https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/06/13/report-389-ds-base-2.0.5-20210613gitda522d535.fc34.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971230
Bug ID: 1971230
Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.997004 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-cpm
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
15 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 88/198 (x86_64), 58/134 (aarch64)
ID: 906568 Test: x86_64
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:37 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 21:14, Jerry James wrote:
> > - python-jupyter-polymake: rebuild due to the polymake soname bump
>
> This one is noarch though; does it really need a rebuild?
You're right. I think I reflexively added that
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 21:14, Jerry James wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
Hi,
> It's nearly time for another round of mathematical software updates,
> including some soname bumps. I am going to do the following, in this
> approximate order:
>
> - cliquer: update to version 1.22
> - cocoalib: update to
Hello all,
It's nearly time for another round of mathematical software updates,
including some soname bumps. I am going to do the following, in this
approximate order:
- cliquer: update to version 1.22
- cocoalib: update to version 0.99713
- ffcall: update to version 2.3
- memtailor: update to
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef
openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9eaea6f65c
audacious-plugins-4.0.5-4.el7 fluidsynth-2.1.8-4.el7
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1dd57fe441
radsecproxy-1.9.0-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
Hello everyone!
I'm a newbie in these lists, but I have been using the Fedora OS since 2010
(more or less).
I'ḿ a primarily web programmer, but I also like to help in open source
projects.
My presentation begins in this issue thread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960053#c10 , where
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210612.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931141
I'd be happy to do some reviews in return.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021, 8:01 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:54 AM Josh Boyer
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 8:35 AM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:54 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 8:35 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 8:35 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This appeared yesterday:
It doesnt package discord but a script that does it for you
Jun 12, 2021 12:55:32 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
:
> On 11.06.2021 20:29, Jan Drögehoff wrote:
>> - copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/duskmourn/discord
>
> Non-free software cannot be packaged in COPR too as it violates
On 11.06.2021 20:29, Jan Drögehoff wrote:
- copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/duskmourn/discord
Non-free software cannot be packaged in COPR too as it violates Fedora
legal policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Shareware
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210611.0):
ID: 906550 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/906550
ID: 906551 Test: x86_64
Thanks for your information.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Am 12.06.21 um 02:51 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Also, not having it available has made it *very* hard to prioritize
getting the issues fixed in DNF. So being able to improve this is
predicated on the existence of signed metadata.
This seems odd to me. I mean, it can't be hard to setup a test repo,
Hi Robert-André,
Robert-André Mauchin writes:
> Hi,
>
> I remember the guidelines changed recently regarding js code in
> packages. Should the code be minified in the spec? Even if the minifier
> is not packaged in Fedora (webpack)?
Wouldn't that more or less equal to shipping a upstream
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210611.0):
ID: 906539 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
21 matches
Mail list logo
