Re: Rawhide hangs booting 5.11.0-rc2

2021-01-09 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/01/2021 09:39, Ian Laurie wrote: I just updated a VirtualBox Rawhide guest with latest updates which included the 5.11.0-rc2 kernel and the system hangs on boot (pic attached).  The system was updated a few days ago so was reasonably up to date before today. Booting the previous kernel

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2021-01-09 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599 openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ab8d229496 awstats-7.8-2.el7 9

Rawhide hangs booting 5.11.0-rc2

2021-01-09 Thread Ian Laurie
I just updated a VirtualBox Rawhide guest with latest updates which included the 5.11.0-rc2 kernel and the system hangs on boot (pic attached). The system was updated a few days ago so was reasonably up to date before today. Booting the previous kernel 5.10.0-rc6 still works OK. In case

[Bug 1912934] perl-Socket-2.031 is available

2021-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912934 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1914592] New: perl-Config-MVP-2.200012 is available

2021-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914592 Bug ID: 1914592 Summary: perl-Config-MVP-2.200012 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Config-MVP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: F33: kernel 5.10.x

2021-01-09 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:31 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 08.01.2021 23:40, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > Just wondering whether there is a particular reason 5.10 kernel has not > > been submitted for testing in bodhi for F33 > > 5.10.x is full of regressions: BTRFS

[Bug 1914567] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210109 is available

2021-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914567 Bug ID: 1914567 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210109 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords:

SONAME bump: cpp-hocon

2021-01-09 Thread Benjamin Beasley
I just took over the orphaned cpp-hocon package and updated it. Version 0.3.0 is built in side tag f34-build-side-35661. Upstream has no ABI stability; SONAME changes even on patch releases. A multi-build update will be created for Rawhide after the only known dependent package, facter, is

Re: Non-responsive maintainer Eduardo Augusto Mayorga (mayorga)

2021-01-09 Thread Eduardo A. Mayorga
Hello, El 1/8/21 a las 7:55 AM, Nils Philippsen escribió: > Happy New Year everyone! > > I've tried to get in touch with Eduardo concerning co-maintainership of > the python-rfc3987 package for EPEL8 a couple times at/after December > 7th and haven't heard back from him. I truly apologize for

Fedora-Rawhide-20210109.n.0 compose check report

2021-01-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 10/180 (x86_64), 8/122 (aarch64) New failures

Re: How to troubleshoot aarch64 and s390x?

2021-01-09 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 07:32:59AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm working on building the new openexr package but the unit tests are > failing > > but just on aarch64 and s390x. > > > > The aarch64 test instances are down due to

Re: F33: kernel 5.10.x

2021-01-09 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 08.01.2021 23:40, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: Just wondering whether there is a particular reason 5.10 kernel has not been submitted for testing in bodhi for F33 5.10.x is full of regressions: BTRFS regressions[1] and now HDMI output regressions[2] on modern Intel processors. [1]:

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

2021-01-09 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 08.01.2021 23:24, Matthew Miller wrote: I think we should get to the point where it blocks manual pushes (without the failure being waved). If the test is broken, fix the test. Some tests are permanently broken. For example rpminspect-pipeline - filesize. It's okay when the size of the