No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201106.0):
ID: 717360 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895570
Bug ID: 1895570
Summary: perl-Tk-GraphViz-1.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Tk-GraphViz
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895570
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/J/JG/JGS/Tk/GraphViz/Tk-GraphViz-1.02.tar.gz
to ./Tk-GraphViz-1.02.tar.gz
--
$SSIA
See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jedi/pull-request/4#request_diff
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent this week.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/11/07/report-389-ds-base-2.0.1-20201107git04ba05e.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4f4de3554d
fastd-21-1.el8
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f50399d2e
chromium-86.0.4240.111-1.el8
6
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fd6ec50fa5
fastd-21-2.el7
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3157c3d291
chromium-86.0.4240.111-1.el7
8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-7-1.fc34 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-7-1.fc34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-7-1.fc34 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-7-1.fc34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890599
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890586
Bug 1890586 depends on bug 1890588, which changed state.
Bug 1890588 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-BDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890588
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890601
Bug 1890601 depends on bug 1890599, which changed state.
Bug 1890599 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-Symbol-Util
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890599
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890605
Bug 1890605 depends on bug 1890599, which changed state.
Bug 1890599 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-Symbol-Util
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890599
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890925
Bug 1890925 depends on bug 1890929, which changed state.
Bug 1890929 Summary: Add perl-Spiffy to EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890929
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890588
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890601
Bug 1890601 depends on bug 1890591, which changed state.
Bug 1890591 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-Exception-Base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890591
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890590
Bug 1890590 depends on bug 1888288, which changed state.
Bug 1888288 Summary: perl-EV in epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890590
Bug 1890590 depends on bug 1890592, which changed state.
Bug 1890592 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-Guard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890592
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890793
Bug 1890793 depends on bug 1890594, which changed state.
Bug 1890594 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890594
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890592
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890326
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890591
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890594
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890310
Bug 1890310 depends on bug 1890315, which changed state.
Bug 1890315 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890315
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895541
Bug ID: 1895541
Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.994 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-cpm
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891959
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895538
Bug ID: 1895538
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Graph-0.9707 is|perl-Graph-0.9708 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild',
'-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-ndop59wi/perl-Graph.spec'] returned 1: b'error:
There is one release so far this year, qtwebkit-5.212.0-alpha4, based
on WebKitGTK 2.12. Security support for 2.12 ended in September 2016.
So that is the status of your "less outdated" version. Applications
will continue to depend on it indefinitely if they have no flag date to
migrate.
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Well that only halfway removes QtWebKit. There is also the Qt5 version
> of the package that needs to be removed as well.
The Qt 5 version is less outdated and there is still hope that it can be
brought up to date (upstream does not look dead:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895493
Bug ID: 1895493
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.901 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895493
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1727263
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1727263=edit
[patch] Update to 1.901 (#1895493)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895491
Bug ID: 1895491
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.64 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> In QEMU there's a desire to make use of BPF programs for implementing
> some networking features. The current patches are proposing adding
> prebuilt BPF byte code to the QEMU repo, with source available, but
> not actually building
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894917
Robbie Harwood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caillon+fedoraproject@gmail
On 06.11.20 13:00, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
But I'll also expand the analysis to the entire qt4 stack and see what
comes out.
Dropping the entire Qt 4 stack is a non-starter. I am keeping the qt4
package secure with backported security fixes. I see no reason to drop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764
--- Comment #30 from Harald Reindl ---
Fedora 32 - that's why i updated "Version" of this bugreport :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel
As a reminder, through 11 Nov, you may nominate candidates for the 5
open seats on the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo). There
are currently 5 candidates.
To nominate yourself (or others, if you check with them first), visit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764
--- Comment #29 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Please tell me what target you need in order to test this fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:36 pm, Sandro Mani
wrote:
On 06.11.20 01:27, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711519
Soo, initial change proposal for dropping qtwebkit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Smani/QtwebkitRemoval
Feedback welcome.
Christian Stadelmann wrote:
>> The following packages will be retired:
>> arora
>> […]
>> rekonq
>
> Is there any reasons why they should retired and not also being obsoleted?
> (Just asking, not suggesting. I don't really know the process but what
> happens if someone still has arora installed,
Adding Tomas Kopecek into this discussion.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:49 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:33:09AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote:
> > I reran my build and it is picking up the old version. Is this an issue
> in
> > brew/dist-git? Am I expected to change my
> >
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:33:09AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote:
> I reran my build and it is picking up the old version. Is this an issue in
> brew/dist-git? Am I expected to change my
> Makefile and produce another release (doesn't seem reasonable)?
>
Petr:
I reran my build and it is picking up the old version. Is this an issue in
brew/dist-git? Am I expected to change my
Makefile and produce another release (doesn't seem reasonable)?
https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=32922197
Carol
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:39 AM
Thank you for this proposal!
I found a small typo:
> fro mother
> The following packages will be retired:
> arora
> […]
> rekonq
Is there any reasons why they should retired and not also being obsoleted?
(Just asking, not suggesting. I don't really know the process but what happens
if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781737
Jan Holcapek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Thank you Petr!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:10:09AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote:
> > I am a developer to Beaker Project which manages tests for various
> distros
> > such as
> > Fedora 34. I'm trying to build a restraint release and there
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:10:09AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote:
> I am a developer to Beaker Project which manages tests for various distros
> such as
> Fedora 34. I'm trying to build a restraint release and there exists an
> build issue with
> Architecture s390x. The error I'm seeing is as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878468
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
I am a developer to Beaker Project which manages tests for various distros
such as
Fedora 34. I'm trying to build a restraint release and there exists an
build issue with
Architecture s390x. The error I'm seeing is as follows:
collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Soo, this opened a bit a can of worms, as qt-mobility (clearly being of
>> the qt4 era dead upstream) is not going to support proj7.
>
> Can't we get it to build without proj? Does QtWebKit or anything else
> actually need the parts that wrap
Sandro Mani wrote:
> But I'll also expand the analysis to the entire qt4 stack and see what
> comes out.
Dropping the entire Qt 4 stack is a non-starter. I am keeping the qt4
package secure with backported security fixes. I see no reason to drop it.
Qt4WebKit is a different matter, though I
Sandro Mani wrote:
> Soo, this opened a bit a can of worms, as qt-mobility (clearly being of
> the qt4 era dead upstream) is not going to support proj7.
Can't we get it to build without proj? Does QtWebKit or anything else
actually need the parts that wrap proj?
Kevin Kofler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878468
--- Comment #3 from Dick Franks ---
I have no evidence of this behaviour with Fedora or RHEL, but there is no
guarantee that will always remain so.
However, this has happened in the past when doing CPAN installs, and
Net::DNS::SEC was
Hi everyone!
I am Timothée Ravier and I am a Linux system and security engineer interested
in safe programming languages and container focused operating systems.
I am currently a Red Hat and Fedora CoreOS engineer.
I maintain an unofficial project nicknamed Kinoite [1] that provide variants
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764
--- Comment #28 from Harald Reindl ---
this is a F33 build and production servers will see F33 not before 2-4 months
after release
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On 06.11.20 01:27, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711519
Soo, initial change proposal for dropping qtwebkit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Smani/QtwebkitRemoval
Feedback welcome. I'll also post the link in the bug.
Sandro
On Friday, 06 November 2020 at 00:06, Jerry James wrote:
> Have you ever thought, "I wish Fedora had a command line utility where
> I could type in an ASCII representation of the state of a Rubiks cube
> and have it print an equally hard to read ASCII representation of the
> moves needed to solve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895331
Bug ID: 1895331
Summary: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.50 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cache-FastMmap
Keywords: FutureFeature,
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64), 7/7 (aarch64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |xav...@bachelot.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829990
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rc040203@freenet. |
|de)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829990
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de |xav...@bachelot.org
--
You are
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201104.1):
ID: 717202 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/717202
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
Hello,
I have removed dependencies on rubygem-json_pure from rubygem-morph-cli
and rubygem-multi_json, therefore nothing else depended on
rubygem-json_pure. There is no real need for rubzgem-json_pure in
Fedora, since jruby is long gone and ruby can use the binary
rubygem-json, which is more
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:26:37 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> > On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide
> >>> shortly. I'll do a round of
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201105.0):
ID: 717174 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello all,
I have a couple of new review tickets for which I may need some advice
from experts of Python / Fortran / Octave modules:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893539 (calceph)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895290 (python-calcephpy)
Ideally, the python
On Thursday, 05 November 2020 at 22:26, Sandro Mani wrote:
[...]
> > > On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > > I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide
> > > > shortly. I'll do a round of test builds in this copr [1], and
> > > > then build everything (and rebuild
On 11/6/20 12:16 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I've put up another bunch of mingw-python-* packages for review which I used to
maintain in COPR but I'd like to move into Fedora proper:
mingw-python-pytz - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895157
mingw-python-chardet -
On 11/6/20 12:16 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I've put up another bunch of mingw-python-* packages for review which I used to
maintain in COPR but I'd like to move into Fedora proper:
mingw-python-pytz - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895157
mingw-python-chardet -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894755
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
80 matches
Mail list logo
