Kerberos and Fedora's 2FA UX

2021-04-22 Thread Miroslav Suchý
I have been using 2FA with the new Fedora Account system and the UX is ... can be improved. The question is how? If you are not using 2FA yet then you may not know what I am talking about. Here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos#Command_line You have to run:     kinit -n

Orphaning appres, editres, listres, viewres

2021-04-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
appres is used by xscreensaver, editres *may* be used by grace. I've contacted both maintainers directly to notify them. listres and viewres appear to be unused by any other packages. All package average 1-2 commits per year upstream and almost all of these are housekeeping. The codebase is 20+ y

Re: Retiring a set of old X utilities

2021-04-22 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:14:44AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 04. 21 4:03, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > Now that the XorgUtilityDeaggregation [1] is complete, I'm planning to > > retire a set of old X utilities that I think don't need to be in Fedora: > > > > oclock > > xbiff > > xload > > x

Better documentation/tooling for the vacation calendar?

2021-04-22 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi, This came up in the EPEL SIG meeting this week -- there seems to not be enough awareness of the vacation calendar, because it's not really well documented: - it is mentioned in the non-responsive maintainer policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_ma

Fedora-34-20210422.n.0 compose check report

2021-04-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/189 (x86_64), 2/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210421.n.0): ID: 865770 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/865770 ID: 865863 Test: aarch64 Server

Announcing upstream change for the lmdbxx package

2021-04-22 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
Hello. I'm going to change upstream for the lmdbxx package from [1] to [2]. This is a header-only library. No rebuilds needed. [1]: https://github.com/drycpp/lmdbxx [2]: https://github.com/hoytech/lmdbxx -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Re: F34 Final Go/No-Go moved to Friday

2021-04-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:41:24PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > The Fedora Linux 34 Final Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Friday > 23 April at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. At this time, we will > determine the status of F34 for the 27 April target date. For more I will be getting my first COV

Re: why some package are retired and others are retired without be orphan ?

2021-04-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo > raproject.org/rpms/gdesklets have the button orphan , why ? > > Or better ,

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-04-22 Thread Björn Persson
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Björn Persson writes: > > And as you noted yourself, an attacker who can manipulate cached files > > client-side has already taken over the user account anyway. > > Yes and no, and so I must disagree with your "won't improve ... for > anyone". The proposed client-side

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-04-22 Thread Björn Persson
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > "Sampson Fung" writes: > > > The first run, giving my "Try"s, takes much longer than the second run, > > which gives no "Trys". > > Just from impression: > > 1st run: From run to download finish, I will say it takes about 5+ minutes. > > 2nd run: ~1 minute > > For each

Re: why some package are retired and others are retired without be orphan ?

2021-04-22 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:53:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210422.n.0 changes

2021-04-22 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-34-20210421.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210422.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora-Rawhide-20210422.n.0 compose check report

2021-04-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/127 (aarch64), 13/189 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2021-04-22 Thread sgallagh
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2021-04-23 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/ ___ devel maili

Re: why some package are retired and others are retired without be orphan ?

2021-04-22 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo > raproject.org/rpms/gdesklets have the button orphan , why ? Because they sti

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210422.n.0 changes

2021-04-22 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210421.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210422.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:7 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1008.88 KiB Size of dropped packages

why some package are retired and others are retired without be orphan ?

2021-04-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, while https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/projectM-jack is retired , https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/publican-fedora and https://src.fedo raproject.org/rpms/gdesklets have the button orphan , why ? Or better , when the package is retired by some rules like FTBFS or RetirePython2 , the pa

Fedora-IoT-34-20210422.0 compose check report

2021-04-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210421.0): ID: 865185 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/865185 ID: 865194 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210422.0 compose check report

2021-04-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210421.0): ID: 865264 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Retiring a set of old X utilities

2021-04-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 22. 04. 21 4:03, Peter Hutterer wrote: Now that the XorgUtilityDeaggregation [1] is complete, I'm planning to retire a set of old X utilities that I think don't need to be in Fedora: oclock xbiff xload xman xrefresh xlogo xpr xfd viewres listres xconsole This is a very conservative list of p

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210422.0 compose check report

2021-04-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210421.0): ID: 865157 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op