On 5/11/21 2:06 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages`
that you are following:
``
Thank you for this PR, Jikta. I've been meaning to work on this since the next
version of Bugzilla will require PSGI and having handlers in their
Hi folks,
i pushed the updated libfmt v6 to EPEL7 as a fix of [1]. it upgraded
libfmt v3.01 to libfmt 6.2.1, and introduced a soname bump for
libfmt.so. so packages depending on libfmt should be rebuilt to pick
up the new library.
sorry for violating the related policy[2] and the regression[3].
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-12-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-12-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-11-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-11-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-12-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-12-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-11-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-11-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947703
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3a1aaec707
pngcheck-2.4.0-8.el8
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b308580516
perl-Image-ExifTool-12.16-3.el8
13
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages`
that you are following:
``
Thank you for this PR, Jikta. I've been meaning to work on this since the next
version of Bugzilla will require PSGI and having handlers in their own
subpackages makes things simpler.
Ralf,
The pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages` of project:
`perl-Plack` has been assigned to `eseyman` by eseyman.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2021-05-09 at 21:40 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> My boot menu is now repaired.
>
> I replaced /boot/grub2/grub.cfg with the following:
>
> insmod part_gpt
> insmod ext2
> search --no-floppy --fs-label --set=root speedy.boot2
> insmod blscfg
> blscfg
>
> That was good enough to find the
Hi Stefano,
a few months ago certbot switched to Python 3 only. certbot on EPEL 7 still uses
Python 2 because EPEL 7 does not have all required Python 3 packages. So we need
to bring the missing packages to EPEL 7.
The main bug for this is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797129
Hi Felix,
thanks for the hint, I have subscribed the python mailing list.
Please let me know how can I help you :)
Stefano
On Mon, 2021-05-10 at 22:14 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Am 10.05.21 um 14:25 schrieb Stefano Prina:
> > I'm good with python programming and as sys
Hi Stefano,
Am 10.05.21 um 14:25 schrieb Stefano Prina:
I'm good with python programming and as sys admin.
Now I'm loking for a project or a task to work on, let me know if
someone need help :)
Welcome to Fedora. Fedora+Python is a pretty good match so you'll find plenty of
packages to
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:44:28AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:59 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > No, I don't think it will ever be "fixed".
> > ...
> > We have in update pungi config a (IMHO poorly named)
> > "multilib_whitelist" variable. We can add packages to this and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959040
Bug ID: 1959040
Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.30 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Message
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hello all!
I was packaging up some deps for a few packages which would be
essential to NeuroFedora [0].
There are some reviews pending to proceed further, and would be happy
to swap them with other developers here :D
Review 1 - Python-PuLP: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958914
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947703
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f07429afc3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f07429afc3
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947703
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f07429afc3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f07429afc3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947703
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:18 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Charalampos Stratakis:
>
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> >
> > * Charalampos Stratakis:
> >
> > > I think these rules make sense for RUNPATH, and we should outright
> ban
> > > RPATH.
> > >
> > > I'd
* Charalampos Stratakis:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Charalampos Stratakis:
>
> > I think these rules make sense for RUNPATH, and we should outright ban
> > RPATH.
> >
> > I'd agree here as well, however this could be a future fedora change
> > as I
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Charalampos Stratakis:
>
> > I think these rules make sense for RUNPATH, and we should outright ban
> > RPATH.
> >
> > I'd agree here as well, however this could be a future fedora change
> > as I would deem it too disruptive to
* Charalampos Stratakis:
> I think these rules make sense for RUNPATH, and we should outright ban
> RPATH.
>
> I'd agree here as well, however this could be a future fedora change
> as I would deem it too disruptive to outright ban RPATH for now.
I don't agree because of this:
> I think we
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:09 PM David Cantrell wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >Some random questions about this:
> >
> >- How many existing packages are affected? Can this be analyzed and
> > the maintainers notified?
> >
> >- If I want to
Will attend the meeting today too, and has started helping out some in the
Kernel 5.12 test week on Saturday last week and today
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2021-05-10
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
>
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/194 (x86_64), 10/133 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954342
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 4:46 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ben Cotton:
>
> > Another problem of a hardcoded RPATH is security. When an ELF object
> > contains an RPATH pointed to a directory not managed by the system,
> > where some malicious actor has write permissions to, it's relatively
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958432
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 1:52 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Some random questions about this:
>
> - How many existing packages are affected? Can this be analyzed and
> the maintainers notified?
>
There is a list of packages at the change and also at the initial email
thread before this change
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Some random questions about this:
- How many existing packages are affected? Can this be analyzed and
the maintainers notified?
- If I want to analyze my own packages to see if they contain
rpaths, is it sufficient to run
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mango` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mango/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Mango` that you are
following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mango/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hello,
My name is Stefano Prina I'am 31 and I came from Turin, Italy; actually
I'm working as system engeneer and developer in CNH's telematic team
and I'am a fedora user from many years.
Now I would like to actively participate on fedora development.
I'm good with python programming and as sys
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210508.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210510.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 56
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.15 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 5/7/21 5:27 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> On 5/7/21 12:01 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> On 5/6/21 9:36 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
>>> Would you want to see that ported to a "How to debug printing
>>> problems" Quick Doc[0]? Probably under "Usage and customisation"? I
>>> could take a crack at a
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210510.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957783
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958432
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Link ID|
Correction: today's meeting is to be chaired by @gicmo :)
On Mon, May 10, 2021 11:19:50 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 10th
> May (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The
> meeting is a public
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210509.0):
ID: 883154 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/883154
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 10th
May (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The
meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can
join us over:
IRC:
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210508.0):
ID: 883138 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello,
my name is Konrad Kleine. I'm 38 years old and work at RedHat on upstream
and downstream LLVM. I love being a dad, husband and bringing music into
our family life.
I'm interested in doing snapshot RPM builds of LLVM. Currently most of the
work happens in my forks of the different git
After few weeks of prototypes and discussions with fedora RelEng and
QA people, we have a rough plan how to replace and retire PDC.
First, I want to make it clear that there is no timeline yet, the work
to replace PDC might be scoped next quarter at the earliest and
because we plan to split it's
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:59 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> No, I don't think it will ever be "fixed".
> ...
> We have in update pungi config a (IMHO poorly named)
> "multilib_whitelist" variable. We can add packages to this and pungi
> will pull them in, no matter if something depends on them or not.
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210509.0):
ID: 883122 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Plack` that you
are following:
``
Move Apache handler ro sub-packages
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
51 matches
Mail list logo
