[Bug 1888513] New: perl-Math-FFT-1.35 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513 Bug ID: 1888513 Summary: perl-Math-FFT-1.35 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Math-FFT Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: msu...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: msu...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.35 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.34-15.fc33 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-FFT/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5962/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-10-15 - 95% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/10/15/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20201014git7fd97b1.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] Re: Roadmap for rust as a requirement in the project
Hi everyone, I'm once again here to bring up my favourite topic, of rust-in-ds. Slow and steady progress has been made, and it would be good to update the situation here. Completed Items are: >> - william -> fix the intentional name leak in the rust slapi plugin >> interface to use lazy_static. Today this triggers LSAN which breaks basic >> test suites. >> - william -> revive and make on upgrade configs better (see above), >> potentially break it out from the v4 plugin patch. Todo Soon: >> - everyone -> test that you can build and run tests with --enable-rust >> --disable-asan in your development environment so that we can work out and >> issues that may exist for us as developers. > I meant to try this again to confirm, but it worked for me a few weeks ago on > Fedora. The build took a lot longer :-( but it worked ;-) >> - william -> clean up libsds linking and some of the related elements >> - william + mark -> check that our respective major distros/releases can >> build with --enable-rust in release rpms > As long as "make -f rpm.mk dist-bz2" does all the cargo building it should > work fine on Fedora and RHEL. Todo a bit later >> - william + viktor -> check that we can pass with --enable-rust and >> --enable-asan, especially in CI >> - anyone interested -> update wiki contributing guide to include rust as a >> requirement >> - (optional) anyone interested (but not william) -> add a section to the >> wiki on using rust in development >> - team -> agree we are happy, and make configure.ac have --enable-rust by >> default >> - team -> after a few weeks / months, remove the ifdefs, duplicate C >> versions of Rust features, and enable/disable features from configure.ac I'm hoping that if we start to look at some of these items sooner, we could think about this for 1.4.4 (?). At the moment the major item for all of us would be to test that we can build in our development environments with rust, as that's a pretty major thing we need to pass for us to continue :) Thanks! — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] Re: Mapping tree rework
This has come up because there is a set of customer cases where they have configured it incorrectly, due to bugs in lib389. The issues in lib389 arise from a lack of validation/constraint in the checking of the nsslapd-parent-suffix value in the server, allowing the client to create invalid configurations. So today, our own tools can easily, and trivially cause this situation. One thought is to either document this issue or to fix lib389 - but neither of the actions really fix the underlying problem, which is that our server accepts an invalid configuration silently. So the best thing for us to do is to make it impossible for the server to get it wrong, which means we fix lib389 *and* any other admin tooling/scripts in a single pass. Which is what led to the interest in changing something that has been "working" for a long time :) > On 14 Oct 2020, at 19:47, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > Hi, > > you are right that it is possible to configure suffix hierarchies which are > broken, but in my experience this wasn't an issue. people using sub suffixes > did get it right. > > So is there really a need to change something that is working for a long time > ? > > > Regards, > > Ludwig > > > On 14.10.20 08:12, William Brown wrote: >> https://github.com/mreynolds389/389wiki/pull/48 >> >> This is a draft design, and probably of interest to thierry whom I discussed >> this with last night :) >> >> Thanks! >> >> — >> Sincerely, >> >> William Brown >> >> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server >> SUSE Labs, Australia >> ___ >> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888288] perl-EV in epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288 --- Comment #2 from Carl George 鸞 --- I think I accidentally removed myself from this package. I agreed in bug 1408326 to maintain the epel7 branch because at the time a coworker needed it. I have a new job now, so I don't actually have any need for this package myself, but it's not fair to dump it on Emmanuel after agreeing to maintain it. That said, since I don't use this package, I'm not the best person to maintain even just a branch of it. Jakub, would you be willing to maintain the epel8 branch, and perhaps even the epel7 branch? If not, Emmanuel please add me back to maintain the epel7 branch as I agreed, but I'm not going to maintain the epel8 branch in any case. Side point, we now have a new permission level specifically for this called "collaborator". You can grant commit access to branches matching a pattern, e.g. epel7 or epel*. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1870762] EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-SQL-Abstract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870762 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6d933da06b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6d933da06b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!
On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 10:43 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan To clarify this with Ben's post today: we considered this to be a non- RC compose. In the distant past we had "test composes" (TCs) and "release candidates" (RCs) and they were actually named differently and built slightly differently; these days with Pungi 4 the distinction doesn't really exist as far as the tools and naming conventions are concerned, but we can still kind of "designate" candidate composes as being RCs or not. We built this compose with known blockers outstanding, so it cannot be considered an RC; we built it because we wanted to test some updates in a compose before pushing them stable, particularly the os-prober update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-93c02b1d43 It would be good if folks who have systems with Windows, macOS, other Linux distros and even other non-Linux but *nix-y OSes can test installing alongside those, if possible, and check for any problems that do not occur with recent nightly composes (which don't have the new os-prober in them). Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] please review: PR 4378 - suffix management in backends is incorrect
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4378 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 33 Final is NO-GO, Release Readiness meeting still on
Due to outstanding unresolved blockers, there is no release candidate for Fedora 33 Final yet. I am cancelling tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting. The Release Readiness meeting *will be held* as scheduled[1]. Please update the Release Readiness wiki page[2] with your team's readiness if appropriate. We will use that to keep the Release Readiness meeting short and focused. The Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go meeting[3] will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 22 October in #fedora-meeting-1. We will target the Final target date #1 milestone. The release schedule[5] has been updated accordingly. Help is wanted with any of the outstanding blockers. [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9827/ [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness [3] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9831/ [4] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/33/final/buglist [5] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Final is NO-GO, Release Readiness meeting still on
Due to outstanding unresolved blockers, there is no release candidate for Fedora 33 Final yet. I am cancelling tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting. The Release Readiness meeting *will be held* as scheduled[1]. Please update the Release Readiness wiki page[2] with your team's readiness if appropriate. We will use that to keep the Release Readiness meeting short and focused. The Fedora 33 Final Go/No-Go meeting[3] will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 22 October in #fedora-meeting-1. We will target the Final target date #1 milestone. The release schedule[5] has been updated accordingly. Help is wanted with any of the outstanding blockers. [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9827/ [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness [3] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9831/ [4] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/33/final/buglist [5] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888395] perl-Mail-Message-3.010 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888395 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Mail-Message-3.010-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53465255 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888116] Please update to >=1.46, to build openssl 1.1.1d an newer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888116 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-58288eadbd has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-58288eadbd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888395] perl-Mail-Message-3.010 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888395 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1721554 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1721554=edit [patch] Update to 3.010 (#1888395) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888395] New: perl-Mail-Message-3.010 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888395 Bug ID: 1888395 Summary: perl-Mail-Message-3.010 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mail-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: spo...@gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, spo...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 3.010 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.009-4.fc33 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-Message/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/13324/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: new packager asks for help - packaging my first Python package
On 14. 10. 20 20:29, Vojtěch Polášek wrote:
Hello,
I have some basics of RPM packaging, but I have not created a package from
scratch yet. I would like to package one Python package called Tesserwrap. I
used the pyp2rpm program to create a spec file. The file is here:
https://fedorapeople.org/~vpolasek/tesserwrap.spec
Unfortunately the build fails because there are some installed and unpackaged
files. One of them is some debug file which I would probably discard, one of
them is a shared library.
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/libtesserwrap.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so-0.1.6-1.fc32.x86_64.debug
/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/libtesserwrap.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
I have some questions:
1. How to ignore that installed file, e.g. do not package it? This goes for the
debug file.
The debug file will be handled by magic when you include the normal file with
Python extension module.
2. Where is some list of macros which I could use for my paths and file names?
The file name of the library contains python version (cpython38). Can this be
somehow expressed with macro or do I have to put there the file name manually?
Add this to %files:
%{python3_sitearch}/libtesserwrap%{python3_ext_suffix}
Or this:
%{python3_sitearch}/libtesserwrap.cpython-%{python3_version_nodots}-%{python3_platform_triplet}.so
Or this:
%{python3_sitearch}/libtesserwrap.cpython-*.so
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
new packager asks for help - packaging my first Python package
Hello, I have some basics of RPM packaging, but I have not created a package from scratch yet. I would like to package one Python package called Tesserwrap. I used the pyp2rpm program to create a spec file. The file is here: https://fedorapeople.org/~vpolasek/tesserwrap.spec Unfortunately the build fails because there are some installed and unpackaged files. One of them is some debug file which I would probably discard, one of them is a shared library. /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/libtesserwrap.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so-0.1.6-1.fc32.x86_64.debug /usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/libtesserwrap.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so I have some questions: 1. How to ignore that installed file, e.g. do not package it? This goes for the debug file. 2. Where is some list of macros which I could use for my paths and file names? The file name of the library contains python version (cpython38). Can this be somehow expressed with macro or do I have to put there the file name manually? Thank you very much, Vojta ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888379] perl-User-Identity-1.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888379 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2020-10-14 18:06:33 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- 1.00 in rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888379] New: perl-User-Identity-1.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888379 Bug ID: 1888379 Summary: perl-User-Identity-1.00 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-User-Identity Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: spo...@gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ser...@serjux.com, spo...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.00 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.99-11.fc33 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/User-Identity/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6038/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888379] perl-User-Identity-1.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888379 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/User/User-Identity-1.00.tar.gz to ./User-Identity-1.00.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 13.10.20 um 10:12 schrieb Christopher Engelhard: > > On 12.10.20 10:49, Leon Fauster wrote: > > > Not sure but IIRC EPEL should not depend on software collections ...? > > > > Can someone confirm that? If the package can't depend on php7.2+, then > > the question of how to deal with EPEL7 is moot. > > > > My recall was this > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DBAQB3V35TXPNUV4UKKHXUC52BENZJUQ/ It's changed a bit since then. We now allow scls if: * They only need to be used at build time (ie, the rpms produced do not require users to install/enable any scls) * They are approved by the epel steering comittee. So far we have only enabled devtoolset. (so for example, chromium uses devtoolset to build with a newer gcc, but does not require users to install or enable anything to use it). In the case of php, this would likely not work because it would require users to install/enable php to get the webserver module or cmd line. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: intending to retire thunderbird-enigmail in F34+
As a Rawhide use, who is effectively F34 user already, I'd appreciate if you retired the thunderbird-enigmail in F35+ or mabybe just wait a bit longer. This is good candidate for inclusion in fedora-obsolete-packages BTW. OTOH I'll soon update also my other computer and won't care anymore ;) Vít Dne 14. 10. 20 v 14:25 Felix Schwarz napsal(a): > Hey, > > Thunderbird 78 changed its tech stack and integrated OpenPGP support so the > enigmail plugin does not work anymore. > > Enigmail 2.2.x does not contain any OpenPGP functionality besides a migration > tool which migrates keys to Thunderbird's internal keyring. Since Thunderbird > 78 was pushed to F31+ I also updated thunderbird-enigmail. > > However I'd like to retire the package in rawhide (F34+) as the new version > does not provide any features once users migrated their keys to Thunderbird. > (I'll ship enigmail in F33 as a zero-day update as I think we can not remove a > package anymore from F33 at this point.) > > Objections? > > Felix > > PS: Worst case users can always install the add-on manually via Thunderbird's > extension manager. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-IoT-33-20201014.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201013.0): ID: 695479 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695479 Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.14 to 0.39 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693438#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695482#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888288] perl-EV in epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- I think Carl does not maintain this package in EPEL because he has no commit access to the git repository. Emmanuel could help you including changing the Bugzilla assignee for EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-54db3ea55d has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-54db3ea55d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-54db3ea55d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888006] perl-DB_File-1.855 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-506f68c17b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-506f68c17b` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-506f68c17b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888288] New: perl-EV in epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288 Bug ID: 1888288 Summary: perl-EV in epel8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-EV Assignee: c...@redhat.com Reporter: jakub.jedel...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: c...@redhat.com, emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, could you, please, build perl-EV for EPEL8? It'll help me/us to build even more perl packages. I'm able to help with it if needed, feel free to add me as a contributor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-IoT-34-20201014.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201013.0): ID: 695446 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695446 ID: 695464 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695464 ID: 695478 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695478 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 13 of 16 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-33-20201014.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201013.n.0): ID: 695111 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695111 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20201013.n.0): ID: 695128 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695128 Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20201013.n.0): ID: 695053 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695053 ID: 695072 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695072 ID: 695099 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695099 ID: 695112 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695112 ID: 695132 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695132 ID: 695135 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695135 ID: 695149 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695149 ID: 695161 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695161 ID: 695183 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695183 ID: 695186 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695186 Passed openQA tests: 169/181 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: Used swap changed from 59 MiB to 40 MiB System load changed from 0.80 to 1.06 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693284#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695096#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 52 MiB to 36 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693286#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695098#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: Used swap changed from 15 MiB to 17 MiB System load changed from 1.12 to 1.60 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693303#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695115#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 60 MiB to 15 MiB System load changed from 2.03 to 1.11 Average CPU usage changed from 48.08571429 to 28.87142857 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693304#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695116#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: Used swap changed from 28 MiB to 23 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693320#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695132#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 29 MiB to 25 MiB System load changed from 0.32 to 0.58 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693323#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695135#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde: Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 6 MiB System load changed from 1.06 to 1.34 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693364#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695176#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal: System load changed from 0.21 to 0.10 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693411#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695223#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?
On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 12:05 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Robbie Harwood > wrote: > > That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it. > > Are > > there things that could be done to make it easier to add? > > Currently anaconda is not accessible even in the default live > Workstation install that runs under gnome-shell and where everything > else is accessible. I don't know why, but orca just doesn't read > anything from anaconda, whereas it does for everything else. IIRC the latest findings point to Anaconda GUI running as root likely being teh case. Other GUI apps running as root (gparted) apparently behave the same. CCing Vladimir Slavik who has been looking into this recently. > Since that > is what the vast majority of our users will be using to install, I > would say that's where the greatest benefit lies. Of course netinstall > is important too, but realistically it's not very easy to find those > images compared with the heavily-promoted live image. > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1883530] Add perl-Curses-UI to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883530 Pierre Amadio changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(davejohansen@gmai ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1883530] Add perl-Curses-UI to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883530 Pierre Amadio changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pama...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Pierre Amadio --- Would it be possible to get an update on the previous comment from Petr ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
What’s new in Fedora CI
Hello! There are some cool new features in Fedora CI that we would like to tell you about. First of all, Fedora CI now supports running tests using the new tmt format. The tmt tool provides better user experience for enabling, creating and running tests across different environments (e.g. vm, container, localhost). The same configuration can be used for enabling tests in Packit, Fedora CI and RHEL CI. See [1] to get a quick start. This functionality is available for Rawhide and for dist-git pull requests. The older STI format is, of course, still supported and it takes precedence over tmt. If you’d want to switch over to tmt, you will need to rename or delete the tests*.yml files used by STI. Next there are 3 generic tests that automatically run on all Rawhide builds. Note not all of them are completely new — you’ve likely seen some of these tests before. What’s really new is that all these generic tests run in Testing Farm [2] now. Testing Farm is a new test execution service that provides an infrastructure that should be much more stable and as a result, less flakiness overall. These generic tests are: - rpmdeplint - rpminspect - installability If you’d want to know more about any of those tests, please check out the Fedora CI wiki page [3]. And last but not least, here are some real world examples of (potential) problems that the tests discovered in the recent Rawhide builds: [rpmdeplint] undeclared file conflicts: https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpmdeplint-pipeline/job/master/7921/testReport/(root)/tests/ [rpminspect] relaxed permissions: https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/6461/testReport/junit/(root)/tests/ [installability] package cannot be installed: https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/installability-pipeline/job/master/5499/testReport/junit/(root)/tests/ All this was a multi-team effort and I'd like to thank everyone who participated :) Thanks, Michal [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/tmt/ [2]: https://testing-farm.gitlab.io/api/ [3]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/generic_tests/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 33 compose report: 20201014.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-33-20201013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201014.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 11 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 377.33 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 979.24 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: bcm283x-firmware-20201008-2.63b1922.fc33 Old package: bcm283x-firmware-20200928-2.f0eab3a.fc33 Summary: Firmware for the Broadcom bcm283x/bcm2711 used in the Raspberry Pi RPMs: bcm2711-firmware bcm2835-firmware bcm283x-firmware bcm283x-overlays Size: 13.66 MiB Size change: -2.21 KiB Changelog: * Sat Oct 10 2020 Peter Robinson 20201008-1.63b1922 - Latest firmware update * Mon Oct 12 2020 Peter Robinson 20201008-2.63b1922 - Enable UART for all devices to work around firmware boot issues Package: fawkes-1.3.1-0.1.4923a6c.fc33 Old package: fawkes-1.3.0-12.fc33 Summary: Robot Software Framework RPMs: fawkes fawkes-core fawkes-devel fawkes-devenv fawkes-doc fawkes-firevision fawkes-firevision-tools fawkes-guis fawkes-lua fawkes-plugin-amcl fawkes-plugin-bblogger fawkes-plugin-bbsync fawkes-plugin-cedar fawkes-plugin-clips fawkes-plugin-clips-agent fawkes-plugin-clips-executive fawkes-plugin-clips-navgraph fawkes-plugin-clips-pddl-parser fawkes-plugin-clips-protobuf fawkes-plugin-clips-tf fawkes-plugin-colli fawkes-plugin-dynamixel fawkes-plugin-execution-time-estimator fawkes-plugin-flite fawkes-plugin-gazebo fawkes-plugin-gazsim-comm fawkes-plugin-gazsim-depthcam fawkes-plugin-gazsim-laser fawkes-plugin-gazsim-localization fawkes-plugin-gazsim-robotino fawkes-plugin-gazsim-timesource fawkes-plugin-gazsim-vis-localization fawkes-plugin-gazsim-webcam fawkes-plugin-gossip fawkes-plugin-hardware-models fawkes-plugin-imu fawkes-plugin-jaco fawkes-plugin-joystick fawkes-plugin-joystick-teleop fawkes-plugin-katana fawkes-plugin-laser fawkes-plugin-laser-cluster fawkes-plugin-laser-filter fawkes-plugin-laser-lines fawkes-plugin-laser-pointclouds fawkes-plugin-luaagent fawkes-plugin-map-lasergen fawkes-plugin-navgraph fawkes-plugin-navgraph-clusters fawkes-plugin-navgraph-generator fawkes-plugin-navgraph-static-constraints fawkes-plugin-openni fawkes-plugin-openni-data fawkes-plugin-openni-handtracker fawkes-plugin-openni-pcl-frombuf fawkes-plugin-openni-usertracker fawkes-plugin-pantilt fawkes-plugin-realsense fawkes-plugin-realsense2 fawkes-plugin-refboxcomm fawkes-plugin-robot-state-publisher fawkes-plugin-robotino fawkes-plugin-robotino-ir-pcl fawkes-plugin-roomba fawkes-plugin-rrd fawkes-plugin-skiller fawkes-plugin-skiller-simulator fawkes-plugin-static-transforms fawkes-plugin-tabletop-objects fawkes-plugin-ttmainloop fawkes-plugin-webview fawkes-plugin-xmlrpc fawkes-protobuf Added RPMs: fawkes-plugin-execution-time-estimator fawkes-plugin-hardware-models Size: 72.75 MiB Size change: 882.52 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jun 04 2020 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.3.0-13 - Rebuilt for OpenCV 4.3 * Sun Jun 14 2020 Adrian Reber - 1.3.0-14 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.12 * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.3.0-15 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Aug 01 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.3.0-16 - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Oct 09 2020 Till Hofmann - 1.3.1-0.1.4923a6c - Update to snapshot release to fix FTBFS - Add new plugins Package: gazebo-10.1.0-11.fc33 Old package: gazebo-10.1.0-10.fc33 Summary: 3D multi-robot simulator with dynamics RPMs: gazebo gazebo-common gazebo-devel gazebo-doc gazebo-libs gazebo-media gazebo-ode gazebo-ode-devel player-gazebo Size: 126.95 MiB Size change: 54.84 KiB Changelog: * Sat Oct 10 2020 Till Hofmann - 10.1.0-11 - Rebuilt for protobuf 3.12.4 / ignition-msgs 1.0.0-9 (#1863531) Package: gnome-calendar-3.38.1-2.fc33 Old package: gnome-calendar-3.38.1-1.fc33 Summary: Simple and beautiful calendar application designed to fit GNOME 3 RPMs: gnome-calendar Size: 2.21 MiB Size change: -113 B Changelog: * Tue Oct 13 2020 Michael Catanzaro - 3.38.1-2 - Fix #1883681 crashes in on_calendar_monitor_completed_cb() Package: gnome-control-center-3.38.1-2.fc33 Old package: gnome-control-center-3.38.1-1.fc33 Summary: Utilities to configure the GNOME desktop RPMs: gnome-control-center gnome-control-center-filesystem Size: 28.34 MiB Size change: 3.66 KiB Changelog: * Tue Oct 13 2020 Kalev Lember - 3.38.1-2 - Add Recommends: nm-connection-editor for the network panel (#1887891) Package
Disk space minimization of Python
Hi, I have opened an upstream discussion about disk space minimization of Python, take a look: https://discuss.python.org/t/disk-space-minimization-for-python-distributors/5447 All the best, Tomas ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Rawhide-20201014.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 95/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201013.n.0): ID: 694727 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694727 ID: 694728 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694728 ID: 694732 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694732 ID: 694734 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694734 ID: 694746 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694746 ID: 694765 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694765 ID: 694766 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694766 ID: 694769 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694769 ID: 694787 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694787 ID: 694828 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694828 ID: 694855 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694855 ID: 694856 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694856 ID: 694873 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694873 ID: 694876 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694876 ID: 694889 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694889 ID: 694906 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694906 ID: 694907 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694907 ID: 694908 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694908 ID: 694909 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694909 ID: 694910 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694910 ID: 694926 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694926 ID: 694937 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694937 ID: 694952 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694952 ID: 694953 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694953 ID: 694969 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694969 ID: 694970 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694970 ID: 694971 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694971 ID: 694972 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_resize_lvm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694972 ID: 694973 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694973 ID: 694974 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694974 ID: 694975 Test: x86_64 universal install_resize_lvm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694975 ID: 694976 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694976 ID: 694977 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694977 ID: 694978 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694978 ID: 694979 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694979 ID: 694980 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694980 ID: 694981 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694981 ID: 694982 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694982 ID: 694983 Test: x86_64 universal
intending to retire thunderbird-enigmail in F34+
Hey, Thunderbird 78 changed its tech stack and integrated OpenPGP support so the enigmail plugin does not work anymore. Enigmail 2.2.x does not contain any OpenPGP functionality besides a migration tool which migrates keys to Thunderbird's internal keyring. Since Thunderbird 78 was pushed to F31+ I also updated thunderbird-enigmail. However I'd like to retire the package in rawhide (F34+) as the new version does not provide any features once users migrated their keys to Thunderbird. (I'll ship enigmail in F33 as a zero-day update as I think we can not remove a package anymore from F33 at this point.) Objections? Felix PS: Worst case users can always install the add-on manually via Thunderbird's extension manager. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-33-20201014.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64) ID: 694483 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694483 ID: 694544 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694544 ID: 694690 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694690 ID: 694691 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694691 ID: 694707 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694707 ID: 694708 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694708 ID: 694724 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694724 Soft failed openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 694461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694461 ID: 694480 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694480 ID: 694540 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694540 ID: 694543 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694543 ID: 694557 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694557 ID: 694569 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694569 ID: 694591 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694591 ID: 694594 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694594 Passed openQA tests: 136/181 (x86_64) Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 30 of 181 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201014.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201014.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 15 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 87 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 759.92 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 5.40 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 210.60 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: perl-Test-Snapshot-0.06-1.fc34 Summary: Test against data stored in automatically-named file RPMs:perl-Test-Snapshot Size:13.55 KiB Package: perl-Test2-Tools-PerlCritic-0.03-2.fc34 Summary: Testing tools to enforce Perl::Critic policies RPMs:perl-Test2-Tools-PerlCritic Size:20.87 KiB Package: python-zuul-client-0.0.2-1.fc34 Summary: The zuulclient Python module RPMs:python-zuul-client-doc python3-zuul-client Size:177.52 KiB Package: rust-andrew-0.3.0-1.fc34 Summary: Convenient drawing of shapes, lines and text to buffers RPMs:rust-andrew+default-devel rust-andrew-devel Size:25.85 KiB Package: rust-cedarwood-0.4.4-1.fc34 Summary: Efficiently-updatable double-array trie in Rust (ported from cedar) RPMs:rust-cedarwood+default-devel rust-cedarwood+reduced-trie-devel rust-cedarwood-devel Size:33.76 KiB Package: rust-dlv-list-0.2.2-1.fc34 Summary: Semi-doubly linked list implemented using a vector RPMs:rust-dlv-list+default-devel rust-dlv-list-devel Size:26.54 KiB Package: rust-fdlimit-0.2.1-1.fc34 Summary: Utility crate for raising file descriptors limit for OSX and Linux RPMs:rust-fdlimit+default-devel rust-fdlimit-devel Size:21.03 KiB Package: rust-font-kit-0.10.0-1.fc34 Summary: Cross-platform font loading library RPMs:rust-font-kit+default-devel rust-font-kit+freetype-devel rust-font-kit+loader-freetype-default-devel rust-font-kit+loader-freetype-devel rust-font-kit+servo-fontconfig-devel rust-font-kit+source-devel rust-font-kit+source-fontconfig-default-devel rust-font-kit+source-fontconfig-devel rust-font-kit-devel Size:118.93 KiB Package: rust-httpdate-0.3.2-1.fc34 Summary: HTTP date parsing and formatting RPMs:rust-httpdate+default-devel rust-httpdate+unstable-devel rust-httpdate-devel Size:31.91 KiB Package: rust-ordered-multimap-0.3.0-1.fc34 Summary: Insertion ordered multimap RPMs:rust-ordered-multimap+default-devel rust-ordered-multimap-devel Size:32.23 KiB Package: rust-owned_ttf_parser-0.6.0-1.fc34 Summary: Support for owned data on top of ttf-parser RPMs:rust-owned_ttf_parser+default-devel rust-owned_ttf_parser+std-devel rust-owned_ttf_parser-devel Size:29.93 KiB Package: rust-pathfinder_geometry-0.5.1-1.fc34 Summary: Basic SIMD-accelerated geometry/linear algebra RPMs:rust-pathfinder_geometry+default-devel rust-pathfinder_geometry-devel Size:26.21 KiB Package: rust-rusttype-0.9.2-1.fc34 Summary: Pure Rust alternative to libraries like FreeType RPMs:rust-rusttype+crossbeam-deque-devel rust-rusttype+crossbeam-utils-devel rust-rusttype+default-devel rust-rusttype+gpu_cache-devel rust-rusttype+has-atomics-devel rust-rusttype+libm-devel rust-rusttype+libm-math-devel rust-rusttype+linked-hash-map-devel rust-rusttype+num_cpus-devel rust-rusttype+rustc-hash-devel rust-rusttype+std-devel rust-rusttype-devel Size:118.05 KiB Package: rust-tinyvec0.3-0.3.4-1.fc34 Summary: Just, really the littlest Vec you could need RPMs:rust-tinyvec0.3+alloc-devel rust-tinyvec0.3+default-devel rust-tinyvec0.3+experimental_write_impl-devel rust-tinyvec0.3+grab_spare_slice-devel rust-tinyvec0.3+nightly_const_generics-devel rust-tinyvec0.3+nightly_slice_partition_dedup-devel rust-tinyvec0.3-devel Size:66.92 KiB Package: rust-tinyvec_macros-0.1.0-1.fc34 Summary: Some macros for tiny containers RPMs:rust-tinyvec_macros+default-devel rust-tinyvec_macros-devel Size:16.62 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: CTL-1.5.2-13.fc34 Old package: CTL-1.5.2-12.fc34 Summary: The Color Transformation Language RPMs: CTL CTL-devel CTL-docs OpenEXR_CTL Size: 6.88 MiB Size change: 6.11 KiB Changelog: * Tue Oct 13 2020 Jeff Law - 1.5.2-13 - Fix deprecated use of std::istream::streampos Package: R-4.0.3-1.fc34 Old package: R-4.0.2-5.fc34 Summary: A language for data analysis and graphics RPMs: R R-core R-core-devel R-devel R-java R-java-devel libRmath libRmath-devel libRmath-static Size: 346.08 MiB Size change: 2.48 MiB Changelog: * Mon Oct 12 2020 Tom Callaway - 4.0.3-1 - update to 4.0.3 Package: R-bookdown-0.21-1.fc34 Old package: R-bookdown-0.20-1.fc33 Summary: Authoring Books and Technical Documents with R Markdown RPMs: R-bookdown Size: 906.39 KiB Size change: 10.95 KiB Changelog: * Tue Oct 13 2020 Elliott Sales de
Re: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 1:12 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Roman Mohr wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am playing with RPM dependency resolution and I came across this in the > > fc32 repos: > > > > # dnf -y deplist gnutls | grep libtasn1 > > Last metadata expiration check: 2:04:09 ago on Wed 14 Oct 2020 09:47:12 > > CEST. > > dependency: libtasn1 >= 4.3 > >provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.i686 > >provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 > > > > Could someone explain to me why version 4.16.0 satisfies 4.3? Does RPM > > implicitly add `0.` to the comparison and it effectively compares > `4.16.0` > > with `0.4.3`? > > IIRC, it will compare each component of the version in turn and stop > evaluation as soon as it gets an answer. So effectively it has > compared 4.16 <=> 4.3, the trailing '.0' in 4.16.0 never needed > evaluating. > > Vitaly, Daniel thanks. My brain permanently makes 4.1.6 out of 4.16. It is obviously correct. Best regards, Roman > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- > https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- > https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org-o- > https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: our containers with alias vim=vi
On 13/10/20 16:04 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 10/13/20 12:34 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/10/20 07:45 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 10/12/20 5:15 PM, Joe Doss wrote:
On 10/12/20 1:50 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
This would break using Vim when vim-minimal and vim-enhanced are
installed (it would start Vi instead of typed Vim). To make it work,
vim-minimal would have to conflict with vim-enhanced, which doesn't
make
sense - Vi and Vim binaries can exist together just fine.
I have vim-enhanced and vim-minimal installed
# rpm -qa |grep vim
vim-common-8.2.1770-1.fc33.x86_64
vim-filesystem-8.2.1770-1.fc33.noarch
vim-minimal-8.2.1770-1.fc33.x86_64
vim-enhanced-8.2.1770-1.fc33.x86_64
and when I type vi it launches vim.
I'm sorry I forgot about this alias - yes, there is an alias which is
applied when both - vim-minimal and vim-enhanced - are installed so it
launches 'vim' when you type 'vi'. I would say less people will complain
if something has more features than if it has less, so I'm content with
this alias.
# whereis vi
vi: /usr/bin/vi /usr/share/man/man1p/vi.1p.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/vi.1.gz
# /usr/bin/vi --version
VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 (2019 Dec 12, compiled Sep 29 2020 00:00:00)
It doesn't look like these are existing together just fine. It seems
that vim takes over vi. Shouldn't these conflict and only one can be
installed over the other?
'Vi' as the original project is no longer (I'm not sure for how long)
shipped in Fedora. 'Vi' we ship is just 'VIM' compiled with 'small' set
of features (f.e. without syntax highlighting) to mimic the original
'Vi'. So if you run 'vi --version' it always shows 'VIM'.
In the end I find it incorrect to mislead users by default by telling
them 'Vim works' but Vi is run instead - Vi and Vim don't have the
same
set of features, which may lead into bug reports caused by this
mistake.
Isn't that the reverse behavior detailed above? I type vi on Fedora
Workstation it launches vim? I assume this isn't causing bug reports.
You're right, as I wrote above - aliasing vi->vim doesn't seem as a
problem to me, but aliasing vim->vi as clime suggested can cause mislead
for users.
I would also appreciate if "vim" ran the executable installed by
vim-minimal. I frequently type "vim" on servers I don't own and then
grumble that it fails and I have to run "vi" instead. It **is** vim,
it's just not installed with that name. Insisting that users call it
vi when we know it's vim and they know it's vim seems unnecessary.
It's Vim but with a different set of features - VIM compiled as Vi
binary is trying to be small, kind of simulate Vi behavior without
setting 'compatible'.
Since you know it has less features, good for you. But unfortunately,
not all users know - there was already a report about Vim missing
highlighting, and the reporter was running /usr/bin/vi. So my aim is to
prevent such a report.
$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/vi
vim-minimal-8.2.1770-1.fc32.x86_64
Could vim-minimal and vim-enhanced both install the same
/etc/profile.d/vim.sh file that did something like this?
Installing the same file would mean to set conflicts between those two
package, wouldn't it? Or would you mind explaining how to achieve it?
RPM allows a file to be owned by more than one package. Fedora has
allowed this for eight years:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/138
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_ownership
The file would be owned by both packages, and only removed if both
packages get removed. That means it would be present if at least one
of them was installed.
if [ -n "${BASH_VERSION-}" -o -n "${KSH_VERSION-}" -o -n
"${ZSH_VERSION-}" ]; then
 [ "`/usr/bin/id -u 2>/dev/null || echo 0`" -le 200 ] && return
 # for bash and and ksh and zsh
 case "$(type -t vim)-$(type -t vi)" in
   file-file)
     # both vim and vi are present
     alias vi=vim
     alias view="vim -R"
     ;;
   -file)
     # only vim-minimal is installed, expose it as 'vim' too
     alias vim=vi
     ;;
 esac
fi
Looks good, although it doesn't touch the problem mistaking Vi and Vim
as I said before. I tried to come up with a little bash script which
will mention it really runs vi instead of typed vim (just the important
snippet):
alias vim="read -rep $'No vim found, using vi, press ENTER to
continue\n' -n1 -t 20 -s && vi"
This can be add into bash profile instead of 'alias vim=vi' when only
vim-minimal is installed.
Does it work for our case? IMO only problem would be with scripting, but
scripts which depend on vim and run on machine without vim-enhanced are
broken even now, so it shouldn't be a problem here.
That would work for me.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Re: our containers with alias vim=vi
On 13/10/20 07:38 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jonathan Wakely said:
Could vim-minimal and vim-enhanced both install the same
/etc/profile.d/vim.sh file that did something like this?
if [ -n "${BASH_VERSION-}" -o -n "${KSH_VERSION-}" -o -n "${ZSH_VERSION-}" ];
then
[ "`/usr/bin/id -u 2>/dev/null || echo 0`" -le 200 ] && return
Why this? Why not alias vi=vim for root? We don't block root from
running vim (so it doesn't appear to be for security - vim already
ignores some things when running as root).
That was already there, I just copied what is in /etc/profile.d/vim.sh
today.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Roman Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > I am playing with RPM dependency resolution and I came across this in the > fc32 repos: > > # dnf -y deplist gnutls | grep libtasn1 > Last metadata expiration check: 2:04:09 ago on Wed 14 Oct 2020 09:47:12 > CEST. > dependency: libtasn1 >= 4.3 >provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.i686 >provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 > > Could someone explain to me why version 4.16.0 satisfies 4.3? Does RPM > implicitly add `0.` to the comparison and it effectively compares `4.16.0` > with `0.4.3`? IIRC, it will compare each component of the version in turn and stop evaluation as soon as it gets an answer. So effectively it has compared 4.16 <=> 4.3, the trailing '.0' in 4.16.0 never needed evaluating. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?
On 14.10.2020 12:57, Roman Mohr wrote: dependency: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 Could someone explain to me why version 4.16.0 satisfies 4.3? Version 4.16.0 is higher than 4.3, that's why the expression X >= 4.3 will be TRUE. $ rpmdev-vercmp 4.16.0 4.3 4.16.0 > 4.3 -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?
Hi, I am playing with RPM dependency resolution and I came across this in the fc32 repos: # dnf -y deplist gnutls | grep libtasn1 Last metadata expiration check: 2:04:09 ago on Wed 14 Oct 2020 09:47:12 CEST. dependency: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.i686 provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 Could someone explain to me why version 4.16.0 satisfies 4.3? Does RPM implicitly add `0.` to the comparison and it effectively compares `4.16.0` with `0.4.3`? Best Regards, Roman ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/33 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.1_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.1_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.1_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.1_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.1_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.1_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_33_RC_1.1_Security_Lab All RC priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the RC Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_RC_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-31-20201014.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
rlottie license change
Hello all. License changed from "LGPLv2+ and MIT and FTL and BSD and MPLv1.1" to "MIT and FTL and BSD and MPLv1.1". -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 33: pcscd and xrdp issue
Am 13.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:55 PM Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > wrote: > >>> Second thing to chance: just ask, if a usable hw is found. Asking >>> permission for an impossible task is the definition of madnes >>> >>> Back to your request to change the policy: >>> >>> I don't see any restrictions for remote access. ( F33 has same as >>> https://pastebin.com/Mn8mzjVp ) >>> >>> auth_admin >>> auth_admin >>> yes >>> >>> and I have no clue, besides setting those above to "no", which had the >>> hoped result(tested), how to change the file to ignore or skip the request >>> it generates via polkit when gnome starts.But I'm pretty sure, changing the >>> policy file, just makes thing unusable in case a smartcardread is really >>> available in the system. >> Try setting the access daemon part from auth_admin to yes. Does it >> address the issue? > btw. Have you tried that on the systems that fail? Does it improve the > usability? > > As i already wrote, the same systems from last week that failed, did not show the error this week. No clue why. So, no , i did not test for "yes" as the testcase vanished :) Best regards, Marius ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 33: pcscd and xrdp issue
Am 13.10.20 um 13:17 schrieb Jakub Jelen: > On 10/13/20 12:22 PM, Marius Schwarz wrote: >> >> captured with a brute force watch ps auxf >> log >> >> marius 5396 0.0 0.5 535000 10360 ? Ssl 03:34 0:00 \_ >> /usr/libexec/gsd-smartcard >> >> >> btw. Boxen seems to simulate a reader: >> >> ccid_usb.c:659:OpenUSBByName() Found Vendor/Product: 08E6/4433 (Gemalto >> Gemplus USB SmartCard Reader 433-Swap) > > Yeah, this is the virtual smart card driver, which is enabled if you > configure your vm/remote-viewer to do so. Not sure if this is by default. > >> which changes the behaviour without altering the policy. >> >> I will repeat it with a real device. >> >> ** Surprise ** >> >> Today, it does not show the requester at all. Not on Boxen, not on the >> real hw device I tested it last week with. >> >> But, the error message appears and several processes lite it up: >> >> 2x /usr/libexec/gsd-smartcard >> >> !!! 48x /usr/libexec/gstreamer-1.0/gst-plugin-scanner -l >> /usr/bin/gjs-console >> >> The policy file was untouched, the image was the same as last week, the >> device is the same as last week. Is there any OTA shenanigans at work? >> >> I mean, 2 devices tested on several days over the last week, and all >> produce the same message and than, a week later, with an unalterted >> ISOIMAGE it does no longer happen??? Something is very suspicious here! >> > > Whether virtual smart card and reader is created depends on the VM > configuration & remote-viewer configuration. Did you update/change > that in your client system? > > Regards, No, nothing changed, neither Boxens config ( silently updated by dnf is possible), but the USB drive with Fedora 33 livedisc is unaltered and the hw is the same as ever. So at least the HW test should have produced the bug, as it did a week before. best regards, Marius ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] Re: Mapping tree rework
Hi, you are right that it is possible to configure suffix hierarchies which are broken, but in my experience this wasn't an issue. people using sub suffixes did get it right. So is there really a need to change something that is working for a long time ? Regards, Ludwig On 14.10.20 08:12, William Brown wrote: https://github.com/mreynolds389/389wiki/pull/48 This is a draft design, and probably of interest to thierry whom I discussed this with last night :) Thanks! — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-32-20201014.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201013.0): ID: 694448 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694448 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Fast-moving packages in EPEL
On 13.10.20 12:14, Leon Fauster wrote: > My recall was this > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DBAQB3V35TXPNUV4UKKHXUC52BENZJUQ/ OK, thanks, that clears that up. So I'll go ahead and retire the EPEL7 package. Maybe I can put an updated one on Copr instead. Thanks to all of you, you helped tremendously. Christopher ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5608fa4a78 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5608fa4a78 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-174525f97d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-174525f97d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-54db3ea55d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-54db3ea55d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Usage-2.01-1.fc34 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: nodejs-svgo dependencies
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:13:18AM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I took over the maintenance of nodejs-svgo needed for Inkscape.
> Unfortunately, two dependencies were retired due to lack of
> maintenance: sax and js-ymal. The attempt to rebuild those packages
> failed but the guideline for nodejs packages seems unclear with that
> line [1]:
I seems quite a few more deps have been retired...
npm(mocha)
npm(supports-color)
...
This will be a big task to support all that :(
> %prep
> %setup -q -n package
> %nodejs_fixdep foomodule
...
> + cd package
This directory is called 'js-yaml-3.14.0' in the new version:
%prep
-%setup -q -n package
-%setup -q -T -D -a 1 -n package
-%setup -q -T -D -a 2 -n package
+%autosetup -n js-yaml-%{version}
+%setup -q -T -D -a 1 -n js-yaml-%{version}
+%setup -q -T -D -a 2 -n js-yaml-%{version}
Unfortunately the build fails later because 'fast-check' is missing...
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: [EPEL7] Celery stack update & Python 3 enablement
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:09 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > How big are the changes between 4.2.2 and 4.3? > So, I finally got back to this, sorry for the late reply. After reading through kombu 4.3 changelog [0], it seems the only truly breaking change is in SQLAlchemy transport ( I can be wrong, of course) which would require manual intervention in the database: "Added an index to the Message table for the SQLAlchemy transport." >From what I understand, using SQLAlchemy for celery/kombu is pretty niche and documentation mentions and most applications around the world I was able to find are using different backends for celery (RabbitMQ, Redis). The plan will be to leave the upgraded stack for a long time in testing, I was thinking about something like a month or two. I'll definitely send an announcement once the stack is in testing repo and then (week or two) before pushing it to epel stable. [0] https://docs.celeryproject.org/projects/kombu/en/v4.3.0/changelog.html ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888006] perl-DB_File-1.855 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-506f68c17b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-506f68c17b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888006] perl-DB_File-1.855 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9374ba063f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9374ba063f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888006] perl-DB_File-1.855 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-DB_File-1.855-1.fc34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1887366] perl-Pod-Usage-2.01 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
nodejs-svgo dependencies
Hello team, I took over the maintenance of nodejs-svgo needed for Inkscape. Unfortunately, two dependencies were retired due to lack of maintenance: sax and js-ymal. The attempt to rebuild those packages failed but the guideline for nodejs packages seems unclear with that line [1]: %prep %setup -q -n package %nodejs_fixdep foomodule Yet the resulting failure: + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf package + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/js-yaml-3.14.0.tar.gz + /usr/bin/tar -xof - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd package /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.N0bzEw: line 39: cd: package: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.N0bzEw (%prep) Those packages are hosted on COPR [2] and a help will be greatly appreciated to update the specs. Thanks in advance. References --- [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Node.js/ [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/luya/svgo/builds/ -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-14) + Proposal to Cancel
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 21:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:01 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > Since there are no open tickets that are tagged with "meeting" and no new > > tickets are in need of synchronous discussion IMO, I propose to cancel > > tomorrow's meeting, and would chair next week's meeting instead. > > > > The usual (empty) schedule and announcements are listed below. > > > > I'm fine with that. > > > Works for me too > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888006] perl-DB_File-1.855 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1888116] New: Please update to >=1.46, to build openssl 1.1.1d an newer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888116 Bug ID: 1888116 Summary: Please update to >=1.46, to build openssl 1.1.1d an newer Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Status: NEW Component: perl-Text-Template Assignee: spo...@gmail.com Reporter: bugzi...@terrortux.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, spo...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Link ID: Github openssl/openssl/issues/11367 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Version 1.45 seem to have an bug, which will stop to build openssl 1.1.1d and newer. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Text-Template-1.45-12.el7 See the bug link for more information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] Mapping tree rework
https://github.com/mreynolds389/389wiki/pull/48 This is a draft design, and probably of interest to thierry whom I discussed this with last night :) Thanks! — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: 389ds making a local dns server for local web app.
On 10/13/20 10:55 PM, rodents...@gmail.com wrote: Btw sir, if I use freeipa. I won't be needing 389ds anymore? I freeipa is made using 389ds. Am I correct? Yes, freeipa uses 389ds as its backend database. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
