[Bug 1900710] RFE - build perl-Object-Remote for epel 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900710 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3be8d97b7b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3be8d97b7b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1900710] RFE - build perl-Object-Remote for epel 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900710 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora-Cloud-33-20201127.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201126.0): ID: 729558 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-11-27 - 92% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/11/27/report-389-ds-base-2.0.1-20201127gitce7beae.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1889575] perl-Graph-0.9711 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-1j_yv5_k/perl-Graph.spec'] returned 1: b'error:

[Bug 1889575] perl-Graph-0.9711 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Graph-0.9710 is|perl-Graph-0.9711 is

[Bug 1889575] perl-Graph-0.9710 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-43hgwhkl/perl-Graph.spec'] returned 1: b'error:

[Bug 1889575] perl-Graph-0.9710 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Graph-0.9709 is|perl-Graph-0.9710 is

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-Tail-1.3-19.fc32 |perl-File-Tail-1.3-19.fc32

[Bug 1890589] EPEL8 Request: perl-Config-GitLike

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890589 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1890795] EPEL8 Request: perl-PDL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890795 Bug 1890795 depends on bug 1890896, which changed state. Bug 1890896 Summary: Add perl-File-Map to EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890896 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1890896] Add perl-File-Map to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890896 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1900710] RFE - build perl-Object-Remote for epel 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900710 Bug 1900710 depends on bug 1893136, which changed state. Bug 1893136 Summary: RFE - build a perl-Future package for EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893136 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1822398] Request for perl-Net-OpenSSH for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822398 Bug 1822398 depends on bug 1893136, which changed state. Bug 1893136 Summary: RFE - build a perl-Future package for EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893136 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1781754] Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781754 Bug 1781754 depends on bug 1893136, which changed state. Bug 1893136 Summary: RFE - build a perl-Future package for EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893136 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1893136] RFE - build a perl-Future package for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1890601] EPEL8 Request: perl-Test-Assert

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890601 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Rust library and binary review swaps

Hello, I'm new here. Would anyone like to do a review swap for the following, please?

Re: Koji funkiness?

The build is still "downloading" for both ARM arches an hour later... I still think something's up. Thanks, Richard > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

searching for help in creating an accessible Fedora live image

Hello all, my name is Vojta and I am a blind Linux user from Czech Republic. Linux and its desktop ecosystem is open. And for me that means that I believe it should be open also to people with various disabilities including visual impairment. I am working on a project which tries to achieve

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-11-27 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

Re: Koji funkiness?

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:03 AM Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:51:36 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I've noticed that builds seem to be completing slower than usual, some > > seemingly to s390x builder shortages, but now I've got this build: > > > >

Re: Koji funkiness?

On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:51:36 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > I've noticed that builds seem to be completing slower than usual, some > seemingly to s390x builder shortages, but now I've got this build: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56281919 > > I've looked at most of the

Koji funkiness?

I've noticed that builds seem to be completing slower than usual, some seemingly to s390x builder shortages, but now I've got this build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56281919 I've looked at most of the build logs and all of them are showing that the packages have been

Re: orphaning python-dmidecode

I'm taking python-dmidecode. I hope upstream does not abandon it, one day. On 25/11/20 11:41, Dan Horák wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:34:37 +0100 "Antonio T. sagitter" wrote: Is upstream still active? I would call it "they are alive", there were commits few months ago, see

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

On to, 26 marras 2020, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On ke, 25 marras 2020, Tomáš Popela wrote: >On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:51 PM Alexander Bokovoy >wrote: > >>Screencasting still does not work in Fedora 33. It pretends to

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

Dne 26. 11. 20 v 14:38 Neal Gompa napsal(a): On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 8:35 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On ke, 25 marras 2020, Tomáš Popela wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:51 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote:

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 8:35 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On ke, 25 marras 2020, Tomáš Popela wrote: > > >On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:51 PM Alexander Bokovoy > > >wrote: > > > > > >>Screencasting still does not

Fedora-IoT-34-20201126.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201124.0): ID: 729326 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/729326 ID: 729338 Test: x86_64

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ke, 25 marras 2020, Tomáš Popela wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:51 PM Alexander Bokovoy > >wrote: > > > >>Screencasting still does not work in Fedora 33. It pretends to work as > >>in claiming through the applications

Re: How is the list of emails used for "Email sent to" on bugzilla.redhat.com generated?

* Marcin Dulak: > The individual email recipients used for "Email sent to" are not > included in the given bug "CC list", and the only other email in the > bug settings seems to be "extras...@fedoraproject.org". > How/why are those additional email addresses added? It's possible to watch other

Re: How is the list of emails used for "Email sent to" on bugzilla.redhat.com generated?

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:30 PM Marcin Dulak wrote: > > I noticed several, surprising to me email addresses, listed under "Email sent > to" when making changes to my bugzilla.redhat.com bugs. > For example this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900680 > > The individual email

How is the list of emails used for "Email sent to" on bugzilla.redhat.com generated?

I noticed several, surprising to me email addresses, listed under "Email sent to" when making changes to my bugzilla.redhat.com bugs. For example this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900680 The individual email recipients used for "Email sent to" are not included in the given

selinux-policy-contrib repository merged with selinux-policy

Hello, On November 25th, 2020, the selinux-policy-contrib repository was merged with selinux-policy. SELinux policy packages in Fedora used 2 repositories previously: base [1] and contrib [2]. >From now on, these repos are merged into one, containing sources from both [1]. The change affected

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201126.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201125.0): ID: 729014 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

Running Rawhide, I don't think there is a need to postpone this, if the PipeWire and PA are easily swap-able and that should be possible next week as far as I understand your plan. That means everybody will be able to switch back to PA if there are issues. That should be good for Rawhide as