Re: F34 Change proposal: Debug Info Standardization (from DWZ to -fdebug-types-section) (System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-10-04 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jan Kratochvil: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:29:44 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> I was just discussing that recently with the Hotspot Perf GUI >> maintainer. And we concluded that if .debug files would be compressed >> then we would need an uncompressed cache somewhere. The issue with >> having the

Re: F33 podman: unpacking of archive failed cpio: cap_set_file

2020-10-04 Thread Lumír Balhar
On 10/2/20 9:52 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: On 10/2/20 06:09, Lumír Balhar wrote: Hello. I have fully upgraded Fedora 33 on my laptop and when I try to use podman and install httpd package into container, I get the following error message: Error unpacking rpm package httpd-2.4.46-1.fc32.x86_64

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Sunday, October 4, 2020 7:44:49 PM CEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Jerry James wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > > > > > - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 > > > - opencv-core requires libtbb.so.2 > > > >

Re: Orphaning openbabel

2020-10-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:53:03AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've finally managed to find some time and get the latest Open Babel > snapshot to build in F32 and rawhide. The spec file is ugly with a > bunch of comments still in it and I've realized that documentation

Fedora-33-20201004.n.1 compose check report

2020-10-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 6/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201003.n.0): ID: 684468 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/684468 ID: 684513 Test: x86_64 universal instal

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201004.n.1 changes

2020-10-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20201003.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201004.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 61 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 36 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.69 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

2020-10-04 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:50 AM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 03.10.20 um 22:07 schrieb Chris Murphy: > > > > No the correct invocation is "dnf reinstall grub2-efi-x64 shim-x64" > > > > Suggesting UEFI users install GRUB with grub2-install is asking for a > > support nightmare, it's untenable. > >

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

2020-10-04 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:37 AM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > now, the efi stuff is installed, i accept a few "oh, theres efi, i do > efi" mistakes from time to time. But i don't have a clue, how the system > could boot with those symlinks before that grub-install destroyed it. The symlinks are in /e

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 00:23 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 21:54, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 19:44 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Jerry James > > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iñaki Ucar < > > > > iu...@fedoraproj

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

2020-10-04 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 3:01 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/4/20 9:36 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > And still,we do not know why the f33 livedisc does not boot at all when > > inserted early > > AND > > why grub-install /dev/USBDRIVE (correct devicename ofcourse ) is > > overwriting the ssd boot

Re: build rpm from spec file fails on fedora-eln-armhfp

2020-10-04 Thread Ruki Wang
My spec file: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/waruqi/xmake/fedora-eln-armhfp/01693870-xmake/xmake.spec Ruki Wang 于2020年10月5日周一 上午8:50写道: > Hi all, > > I'm building rpm from spec file on copr and doing some tests. > > But It always failed on fedora-eln-armhfp. > > I don’t know

build rpm from spec file fails on fedora-eln-armhfp

2020-10-04 Thread Ruki Wang
Hi all, I'm building rpm from spec file on copr and doing some tests. But It always failed on fedora-eln-armhfp. I don’t know if it’s the spec or dnf. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/waruqi/xmake/build/1693870/ https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/waruqi/xmake/fedora-eln-a

Re: %set_build_flags problem in rpm spec file

2020-10-04 Thread Ruki Wang
It works fine, Thanks! Neal Gompa 于2020年10月3日周六 下午10:55写道: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 10:18 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 03.10.2020 15:47, Ruki Wang wrote: > > > I try `%?set_build_flags` and it works fine. > > > > No, it will not. This command will just force RPM to ignore err

Re: Orphaning openbabel

2020-10-04 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello everyone, I've finally managed to find some time and get the latest Open Babel snapshot to build in F32 and rawhide. The spec file is ugly with a bunch of comments still in it and I've realized that documentation upstream is lacking, especially concerning build options and bindings. So far,

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 21:54, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 19:44 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Jerry James > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iñaki Ucar > > > wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > > > > > > > - tbb provide

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 15:28 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 1:47 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --clean --install opencv-devel > > > > it installs opencv-devel well, it seems to me you need install tbb- > > devel ? > > That wouldn't explain why I go

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 1:47 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --clean --install opencv-devel > > it installs opencv-devel well, it seems to me you need install tbb-devel ? That wouldn't explain why I got a good build in mock. Where Iñaki got an error, my build log shows: **

Re: F34 Change proposal: Debug Info Standardization (from DWZ to -fdebug-types-section) (System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-10-04 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:29:44 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I was just discussing that recently with the Hotspot Perf GUI > maintainer. And we concluded that if .debug files would be compressed > then we would need an uncompressed cache somewhere. The issue with > having the on-disk debuginfo files

Re: fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

2020-10-04 Thread Björn Persson
Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 21:39 +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 12:31 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > > On 04.10.2020 12:04, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > > Why is a PR being created? I'm the maintainer and have

Re: fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

2020-10-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 21:39 +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 12:31 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > On 04.10.2020 12:04, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > Why is a PR being created? I'm the maintainer and have not seen > > > > this before. > >

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 19:44 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Jerry James > wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iñaki Ucar > > wrote: > > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > > > > > - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 > > > - opencv-core requires libtbb.so.2 > > > > > >

Re: fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

2020-10-04 Thread Björn Persson
Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 12:31 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 04.10.2020 12:04, Barry Scott wrote: > > > Why is a PR being created? I'm the maintainer and have not seen this > > > before. > > > > It just suggests you to create a pull request. Just ignore.

Re: Unresponsive packagers: ekulik, imcleod and lsun

2020-10-04 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:04:46AM -, Liming Sun wrote: > Apology for the late reply. I had email issues from upstream community > recently. Somehow my Redhat Bugzilla account seems not accessible anymore > either. I recreated the account with the same email address > (l...@mellanox.com). Is

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

2020-10-04 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 10/4/20 9:36 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: And still,we do not know why the f33 livedisc does not boot at all when inserted early AND why grub-install /dev/USBDRIVE  (correct devicename ofcourse ) is overwriting the ssd boot setup, instead of the usbdrive bootconfig. You can't use "grub2-install

Re: fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

2020-10-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 12:31 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 04.10.2020 12:04, Barry Scott wrote: > > Why is a PR being created? I'm the maintainer and have not seen this before. > > It just suggests you to create a pull request. Just ignore. Right. It's not saying a pull request *has

Re: Orphaning vdr-skinsoppalusikka and the status of my packages (looking for co-maintainers for Finnish spell checking)

2020-10-04 Thread Ville-Pekka Vainio
Hi, Just letting people know that I was able to fix the foma build. A review request for unretiring the package is at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885048 I could do a review swap for a python package, a simple autotools-based package or something like that. -Ville-Pekka __

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > > > - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 > > - opencv-core requires libtbb.so.2 > > > > but [1] pulls opencv-devel and tbb is not pulled too, so the linker > > th

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 18:29, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Sunday, 04 October 2020 at 15:06, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > > > - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 > > That seems correct. > > > - opencv-core requires libtbb.so.2 > > Does it? Not on

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

2020-10-04 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 03.10.20 um 22:07 schrieb Chris Murphy: > > No the correct invocation is "dnf reinstall grub2-efi-x64 shim-x64" > > Suggesting UEFI users install GRUB with grub2-install is asking for a > support nightmare, it's untenable. > Isn't a simple check "are we booted with efi" a working solution to th

[Test-Announce] 2020-10-05 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2020-10-04 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2020-10-05 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's get together and check in. If anyone has any other it

Re: Fedora 32/33 livedisks do not boot on M$ system(s)

2020-10-04 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 03.10.20 um 22:23 schrieb Chris Murphy: > >> after investigating the problem with not finding grub.cfg in the >> proprosed bootpath /boot/ .. the solution was simple. >> >> The system died not use secure boot, as secure-boot was disabled for the >> kernel-surface kernelseries. They are no

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 > - opencv-core requires libtbb.so.2 > > but [1] pulls opencv-devel and tbb is not pulled too, so the linker > throws the following error: > > libtbb.so.2: cannot open shared objec

Re: libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Sunday, 04 October 2020 at 15:06, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure what's the issue here: > > - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 That seems correct. > - opencv-core requires libtbb.so.2 Does it? Not on F32: $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatprovides 'libtbb.so.2()(64bit)' Last metadata expiration

libtbb.so.2 not found

2020-10-04 Thread Iñaki Ucar
Hi, I'm not sure what's the issue here: - tbb provides libtbb.so.2 - opencv-core requires libtbb.so.2 but [1] pulls opencv-devel and tbb is not pulled too, so the linker throws the following error: libtbb.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory tbb issue?, opencv issue?

Re: fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

2020-10-04 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 04/10/20 12:04, Barry Scott ha scritto: > > Where do want the traceback reported? > See https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9366 Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis

Re: fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

2020-10-04 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 04.10.2020 12:04, Barry Scott wrote: > Why is a PR being created? I'm the maintainer and have not seen this before. It just suggests you to create a pull request. Just ignore. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing

fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

2020-10-04 Thread Barry Scott
$ fedpkg push Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 353 bytes | 353.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 remote: Emitting a message