
>
> The background is that I added glibc-headers-x86.noarch to deal with a
> conflict between inconsistent composes (glibc-headers.i686 was sometimes
> in the x86_64 co
Is it possible to include a noarch package only in some of the composes?
The background is that I added glibc-headers-x86.noarch to deal with a
conflict between inconsistent composes (glibc-headers.i686 was sometimes
in the x86_64 compose, sometimes it was not). glibc-headers-x86.noarch
is always
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 64.95 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200905.0):
ID: 656801 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and I'm +1 to
> > > incorporating it. Its current phrasing seems fi
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hi Till,
please install firefox-x11 package and use Firefox X11 to test if it's
caused by Wayland backend.
Also please file a new bug at #BZ so it can be diagnosed more, i.e.
test Mozilla binaries, disable extensions etc..
Thanks,
Martin
On 9/5/20 2:50 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Hi all,
I'
28 matches
Mail list logo
