[Bug 1874459] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99031 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874459 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1876823] perl-Text-Table-Tiny-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876823 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1879188] perl-Search-Elasticsearch-7.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879188 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1880535] perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880535 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Need assistance for luxcorerender to use c++14

On 2020-09-19 1:32 p.m., Andy Mender wrote: On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 22:27, Richard Shaw > wrote: On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 3:16 PM Luya Tshimbalanga mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Hello team, openvdb is updated to 7.1.0 in Rawhide and

[Bug 1880667] perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880667 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0e91de7a1a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[Bug 1880667] perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880667 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-c2494539ba has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0214580ca4 mbedtls-2.16.8-1.el8 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c5ced83bcc seamonkey-2.53.4-1.el8 2

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 767 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 506 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7 14

rust-copyless license change: MPLv2 -> MIT or ASL 2.0

$subject basically says it all. The copyless crate changed its license from MPL-2.0 to (MIT OR Apache-2.0) with the 0.1.5 release. I expect this to have no ill effects in fedora, since the new license terms are more liberal and (MIT OR Apache-2.0) is actually the de-facto standard license in the

Re: Need assistance for luxcorerender to use c++14

On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 22:27, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 3:16 PM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > >> Hello team, >> >> openvdb is updated to 7.1.0 in Rawhide and luxcorerender needs to switch >> to -std=c++14 similar to that upstream ticket: >>

Re: Need assistance for luxcorerender to use c++14

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 3:16 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > openvdb is updated to 7.1.0 in Rawhide and luxcorerender needs to switch > to -std=c++14 similar to that upstream ticket: > https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openvdb/issues/795. > > Is there anyone knowing how

Re: Test machines for maintainers (was: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k))

On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 16:14, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hi, Kevin. > > On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 19:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Zbigniew

Need assistance for luxcorerender to use c++14

Hello team, openvdb is updated to 7.1.0 in Rawhide and luxcorerender needs to switch to -std=c++14 similar to that upstream ticket: https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openvdb/issues/795. Is there anyone knowing how to do it on the spec file?

Test machines for maintainers (was: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k))

Hi, Kevin. On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 19:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:09:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > I'm

Re: Fedora EOL wrt new dist-git branches (and my confusion)

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 17:03 Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> >> So, my question is: Should we fix the document to describe the long >> standing >> practice more understandably, or should we change the practice to allow >> new >> dist-git branches

[Bug 1880667] perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880667 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1880681] perl-Apache-Session-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880681 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: btrfs / booting alternative OS versions from subvolumes

On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:48:18 +0200 Daniel Pocock wrote: > I noticed another thread about subvolumes already exists, I'm starting > this one for the very specific topic of installing multiple root > filesystems as subvolumes > > Examples: Fedora 33 in one subvolume, Fedora rawhide in another >

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Upgrade Test Day 2020-09-21

Hey All, As we come closer to Fedora 33 Beta, it's time to test upgrades. Fedora 33 has a lot of changesets [0] and it becomes essential that we test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line. As a part of this test day[1], we will test upgrading from a full updated, F31 and F32

Re: maybe a path forward for java and modules? [was Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:30 PM David Cantrell wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only > >> packages because we don't want

Re: btrfs / booting alternative OS versions from subvolumes

Daniel Pocock wrote: > All these OS installs would shared some things like /home That would be likely to break various user programs. Sometimes a program – for example an email client – changes its internal file format or directory layout. When the new version sees the old format, it concludes

[Bug 1694444] Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/ ( { <-- HERE } (?: / \* )? | \* ) / at (eval 97) line

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169 Juan Orti Alcaine changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Kubernetes Development SIG

On 9/19/20 1:10 AM, Vipul Siddharth wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 8:26 PM Sumantro Mukherjee mailto:sumuk...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:15 PM Leonardo Rossetti mailto:lross...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hello all, I would like to present a Kubernetes Development SIG. Love the

Fedora-IoT-33-20200919.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200918.0): ID: 671636 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL:

[Bug 1848125] amavisd fails to start in multiple port config

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848125 Juan Orti Alcaine changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Fedora-33-20200919.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200918.n.0): ID: 671532 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/671532 Soft failed openQA tests: 9/181 (x86_64)

Re: [HEADS UP] Breaking version change: php-email-address-validation

Since nobody contacted me regarding this, I'll go ahead and make the change somewhen tomorrow. A.FI. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Fedora 33 compose report: 20200919.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20200918.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20200919.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

[Bug 1880667] perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880667 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1f72abdb46 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f72abdb46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1880667] perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880667 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-1f72abdb46 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f72abdb46 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---

Re: btrfs / booting alternative OS versions from subvolumes

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 5:48 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > I noticed another thread about subvolumes already exists, I'm starting > this one for the very specific topic of installing multiple root > filesystems as subvolumes > > Examples: Fedora 33 in one subvolume, Fedora rawhide in another >

[Bug 1880667] perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880667 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora-IoT-34-20200919.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200918.0): ID: 671450 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/671450 ID: 671453 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso

[Bug 1880681] perl-Apache-Session-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880681 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-7d8ff10ca8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7d8ff10ca8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1880681] perl-Apache-Session-1.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880681 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora-Rawhide-20200919.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Kubernetes Development SIG

The Idea sounds pretty Interesting, Would love to participate in it. -- Nasir Hussain On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 6:44 PM Leonardo Rossetti wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to present a Kubernetes Development SIG. > > I initially thought of an "operator SIG" but I think a wider SIG about >

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200919.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200919.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200918.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200919.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 178 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 660.53 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

btrfs / booting alternative OS versions from subvolumes

I noticed another thread about subvolumes already exists, I'm starting this one for the very specific topic of installing multiple root filesystems as subvolumes Examples: Fedora 33 in one subvolume, Fedora rawhide in another subvolume, Fedora 33 32-bit in another subvolume, maybe RHEL in a

Re: Fedora 33 blocker status

Hi all, For what is worth, logging out and back in from the last ISO (KDE Spin) does work in the live session. I'm going to try again and install it, and see if there's any difference. Regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 22:12, Ben Cotton wrote: > We're getting close! I'm