No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 748053 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748053
ID: 748060 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 15:36 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
> > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800
> > > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all
> I was trying it with Bose QC35 headphones.
>
>
> It was 0.3.18 and as I say it was showing up as a device but
> with no node that I could route audio to.
>
Maybe an extra step is required for that Bose QC35. Try to forget that device
and reconnect.
> That configuration you attached still se
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:30 PM Davide Cavalca via devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 16:22 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 07:44:04PM -, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Another variation on this th
On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 16:22 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 07:44:04PM -, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Another variation on this theme: enable by default in Fedora 34
> > > Server
> > > edition. And more broadl
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 07:44:04PM -, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang
> > >
> >
> > Another variation on this theme: enable by default in Fedora 34 Server
> > edition. And more broadly rolled out for Fedora 35.
> >
> > If it's broadly ready for Fedora 34,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:44 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Flint 2.7.0 is out and has bumped the soname. In about a week, I will
> build it and rebuild all dependent packages, namely:
Except I won't, because some API changes broke a few Fedora packages.
I'll work with the respective upstreams to addre
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:56:55PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching
> (February 2021).
>
> Policy:
> https://docs.fedoraproject
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> > > will stop working. Worse they will app
Fulko Hew wrote:
> a) is there an easy (i.e. documented) way of testing it?
Keeping in mind that testing anything now (before plasma 5.21 is
preliminary), but... best way to test:
1. create a new user for testing purposes
2. make sure plasma-workspace-wayland pkg is installed
3. login using
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/180 (x86_64), 5/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
...snip...
> >
> > $ preproc-rpmspec pkg.spec.rpkg # prints rendered spec to stdout,
> > pkg.spec.rpkg is a spec template
>
> This would be a viable workaround, but a workaround nevertheless. Since
> I am not frequently rebuilding Fedora rpms outside of mock, koji & copr,
> I cannot tell how much
Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have
to remove them and re-install them (after downgrading n
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 7/15 (aarch64)
ID: 748023 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748023
ID: 748032 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 3:51 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
... snip ...
So if you haven't tried wayland and plasma lately - you should try again.
>
OK.
a) is there an easy (i.e. documented) way of testing it?
b) is there an equivalent to 'remoting' single windows (applications)
to remote machines
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 34 approximately one week before branching (February
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
Note that s
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 21:12, FreedomBen via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've read a crap ton of pages now about package creation/maintenance but
> feel like I'm missing stuff and spinning wheels so I wanted to ask. The
> process seems pretty muddled :-D
>
> I've g
I really don't see we have much of a choice here. X11 is eventually going away
and Wayland is the path forward. That's already been decided, so at this point
it isn't a matter for debate. Human nature being what it is, people tend to
procrastinate and not do anything until pressed up against
Hi all,
I've read a crap ton of pages now about package creation/maintenance but feel
like I'm missing stuff and spinning wheels so I wanted to ask. The process
seems pretty muddled :-D
I've got an RPM package I maintain called "pick" (I'm already working with the
upstream project and have the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 71
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 66
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 6:17 PM Anita Zhang wrote:
>
>
> Another variation on this theme: enable by default in Fedora 34 Server
> edition. And more broadly rolled out for Fedora 35.
>
> If it's broadly ready for Fedora 34, great. Otherwise, it seems like a
> good fit for Fedora Server edition
> Okay, and? There's five months between now and beta freeze. Do you
> seriously think that the bugs there won't get fixed? Some of them
> already *have* been fixed in Plasma 5.19.
It looks like most of the issues listed [1] still have open bug reports. Are
these bug reports just not getting clos
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma
>> >
>> > == Summary ==
>> > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the
>> > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop ses
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 11:32 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> I have not really looked into the source code, so forgive me if that is
> obvious, but why is the snebu executable setuid?
This is for
1) Privilege separation -- application owns the files in the target
repository (/var/lib/snebu); you will ty
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 at 17:52, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 07:44:57PM +0100, clime wrote:
> > I think we can simply parse server-side access logs to count package
> > downloads, no?
>
> We can for our primary server, but most people get updates from mirrors
>
which we don't run
On 28.12.2020 11:54, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Also, I'm against add workarounds on desktop files like this one [1]
forcing apps running with QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb , because is just hidden
the real problem.
Instead of patching, Qt5 maintainers should drop this patch[1].
[1]:
https://src.fedoraproject
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Change the default session selection in SDDM to prefer the
> > Wayland-based KDE Plasma Desktop session over the X11-based one.
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 747650 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/747650
ID: 747657 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
clime writes:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 20:07, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>>
>> clime writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
>> >> Ben Cotton wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 1. How does this affect users who download, maybe modify, and re
Adam Williamson writes:
> On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 20:07 +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> clime writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
>> > > Ben Cotton wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 1. How does this affect users who download, mayb
30 matches
Mail list logo
