No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 5/126 (aarch64)
ID: 819367 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/819367
ID: 819414 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi
URL:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6b1b1f9053
python-django-2.2.19-1.el8
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-58f4d56777
zabbix40-4.0.29-1.el8
10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829990
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890910
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936221
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f2bf0f1eb2 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Am 14.03.21 um 23:32 schrieb clime:
Hello,
I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided
by Fedora. Big thanks to the Fedora project for sponsoring libravatar.
Avatars in pagure.io, src.fp.o, Bodhi should now load much faster.
+1
Christoph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936221
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ae3eac324a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 34 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829990
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829977
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tremble@tremble.o |
|rg.uk)
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 17.03.21 um 16:47 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
> > > symbolic links) of configuration files
Am 17.03.21 um 16:47 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package? That
is, automatically on system or package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939742
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.33 is |perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.34
Hey All,
Fedora users in out-of-memory (OOM) situations get benefitted by
enabling systemd-oomd[0] by default. Actions taken by systemd-oomd
operate on a per-cgroup level, aligning well with the life cycle of
systemd units. As this becomes a default feature, we are running a
test week to verify
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/187 (x86_64), 4/126 (aarch64)
ID: 813393 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813393
ID: 813402 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813402
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4675
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Upstream changed this back in 2017, but the spec file was still
listing BSD. This is likely not an issue for anyone, as the package
produces a self-contained binary executable, so nothing is linking
against it.
___
devel mailing list --
Il 17/03/21 11:41, Vít Ondruch ha scritto:
>
> I think the problem is that the groups can be removed from package only
> by the main admin. If the main admin is non-responsive, then the whole
> group is kind of hostage. Every group member should be able to remove
> the group from the package IMHO.
Hello!
I have a dozen or more packages waiting to be reviewed and I'm looking for
someone to
help in exchange of some of yours.
Silver is cross-shell customizable powerline-like prompt heavily inspired by
Agnoster.
It needs to be updated to 2.0.0.
- [ ] rust-silver update
- [ ]
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:25:24AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
> symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package? That
> is, automatically on system or package installation, and not as a tool
> that system
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2021-03-17)
=
Meeting started by mhroncok at 14:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-03-17/fesco.2021-03-17-14.00.log.html
.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 12/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210316.n.0):
ID: 818411 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/818411
ID: 818474 Test:
OLD: Fedora-34-20210316.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939844
--- Comment #2 from Tom G. Christensen ---
Thank you for the quick update.
I checked the new build against the old package and also a locally built fixed
version and it looks good.
The requires are fixed and contents are otherwise the same.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939292
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Dancer2-0.301000 is|perl-Dancer2-0.301001 is
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 14/176 (x86_64), 15/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210316.n.1):
ID: 818124 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL:
Hello!
We are pleased to announce that today, March 13 2020, a new Copr release landed
production. The list of user visible changes is in the release notes document:
https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/release-notes/2021-03-17.html
Namely we introduced Fedora Review feature, and we plan to
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210315.0):
ID: 818365 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/818365
ID:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890795
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1890595
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890595
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
Hey all,
I wanted to highlight something that may be interesting to the
community: the introduction of a new tool by Mageia's ManaTools team:
ManaFirewall[1].
The ManaFirewall tool is a rewrite of the drakfirewall tool that has
been part of the Mandriva/Mageia Control Center for decades. The old
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-03-17 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890795
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32956
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890910
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a0b9d8d2b7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a0b9d8d2b7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890910
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210316.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 17
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 38.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Dne 17. 03. 21 v 11:05 Otto Urpelainen napsal(a):
Sandro Mani kirjoitti 17.3.2021 klo 11.17:
Hi
I need litehtml to update to qt-creator-4.15, review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875
Happy to review in exchange.
I have never done a package review before,
Dne 16. 03. 21 v 18:22 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
Il 16/03/21 17:50, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
Hi everybody,
I've realized that there's a big mismatch between the permissions that
are necessary and the immediate impact for orphaning and retiring a
package:
orphan:
- is reversible by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939759
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939759
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938597
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
Sandro Mani kirjoitti 17.3.2021 klo 11.17:
Hi
I need litehtml to update to qt-creator-4.15, review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875
Happy to review in exchange.
I have never done a package review before, but looking at the spec file,
I think this could
Is there any way to proceed for rebuilt gcc SRPM without C support ?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210316.0):
ID: 817976 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Does Fedora has any policies regarding editing or replacing (say with
symbolic links) of configuration files owned by another package? That
is, automatically on system or package installation, and not as a tool
that system administrators run explicitly to make changes to those
files.
Thanks,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939844
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Hi
I need litehtml to update to qt-creator-4.15, review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939844
Bug ID: 1939844
Summary: Unnecessary dependencies
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Throwable
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 06:44:21PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On ti, 16 maalis 2021, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > Since February 24th the packager kir has been receiving a daily email asking
> > them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939044
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c56daf4eea has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c56daf4eea
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939044
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210316.0):
ID: 817811 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/817811
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890910
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32941
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890933
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Pegex-0.75-1.el8
--
You are
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-Format-Pg`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi.
On 3/16/21 8:22 PM, Jos de Kloe wrote:
Hi Miro,
in general I think explicit is better than implicit
(and since I am Dutch, this seems obvious to me).
I agree with Jos here. From my recent experience with onbording a new
packager it seems that our macros (old and new ones) are just enough
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/17/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210317gitaec1b4494.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
60 matches
Mail list logo
