[Bug 1915891] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915891 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1915904] perl-PAR-Packer-1.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915904 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1915904] perl-PAR-Packer-1.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915904 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Unify the GRUB configuration files location across all supported architectures (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hi, Il giorno mer, 13/01/2021 alle 13.46 -0700, Chris Murphy ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:48 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: ... snip > There are separate issues. > > grubenv is "OK" on ext4 and XFS. The issue is that none of the file > systems developers like anything other

[Bug 1915876] perl-PAR-1.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915876 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f6d63fd6b1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f6d63fd6b1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1915876] perl-PAR-1.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915876 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1916075] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.077 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916075 Bug ID: 1916075 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.077 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Localization measurement and tooling (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I think it is really worth mentioning here that Transtats already provides a lot of Fedora translation statistics and info. There is certainly more that could be done and we would like to do, to enhance it further... While I know Jean-Baptiste is not

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-01-14 17:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-01-14 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2021-01-14 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2021-01-14

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-001e4d949f dia-0.97.3-16.el8 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bd945e3b55 adplug-2.3.3-1.el8 audacious-plugins-4.0.5-3.el8 2

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 27 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599 openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a8b2c928f5 dia-0.97.3-16.el7 9

Re: Proposal: gate stable release critical path updates on openQA test results

On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 09:25 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! > > So here's an idea I was thinking about over the RH shutdown: I propose > we gate stable release critical path updates on the openQA tests. As feedback on this was mostly positive, I went ahead and did the work. The PR for

[Bug 1915067] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915067 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1912934] perl-Socket-2.031 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912934 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a187ad8a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1905896] perl-libnet-3.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905896 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a187ad8a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1909508] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20201220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909508 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a187ad8a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a187ad8a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1903541] perl-Encode-3.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1903541 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a187ad8a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1899994] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20201120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a187ad8a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1891478] Upgrade perl-Params-Util to 1.102

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891478 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a187ad8a04 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1912934] perl-Socket-2.031 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912934 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-558ba3f09c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-558ba3f09c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1909508] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20201220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909508 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-558ba3f09c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1905896] perl-libnet-3.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905896 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-558ba3f09c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1903541] perl-Encode-3.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1903541 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-558ba3f09c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1899994] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20201120 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-558ba3f09c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1891478] Upgrade perl-Params-Util to 1.102

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891478 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-558ba3f09c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 1910811] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.036 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910811 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git- |perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-

[Bug 1912612] perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912612 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.10-1.fc |perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.10-1.fc

[Bug 1912662] perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912662 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006-1. |perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006-1.

[Bug 1914367] perl-Net-HTTP-6.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914367 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1914006] perl-libwww-perl-6.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914006 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1911534] perl-libwww-perl-6.51 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911534 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1910811] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.036 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910811 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1912662] perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912662 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Cfitsio soname bump

Hello, I'm going to build new cfitsio 3.490 in Rawhide in a week. This involves a soname bump. The affected packages are the following: CCfits LabPlot astrometry bes cpl elements-alexandria gdal healpix indi-gphoto kst kstars libindi luminance-hdr nightviewperl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO phd2

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

Tom Callaway wrote: > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1164975 > > Please add in this info, it was on my TODO list, but clearly hasn't > happened yet. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1164975#c8 Kevin Kofler

Re: libelf now depends on openssl

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I notice that WebKit, when built with WebRTC enabled, now crashes > during the build: > > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214812#c7 > > It's a symbol conflict between boringssl (used by libwebrtc) and > openssl. Do the boringssl symbols not have hidden

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 13:42 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm definitely in favor of this effort. ;) > > A few questions inline... > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:53:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > ...snip... > > > > that is all it does. The "releases" and "events" are entirely > >

libelf now depends on openssl

Hi, I notice that WebKit, when built with WebRTC enabled, now crashes during the build: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214812#c7 It's a symbol conflict between boringssl (used by libwebrtc) and openssl. But why is openssl involved at all? It's a dependency of libcurl, which is a

[389-devel] Re: Deref plugin entries == NULL #4525

> On 13 Jan 2021, at 21:24, Pierre Rogier wrote: > > Thank you Willian, > So far your scenario (entry found when reading base entry but no more > existing when computing the candidates) is the only one that matches the > symptoms. It's a scenario we will need to fix via your BE work because

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Unify the GRUB configuration files location across all supported architectures (System-Wide Change proposal)

Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > The issue with journaled file systems is that GRUB's file system > drivers have no ability to do journal replay. Therefore there is a > small risk the file system is rendered unbootable in a crash, because > the bootloader only sees the no-replay state of

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

This sounds like a Particularly Delightful Concept. :-) I like the idea and heartily endorse you doing it. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Migrating the Fedora Developer Portal to Fedora Docs

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:15:47AM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > (CC: docs ML) > > I've seen the Fedora Developer portal continue to exist as a standalone > project separately from the Fedora docs, and I don't quite understand > why this is so. I think it'll be much better if the

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2021-01-13)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:33:18PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 21:30 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > > FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on > >

Fedora-IoT-33-20210113.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20210104.0): ID: 755753 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/755753 Old failures (same test

Re: Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

I'm definitely in favor of this effort. ;) A few questions inline... On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:53:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > > that is all it does. The "releases" and "events" are entirely > arbitrary; a "release" can be any string, and so can the "state" for a > given

Re: [apt-cacher-ng] Resurrect dead package

Hi Frederic, thanks for doing this, I have a few local fixes for it but never got around to resurrect it, I'll likely create some PRs after it is back up. Pablo. On 13/1/21 17:41, Frédéric Pierret wrote: Hi, I've resurrected `apt-cacher-ng` on my fork:

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Unify the GRUB configuration files location across all supported architectures (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:06 PM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > The thing is that implementing this proposal should be straightforward > and something that could be done for F34 but solving the grubenv issue > will require more time, since we first will need to agree with GRUB > upstream on

Re: Self Introduction: Jan Zerdik

Le 1/13/21 à 4:25 PM, Jan Zerdik a écrit : Hi. My name is Jan and I'm a new red hatter. I'll be a TuneD co-maintainer. My experience with open source projects is mostly just as a user, but I'm looking forward to joining the community. ___ devel

Moving Experts US

When you are planning to make a long-distance move, Moving Experts US can provide you with quality long distance movers Chicago has! Are you planning to relocate to another place? If you are, do not forget that hiring long distance movers Chicago is going to be helpful a lot. Still, it is a

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Unify the GRUB configuration files location across all supported architectures (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:48 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 19:56 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > So I've read Neal's comment there and what he describes really > > is a special corner case, but yes it is possible for people to have > > created the special

[apt-cacher-ng] Resurrect dead package

Hi, I've resurrected `apt-cacher-ng` on my fork: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/fepitre/rpms/apt-cacher-ng/c/06340bafbb23a43b4279dab045040717a025c83c?branch=master with successful builds on my testing COPR repository for F32+ and EPEL8:

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2021-01-13)

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I'm not sure why it's in UTC and not some DST zone. It might even have > been on purpose. I wasn't involved in that decision but I can tell you one simple and obvious reason to specify times in UTC: Everybody needs to know only their own current offset from

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Localization measurement and tooling (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I fully agree. My idea would be to help contributors to understand where to go translate each project upstream. The Language-Team attribute probably is good enough to lead a contributor at the right place, here are a few examples for French language: 0ad: "Language-Team: French

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Localization measurement and tooling (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Weblate is a translation platform. Using it to display translations of projects who did not choose to be part of our translation would be equivalent to fork what upstream do. Ubuntu does it with launchpad, but the limit between upstream work and distribution work isn't clear enough. Translators

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-01-13)

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-01-13/fesco.2021-01-13-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-01-13/fesco.2021-01-13-15.00.txt Log:

[389-devel] please review: PR 4543 - Search results are different between RHDS10 and RHDS11

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4543 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1914982] Upgrade perl-Email-MIME-ContentType to 1.026

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914982 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Release 5.6.1 of Sundials

bout++ package is still missing. Please, rebuild it. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description:

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1164975 Please add in this info, it was on my TODO list, but clearly hasn't happened yet. ~spot On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:33 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 03:14, Kevin

Attempting to allow for a source of truth for Fedora release cycle information: releasestream

Hi folks! Before the RH holiday shutdown, I started a new project designed to address a long-standing pain point in Fedora: we don't really have a good source of truth for release cycle information. I'm thinking of situations where something: * Needs to know what the "current stable" Fedora

[Bug 1915904] New: perl-PAR-Packer-1.052 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915904 Bug ID: 1915904 Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.052 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PAR-Packer Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Migrating the Fedora Developer Portal to Fedora Docs

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:15:47AM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > What do you think? I think it's a good idea. Having one place to look makes things easier for users, especially once we finally get search. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___

[Bug 1915891] New: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915891 Bug ID: 1915891 Summary: perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.30 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-ScanDeps Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1915876] perl-PAR-1.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915876 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1915876] New: perl-PAR-1.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915876 Bug ID: 1915876 Summary: perl-PAR-1.017 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PAR Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Self Introduction: Jan Zerdik

Hi. My name is Jan and I'm a new red hatter. I'll be a TuneD co-maintainer. My experience with open source projects is mostly just as a user, but I'm looking forward to joining the community. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

usrsctp soversion bump

Hello all. Usrsctp 0.9.5.0 update will include a soversion bump from 1 to 2. I will rebuild dependent package psi-plus. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: cmake FTBFS in rawhide

Benjamin Beasley wrote: > I think you will need to either skip the multi-threaded TXZ test, or bound > its memory requirements by patching it to use some fixed value for > CPACK_ARCHIVE_THREADS instead of 0. See >

Re: ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide

On 13. 01. 21 14:58, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:19 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 13. 01. 21 14:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:27 AM mailto:notificati...@fedoraproject.org> >

Re: ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13. 01. 21 14:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:27 AM > > wrote: > > > > Notification time stamped 2021-01-12 08:26:20 UTC > > > > ceph's builds started to fail in

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 03:14, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Florian Weimer wrote: > > Right, and the glibc 2.33 versions all call fstatat64 in the end (system > > call number 0x106). > > That would be: > > #if !defined(__NR_newfstatat) > #define __NR_newfstatat 262 > #endif > >

Fedora-Rawhide-20210113.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 7/180 (x86_64), 9/122 (aarch64) New failures

Re: ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide

On 13. 01. 21 14:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:27 AM > wrote: Notification time stamped 2021-01-12 08:26:20 UTC ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide

Re: ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:17 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:27 AM wrote: > >> Notification time stamped 2021-01-12 08:26:20 UTC >> >> ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide >> >> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/ceph?collection=f34 >> >> > I

Re: ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:27 AM wrote: > Notification time stamped 2021-01-12 08:26:20 UTC > > ceph's builds started to fail in Fedora rawhide > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/ceph?collection=f34 > > I updated my rawhide box yesterday and it builds fine on that. There is

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210113.n.0 changes

Fedora Rawhide Report wrote on 2021/01/13 20:49: OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210112.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210113.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 159 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added

Re: Fedora 33 virt-install + ks has some problem switching root

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:34:09AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:16:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > We use the same process to make these as we have always used, this > > kickstart: > > > > > >

[Bug 1914983] Upgrade perl-Gtk2-SourceView2 to 0.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914983 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210113.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210112.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210113.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 159 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 111.31 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Orphaned python-flexmock

Hey Lumír, I've added you as admin to the repo. Thanks! Hunor On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:03 PM Lumír Balhar wrote: > > I'm a maintainer of micropipenv so I can co-maintain flexmock, if you want. > > Have a nice day. > > Lumír > > On 1/13/21 9:30 AM, Hunor Csomortáni wrote: > > I will take it

[Bug 1915067] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915067 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c20433c9e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c20433c9e0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1915067] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1915067 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: Fedora 33 virt-install + ks has some problem switching root

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:16:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Sorry for this rather ill-defined bug report, but I'm hoping someone > will recognize the symptoms or at least suggest a way to debug this. > > Ever since Fedora 33 was released we've been unable to produce a > working

[389-devel] Re: Deref plugin entries == NULL #4525

Thank you Willian, So far your scenario (entry found when reading base entry but no more existing when computing the candidates) is the only one that matches the symptoms. And that triggered a thought: We cannot do anything for SUBTREE and ONE_LEVEL searches because the fact that the base entry

Re: Fedora 33 virt-install + ks has some problem switching root

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:02:33PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:16:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Sorry for this rather ill-defined bug report, but I'm hoping someone > > will recognize the symptoms or at least suggest a way to debug this. > > > > Ever since

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Signed RPM Contents (late System-Wide Change)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:21 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 01:05:01PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Signed_RPM_Contents > > > > Note that this change was submitted after the deadline, but since it can be > > shipped in an complete state,

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Signed RPM Contents (late System-Wide Change)

> >> > During signing builds, the files in it will be signed with IMA > >> > signatures.. These signatures will be made with a key that’s kept by > >> > the Fedora Infrastructure team, and installed on the sign vaults. > >> > >> What is the impact on RPM database size? > > > > They're stored in

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Signed RPM Contents (late System-Wide Change)

On 12.01.2021 21:20, Brian C. Lane wrote: Who is going to use this feature? My guess is a very limited set of users, so it seems unfair to dramatically increase the size of their downloads and install footprint to support something they don't use. Can't they be shipped on the side? An rpm of

Re: Orphaned python-flexmock

I'm a maintainer of micropipenv so I can co-maintain flexmock, if you want. Have a nice day. Lumír On 1/13/21 9:30 AM, Hunor Csomortáni wrote: I will take it over. On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:38 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: I've orphaned python-flexmock. It is essentially dead/complete upstream

Re: Fedora 33 virt-install + ks has some problem switching root

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:16:43AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Sorry for this rather ill-defined bug report, but I'm hoping someone > will recognize the symptoms or at least suggest a way to debug this. > > Ever since Fedora 33 was released we've been unable to produce a > working

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Localization measurement and tooling (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 13.01.2021 09:26, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote: Each upstream project decides their translation process. This is a normal workflow. What we will measure with this change, is what is what the Linux ecosystem is delivering to end users. Which should help to make the Linux community more

Re: Migrating the Fedora Developer Portal to Fedora Docs

Le 2021-01-13 11:15, Ankur Sinha a écrit : What do you think? From an internationalization point of view, it would helps a lot. Both Fedora docs and Websites can be translated, only developer portal is stuck in English only. ___ devel mailing list

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 4534 - libasan read buffer overflow in filtercmp

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4541 Regards, -- -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Fedora 33 virt-install + ks has some problem switching root

Sorry for this rather ill-defined bug report, but I'm hoping someone will recognize the symptoms or at least suggest a way to debug this. Ever since Fedora 33 was released we've been unable to produce a working virt-builder template. The template that we have made fails at switch root.

Migrating the Fedora Developer Portal to Fedora Docs

Hi folks, (CC: docs ML) I've seen the Fedora Developer portal continue to exist as a standalone project separately from the Fedora docs, and I don't quite understand why this is so. I think it'll be much better if the information there was moved to the new Fedora docs---so that users and the

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Remove Guile Support From Toolchain (Self-Contained Change)

* Jakub Jelinek: > A better way to do that is I think what GCC does e.g. with isl, > patch the source so that for the very rarely if ever used feature it doesn't > link against the corresponding library, but instead dlopens it and calls it > through dlsym pointers. > That way, make would not have

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Remove Guile Support From Toolchain (Self-Contained Change)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:10:08PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > This is probably a bad idea, since that deliberately breaks things for > things that expect it to be there. If we *really* want to get rid of > this (and I'm not entirely convinced we should), why not just make an > alternative build

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Remove Guile Support From Toolchain (Self-Contained Change)

* Neal Gompa: > This is probably a bad idea, since that deliberately breaks things for > things that expect it to be there. If we *really* want to get rid of > this (and I'm not entirely convinced we should), why not just make an > alternative build subpackage and make the two conflict? One with

  1   2   >