https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/10/17/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20201016git141a514.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887018
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Data-JavaScript-1.14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027
Bug ID: 1889027
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.42 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889018
Bug ID: 1889018
Summary: perl-Devel-PPPort-3.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-PPPort
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/37 (x86_64)
ID: 698908 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/698908
ID: 698922 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/698922
On 16/10/2020 18:57, Sven Kieske wrote:
> On Fr, 2020-10-16 at 15:27 +0200, David S. wrote:
>> My testing is currently on a standard Fedora 32 x86_64 running in
>> Digital Ocean (from their Fedora image pool). It should be fairly
>> up-to-date (I see now there is a 5.8.15-201 kernel available).
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 95/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in
On 16.10.2020 18:56, Adam Williamson wrote:
Can you check the logs and see what it skipped?
Nothing was skipped.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
With luck, this is the last time I'll send this until Fedora 34 Beta!
The Go/No-Go is Thursday.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. sddm — login stuck when changing users repeatedly (log out, log in
a different one) — ASSIGNED
ACTION: QA to test
On Fr, 2020-10-16 at 15:27 +0200, David S. wrote:
> My testing is currently on a standard Fedora 32 x86_64 running in
> Digital Ocean (from their Fedora image pool). It should be fairly
> up-to-date (I see now there is a 5.8.15-201 kernel available).
>
> [root@davids-devtest-f32 ~]# uptime
>
On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 18:38 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 16.10.2020 18:12, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Did you?
>
> Forcing with --skip-broken helped. Thanks.
Can you check the logs and see what it skipped? That would be useful
for filing a bug. The original logs don't really tell
On 16.10.2020 18:12, Adam Williamson wrote:
Did you?
Forcing with --skip-broken helped. Thanks.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201015.0):
ID: 698470 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
Hello all,
Here is the updated package review request for github-cli 1.1.0 and the
eleven dependency... Ooof.
github-cli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803302#c8
golang-github-netflix-expect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803309
golang-github-hinshun-vt10x
On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 15:26 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Oct 16 15:14:57 laptop dnf[1001]: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip
> uninstallable packages)
Did you?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.41
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2dbce134fd
singularity-3.6.4-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
php-horde-Horde-Vfs-2.4.1-1.el6
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201015.n.0):
ID: 698109 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/698109
ID: 698133 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886146
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
Reported to RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888944
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 16/10/2020 01:09, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:24 PM David S. wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just spotted that there is a difference in the default log levels on
>> Fedora and RHEL-8 vs RHEL-7.
>>
>> Fedora/RHEL-8 uses:
>>
>># cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk
>>7 4
Hello all.
Fedora 32 (KDE Spin). Trying to upgrade to Fedora 33:
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=33
sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot
After rebooting, an error occured and then rebooted again into Fedora 32.
Full
OLD: Fedora-33-20201015.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201016.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201015.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201016.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 111
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201015.0):
ID: 697690 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Am 16.10.20 um 11:30 schrieb Paul Black:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 09:49, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>>
>> means: the delta-rpms increased the downloadsize by 3 MB. I'm pretty sure,
>> this is not intended :)
> It's due to kernel-devel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873876
>
Ok, that
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 09:49, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> while updating for the 5.8.15 kernel with dnf, this message appeared:
>
> Gesamt
> 6.2
>
On 10/16/20 1:48 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote:
while updating for the 5.8.15 kernel with dnf, this message appeared:
Gesamt 6.2 MB/s | 93 MB 00:14
Fehlgeschlagen: Delta-RPMs erhöhten die Größe für Updates von 89.6 MB
auf 92.7 MB (-3.1% verschwendet)*
[ Fail: Delta-RPMs have increased the size
Hi,
while updating for the 5.8.15 kernel with dnf, this message appeared:
Gesamt
6.2 MB/s | 93 MB 00:14
Fehlgeschlagen: Delta-RPMs erhöhten die
Hi William,
I agree with your architecture points and that is why I said my proposal is
a less appealing trade off.
My real concern is your last point:
we just do not know and IMHO we are unable to predict what (or if) config
will cause problems, and I am afraid we will only discover it when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
--- Comment #11 from Sjoerd Mullender ---
I see that the patch is included in the source RPM, but the patch is not
applied by the .spec file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
--- Comment #10 from Sjoerd Mullender ---
The Fedora 32 version of the bugzilla (bugzilla-5.0.6-6.fc32.noarch) does not
contain the patch for this bug.
The file /usr/share/bugzilla/Bugzilla/BugMail.pm has not changed since the
previous
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197
Bug ID: 197
Summary: perl-Text-Format-0.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Format
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1721999
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1721999=edit
[patch] Update to 0.62 (#197)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 8:20 PM Leslie Satenstein via devel
wrote:
>
> I am looking to some performance considerations for the /etc/fstab btrs
> default config generated by anaconda.
>
> It appears to have created a subvol for root (root00) and for home (home00).
> I would like to put in /opt
36 matches
Mail list logo
