[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2020-10-24 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-01179f6b9f   
suricata-4.1.9-1.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e6c7b4cbec   
tcpreplay-4.3.3-3.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-284f18e5de   
lout-3.40-18.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

python-pyspf-2.0.14-11.el7

Details about builds:



 python-pyspf-2.0.14-11.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-59c598230b)
 Python module and programs for SPF (Sender Policy Framework)

Update Information:

Add an explicit conflict with python3-dns.

ChangeLog:

* Sun Oct 25 2020 Bojan Smojver  - 2.0.14-6
- Add conflicts with python3-dns (bug #1891225)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1891225 - python3-pyspf breaks if python3-dns is installed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891225


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1891235] perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.15 is available

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891235



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1723949
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1723949=edit
[patch] Update to 0.15 (#1891235)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1891235] New: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.15 is available

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891235

Bug ID: 1891235
   Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.15 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.15
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.14-1.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-ISO8601/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2796/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

2020-10-24 Thread Florian Weimer 
* Jakub Jelinek:

> The thing is that GCC is a moving target at that point, while you can fix up
> packages to deal with GCC at certain date, in a week or two you might need
> to do it again, or there could be ABI changes etc.
> Which is why I'm suggesting at least end of GCC stage1, which still doesn't
> guarantee any of that, at least major new features shouldn't be making it in
> (unless they were posted already before that), and people start focusing on
> fixing bugs (some bugs are fixed continually, but a concerted effort to fix
> bugs starts at end of stage1).

And ELN is different here because it has a rebuild number in the dist
tag, so it is much easier to do rebuilds (bump the rebuild number, do
the required builds, done).

We have walked back ABI versions in Fedora rawhide in the past and know
how to do it, but it requires per-package dist-git upgrades for fresh
NVRs.

Thanks,
Florian
-- 
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Rawhide-20201024.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-24 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 34/181 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.1):

ID: 706247  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706247
ID: 706248  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706248
ID: 706249  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706249
ID: 706250  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706250
ID: 706251  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706251
ID: 706253  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706253
ID: 706256  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_fileconflicts
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706256
ID: 706258  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706258
ID: 706265  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706265
ID: 706295  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706295
ID: 706363  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706363
ID: 706366  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706366
ID: 706374  Test: x86_64 universal install_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706374
ID: 706387  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706387
ID: 706406  Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706406
ID: 706407  Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706407
ID: 706425  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706425

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.1):

ID: 706272  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706272
ID: 706276  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706276
ID: 706280  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706280
ID: 706281  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706281
ID: 706282  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706282
ID: 706284  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706284
ID: 706291  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706291
ID: 706305  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706305
ID: 706308  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706308
ID: 706309  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706309
ID: 706310  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706310
ID: 706328  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706328
ID: 706356  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706356
ID: 706377  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706377
ID: 706391  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706391
ID: 706399  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706399
ID: 706418  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706418

Soft failed openQA tests: 5/181 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.1):

ID: 706266  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706266
ID: 706293  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706293
ID: 706306  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL:

Re: Has glibc just removed some symbols?

2020-10-24 Thread Florian Weimer 
* Scott Talbert:

> Has this been fixed in rawhide yet?  I'm still getting this when
> running fedora-review:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in 
> from dnf.cli import main
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in 
> 
> import dnf.base
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 29, in 
> import libdnf.transaction
>   File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line 12, in 
> 
> from . import conf
>   File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 13, in 
> 
> from . import _conf
> ImportError: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0: undefined symbol: lstat64, version 
> GLIBC_2.33

You need to tell fedora-review to perform a full upgrade to the rawhide
for the chroot it manages.  glibc in rawhide already has the
lstat64@@GLIBC_2.33 symbol, and this version should also be in the
compose by now.

Thanks,
Florian
-- 
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201024.n.0 changes

2020-10-24 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201024.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   29
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  2.06 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   3.45 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   8.27 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: booksorg-0.3.1-3.fc34
Summary: Books Organizer
RPMs:booksorg
Size:2.06 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  awscli-1.18.164-1.fc34
Old package:  awscli-1.18.163-1.fc34
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 1.89 MiB
Size change:  179 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.18.164-1
  - 1.18.164


Package:  btrfs-progs-5.9-1.fc34
Old package:  btrfs-progs-5.7-5.fc33
Summary:  Userspace programs for btrfs
RPMs: btrfs-progs btrfs-progs-devel libbtrfs libbtrfsutil 
python3-btrfsutil
Added RPMs:   python3-btrfsutil
Size: 7.16 MiB
Size change:  214.27 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 Neal Gompa  - 5.9-1
  - New upstream release
  - Build Python bindings
  - Drop patches incorporated into this release


Package:  cinnamon-control-center-4.7.0-0.2.20201022gitb1b396a.fc34
Old package:  cinnamon-control-center-4.7.0-0.1.20201022gitb1b396a.fc34
Summary:  Utilities to configure the Cinnamon desktop
RPMs: cinnamon-control-center cinnamon-control-center-devel 
cinnamon-control-center-filesystem
Size: 3.80 MiB
Size change:  105.50 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 Leigh Scott  - 
4.7.0-0.2.20201022gitb1b396a
  - Readd bin file


Package:  compiz-1:0.8.16.1-7.fc34
Old package:  compiz-1:0.8.16.1-6.fc33
Summary:  OpenGL window and compositing manager
RPMs: compiz compiz-devel
Size: 6.50 MiB
Size change:  36.99 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 Wolfgang Ulbrich  - 
2:2.148.0-3.dev.git9b3b66f
  - autobuilt 9b3b66f

  * Fri Oct 23 2020 RH Container Bot  - 
2:2.150.0-2.dev.git0ef4703
  - bump to 2.150.0
  - autobuilt 0ef4703


Package:  containernetworking-plugins-0.8.7-16.1.git440dcc3.fc34
Old package:  containernetworking-plugins-0.8.7-15.1.gita9abbaf.fc34
Summary:  Libraries for writing CNI plugin
RPMs: containernetworking-plugins containernetworking-plugins-devel 
containernetworking-plugins-unit-test-devel
Size: 45.33 MiB
Size change:  2.01 MiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 RH Container Bot  - 
0.8.7-16.1.git440dcc3
  - autobuilt 440dcc3


Package:  dummy-test-package-crested-0-1983
Old package:  dummy-test-package-crested-0-1977
Summary:  Dummy Test Package called Crested
RPMs: dummy-test-package-crested
Size: 128.39 KiB
Size change:  363 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1978
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1979
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1980
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1981
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1982
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1983
  - rebuilt


Package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-1868.fc34
Old package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-1862.fc34
Summary:  Dummy Test Package called Gloster
RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster
Size: 120.18 KiB
Size change:  370 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1863
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1864
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1865
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1866
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1867
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1868
  - rebuilt


Package:  dummy-test-package-rubino-0-1983
Old package:  dummy-test-package-rubino-0-1977
Summary:  Dummy Test Package called Rubino
RPMs: dummy-test-package-rubino
Size: 128.46 KiB
Size change:  378 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1978
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1979
  - rebuilt

  * Fri Oct 23 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1980
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1981
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1982
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Oct 24 2020 packagerbot  - 0-1983
  - rebuilt


Package:  fastd-21-1.fc34
Old package:  fastd-20-3.fc34
Summary:  Fast and secure tunneling daemon
RPMs: fastd
Size: 559.18 KiB
Size change:  2.52 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 23 2020 Felix Kaechele  - 21-1
  - update to 21
  - fixes CVE-2020-27638


Package:  fedora-coreos-config-transpiler-0.7.0-1.fc34
Old package:  fedora-coreos-config-transpiler-0.6.0-2.fc33
Summary:  Fedora CoreOS Config Transpiler (FCCT)
RPMs: fedora-coreos-config-transpiler 
fedora-coreos-config-transpiler-nonlinux
Size: 15.54 MiB

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201024.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2020-10-24 Thread rawhide 
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201024.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/34

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Rawhide_20201024.n.0_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Rawhide_20201024.n.0_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Rawhide_20201024.n.0_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Rawhide_20201024.n.0_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Rawhide_20201024.n.0_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Rawhide_20201024.n.0_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Rawhide_20201024.n.0_Security_Lab

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1829982] perl-WWW-Mechanize for EL8

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829982

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1890587, 1890604
 CC||jakub.jedel...@gmail.com



--- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot  ---
*** Bug 1890603 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890587
[Bug 1890587] EPEL8 Request: perl-App-Nopaste
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890604
[Bug 1890604] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890604] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890604
Bug 1890604 depends on bug 1890603, which changed state.

Bug 1890603 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890604] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890604

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1829982





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829982
[Bug 1829982] perl-WWW-Mechanize for EL8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890587] EPEL8 Request: perl-App-Nopaste

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890587
Bug 1890587 depends on bug 1890603, which changed state.

Bug 1890603 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890603] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||xav...@bachelot.org
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2020-10-24 11:22:33



--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1829982 ***


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890587] EPEL8 Request: perl-App-Nopaste

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890587

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1829982





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829982
[Bug 1829982] perl-WWW-Mechanize for EL8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201024.0 compose check report

2020-10-24 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

2020-10-24 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova 
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:43 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:

..skipped..

> There's actually nothing wrong with this idea in itself, because at
> the crux of it is that there is a desire to have a side-tag to build
> gcc11 with a limited compose to regression test and further evaluate
> the development of GCC earlier. This is something I'd like to have
> available for more things, and it's a great idea. But there is
> basically no reason to stuff it into ELN other than it already exists
> as a gap in our existing process. Instead, I'd like to have that
> formally approved by FESCo in a way that releng would make a dedicated
> side tag for it and allow OSCI to be configured for mini-composes for
> the purpose of assisting in GCC development. Then it can be a regular
> part of GCC rebase processes.

On top of generic sidetag functionality, ELN has additional features
like automated continuous rebuilds of Rawhide packages, regular
composes and container builds[1], and people watching after them.
Note that we have spent three months on ELN automation and it still
has a lot of gaps in it.

Collaboration between GCC11 maintainers and ELN SIG allows us to save
the resources, both technical and human, and use the already existing
infrastructure pieces built for ELN to temporarily (for three weeks)
test the GCC11 too.

You are suggesting now that someone goes and duplicates this work. If
you know people somewhere ready to do this, let them step in and we
can discuss it.

I also don't see why you think that landing GCC11 in ELN three weeks
ahead on Rawhide contradicts with the idea of ELN being a development
preview of future RHEL.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/eln/deliverables/

> [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages
> [2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose
> [3]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ArbitraryBranching
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

-- 
Aleksandra Fedorova
bookwar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

2020-10-24 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova 
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:58 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
 wrote:
>
> On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 20:36, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 10/23/20 8:01 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> [...]
> > And as I've mentioned before on this thread, we're trying to figure out
> > how to drop that change in earlier than we have in the past.   There's
> > technical as well as non-technical concerns.  The time period Jakub and
> > myself were looking at was dropping it in at the end of stage1 upstream
> > gcc development which would be mid Nov.  But we both feel it's
> > imperative that the implications be discussed here and that the change
> > in procedure gets highlighted in the usual change proposal.
>
> Great! I'm all for landing major GCC updates as early as it makes sense
> for both upstream and Fedora. Does landing the update in ELN first give
> us any benefits compared to landing it directly in rawhide? Everybody
> involved with the ELN-GCC11 proposal in this thread seems to be avoiding
> the answer to this question.

The question why GCC11 can not land in Rawhide right now has been
answered by Jakub.

> > >> This activity could have been done internally in RHEL, or externally
> > >> in some upstream working groups. But ELN now allows us to do this work
> > >> in public in Fedora, and invite Fedora community to join it, if they
> > >> _want_.
> > > How can we join, then? How is this better than doing this, say, in COPR?
> > > Or a rawhide side-tag.
> >
> > Right now the build is on a side tag and hasn't been merged into ELN (to
> > the best of my knowledge).  Once the bits are merged in then I expect
> > anyone can join in the "fun".
>
> And yet the post starting this thread invited everyone to join. So which
> is it? Can I join now or must I wait until the tag is merged?

I did share the details of the upcoming update in advance.
Specifically for the purpose that people can join the conversation
about it in the issue I linked.

If you are interested in the coordination of this update, or you can
join now and provide your feedback. If you are only interested in the
states of packages built with GCC11, you need to wait for until the
update is merged

> > >> As we promised by the ELN Change we have provided the platform for GCC
> > >> upstream, RHEL downstream and Fedora community to collaborate on the
> > >> work for Fedora, and motivation for Red Hat to sponsor this effort.
> > > So far I haven't seen any clear instructions on how I can, say, rebuild
> > > my packages with GCC11 to catch any fall-out early. Or where you're
> > > going to publish (if at all) the results of any rebuilds you'll perform.
>
> > We don't generally publish them -- though we've certainly discussed it
> > in the past and the only impediment is my time.  The jenkins server
> > which drives my testing is on Red Hat's internal network, but there's a
> > publisher that would allow us to push the build info out to a public
> > facing server.  There's nothing inherently private and/or secret about
> > the work.  We also use that jenkins system to do wide scale testing of
> > GCC work before it lands in upstream GCC.
>
> I wasn't implying there was anything secret anywhere. Thanks for the
> background details, though.
>
> > If you have specific packages in mind, I'm happy to let you know their
> > build status with gcc-11.  It's just some clicking.
>
> Well, let's see. I'm interested in all my packages which have gcc* in
> their BuildRequires.
>
> Regards,
> Dominik
> --
> Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
> There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
> oppression to develop psychic muscles.
> -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

-- 
Aleksandra Fedorova
bookwar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201024.0 compose check report

2020-10-24 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201023.0):

ID: 706237  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706237

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890604] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890604

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1890603
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603
[Bug 1890603] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890603] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1890604





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890604
[Bug 1890604] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890599] EPEL8 Request: perl-Symbol-Util

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890599

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1890605





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890605
[Bug 1890605] EPEL8 Request: perl-constant-boolean
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890603] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1890605 |





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890605
[Bug 1890605] EPEL8 Request: perl-constant-boolean
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890605] EPEL8 Request: perl-constant-boolean

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890605

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1890603 |1890599





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890599
[Bug 1890599] EPEL8 Request: perl-Symbol-Util
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603
[Bug 1890603] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Non-responsive maintainer johnp for python-ldap package request

2020-10-24 Thread Alexander Bokovoy 

On la, 24 loka 2020, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 10/24/20 5:48 AM, John Palmieri wrote:



On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote:


   On 10/23/20 6:13 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On pe, 23 loka 2020, John Palmieri wrote:
>> I haven’t been a Linux dev for some time now. I can’t even figure out how
>> to log into Fas anymore otherwise I would help out.
>
> Thank you for the response, John.
>
> Does it mean that I should proceed with the non-responsive process right
> away so that FESCO would be able to switch the maintainership to me?

   If you agree John, I'll remove your assignment from Fedora packages right 
away.


Please do.


Done.

I gave python-ldap to cheimes and removed johnp from all other packages.

Christian, please consider adding @python-sig.


John and Miro, thank you for prompt response!

--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Security / Identity Management Engineering
Red Hat Limited, Finland
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890603] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1890605





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890605
[Bug 1890605] EPEL8 Request: perl-constant-boolean
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1890605] EPEL8 Request: perl-constant-boolean

2020-10-24 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890605

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1890603
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890603
[Bug 1890603] EPEL8 Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Non-responsive maintainer johnp for python-ldap package request

2020-10-24 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 10/24/20 5:48 AM, John Palmieri wrote:



On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote:


On 10/23/20 6:13 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
 > On pe, 23 loka 2020, John Palmieri wrote:
 >> I haven’t been a Linux dev for some time now. I can’t even figure out 
how
 >> to log into Fas anymore otherwise I would help out.
 >
 > Thank you for the response, John.
 >
 > Does it mean that I should proceed with the non-responsive process right
 > away so that FESCO would be able to switch the maintainership to me?

If you agree John, I'll remove your assignment from Fedora packages right 
away.


Please do.


Done.

I gave python-ldap to cheimes and removed johnp from all other packages.

Christian, please consider adding @python-sig.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Cloud-33-20201024.0 compose check report

2020-10-24 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 706177  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/706177

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org