[Bug 1886655] New: perl-SVN-Look-0.42 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886655

Bug ID: 1886655
   Summary: perl-SVN-Look-0.42 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-SVN-Look
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.42
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.41-16.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SVN-Look/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/8286/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Rawhide-20201008.n.1 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 21/181 (x86_64)

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201007.n.0):

ID: 688745  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688745
ID: 688763  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688763
ID: 688782  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688782
ID: 688785  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688785
ID: 688804  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688804
ID: 688826  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688826
ID: 688831  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688831
ID: 688832  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688832
ID: 688844  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688844
ID: 688847  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688847
ID: 688849  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688849
ID: 688850  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688850
ID: 688852  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688852
ID: 688865  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688865
ID: 688869  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688869
ID: 61  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/61
ID: 62  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62
ID: 63  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63
ID: 688899  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688899
ID: 688900  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688900
ID: 688916  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688916

Soft failed openQA tests: 4/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201007.n.0):

ID: 688703  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688703
ID: 688722  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688722
ID: 688799  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688799
ID: 688812  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688812

Passed openQA tests: 117/181 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201007.n.0):

ID: 688819  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688819

Skipped gating openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64)

Old skipped gating tests (same test skipped in Fedora-Rawhide-20201007.n.0):

ID: 66  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/66
ID: 67  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/67
ID: 688896  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688896
ID: 688898  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688898
ID: 688906  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_system_logging **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688906
ID: 688907  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688907
ID: 688911  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688911
ID: 688914  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688914

Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 31 of 181

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 180 MiB to 200 

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-10-09 - 94% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/10/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20201008git7cb9a63.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201008.n.1 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201007.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201008.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  14
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   161
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  1.52 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   3.11 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -16.32 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: emacs-async-1.9.4-0.fc34
Summary: Asynchronous processing in Emacs
RPMs:emacs-async
Size:28.91 KiB

Package: golang-github-rickb777-plural-1.2.2-1.fc34
Summary: Simple Go API for pluralisation
RPMs:golang-github-rickb777-plural-devel
Size:13.32 KiB

Package: kdiskmark-1.6.2-2.fc34
Summary: Simple open-source disk benchmark tool for Linux distros
RPMs:kdiskmark
Size:613.93 KiB

Package: postfix-mta-sts-resolver-1.0.0-1.fc34
Summary: Daemon providing MTA-STS map to Postfix
RPMs:postfix-mta-sts-resolver
Size:61.74 KiB

Package: profile-sync-daemon-6.42-2.fc34
Summary: Symlinks and syncs browser profile dirs to RAM thus reducing HDD/SDD 
calls
RPMs:profile-sync-daemon
Size:32.64 KiB

Package: python-aioeafm-1.0.0-1.fc34
Summary: Python wrapper for the UK Environment Agency Flood Monitoring API
RPMs:python3-aioeafm
Size:15.19 KiB

Package: python-async-upnp-client-0.14.14-1.fc34
Summary: Async Python UPnP Client
RPMs:python3-async-upnp-client
Size:82.62 KiB

Package: python-didl-lite-1.2.5-2.fc34
Summary: DIDL-Lite (Digital Item Declaration Language) tools
RPMs:python3-didl-lite
Size:27.10 KiB

Package: python-enturclient-0.2.1-2.fc34
Summary: Python API client for data from Entur.org
RPMs:python3-enturclient
Size:18.91 KiB

Package: python-google-i18n-address-2.4.0-1.fc34
Summary: Address validation helpers for Google's i18n address database
RPMs:python3-google-i18n-address
Size:338.98 KiB

Package: python-nrf24-1.1.1-1.fc34
Summary: Library for NRF24L01 communication
RPMs:python3-nrf24
Size:28.45 KiB

Package: python-pyvlx-0.2.17-1.fc34
Summary: Python wrapper for the Velux KLF 200 API
RPMs:python3-pyvlx
Size:96.04 KiB

Package: rpm-git-tag-sort-1.0-1.fc34
Summary: Sorts merged git annotated tags according to topology and rpm version 
sorting.
RPMs:rpm-git-tag-sort
Size:109.40 KiB

Package: rust-getrandom0.1-0.1.15-1.fc34
Summary: Small cross-platform library for retrieving random data from system 
source
RPMs:rust-getrandom0.1+compiler_builtins-devel rust-getrandom0.1+core-devel 
rust-getrandom0.1+default-devel rust-getrandom0.1+dummy-devel 
rust-getrandom0.1+log-devel rust-getrandom0.1+rustc-dep-of-std-devel 
rust-getrandom0.1+std-devel rust-getrandom0.1-devel
Size:85.18 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CTL-1.5.2-12.fc34
Old package:  CTL-1.5.2-9.fc33
Summary:  The Color Transformation Language
RPMs: CTL CTL-devel CTL-docs OpenEXR_CTL
Size: 6.88 MiB
Size change:  -258.89 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.5.2-10
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sat Aug 01 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.5.2-11
  - Second attempt - Rebuilt for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

  * Wed Oct 07 2020 Nicolas Chauvet  - 1.5.2-12
  - Fix FTBFS


Package:  IP2Location-8.2.0-11.fc34
Old package:  IP2Location-8.1.3-11.fc34
Summary:  C library for mapping IP address to geolocation information
RPMs: IP2Location IP2Location-data-sample IP2Location-devel
Size: 5.66 MiB
Size change:  4.81 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 07 2020 Peter Bieringer  - 8.2.0-12
  - update version to 8.2.0 (soname: 3)


Package:  LabPlot-2.7.0-6.fc34
Old package:  LabPlot-2.7.0-5.fc34
Summary:  Data Analysis and Visualization
RPMs: LabPlot
Size: 31.00 MiB
Size change:  -19 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 07 2020 Mohan Boddu  - 2.7.0-6
  - Rebuilt for cantor soname-bump


Package:  Lmod-8.4.9-1.fc34
Old package:  Lmod-8.4.7-1.fc34
Summary:  Environmental Modules System in Lua
RPMs: Lmod
Size: 1.07 MiB
Size change:  574 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Oct 08 2020 Orion Poplawski  - 8.4.9-1
  - Update to 8.4.9


Package:  MUMPS-5.3.4-1.fc34
Old package:  MUMPS-5.3.3-2.fc34
Summary:  A MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver
RPMs: MUMPS MUMPS-common MUMPS-devel MUMPS-examples MUMPS-mpich 
MUMPS-mpich-devel MUMPS-mpich-examples MUMPS-openmp MUMPS-openmp-devel 
MUMPS-openmp-examples MUMPS-openmpi MUMPS-openmpi-devel MUMPS-openmpi-examples 
MUMPS-srpm-macros
Size: 77.78 MiB
Size change:  151.36 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Oct 06 2020 Antonio Trande  - 5.3.4-1
  - Release 5.3.4


Package:  PerceptualDiff-2.1-1.fc34
Old package:  PerceptualDiff-1.1.1-25.fc32
Summary

Fedora-33-20201008.n.1 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 9/181 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201007.n.0):

ID: 688579  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688579
ID: 688582  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688582
ID: 688631  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688631
ID: 688633  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688633
ID: 688644  Test: x86_64 universal install_with_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688644
ID: 688652  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688652
ID: 688674  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688674
ID: 688693  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688693

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20201007.n.0):

ID: 688597  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688597

Soft failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20201007.n.0):

ID: 688522  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688522
ID: 688541  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688541
ID: 688568  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688568
ID: 688581  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688581
ID: 688601  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688601
ID: 688604  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688604
ID: 688618  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688618

Passed openQA tests: 165/181 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-33-20201007.n.0):

ID: 688595  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688595
ID: 688630  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688630
ID: 688655  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688655

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.27 to 0.10
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/686966#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688530#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.06 to 0.17
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/686968#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688532#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 1.04 to 0.79
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/687003#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688567#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 8 MiB to 21 MiB
1 packages(s) removed since previous compose: kf5-libkdepim-akonadi
System load changed from 0.89 to 1.27
Average CPU usage changed from 32.11904762 to 14.45238095
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/687020#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688584#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 12 MiB to 15 MiB
1 packages(s) removed since previous compose: kf5-libkdepim-akonadi
System load changed from 1.34 to 1.10
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/687021#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688585#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used swap changed from 24 MiB to 21 MiB
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/687037#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688601#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Mount /run/user/979 appeared since previous compose
2 services(s) added since previous compose: user-runtime-dir@979.service, 
user@979.service
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/687040#downloads

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-e943b78209 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-e943b78209`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e943b78209

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7d1114b762   
xawtv-3.105-2.el6
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f853880b07   
prosody-0.11.7-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

IP2Location-8.2.0-11.el6
rpm-git-tag-sort-1.0-1.el6

Details about builds:



 IP2Location-8.2.0-11.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-740ab185da)
 C library for mapping IP address to geolocation information

Update Information:

update version to 8.2.0 (soname: 3)    update version to 8.1.3    update
version to 8.1.2 (soname: 2)    add additional
Obsoletes/Provides/BuildRequires    subpackage data-sample: add suffix
"SAMPLE" to included BIN files, fix file permissions    add patch to sync
with upstream

ChangeLog:





 rpm-git-tag-sort-1.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed9fedcf35)
 Sorts merged git annotated tags according to topology and rpm version sorting.

Update Information:

Command-line tool to sort git annotated N-V-R named tags, which have been
merged, by topological sort (primary criterion) and rpm version-release sort
(secondary criterion).

ChangeLog:



___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201008.n.1 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-33-20201007.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201008.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   141
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   1.32 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   17.37 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  akonadi-calendar-tools-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  akonadi-calendar-tools-20.04.3-2.fc33
Summary:  Akonadi Calendar Tools
RPMs: akonadi-calendar-tools
Size: 1.20 MiB
Size change:  10.41 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  akonadi-import-wizard-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  akonadi-import-wizard-20.04.3-2.fc33
Summary:  Akonadi Import Wizard
RPMs: akonadi-import-wizard akonadi-import-wizard-devel
Size: 2.96 MiB
Size change:  252.34 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  akonadiconsole-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  akonadiconsole-20.04.3-2.fc33
Summary:  Akonadi developer tool
RPMs: akonadiconsole
Size: 1.60 MiB
Size change:  7.17 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  akregator-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  akregator-20.04.3-2.fc33
Summary:  Feed Reader
RPMs: akregator akregator-libs
Size: 8.13 MiB
Size change:  51.46 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  baloo-widgets-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  baloo-widgets-20.04.3-3.fc33
Summary:  Widgets for Baloo
RPMs: baloo-widgets baloo-widgets-devel
Size: 926.99 KiB
Size change:  -1.23 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Aug 17 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  bomber-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  bomber-20.04.3-3.fc33
Summary:  Arcade bombing game
RPMs: bomber
Size: 4.44 MiB
Size change:  241 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  bovo-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  bovo-20.04.3-3.fc33
Summary:  Five in a row game
RPMs: bovo
Size: 1.57 MiB
Size change:  1.41 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  dolphin-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  dolphin-20.04.3-3.fc33
Summary:  KDE File Manager
RPMs: dolphin dolphin-devel dolphin-libs
Size: 20.87 MiB
Size change:  1.49 MiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Aug 17 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  dolphin-plugins-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  dolphin-plugins-20.04.3-3.fc33
Summary:  Dolphin plugins for revision control systems
RPMs: dolphin-plugins
Size: 2.46 MiB
Size change:  608.46 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Aug 17 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  dragon-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  dragon-20.04.3-4.fc33
Summary:  Media player
RPMs: dragon
Size: 10.36 MiB
Size change:  1.59 MiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  f33-backgrounds-33.0.7-1.fc33
Old package:  f33-backgrounds-33.0.6-1.fc33
Summary:  Fedora 33 default desktop background
RPMs: f33-backgrounds f33-backgrounds-base f33-backgrounds-extras-base 
f33-backgrounds-extras-gnome f33-backgrounds-extras-kde 
f33-backgrounds-extras-mate f33-backgrounds-extras-xfce f33-backgrounds-gnome 
f33-backgrounds-kde f33-backgrounds-mate f33-backgrounds-xfce
Size: 29.11 MiB
Size change:  752 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Oct 06 2020 Luya Tshimbalanga  - 33.0.7-1
  - Update to 33.0.7


Package:  granatier-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  granatier-20.04.3-4.fc33
Summary:  Place bombs to kill enemies and remove obstacles
RPMs: granatier
Size: 10.32 MiB
Size change:  -214 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Aug 18 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.0-1
  - 20.08.0

  * Tue Sep 15 2020 Rex Dieter  - 20.08.1-1
  - 20.08.1


Package:  grantlee-editor-20.08.1-1.fc33
Old package:  grantlee-editor-20.04.3-1.fc33
Summary:  KMail Theme Editor
RPMs: grantlee-editor grantlee-editor-libs
Size: 1.01 MiB
Size change:  12.96 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1790461e43   
chromium-85.0.4183.121-1.el8
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0f2bfced63   
prosody-0.11.7-1.el8
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b15161810d   
pdns-4.3.1-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

IP2Location-8.2.0-11.el8
audacious-4.0.5-2.el8
audacious-plugins-4.0.5-2.el8
borgbackup-1.1.14-1.el8
certbot-1.9.0-1.el8
ganglia-3.7.2-33.el8
gsi-openssh-8.0p1-4.el8
python-acme-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-apache-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-cloudflare-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-cloudxns-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-digitalocean-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-dnsimple-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-dnsmadeeasy-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-gehirn-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-google-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-linode-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-luadns-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-nsone-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-ovh-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-rfc2136-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-route53-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud-1.9.0-1.el8
python-certbot-nginx-1.9.0-1.el8
python-f5-icontrol-rest-1.3.15-1.el8
rpm-git-tag-sort-1.0-1.el8

Details about builds:



 IP2Location-8.2.0-11.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f67167f17c)
 C library for mapping IP address to geolocation information

Update Information:

update version to 8.2.0 (soname: 3)    update version to 8.1.3    update
version to 8.1.2 (soname: 2)    add additional
Obsoletes/Provides/BuildRequires    subpackage data-sample: add suffix
"SAMPLE" to included BIN files, fix file permissions    add patch to sync
with upstream

ChangeLog:





 audacious-4.0.5-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a449a3027e)
 Advanced audio player

Update Information:

Audacious is an advanced audio player. It is free, lightweight, currently based
on GTK+ 2, runs on Linux and many other *nix platforms and is focused on audio
quality and supporting a wide range of audio codecs. It still features an
alternative skinned user interface (based on Winamp 2.x skins). Historically, it
started as a fork of Beep Media Player (BMP), which itself forked from XMMS.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
4.0.5-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jul 21 2020 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0.5-1
- Update to 4.0.5 for important bug fixes.
* Sun Jun  7 2020 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0.4-2
- Merge fix for Large APE tag (> 1 MB) causes Audacious to abort
  with std::bad_alloc exception.
* Mon Jun  1 2020 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0.4-1
- Update to 4.0.4 for minor bug fixes.
* Fri May  1 2020 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0.3-1
- Update to 4.0.3 for a few more bug fixes and omissions in the Qt UI.
* Tue Apr 14 2020 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0.2-1
- Update to 4.0.2 which includes mainly bug fixes and tweaks for
  the Qt interface.
* Mon Apr  6 2020 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0.1-1
- Update to 4.0.1, most notably for KDE Plasma 5.18 fixes.
* Sat Mar 28 2020 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0-0.2
- (fedora copr only)
- Update to 4.0.
* Tue Jan 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.10.1-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Nov  4 2019 Michael Schwendt  - 4.0-0.1.beta1
- (fedora copr only)
- Upgrade to 4.0-beta1 which switches to Qt 5 GUI by default.
  Gtk+ build will go away eventually.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1783816 - audacious package doesn't install on EL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783816




 audacious-plugins-4.0.5-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a449a3027e)
 Plugins for the Audacious audio player

Update Information:

Audacious is an advanced audio player. It is free, lightweight, currently based
on GTK+ 2, runs on Linux and many other *nix platforms and is focused on audio
quality and supporting a wide range of audio codecs. It still features an
alternative skinned user interface 

[Bug 1884617] F32->F33 upgrade: obsolete removed Perl packages requiring perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884617

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-e2f42f630f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-e2f42f630f`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e2f42f630f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

[Erich Eickmeyer]

On 10/8/20 2:24 PM, Björn Persson wrote:

Michael Catanzaro wrote:

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:28 pm, Paul Wouters  wrote:

I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making
systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I would like to ensure this
change happens properly and securely for f34.

Well it's too late, since we are now in final freeze. FESCo reaffirmed
the systemd-resolved change just last week, so it's clearly not going
to be postponed. I agree that this DNSSEC problem with systemd-resolved
is unfortunate, and I'm sure the systemd developers would appreciate
help fixing it. Anyway, the best time to deal with this would have been
six months ago, when the change was proposed

The DNSsec problem was brought up by Florian Weimer and Tom Hughes six
months ago, when the change was proposed. Fesco or the change owners
could have chosen to "deal with" the problem then, if they cared about
DNSsec. You Michael replied to Florian and called DNSsec-aware clients
"a quite specialized use-case", so you can't claim that you were unaware
of the issue. "It's too late" rings hollow coming from someone who had
the chance to do something when it wasn't too late.

Björn Persson


Or how about we stick to the Friends Foundation and not make it personal?

--
Erich Eickmeyer
Maintainer
Fedora Jam
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

[Björn Persson]

Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:28 pm, Paul Wouters  wrote:
> > I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making
> > systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I would like to ensure this
> > change happens properly and securely for f34.  
> 
> Well it's too late, since we are now in final freeze. FESCo reaffirmed 
> the systemd-resolved change just last week, so it's clearly not going 
> to be postponed. I agree that this DNSSEC problem with systemd-resolved 
> is unfortunate, and I'm sure the systemd developers would appreciate 
> help fixing it. Anyway, the best time to deal with this would have been 
> six months ago, when the change was proposed

The DNSsec problem was brought up by Florian Weimer and Tom Hughes six
months ago, when the change was proposed. Fesco or the change owners
could have chosen to "deal with" the problem then, if they cared about
DNSsec. You Michael replied to Florian and called DNSsec-aware clients
"a quite specialized use-case", so you can't claim that you were unaware
of the issue. "It's too late" rings hollow coming from someone who had
the chance to do something when it wasn't too late.

Björn Persson


pgp9q1oKjfcMf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ganglia builds on mock/copr, fails on koji

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:37 PM Germano Massullo
 wrote:
> ganglia EPEL 7 successfully builds on mock and copr [1] but fails on
> koji [2], complaining about a missing close in a %if block. By seeing
> the spec file I don't see any missing closure in the block, and I don't
> understand this different behaviour between copr and koji
> What do you think about?

The two spec files are not the same.  The one used for the koji build
has this on line 146:

%if 0%{?systemd}

and, indeed, there is no matching %endif.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

[tdawson]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-10-09 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC
   At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.

A general agenda is the following:

#meetingname EPEL
#topic Intros
#topic Old Business
#topic EPEL-6
#topic EPEL-7
#topic EPEL-8
#topic Openfloor
#endmeeting




Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9722/

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ganglia builds on mock/copr, fails on koji

[Germano Massullo]

ganglia EPEL 7 successfully builds on mock and copr [1] but fails on
koji [2], complaining about a missing close in a %if block. By seeing
the spec file I don't see any missing closure in the block, and I don't
understand this different behaviour between copr and koji
What do you think about?
Thank you

[1]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/germano/ganglia/build/1700857/
[2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53026497
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go and Release Readiness meetings

[Ben Cotton]

Hi everyone,

It's that time already! The Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go[1] and Release
Readiness[2] meetings are scheduled for Thursday 15 October.

As a reminder, please update the Release Readiness page[3] with your
team's readiness if appropriate. We will use that to keep the Release
Readiness meeting short and focused.

[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9826/
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9827/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness


-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go and Release Readiness meetings

[Ben Cotton]

Hi everyone,

It's that time already! The Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go[1] and Release
Readiness[2] meetings are scheduled for Thursday 15 October.

As a reminder, please update the Release Readiness page[3] with your
team's readiness if appropriate. We will use that to keep the Release
Readiness meeting short and focused.

[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9826/
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9827/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness


-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

[Leigh Scott]

Looks like a mistake, lists shouldn't be used for needinfo.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updated zdicts for F33 zchunk metadata

[Jonathan Dieter]

Thanks Dusty for the pointers on the Freeze Exception process.  I've
created https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886581 blocked
the Final Freeze Exception bug.

Jonathan

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:32 PM Jonathan Dieter  wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I'm late to the party on updating the zstd dictionaries
> used by zchunk for F33.  I've just built fedora-repo-zdicts-2010.1,
> which now includes the F33 dictionaries, but we're obviously past
> final freeze.
>
> I would appreciate karma on the following update so it can go in as a
> zero-day update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a9a5b96259
>
> Additionally, if there's any way we can get the GA metadata generated
> on a system with this update installed, the zchunk metadata will be
> significantly smaller.  Just to be clear, it won't cause any breakage
> if we can't, but it would be nice to get the 20-30% reduction in
> zchunk metadata size.
>
> Thanks, and apologies for any inconvenience,
>
> Jonathan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Updated zdicts for F33 zchunk metadata

[Jonathan Dieter]

I'm afraid I'm late to the party on updating the zstd dictionaries
used by zchunk for F33.  I've just built fedora-repo-zdicts-2010.1,
which now includes the F33 dictionaries, but we're obviously past
final freeze.

I would appreciate karma on the following update so it can go in as a
zero-day update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a9a5b96259

Additionally, if there's any way we can get the GA metadata generated
on a system with this update installed, the zchunk metadata will be
significantly smaller.  Just to be clear, it won't cause any breakage
if we can't, but it would be nice to get the 20-30% reduction in
zchunk metadata size.

Thanks, and apologies for any inconvenience,

Jonathan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

[Andy Mender]

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 04:10,  wrote:

> The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has
> been
> waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take
> action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these
> bugs
> might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.)
>
> We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding,
> or if
> there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3
> days for your response.
>
> If you want these mails to stop you need to go to the bug[s] and cancel or
> ack the
> needinfo flags. See:
>
>  * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=faq.html#flags point 3
>  * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=faq.html#miscellaneous point 2
>
> needinfo
> 
>
>   Bug 1872427: Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation
> for Amazon ec2 (6 days old)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427
>
> To see all your outstanding requests, visit:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue=package-review%40lists.fedoraproject.org=type
> ___
> package-review mailing list -- package-rev...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-rev...@lists.fedoraproject.org


The above email was sent to the package-rev...@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailing list and keeps popping up due to a needinfo? flag set on the review
request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427

The review request received quite a bit of feedback so not sure why the
flag is still active and why were not specific people pinged instead?

Cheers,
Andy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Error creating the package RPM: make:*** No rule to make target 'install'.

[Jerry James]

Hi Helg,

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 4:54 AM Helg Green via devel
 wrote:
> Hi Jerry!
> I want to send a small donation, I can use PayPal.

Thank you.  I appreciate the thought.  One of the great things about
the Fedora community is how helpful people are.  I've been the
recipient of help many times myself.  The best payback is for you to
help somebody else, "pay it forward" as they say.  If you really want
to donate money, then please choose a suitable charity.  The world is
full of people who need money way more than I do.

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

[Brian C. Lane]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:43:31PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> "Brian C. Lane"  writes:
> 
> > I don't think it is currently possible to make the iso accessible,
> 
> That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it.  Are
> there things that could be done to make it easier to add?

I'm assuming that we would need a full desktop running, which is really
something we don't want to do for the boot.iso unless it cannot be
avoided.

As a first step I would fix the Workstation problems instead.

Brian

-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

[Brian C. Lane]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:05:34PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Robbie Harwood  
> wrote:
> > That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it.  
> > Are
> > there things that could be done to make it easier to add?
> 
> Currently anaconda is not accessible even in the default live 
> Workstation install that runs under gnome-shell and where everything 
> else is accessible. I don't know why, but orca just doesn't read 
> anything from anaconda, whereas it does for everything else. Since that 
> is what the vast majority of our users will be using to install, I 
> would say that's where the greatest benefit lies. Of course netinstall 
> is important too, but realistically it's not very easy to find those 
> images compared with the heavily-promoted live image.

It's possible that's related to wayland and running anaconda as root.
There are some problems with the on-screen keyboard that seem to be
related to this.

Brian

-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:28 pm, Paul Wouters  wrote:

I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making
systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I would like to ensure this
change happens properly and securely for f34.


Well it's too late, since we are now in final freeze. FESCo reaffirmed 
the systemd-resolved change just last week, so it's clearly not going 
to be postponed. I agree that this DNSSEC problem with systemd-resolved 
is unfortunate, and I'm sure the systemd developers would appreciate 
help fixing it. Anyway, the best time to deal with this would have been 
six months ago, when the change was proposed



I am still trying to
use this setup on my f33 with DNSSEC enabled for systemd-resolved,
and do still seem to have issues that I'm going through to see if
these are related to DNS or not. I feel we should have this working
solidly first, before we are adding more options and features into
the mix.


That's why we did this in two parts. F33: systemd-resolved. F34: DoT. 
We could have done them both at once.



Second, we really need any DNS-over-TLS to not break DNSSEC. If we are
going to outsource validation to a remote endpoint via DNS-over-TLS,
instead of using the local resolver or the local ISP resolver, then
data authenticity becomes eveb more important. And DNS-over-TLS only
provides transport security, not data origin authenticity.


Look, I really don't understand, sorry. How is this in any way related 
to DNSSEC? I think this has zero relation to DNSSEC. Are you assuming 
that we're going to ignore DHCP-provided DNS and hardcode 1.1.1.1 or 
8.8.8.8? The change page says we will not do that.


Michael

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: sundials-5.4.0 updating

[Antonio T. sagitter]

Thank you Orion.

-- 
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/


OpenPGP_0x7B30EE04E576AA84.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

[Paul Wouters]

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, Petr Menšík wrote:


I would like to request pausing any new systemd-resolved features
system-wide, until its current bugs and deficiencies are resolved
sufficiently.


I agree for two reasons. One, the FESCO decision to postpone making
systemd-resolvd the default resolver. I would like to ensure this
change happens properly and securely for f34. I am still trying to
use this setup on my f33 with DNSSEC enabled for systemd-resolved,
and do still seem to have issues that I'm going through to see if
these are related to DNS or not. I feel we should have this working
solidly first, before we are adding more options and features into
the mix.

Second, we really need any DNS-over-TLS to not break DNSSEC. If we are
going to outsource validation to a remote endpoint via DNS-over-TLS,
instead of using the local resolver or the local ISP resolver, then
data authenticity becomes eveb more important. And DNS-over-TLS only
provides transport security, not data origin authenticity.

Paul
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

[Paul Howarth]

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:30:43 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon  wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:  
> > > 
> > > Hello, all.
> > > 
> > > Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and
> > > Jitka Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS
> > > usernames are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively.
> > > 
> > > Is there someone on the list who can do this?  
> > 
> > I can, on it.  
> 
> Done

Now I need someone to create the epel8 branch because collaborators
can't request their own branches.

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/29566

Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Robbie Harwood  
wrote:
That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it.  
Are

there things that could be done to make it easier to add?


Currently anaconda is not accessible even in the default live 
Workstation install that runs under gnome-shell and where everything 
else is accessible. I don't know why, but orca just doesn't read 
anything from anaconda, whereas it does for everything else. Since that 
is what the vast majority of our users will be using to install, I 
would say that's where the greatest benefit lies. Of course netinstall 
is important too, but realistically it's not very easy to find those 
images compared with the heavily-promoted live image.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

[Robbie Harwood]

"Brian C. Lane"  writes:

> I don't think it is currently possible to make the iso accessible,

That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it.  Are
there things that could be done to make it easier to add?

By way of comparison, Debian's installer accessibility is documented
here: https://d-i.debian.org/manual/en.amd64/ch05s02.html .
Specifically section 5.2.4 "Software Speech Synthesis" reads:

Support for software speech synthesis is available on all installer
images which have the graphical installer, i.e. all netinst, CD and
DVD images, and the netboot gtk variant. It can be activated by
selecting it in the boot menu by typing s Enter. The textual version
of the installer will then be automatically selected, and support
for software speech synthesis will be automatically installed on the
target system.

If several sound cards are detected, you will be prompted to press
Enter when you hear speech from the desired sound card.

The first question (language) is spoken in english, and the
remainder of installation is spoken in the selected language (if
available in espeak).

The default speech rate is quite slow. To make it faster, press
CapsLock+6. To make it slower, press CapsLock+5. The default volume
should be medium. To make it louder, press CapsLock+2. To make it
quieter, press CapsLock+1. To get more details on the browsing
shortcuts, see the Speakup guide. To just accept the default answer
for a question, simply press Enter at the prompt. To provide an
empty answer for a question, type ! at the prompt. To get back to
the previous question, type < at the prompt.

Thanks,
--Robbie


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-IoT-34-20201008.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201005.0):

ID: 688487  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688487

Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.35 to 0.17
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/685498#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688488#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used mem changed from 176 MiB to 158 MiB
System load changed from 0.27 to 0.14
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/685500#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688490#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

[Brian C. Lane]

On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 04:40:54PM +0100, majid wrote:
> hey all,
> 
> I would like to start off by saying i'm not a programmer or dev person,
> just a end user of fedora.
> 
> would it be possible to have espeakup and espeak added to the net
> install iso of fedora?
> 
> the iso where you can choose what you will be installing?
> 
> now that espeakup has been mainlined in to the kernel would this be able
> to be made a reality?
> 
> failing that would it be possible to make the net install iso accessible?

I don't think it is currently possible to make the iso accessible, it's
main goal is to remain small (lol, yes, it keeps growing anyway), and
the environment that is running on there isn't a full desktop. It is
currently Xorg + metacity + anaconda and nothing else so, without
digging into the details, I don't think just adding espeak would work
without adding the rest of the accessibility features from gnome.

We are looking at moving the boot.iso over to the mutter window manager,
and *may* need to add gnome-shell. If that ends up being the case then
we can look at adding espeak, etc.

Brian

-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1870755] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870755

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |p...@city-fan.org



--- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/29566
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/29567


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886491] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.075 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886491

Bug ID: 1886491
   Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.075 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.075
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.074-1.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPIx-Regexp/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3288/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F34 Change proposal: DNS Over TLS (System-Wide Change)

[Petr Menšík]

I would like to request pausing any new systemd-resolved features
system-wide, until its current bugs and deficiencies are resolved
sufficiently.

And no, repeating that non-sense again, saying DNSSEC is only the server
stuff nobody needs on desktop, would not count as fixed bug.

Every TLS endpoint needs certificate. DNS has also signatures on zone
data, which should be verified even over encrypted channel.

Visit [1] to read more about difference between the two terms. And how
they go along each other.

In our view, current systemd-resolved has brought many regressions into
F33. Let's wait with its new features, users can enable DNS over TLS any
time already. Fix please years old issues first.

1. https://blog.apnic.net/2018/08/20/dnssec-and-dns-over-tls/

Best Regards,
Petr

On 9/29/20 10:29 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNS_Over_TLS
> 
> == Summary ==
> Fedora will attempt to use DNS over TLS (DoT) if supported by
> configured DNS servers.
> 
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:catanzaro|Michael Catanzaro]]
> * Email: 
> * Name: [[User:Zbyszek|Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]]
> * Email: 
> 
> == Detailed Description ==
> 
> We will build systemd with `-Ddefault-dns-over-tls=opportunistic` to
> protect DNS queries against passive network attackers. An active
> network attacker can trivially subvert this protection, but we cannot
> make DoT mandatory because other operating systems do not do so and
> many (or most?) DNS servers do not support it. DoT will only be used
> if the configured DNS server supports it and if it is not blocked by
> an active network attacker.
> 
> Note that DoT is different from DNS over HTTPS (DoH). In particular,
> DoT is not an anti-censorship tool like DoH. It does not look like
> regular HTTPS traffic, and it can be blocked by network administrators
> if desired, so it should not be a problem for corporate networks.
> 
> 
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> 
> DNS queries are encrypted and private by default, if the user's ISP
> supports DoT. Most probably don't, but users who manually configure a
> custom DNS server (e.g. Cloudflare or Google) will automatically
> benefit from DNS over TLS.
> 
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners: change meson flags in systemd.spec
> * Other developers: N/A (nothing should be required)
> * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9772 #9772] (a
> check of an impact with Release Engineering is needed)
> * Policies and guidelines: N/A (nothing should be required)
> * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
> * Alignment with Objectives: Nope
> 
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> DoT will be enabled automatically on upgrade to F34. If DoT is
> unsupported, systemd-resolved will fall back to unencrypted DNS, so
> there should be no compatibility impact.
> 
> == How To Test ==
> Load any website in a web browser. If you succeed, then name
> resolution probably works.
> 
> Try using `resolvectl query fedoraproject.org` to see that resolvectl
> still works.
> 
> Bonus points: set your DNS server to 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8, then use
> Wireshark to see if your DNS is really encrypted or not.
> 
> == User Experience ==
> Users should not notice any difference in behavior.
> 
> == Dependencies ==
> No dependencies.
> 
> == Contingency Plan ==
> 
> * Contingency mechanism: revert the change
> * Contingency deadline: can be done at any time, before F34 beta
> freeze would be best
> * Blocks release? No
> * Blocks product? No
> 
> == Documentation ==
> See the section `DNSOverTLS=` in the manpage `resolved.conf(5)`
> 
> == Release Notes ==
> systemd-resolved now enables DNS over TLS (DoT) support by default, in
> opportunistic mode. DoT will be used only if supported by your DNS
> server, and provides only best-effort encryption to protect against
> passive network observers. For compatibility with existing DNS
> servers, systemd-resolved will fall back to unencrypted DNS if DoT
> does not appear to be supported, reducing the security benefit. If you
> wish to manually configure systemd-resolved to prevent fallback to
> unencrypted DNS, set `DNSOverTLS=yes` in `/etc/systemd/resolved.conf`.
> Note that DoT is different than DNS over HTTPS (DoH) in that it does
> not use HTTPS and is therefore easy to distinguish from HTTPS traffic.
> 
> 

-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemen...@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879713] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879713

Orion Poplawski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
  Flags|needinfo?(or...@nwra.com)   |
Last Closed||2020-10-08 13:59:09



--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski  ---
Nope, just oversight.  done now.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > 
> > Hello, all.
> > 
> > Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka
> > Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS usernames
> > are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively.
> > 
> > Is there someone on the list who can do this?
> 
> I can, on it.

Done


Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> 
> Hello, all.
> 
> Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka
> Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS usernames
> are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively.
> 
> Is there someone on the list who can do this?

I can, on it.

Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-Data-GUID

[Emmanuel Seyman]

Hello, all.

Ralf Corsepius has requested that someone give Paul Howarth and Jitka
Plesnikova collaborator rights in bug #1870755 . Their FAS usernames
are pghmcfc and jplesnik respectively.

Is there someone on the list who can do this?

Regards,
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Follow-up - Please BuildRequire python3-setuptools explicitly

[Petr Viktorin]

On 2020-10-05 13:53, Richard Shaw wrote:
I updated fail2ban and gmsh and committed to master. I assume that is 
sufficient?


Thank you!
As I understand it, it is sufficient.  But since repo queries look at 
"live" packages, you might get some spurious notifications about this in 
the future.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1884617] F32->F33 upgrade: obsolete removed Perl packages requiring perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884617

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886085] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.96 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886085

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.96-1.f
   ||c34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-10-08 11:57:27



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
A bug-fix release suitable for Fedora ≥ 34.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886085] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.96 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886085

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886390] perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-User-Utmp-1.8-26.fc34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-10-08 11:39:07




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886390] perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Link ID||CPAN 133492




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201008.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886390] perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
That seems to be caused by a newly failed configure-time probe:

$ perl Makefile.PL 
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Failed to run hint file hints/linux.pl: Global symbol "@options" requires
explicit package name (did you forget to declare "my @options"?) at (eval 13)
line 3, <$fh> line 17.
Global symbol "@options" requires explicit package name (did you forget to
declare "my @options"?) at (eval 13) line 10, <$fh> line 17.
Generating a Unix-style Makefile
Writing Makefile for User::Utmp
Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886390] New: perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886390

Bug ID: 1886390
   Summary: perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 FTBFS: Can't locate
auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-User-Ut
mp?collection=f34
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-User-Utmp
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks: 1868278 (F34FTBFS)
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



perl-User-Utmp-1.8-25.fc34 fails to build in Fedora 34, because a test fails:

+ make test
"/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e 'cp_nonempty' -- Utmp.bs
blib/arch/auto/User/Utmp/Utmp.bs 644
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl
1..4
ok 1
not ok 2 (Could not find utmp entry for user mockbuild and/or line )
not ok 3 (Could not find utmpx entry for user mockbuild and/or line )
not ok 4 (Could not find utmpx entry for user mockbuild and/or line )
Can't locate auto/User/Utmp/utmpxname.al in @INC (@INC contains: blib/lib
blib/arch /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.32 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.32
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5
/usr/share/perl5) at test.pl line 139.
make: *** [Makefile:953: test_dynamic] Error 2

A difference between passing and failing build root is at
.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868278
[Bug 1868278] (F34FTBFS) - Fedora 34 FTBFS Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Error creating the package RPM: make:*** No rule to make target 'install'.

[Helg Green via devel]

Hi Jerry!
I want to send a small donation, I can use PayPal.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-IoT-33-20201008.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 688028  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/688028

Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 33: pcscd and xrdp issue

[Marius Schwarz]

Hi,

this is a topic since a lot of time and it's still hits the user in it's
face for no reason.

Found: while presenting Fedora 33 changes to an audience and
screenrecording with wayland isn't working yet :(

Tested on Fedora 33 liveimage:

su
dnf install xrdp  -y
adduser -s /bin/bash -d /home/rdptest rdptest
passwd rdptest
systemctl start xrdp

## different pc ##

Start Remmina or XFreeRDP to connect to your running liveimage.

You get a fucking uncloseable requester once the gnome session is open,
that you need to enter a password for the LIVEUSER with to buttons
without any function. It's not possible to get rid of it by using either
one of the buttons nor a windowclose.

Only Solution: dnf erase pcsc*

Because: stopping that service does not stop the requester from popping
up, as the daemon gets restarted via a socket.

Now what really makes it so anoying: there is no smartcard reader in the
hw.

For what reason does a smartcardservice start if it has nothing to work
with???

Fix:

check for a smartcard reader before the requester pops up ...

and ... Suggestion to the Installer-Team:

check for a smartcard reader before the package gets installed.


best regards,
Marius
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1885000] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.48 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885000



--- Comment #9 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
I'll remove it from Fedoras 31-33.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora33 : Screenrecording and Wayland still don't work

[Marius Schwarz]

Hi,

yes, I know, wayland calls it a security feature, but you still can't
screen share a gnome desktop via a browser i.e. in a Jitsi Meet conference.

Test on Fedora 33 liveimage

There is an additional bug in the next mail.

best regards,
Marius
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1879713] perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.15 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879713

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||needinfo?(or...@nwra.com)



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
There is a commit for update to 1.15, but it wasn't built. Is there any reason
for it?


commit a3c703415bddd23ada6685e38d54946d7f50ed10 (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Orion Poplawski 
Date:   Mon Sep 21 19:55:30 2020 -0600

Update to 1.15


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1885000] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.48 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885000



--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar  ---
I reported it to the upstream
.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-e943b78209 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e943b78209


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6dfb98688e


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1885000] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.48 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885000

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppi...@redhat.com



--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar  ---
Packages that have in illegal MIN_PERL_VERSION value (e.g. "5.008_001") fails
to build with with perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.48-1.fc34:

[test@fedora-34 URI-Fetch-0.13]$ perl Makefile.PL 
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Warning: MIN_PERL_VERSION is not in a recognized format.
Recommended is a quoted numerical value like '5.005' or '5.008001'.
[test@fedora-34 URI-Fetch-0.13]$ echo $?
2

Obviously the new warning is handled as fatal error. I think this kind of
change is not welcome in stable Fedoras.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41
   ||-1.fc34




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: libvirt and systemd-resolved integration?

[Juan Orti Alcaine]

El mié., 7 oct. 2020 a las 10:35, Petr Menšík ()
escribió:

>
>
> On 10/7/20 6:44 AM, Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> >
> > I don't think it's a good idea.
> > dnsmasq is not dns resolver but acts as DHCP and DNS server. It provides
> > VMs with IP
> > address/lease and create corresponding dns record for it. In case of
> > resolved ip addresses and dns records must be managed either manually
> > or... with dnsmasq.
>
> That is not true. Any query sent to @192.168.122.1 would get reply. I
> use for example unbound on localhost and all my machines use .vm. domain
> suffix. rhel7.vm. is machine with rhel7. Dnsmasq manages automatically
> lease names of all its dhcp clients, it works as dynamic DNS connected
> with DHCP just out of the box.
>

I've created a libvirt hook to do the integration I was looking for. This
works for me:

/etc/libvirt/hooks/network.d/laptop-lab.sh

#!/bin/bash
set -o nounset

object="$1"
operation="$2"
suboperation="$3"
extra="$4"

if [ "$object" == "laptop-lab" ]; then
if [ "$operation" == "started" ] && [ "$suboperation" == "begin" ]; then
/usr/bin/resolvectl dns laptop-lab 192.168.100.1
/usr/bin/resolvectl domain laptop-lab laptop.lab
/usr/bin/resolvectl dnssec laptop-lab no
fi
fi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1886146] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|iarn...@gmail.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Where did my keys go in Thunderbird?

[Vít Ondruch]

@Zdeněk, thx for the tip.

And if you wonder like my why you cannot see the menu item, them the
reason might be you are using thunderbird-enigmail installed from
Fedora, which is 2.1.x version. But you need to install Engimail 2.2.x
from Mozilla addons to have this functionality available, unless the
Fedora version is updated.

Here is Mozilla KB article:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/openpgp-thunderbird-howto-and-faq#w_i-have-previously-used-enigmail-how-do-i-migrate-and-configure


Vít


Dne 08. 10. 20 v 7:28 Zdenek Dohnal napsal(a):
> Hi Thunderbird users,
>
> I'm not sure if you noticed, but Thunderbird got a major update for
> F31+, which removes XUL extensions - f.e. Enigmail is not working anymore.
>
> However, if you are using keys to your emails, don't panic and start
> digging into metadata to somehow recover your keys. If you go to
> Tools->Migrate Enigmail settings, then you are able to recover all stuff.
>
> Hope the info will save a time for someone since I wasn't looking
> carefully in the menu and started digging the metadata beforehand...
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Zdenek
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org