Re: Virtual Fedora 33 Release Party - You're invited! (Nov 6th & 7th)

I won't be attending, but I'd like to thank all those that worked on F33. I'm a long time Fedora user and F33 is excellent. Linux rocks ! Fedora rocks ! Good work. On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:21 PM Marie Nordin wrote: > Hey Fedora! > > You're invited to the F33 Release Party! Tomorrow Friday

[Bug 1894755] perl-IO-Pager-2.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894755 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Fedora-Cloud-33-20201106.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201105.0): ID: 717107 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1894777] perl-File-Path-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894777 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1893788] EPEL8 request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893788 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jedelsky --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30256 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30257 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1893788] EPEL8 request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893788 Jakub Jedelsky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-11-06 - 94% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/11/06/report-389-ds-base-2.0.1-20201106git04ba05e.fc32.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4f4de3554d fastd-21-1.el8 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f50399d2e chromium-86.0.4240.111-1.el8 5

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-284f18e5de lout-3.40-18.el7 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fd6ec50fa5 fastd-21-2.el7 8

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ca0361c919 lout-3.40-18.el6 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6bc42544ca wordpress-5.1.8-1.el6 The following builds have been

Re: ld segfaults on rawhide

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:42 AM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 11/3/20 6:08 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > On 11/3/20 9:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > >> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:57:48AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > > >>> On Mon, Nov 2,

[Bug 870408] CVE-2012-4730 CVE-2012-4732 CVE-2012-4734 CVE-2012-4735 CVE-2012-4884 rt3: Multiple flaws fixed in upstream 3.8.15 version [epel-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870408 --- Comment #3 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no

[Bug 663069] Wrong charset in graph.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663069 --- Comment #13 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no

[Bug 1186698] /etc/profile.d/perl-homedir.csh contains bourne shell "if" code. Makes tcsh prompt "if: Expression Syntax."

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186698 --- Comment #6 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no

[Bug 844988] Upgrade to new upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844988 --- Comment #3 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no

[Bug 870408] CVE-2012-4730 CVE-2012-4732 CVE-2012-4734 CVE-2012-4735 CVE-2012-4884 rt3: Multiple flaws fixed in upstream 3.8.15 version [epel-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870408 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 663069] Wrong charset in graph.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663069 --- Comment #12 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 1186698] /etc/profile.d/perl-homedir.csh contains bourne shell "if" code. Makes tcsh prompt "if: Expression Syntax."

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186698 --- Comment #5 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 844988] Upgrade to new upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844988 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 1021422] Insufficient validation of PID file contents

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021422 --- Comment #1 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 1284924] perl-IPTables-Parse: insecure temporary file use [epel-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284924 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 962708] CVE-2012-6143 perl-Spoon (Spoon::Cookie): Do not run Storable::thaw() on arbitrary untrusted user input [epel-6]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962708 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 757287] Cannot continue: bucardo_ctl is version 4.4.6, but /usr/share/bucardo/bucardo.schema is version 4.4.7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757287 --- Comment #1 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 756294] Upgrade to new upstream version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756294 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 1526184] perl-IPTables-Parse returns undef instead of good status on default_log() success

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526184 --- Comment #1 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 879007] SELinux errors with temporary files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879007 --- Comment #4 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

Re: qt-mobility -> qtwebkit, and qt4 removal (was Re: Heads up: proj 7.2.0 + gdal 3.2.0)

See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711519 (And related, but for Qt5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872819) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 904249] /NoAuth isn't specified in /etc/httpd/conf.d/rt3.conf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904249 --- Comment #1 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 920685] CVE-2013-1841 perl-Net-Server: Improper reverse DNS matching for the given hostname [epel-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920685 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 1169601] Upgrade to perl-Net-Server version 2 breaks amavisd

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169601 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 1267965] CVE-2015-8326 perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [epel-6]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267965 --- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

[Bug 824089] CVE-2011-2082 rt3: Multiple security flaws fixed in upstream v3.8.12 and v4.0.6 versions [epel-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824089 --- Comment #4 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that EPEL 6 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for EPEL 6 on 2020-11-30. It is our policy to close all bug reports from releases that are

pari soname bump

Pari 2.13.0 is out, and comes with an soname bump. I have successfully rebuilt all consumers except sagemath in mock (the sagemath build is running now; it takes awhile), so I don't expect any problems. Once the sagemath build completes, I will put the various consuming packages through their

Re: qt-mobility -> qtwebkit, and qt4 removal (was Re: Heads up: proj 7.2.0 + gdal 3.2.0)

On 06.11.20 00:16, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:26 PM Sandro Mani wrote: On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote: On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote: On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide shortly. I'll do

Re: qt-mobility -> qtwebkit, and qt4 removal (was Re: Heads up: proj 7.2.0 + gdal 3.2.0)

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:26 PM Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote: > >> > >>> I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide > >>> shortly. I'll do a round of

Review request for multiple trivial mingw-python-* packages

Hi I've put up another bunch of mingw-python-* packages for review which I used to maintain in COPR but I'd like to move into Fedora proper: mingw-python-pytz - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895157 mingw-python-chardet - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895161

Re: Heads up: poetry 1.1.x and poetry.core coming to rawhide

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:25 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello Pythonistas, > > this is a heads up that we plan to upgrade poetry to 1.1.x in rawhide soon: >https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poetry/pull-request/5 > > It is blocked on python-lark-parser: >

Review swap

Have you ever thought, "I wish Fedora had a command line utility where I could type in an ASCII representation of the state of a Rubiks cube and have it print an equally hard to read ASCII representation of the moves needed to solve the cube"? Have I got a package for you! Sagemath 9.2 is out.

qt-mobility -> qtwebkit, and qt4 removal (was Re: Heads up: proj 7.2.0 + gdal 3.2.0)

On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote: On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote: On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide shortly. I'll do a round of test builds in this copr [1], and then build everything (and rebuild dependent

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-11-06 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL

Virtual Fedora 33 Release Party - You're invited! (Nov 6th & 7th)

Hey Fedora! You're invited to the F33 Release Party! Tomorrow Friday November 6th and Saturday November 7th. We will have a couple information sessions with plenty of fun sessions mixed in like lightning talks, pictionary, and special events! Get ready to celebrate :) See all relevant links

Virtual Fedora 33 Release Party - You're invited! (Nov 6th & 7th)

Hey Fedora! You're invited to the F33 Release Party! Tomorrow Friday November 6th and Saturday November 7th. We will have a couple information sessions with plenty of fun sessions mixed in like lightning talks, pictionary, and special events! Get ready to celebrate :) See all relevant links

[Bug 1891366] Failed to start LSB: web-based administration interface for Unix systems.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891366 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- (In reply to FlyDove from comment #3) > sudo dnf install perl-Encode-Detect perl-Socket6 perl-Authen-PAM Fedora32 Reinstalling perl-Socket6 RPM package from Fedora won't help you. You need to reinstall a

Re: ld segfaults on rawhide

Dne 04. 11. 20 v 16:58 Will Crawford napsal(a): > Does anyone know when this is likely to be available in COPR build roots? Copr does not have any special repository. As soon as it hit stable (see Bodhi) and the compose is made, then it is available in Copr. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat,

[Bug 1891366] Failed to start LSB: web-based administration interface for Unix systems.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891366 FlyDove changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(flyd...@qq.com) | --- Comment #3 from FlyDove --- sudo dnf

[Bug 1891366] Failed to start LSB: web-based administration interface for Unix systems.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891366 FlyDove changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1894714] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894714 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1894714] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894714 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1894777] perl-File-Path-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894777 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-478806368a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-478806368a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1894777] perl-File-Path-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894777 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1894777] perl-File-Path-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894777 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Heads up: proj 7.2.0 + gdal 3.2.0

On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote: On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide shortly. I'll do a round of test builds in this copr [1], and then build everything (and rebuild dependent packages) in a rawhide side-tag and then

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Stratis 2.2.0 (Self-Contained Change)

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stratis_2.2.0 > > Stratis 2.2.0 now places Stratis filesystem symlinks in /dev/stratis, > rather than /stratis. Stratis creates and maintains the symlinks by > means of udev rules, rather than directly

[Bug 1894777] New: perl-File-Path-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894777 Bug ID: 1894777 Summary: perl-File-Path-2.18 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-File-Path Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Orpahing notepadqq

Hi list, Due to limited/no movement in the upstream[1] and more and more dependencies (nodejs packages) being orphaned within Fedora, I'm planning to orphan notepadqq. If someone wants to step up and try to get it back working, let me/Sagitter know. Kind regards, Jan [1]

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On 11/5/20 10:44 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: Ben Cotton writes: = Phase 2: Package Updates = Once we have the list of packages that need to be updated, we will proceed with adding BuildRequires: make to all spec files that require it. This new BuildRequires will be added to the line

[Bug 1894755] New: perl-IO-Pager-2.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894755 Bug ID: 1894755 Summary: perl-IO-Pager-2.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Pager Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: HEADSUP: libsepol and libsemanage soname bump

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > > There are few other components which needs to be rebuild: > > > > parted - for some reason it links to libsepol even though I haven't found a > > code > > which would use it. I've proposed patch upstream > > > >

Re: [COPR] Build against libuv and Judy librairies

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 09:29:46AM +0100, Didier Fabert wrote: > Hi, > > I try to make an epel-8 package on COPR, and I get the following errors in > root.log > DEBUG util.py:634: No matching package to install: 'Judy-devel' > DEBUG util.py:634: No matching package to install: 'libuv-devel' >

Re: HEADSUP: libsepol and libsemanage soname bump

On 11/5/20 7:59 AM, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in order to prevent backward compatibility libsepol and libsemanage used had >> few >> symbols defined twice and used symbol versioning for them. But when LTO was >> enabled

[Bug 1894714] New: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894714 Bug ID: 1894714 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.52 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker Keywords:

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove and deprecate nscd in favour of sssd and systemd-resolved (Self-Contained Change)

> Definitely happy to throw nscd out for something better that was just as > simple and easy to set up. > I'll leave systemd-resolved for the trail blazers. Since systemd-resolved is already on by default since Fedora 33 [1], the user base should be up quite a bit as users continue to upgrade.

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 3:44 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Ben Cotton writes: > > > > The spec file updates will be automated and changes will be pushed > > directly to dist-git once they are ready. > > -1. I think you should use pull requests for this, and continue to > believe that mass-pushing

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

* Daniel P. Berrangé: > Do we need a default build root package set at all ? I think we need something for running the SRPM build and later for parsing the spec file to get the actual build dependencies. Both steps can run arbitrary code, so they need a build environment. Thanks, Florian --

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

Ben Cotton writes: > = Phase 2: Package Updates = > Once we have the list of packages that need to be updated, we will > proceed with adding BuildRequires: make to all spec files that require > it. This new BuildRequires will be added to the line after the last > BuildRequires in the

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, wrote: > >> The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than >> 30 Mo. Does it really worth the effort on changing all the dependent >> packages ? > > Personally I am getting tired of this death of the buildroot by

qemu & LTO

We discovered a few days ago that LTO broke qemu on aarch64. The original bug reported was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893892 But actually looking at the build.log[1] we see another assertion failure in the test suite. (Unfortunately although we run the test suite, the spec

Re: Packaging rules for build from source vs BPF byte code ?

Dne 05. 11. 20 v 13:03 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a): On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:58:54AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: In QEMU there's a desire to make use of BPF programs for implementing some networking features. The current patches

Re: HEADSUP: libsepol and libsemanage soname bump

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > Hi, > > in order to prevent backward compatibility libsepol and libsemanage used had > few > symbols defined twice and used symbol versioning for them. But when LTO was > enabled these symbols were completely dropped during

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 09:42, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:57:32AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, wrote: > > > > > The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than > 30 Mo. > > > Does it really worth the effort on

[Bug 1893788] EPEL8 request: perl-Mail-IMAPClient

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893788 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:57:32AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, wrote: > > > The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than 30 Mo. > > Does it really worth the effort on changing all the dependent packages ? > > > > > Personally I am

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:57:32AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, wrote: > > > The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than 30 Mo. > > Does it really worth the effort on changing all the dependent packages ? > > > > > Personally I am

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On 05/11/2020 11:56, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: CMake actually just generates the makefiles, you still run make directly (as with autotools). The makefiles then do several complex things, possibly including running make with different arguments (and also calling back into CMake by running

Re: Packaging rules for build from source vs BPF byte code ?

Hi, > QEMU ships various keymap data files which are auto-generated from data > provided by X11, but none of these are built "from source", because the > generated data files are considered the preferred source form. Well, the actual reason is the X11 dependency. qemu needs those files also

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, wrote: > The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than 30 Mo. > Does it really worth the effort on changing all the dependent packages ? > > Personally I am getting tired of this death of the buildroot by a million cuts. Could we just

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 --- Comment #27 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- Okay, please test this build and let me know if anything changes: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54919576 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than 30 Mo. Does it really worth the effort on changing all the dependent packages ? - Mail original - De: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Novembre 2020 14:42:08

[Bug 1894364] perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Fedora-0.4.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894364 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 01:13:47PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 9:46 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > (snip) > > > > > Koji/Brew disables weak dependencies. The weak dependency would be for > > developer convenience. > > > > > If the change was automated and you did not have

Re: F34 Change proposal: MariaDB 10.5 (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:07 PM Michal Schorm wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 12:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > == Contingency Plan == > > > > > > Modules will provide the functional version of MariaDB 10.4, available to > > > all

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove and deprecate nscd in favour of sssd and systemd-resolved (Self-Contained Change)

On 11/5/20 12:49 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Petr Menšík: > > > nscd has more usage downstream, leading to bugs such as: > > I have very limited understanding of sssd principles. But I think it is not comparable to nscd, which you

Re: Packaging rules for build from source vs BPF byte code ?

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 07:54:16AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 12:03:43PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Given that dpdk is not providing any build process for going from > > tap_bpf_program.c to tap_bpf_insns.h, it looks to me like the upstream > > project

Re: F34 Change proposal: MariaDB 10.5 (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 12:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > == Contingency Plan == > > > > Modules will provide the functional version of MariaDB 10.4, available to > > all users. > > * Contingency mechanism: Fedora Modules for 10.4 available >

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Stratis 2.2.0 (Self-Contained Change)

Ben Cotton writes: > == Contingency Plan == > * Contingency mechanism: > * Contingency deadline: N/A > * Blocks release? No > * Blocks product? No Shouldn't there be a contingency plan? We should have a plan B for the case that the update would introduce serious regressions. Cheers, Dan

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove and deprecate nscd in favour of sssd and systemd-resolved (Self-Contained Change)

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 6:39 AM Petr Menšík wrote: > > No, no, NO again. > > nscd has no important active bugs in Fedora. I am not sure what bugs are > mentioned, but just a few active bugs are on glibc component in Fedora. > Therefore it seems just fine no commits are good. > > Just unlike

Re: Packaging rules for build from source vs BPF byte code ?

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 12:03:43PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Given that dpdk is not providing any build process for going from > tap_bpf_program.c to tap_bpf_insns.h, it looks to me like the upstream > project effectively considers "tap_bpf_insns.h" to be their preferred > source form,

Re: F34 Change proposal: MariaDB 10.5 (Self-Contained Change)

On 11/5/20 1:44 PM, Michal Schorm wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 10:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Are there packages that require rebuilding? E.g. I see that some packages require libmariadbd.so.19. What is the plan regarding them? Packages that require the server (embedded) library

Re: F34 Change proposal: MariaDB 10.5 (Self-Contained Change)

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 10:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Are there packages that require rebuilding? E.g. I see that some packages > require libmariadbd.so.19. What is the plan regarding them? Packages that require the server (embedded) library "libmariadbd.so.19" are the only one that might need

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove and deprecate nscd in favour of sssd and systemd-resolved (Self-Contained Change)

"the system administrator will need to install and configure sssd to replace it after the update. Even when this is not done, the only visible affect will be slower resolution of named service queries due to a missing cache." I use nscd on a few application servers that point to unreliable DNS

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 12:56:17PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Petr Pisar wrote: > > That's because cmake executes make (if CMakeList does not override it). > > CMake actually just generates the makefiles, you still run make directly (as > with autotools). > That's not true anymore.

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On 11/5/20 2:09 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11/5/20 12:59 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: This change will remove make from the default buildroot in Koji and mock. What is the point of removing a package that is used by almost all package builds from the default buildroot? It is just a

Heads up: poetry 1.1.x and poetry.core coming to rawhide

Hello Pythonistas, this is a heads up that we plan to upgrade poetry to 1.1.x in rawhide soon: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poetry/pull-request/5 It is blocked on python-lark-parser: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-lark-parser/pull-request/5 With this update, poetry was

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

* Kevin Kofler via devel: > I would rather wonder whether we really need our default make implementation > to be extensible in Scheme (the guile22 package). The size of make itself is > negligible. gdb-headless also needs Guile, and in most cases, once you use make, you also end up with

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 9:46 PM Neal Gompa wrote: (snip) > > Koji/Brew disables weak dependencies. The weak dependency would be for > developer convenience. > > > If the change was automated and you did not have to do anything would > > you still be opposed to having your spec files updated with

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

On 11/5/20 12:59 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: This change will remove make from the default buildroot in Koji and mock. What is the point of removing a package that is used by almost all package builds from the default buildroot? It is just a pointless backwards incompatibility.

Re: Packaging rules for build from source vs BPF byte code ?

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:58:54AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > In QEMU there's a desire to make use of BPF programs for implementing > > some networking features. The current patches are proposing adding > > prebuilt BPF

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

Ben Cotton wrote: > This change will remove make from the default buildroot in Koji and mock. What is the point of removing a package that is used by almost all package builds from the default buildroot? It is just a pointless backwards incompatibility. > * Reduce the BuildRoot download size

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove make from BuildRoot (System-Wide Change)

Petr Pisar wrote: > That's because cmake executes make (if CMakeList does not override it). CMake actually just generates the makefiles, you still run make directly (as with autotools). The makefiles then do several complex things, possibly including running make with different arguments (and

Re: Fedora 34 Change proposal: Remove and deprecate nscd in favour of sssd and systemd-resolved (Self-Contained Change)

* Petr Menšík: > nscd has no important active bugs in Fedora. I am not sure what bugs are > mentioned, but just a few active bugs are on glibc component in Fedora. > Therefore it seems just fine no commits are good. > > Just unlike systemd-resolved, which actively breaks some use cases. It >

  1   2   >